Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T23:19:18.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Organismic-Causal Models “From Within” Clarify Developmental Change and Stages

from Part I - Cognitive Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2017

Nancy Budwig
Affiliation:
Clark University, Massachusetts
Elliot Turiel
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Philip David Zelazo
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apel, K-O. (1995). Charles Peirce: From pragmatism to pragmaticism. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Arsalidou, M., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2016). Constructivist developmental theory is needed in developmental neuroscience. NPJ Science of Learning, 1, 16016.Google Scholar
Arsalidou, M., Pascual-Leone, J., & Johnson, J. (2010). Misleading cues improve developmental assessment of attentional capacity: The color matching task. Cognitive Development, 25, 262277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, R. (Ed.) (1995). The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. H. (2010). The thalamic gateway: How the meditative training of attention evolves toward selfless transformations of attention. In Bruya, B. (Ed.), Effortless attention (pp. 373407). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1979). Pascual-Leone’s M construct as a link between cognitive-developmental and psychometric concepts of intelligence. Intelligence, 3, 4163.Google Scholar
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1911). A method of measuring the development of intelligence in young children. Lincoln, IL: Courier Company.Google Scholar
Calvo, A. (2004). Detection of latent giftedness by means of mental-capacity testing. Unpublished master’s thesis, York University, Toronto, ON.Google Scholar
Canadian Achievement Tests – Third Edition (CAT-3). (2000). Markham, ON: Canadian Test Centre.Google Scholar
Canadian Cognitive Abilities Test (CCAT). (1998). Toronto, ON: Nelson Education.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97, 404431.Google Scholar
Case, R. (1975). Gearing the demands of instruction to the developmental capacities of the learner. Review of Educational Research, 45, 5987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 215229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowan, N., Ricker, T. J., Clark, K. M., Hinrichs, G. A., & Glass, B. A. (2014). Knowledge cannot explain the developmental growth of working memory capacity. Developmental Science, 18, 132145.Google Scholar
Cunning, S. (2003). The direction-following task: Assessing mental capacity in the linguistic domain. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, York University, Toronto, ON.Google Scholar
Deary, I. J. (2002). g and cognitive elements of information processing: An agnostic view. In Sternberg, R. J. & Grigorenko, E. L. (Eds.), The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? (pp. 151181). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldstein, K. (2000). The organism. New York, NY: Zone Books. (Original work published 1934).Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Greenberg, L., & Pascual-Leone, J. (1995). A dialectical constructivist approach to experiential change. In Neimeyer, R. & Mahoney, M. (Eds.), Constructivism in psychotherapy (pp. 169191). Washington, DC: APA Press.Google Scholar
Heitz, R. P., Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory capacity, attentional control, and fluid intelligence. In Wilhelm, O. & Engle, R. W. (Eds.), Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence (pp. 6178). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, S. J., Johnson, J., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2014). Clarifying inhibitory control: Diversity and development of attentional inhibition. Cognitive Development, 31, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Im-Bolter, N., Johnson, J., Ling, D., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2015). Inhibition: Mental control process or mental resource? Journal of Cognition and Development, 16, 666681.Google Scholar
Im-Bolter, N., Johnson, J., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2006). Processing limitation in children with specific language impairment: The role of executive function. Child Development, 77, 18221841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johansen, J. D. (1993). Dialogic semiosis: An essay on signs and meaning. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Koffka, K. (1963). Principles of gestalt psychology. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, & World. (Original work published 1935).Google Scholar
Morra, S. (2008). A test of a neo-Piagetian model of the water-level task. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 369400.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget’s developmental stages. Acta Psychologica, 32, 301345.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J. (1978). Compounds, confounds, and models in developmental information processing: A reply to Trabasso and Foellinger. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 26, 1840.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J. (1980). Constructive problems for constructive theories: The current relevance of Piaget’s work and a critique of information-processing simulation psychology. In Kluwe, R. & Spada, H. (Eds.), Developmental models of thinking (pp. 263296). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J. (1984). Attention, dialectic, and mental effort: Towards an organismic theory of life stages. In Commons, M. L., Richards, F. A., & Armon, G. (Eds.) Beyond formal operations: Late adolescence and adult cognitive development (pp. 182215). New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J. (1989). An organismic process model of Witkin’s field-dependence- independence. In Globerson, T. & Zelniker, T. (Eds.), Cognitive style and cognitive development (pp. 3670). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J. (1995). Learning and development as dialectical factors in cognitive growth. Human Development, 38, 338348.