Book contents
- New Perspectives on Human Development
- New Perspectives on Human Development
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Developmental Processes, Levels of Analysis, and Ways of Knowing: New Perspectives on Human Development
- Part I Cognitive Development
- 2 Constructive Artificial Neural-Network Models for Cognitive Development
- 3 Rethinking the Emergence and Development of Implicit Racial Bias: A Perceptual-Social Linkage Hypothesis
- 4 The Differentiation of Executive Functioning Across Development: Insights from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
- 5 Organismic-Causal Models “From Within” Clarify Developmental Change and Stages
- 6 Developmental Evolution: Rethinking Stability and Variation in Biological Systems
- 7 NOC NOC, Who’s There? A New Ontological Category (NOC) for Social Robots
- 8 Understanding the Ecologies of Human Learning and the Challenge for Education Science
- Part II Social Development
- Part III Language and Communicative Development
- Index
- References
7 - NOC NOC, Who’s There? A New Ontological Category (NOC) for Social Robots
from Part I - Cognitive Development
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 May 2017
Book contents
- New Perspectives on Human Development
- New Perspectives on Human Development
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Developmental Processes, Levels of Analysis, and Ways of Knowing: New Perspectives on Human Development
- Part I Cognitive Development
- 2 Constructive Artificial Neural-Network Models for Cognitive Development
- 3 Rethinking the Emergence and Development of Implicit Racial Bias: A Perceptual-Social Linkage Hypothesis
- 4 The Differentiation of Executive Functioning Across Development: Insights from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
- 5 Organismic-Causal Models “From Within” Clarify Developmental Change and Stages
- 6 Developmental Evolution: Rethinking Stability and Variation in Biological Systems
- 7 NOC NOC, Who’s There? A New Ontological Category (NOC) for Social Robots
- 8 Understanding the Ecologies of Human Learning and the Challenge for Education Science
- Part II Social Development
- Part III Language and Communicative Development
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- New Perspectives on Human Development , pp. 106 - 122Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychology study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Baier, A. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96(2), 231–260. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381376Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Dautenhahn, K. (2004). Socially intelligent agents in human primate culture. In Trappl, R. & Payr, S. (Eds.), Agent culture: Human–agent interaction in a multicultural world (pp. 45–71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. (2008). The dominant animal: human evolution and the environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, B., & Kahn, P. H. Jr. (2008). Human values, ethics, and design. In Jacko, J. A. & Sears, A. (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications (pp. 1241–1266). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Revised and updated chapter from the 2003 edition.)Google Scholar
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H. Jr., & Borning, A. (2006). Value Sensitive Design and information systems. In Zhang, P. & Galletta, D. (eds.), Human-computer interaction in management information systems: Foundations (pp. 348–372). Armonk, New York; London, England: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H. Jr., & Hagman, J. (2003). Hardware companions?: What online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 273–280). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, R. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, A., Huttenrauch, H., & Eklundh, K. S. (2004). Applying the Wizard-of-Oz framework to cooperative service discovery and configuration. In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN ’04) (pp. 575–580). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.Google Scholar
Helwig, C. C. (1995). Adolescents’ and young adults’ conceptions of civil liberties: Freedom of speech and religion. Child Development, 66, 152–166.Google Scholar
Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2002). Young children’s naïve thinking about the biological world. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Jipson, J. L., & Gelman, S. A. (2007). Robots and rodents: Children’s inferences about living and nonliving kinds. Child Development, 78(6), 1675–1688. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01095.xGoogle Scholar
Kahn, P. H. Jr. (1992). Children’s obligatory and discretionary moral judgments. Child Development, 63(2), 416–430.Google Scholar
Kahn, P. H. Jr. (2011). Technological nature: Adaptation and the future of human life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jr.Kahn, P. H., Freier, N., G., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Ruckert, J. H., Severson, R. L., & Kane, S. K. (2008). Design patterns for sociality in human robot interaction. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction 2008 (pp. 271–278). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Jr.Kahn, P. H., Friedman, B., Perez-Granados, D. R., & Freier, N. G. (2006). Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children. Interaction Studies: Social Behavior and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 7, 405–436.Google Scholar
Kahn, P. H. Jr., Gary, H. E., & Shen, S. (2013). Children’s social relationship with current and near-future robots. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 32–37. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12011Google Scholar
Kahn, P. H. Jr., Gill, B. T., Reichert, A. L., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Ruckert, J. H. (2010). Validating interaction patterns in HRI. Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp.183–184). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Kahn, P. H. Jr., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Freier, N. G., Severson, R. L., Gill, B. T., … Shen, S. (2012). “Robovie, you’ll have to go into the closet now”: Children’s social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology, 48, 303–314. doi: 10.1037/a0027033Google Scholar
Kahn, P. H. Jr., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Gill, B. T., Ruckert, J. H., Shen, S., … Severson, R. L. (2012). Do people hold a humanoid robot morally accountable for the harm it causes? Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 33–40. doi: 10.1145/2157689.2157696Google Scholar
Kahn, P. H. Jr., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Gill, B. T., Shen, S., Gary, H. E., & Ruckert, J. H. (2015). Will people keep the secret of a humanoid robot? – Psychological intimacy in HRI. Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, (pp. 173–180). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Kahn, P. H. Jr., Reichert, A. L., Gary, H. E., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Shen, S., … & Gill, B. T. (2011). The new ontological category hypothesis in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 159–160. doi: 10.1145/1957656.1957710Google Scholar
Kahn, P. H. Jr., Ruckert, J. H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Reichert, A., Gary, H., and Shen, S. (2010). Psychological intimacy with robots?: Using interaction patterns to uncover depth of relation. Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 123–124). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Kahn, P. H. Jr., Severson, R. L., & Ruckert, J. H. (2009). The human relation with nature and technological nature. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, P. H. Jr., & Turiel, E. (1988). Children’s conceptions of trust in the context of social expectations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34, 403–419.Google Scholar
Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Killen, M., & Smetana, J. G. (Eds.) (2006). Handbook of moral development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, D. N. (2007). Love + sex with robots: The evolution of human-robot relations. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
MacDorman, K. F., & Ishiguro, H. (2006). The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interaction Studies: Social Behavior and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 7(3), 297–337.Google Scholar
Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Boekhorst, R. T., Billard, A. (2004). Robots as assistive technology – Does appearance matter? In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN ’04) (pp. 277–282). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.Google Scholar
Rotenberg, K. J. (Ed.). (2010). Interpersonal trust during childhood and adolescence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rotter, J. B. (1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26, 443–452.Google Scholar
Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35, 1–7.Google Scholar
Severson, R. L., & Carlson, S. M. (2010). Behaving as or behaving as if? Children’s conceptions of personified robots and the emergence of a new ontological category. Neural Networks, 23(8), 1099–1103.Google Scholar
Short, E., Hart, J., Vu, M., & Scassellati, B. (2010). No fair!! An interaction with a cheating robot. Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 219–226). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Smetana, J. G., & Braeges, J. (1990). The development of toddlers’ moral and conventional judgments. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 36, 329–346.Google Scholar
Smetana, J. G., Schlagman, N., & Adams, P. W. (1993). Preschool children’s judgments about hypothetical and actual transgressions. Child Development, 64, 202–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turiel, E. (1998). Moral development. In Damon, W. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. (5th ed.). Vol. 3: Eisenberg, N. (Ed.), Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 863–932). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wainryb, C. (1995). Reasoning about social conflicts in different cultures: Druze and Jewish children in Israel. Child Development, 66, 390–401.Google Scholar
- 13
- Cited by