Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:41:39.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 8 - Hysteroscopic Electrosurgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2020

By
Mary E. Connor
Edited by
Mary E. Connor  and
T. Justin Clark
Mary E. Connor
Affiliation:
Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield
T. Justin Clark
Affiliation:
Birmingham Women’s Hospital
Get access

Summary

Surgical procedures using electrosurgery can be undertaken within the uterine cavity to address excessive menstrual blood loss and to enhance fertility. The insertion of specialised electrodes down hysteroscopic instruments enables the direct application of electricity to uterine tissue. The electrical energy is transformed into heat and, depending upon how this heat is focused, can be used to cut tissue and excise lesions, or cauterise and ablate tissue (Box 8.1). The larger hysteroscopic resectoscopes with outer diameters of 7 to 8.5 mm are generally, though not exclusively, used during inpatient procedures with a general anaesthetic or regional anaesthesia. The introduction of smaller electrodes (1.67 mm, or 5 Fr) has enabled therapeutic procedures to be undertaken using diagnostic hysteroscopes with an operating channel. This has supported the development of outpatient operative hysteroscopy for the removal of small intrauterine lesions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Diagnostic and Operative Hysteroscopy , pp. 96 - 108
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Reid, P. Endometrial ablation in England: coming of age? An examination of hospital episode statistics 1989/1990 to 2004/2005. Eur J Obstet Gynecol and Reprod Biol 2007; 135: 191–4.Google Scholar
De Cherney, A, Polan, ML. Hysteroscopic management of intrauterine lesions and intractable uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61: 392–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Daly, DC, Tohan, N, Walters, C, Riddick, DH. Hysteroscopic resection of the uterine septum in the presence of a septate cervix. Fertil Steril 1983; 39: 560–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid, PC, Mukri, F. Trends in number of hysterectomies performed in England for menorrhagia: examination of health episode statistics, 1989 to 2002–3. BMJ 2005; 330: 938–9.Google Scholar
Overton, C, Hargreaves, J, Maresh, M. A national survey of the complications of endometrial destruction for menstrual disorders: the MISTLETOE study. Minimally invasive surgical techniques – laser, endothermal or endoresection. BJOG 1997; 104: 1351–9.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: Assessment and Management. NICE Guideline NG88. London: NICE; 2018. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng88 (accessed November 2019).Google Scholar
HES Online. Hospital Episode Statistics, Department of Health. www.hesonline.nhs.uk (accessed October 2019).Google Scholar
Gallinat, A, Nugent, W. NovaSure impedance-controlled system for endometrial ablation. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2002; 9: 283–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pritts, EA. Fibroids and infertility: a systematic review of the evidence. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2001; 56: 483–91.Google Scholar
Di Spiezio Sardo, A, Mazzon, I, Bramante, S, et al. Hysteroscopic myomectomy: a comprehensive review of surgical techniques. Human Reprod Update 2008; 14: 101–19.Google Scholar
Keyhan, S, Munro, MG. Office diagnostic and operative hysteroscopy using local anesthesia only: an analysis of patient reported pain and other procedural outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21: 791–8.Google Scholar
Penketh, RJA, Bruen, EM, White, J, et al. Feasibility of resectoscopic operative hysteroscopy in a UK outpatient clinic using local anaesthetic and traditional reusable equipment, with patient experiences and comparative cost analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21: 830–6.Google Scholar
Emanuel, MH. Hysteroscopy and the treatment of uterine fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 29: 920–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Litta, P, Cosmi, E, Saccardi, C, et al. Outpatient operative polypectomy using a 5 mm-hysteroscope without anaesthesia and/or analgesia: advantages and limits. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 139: 210–14.Google Scholar
Mazzon, I, Favilli, A, Grasso, M, et al. Is cold loop hysteroscopic myomectomy a safe and effective technique for the treatment of submucous myomas with intramural development? A series of 1434 surgical procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015; 22: 792–8.Google Scholar
Camanni, M, Bonino, L, Delpiano, EM, et al. Hysteroscopic management of large symptomatic submucous uterine myommas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010; 17: 59–65.Google Scholar
AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide. AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of endometrial polyps. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2012; 19: 3–10.Google Scholar
Cooper, NAM, Clark, TJ, Middleton, L, et al. Outpatient versus inpatient uterine polyp treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding: randomised controlled non-inferiority study. BMJ 2015; 350: h1398.Google Scholar
DeWaay, DJ, Syrop, CH, Nygaard, IE, Davis, WA, Van Voorhis, BJ. Natural history of uterine polyps and leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 3–7.Google Scholar
Haimov-Kochman, R, Deri-Hasid, R, Hamani, Y, Voss, E. The natural course of endometrial polyps: could they vanish when left untreated? Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieng, M, Istre, O, Qvigstad, E. Treatment of endometrial polyps: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89: 992–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J, Zhao, J, Lin, J. Opportunities and risk factors for premalignant and malignant transformation of endometrial polyps: management strategies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010; 17: 53–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bettocchi, S, Ceci, O, Di Venere, R, et al. Advanced operative office hysteroscopy without anaesthesia: analysis of 501 cases treated with a 5 Fr. bipolar electrode. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 2435–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Homer, H, Li, T, Cooke, I The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 1–14.Google Scholar
Di Spiezio Sardo, A, Bettocchi, S, Spinelli, M, et al. Review of new office-based hysteroscopic procedures 2003–2009. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010; 17: 436–48.Google Scholar
AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide. Practice guidelines for management of intrauterine synechiae. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010; 17(1): 1–7.Google Scholar
Kirkup, J. The Evolution of Surgical Instruments: An Illustrated History from Ancient Times to the Twentieth Century. Novato, CA: Norman; 2006.Google Scholar
Geddes, LA. d’Arsonval, physician and inventor. IEEE Eng Med Biol 1999; 18(4): 118–22.Google Scholar
Munro, MG. Fundamentals of electrosurgery, part I: principles of radiofrequency energy for surgery. In Feldman, LS, Fuchshuber, P, Jones, D, eds., The SAGES Manual on the Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE). New York: Springer; 2012.Google Scholar
Clark, W. The desiccation treatment of congenital and new growths of the skin and mucous membranes. JAMA 1914; 63: 925–8.Google Scholar
Cushing, H. Electro-surgery as an aid to the removal of intracranial tumors. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1928; 47: 751–85.Google Scholar
[No authors given] Electrosurgery. www.pfiedlereducation.com/diweb/catalog/item/id/2303868/q/q=electrosurgery&c=514 (accessed October 2019).Google Scholar
Duffy, S, Reid, PC, Smith, JHF, Sharp, F. In vitro studies of uterine electrosurgery. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 213–20.Google Scholar
Umranikar, S, Clark, TJ, Saridogan, E, et al. BSGE/ESGE guideline on management of fluid distension media in operative hysteroscopy. Gynecol Surg 2016; 13: 289–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vilos, GA, Newton, DW, Odell, RC, Abu-Rafea, B, Vilos, AG. Characterization and mitigation of stray radiofrequency currents during monopolar resectoscopic electrosurgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006; 13: 134–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, TN, Varosy, PD, Guillaume, G, et al. Effect of radiofrequency energy emitted from monopolar ‘Bovie’ instruments on cardiac implantable electronic devices. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 219: 399–406.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×