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J. (2012). Piaget as a pioneer of dialectical constructivism: Seeking dynamic processes for human science. In Marti, E. & Rodriguez, C. (Eds.), After Piaget. Edison, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J. (2013). Can we model organismic causes of working memory, efficiency and fluid intelligence? A meta-subjective perspective. Intelligence, 41, 738743.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J. (2014). Dialectics. In Teo, T. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 421428). New York, NY: SpringerReference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J., & Baillargeon, R. (1994). Developmental measurement of mental attention. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17, 161200.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J., Escobar, E. M. R., & Johnson, J. (2012). Logic: Development of logical operations. In Hirstein, W. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J., & Ijaz, H. (1989). Mental capacity testing as a form of intellectual-developmental assessment. In Samuda, R., Kong, S., Cummins, J., Pascual-Leone, J., & Lewis, J.. Assessment and placement of minority students (pp. 143171). Toronto, ON: Hogrefe International.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J., & Johnson, J. (2004). Affect, self-motivation, and cognitive development: A dialectical constructivist view. In Dai, D. Y. & Sternberg, R. S. (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 197235). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J., & Johnson, J. (2005). A dialectical constructivist view of developmental intelligence. In Wilhelm, O. & Engle, R. (Eds.), Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence (pp. 177201). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J., & Johnson, J. (2011). A developmental theory of mental attention: Its applications to measurement and task analysis (pp. 13–46). In Barrouillet, P. & Gaillard, V. (Eds.), Cognitive development and working memory: A dialogue between neo-Piagetian and cognitive approaches (pp. 1346). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J., & Johnson, J. (2012, February). Scale invariance in the measurement of mental-attentional capacity. Poster presented at SRCD Themed Meeting: Developmental Methodology, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J., Johnson, J., & Agostino, A. (2010). Mental attention, multiplicative structures, and the causal problems of cognitive development. In Ferrari, M. & Vuletic, L. (Eds.), Developmental interplay between mind, brain and education: Essays in honor of Robbie Case (pp. 4982). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J., Johnson, J., Baskind, S., Dworsky, S., & Severtston, E. (2000). Culture-fair assessment and the processes of mental attention. In Kozulin, A. & Rand, Y. (Eds.), Experience of mediated learning: An impact of Feuerstein’s theory in education and psychology (pp. 191214). New York, NY: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J., Johnson, J., & Calvo, A. (2004, June). Can mental attentional capacity predict the Canadian Cognitive Abilities score of school children? Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Jean Piaget Society, Toronto, ON.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J., & Morra, S. (1991). Horizontality of water level: A neoPiagetian developmental review. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 23, 231276.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J., Pascual-Leone, A., & Arsalidou, M. (2015). Neuropsychology still needs to model organismic processes “from within.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e83.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J., & Smith, J. (1969). The encoding and decoding of symbols by children: A new experimental paradigm and a neo-Piagetian model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 8, 328355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses: A study of evidence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1983). Piaget’s theory. In Mussen, P. H. (Series Ed.) & Kessen, W. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. History, theory, and methods (4th edn., pp. 103128). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (Eds.) (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Psillos, S. (2002). Causation and explanation. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Rock, I. (1983). The logic of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rouse Ball, W. W. (1905). Mathematical recreations and essays (4th edn.). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Shipstead, Z., Lindsey, D. R. B., Marshall, R. L., & Engle, R. W. (2014). The mechanisms of working memory capacity: Primary memory, secondary memory, and attention control. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 116141.Google Scholar
Skuy, M., Gewer, A., Osrin, Y., Knunou, D., Fridjhon, P., & Rushton, J. P. (2002). Effects of mediated learning on Raven’s matrices scores of African and non-African university students in South Africa. Intelligence, 30, 221232.Google Scholar
Spearman, C. E. (1927). The abilities of man, their nature and measurement. New York, NY: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Stöttinger, E., Filipowicz, A., Valadao, D., Culham, J. C., Goodale, M. A., Anderson, B., & Danckert, J. A. (2015). A cortical network that marks the moment when conscious representations are updated. Neuropsychologia, 79, 113122.Google Scholar
Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory capacity and fluid abilities: Examining the correlation between operation span and Raven. Intelligence, 33, 6781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verguts, T., & De Boeck, P. (2002). On the correlation between working memory capacity and performance on intelligence tests. Learning and Individual Differences, 13, 3755.Google Scholar
Waters, A. C., & Tucker, D. M. (2013). Self-regulation and neural development. In Sokol, B. W., Grouzet, F. M. E., & Muller, U. (Eds.), Self-regulation and autonomy (pp. 279296). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Werner, H., & Kaplan, B. (1984). Symbol formation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles, essence and origin: Field dependence and field independence. New York, NY: International Universities Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×