Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T02:18:08.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - Analgesia and Anaesthesia for Hysteroscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2020

By
Natalie A. M. Cooper  and
Nicholas Ireland
Edited by
Mary E. Connor  and
T. Justin Clark
Mary E. Connor
Affiliation:
Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield
T. Justin Clark
Affiliation:
Birmingham Women’s Hospital
Get access

Summary

Pain is subjective. The level of pain a person experiences is affected not only by the painful stimulus but also by the person’s psychological interpretation of the pain and previous experiences. Medical procedures are inevitably associated with some level of discomfort but, by using analgesic and anaesthetic medications appropriately, we can minimise the pain experienced. In the outpatient setting, pain is the main driver of procedure acceptability. When appropriate techniques and equipment are used, and when analgesic use is tailored to the patient and the procedure, most women deem outpatient hysteroscopic procedures acceptable. Although performing hysteroscopic procedures under general anaesthetic means that perioperative pain is not an issue, it is still important to recognise the possibility of post-operative pain and provide adequate analgesia to manage it accordingly. The aim of this chapter is to cover techniques that can minimise pain and to discuss the use of analgesic and anaesthetic medication for hysteroscopic procedures.

Type
Chapter
Information
Diagnostic and Operative Hysteroscopy , pp. 72 - 82
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Moore, KL, Dalley, AF. Pelvis and perineum. In Kelly, PJ, ed., Clinically Oriented Anatomy, 4th edn. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1992: 374–5.Google Scholar
Kupniyi, O, Alleemudder, DI, Latunde-Dada, A, Eedarapalli, P. Nerve injuries associated with gynaecological surgery. Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 16: 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, NA, Smith, P, Khan, KS, Clark, TJ. Does cervical preparation before outpatient hysteroscopy reduce women’s pain experience? A systematic review. BJOG 2011; 118: 1292–301.Google Scholar
Zhuo, Z, Yu, H, Jiang, X. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of cervical ripening with misoprostol administration before hysteroscopy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2016; 132: 272–7.Google Scholar
Tasma, ML, Louwerse, MD, Hehenkaml, WJ, et al. Misoprostol for cervical priming prior to hysteroscopy in postmenpausal and premenopausal women; a multicentre randomised placebo controlled trial. BJOG 2017; 125: 81–9.Google Scholar
Fouda, UM, Gad Allah, SH, Elshaer, HS. Optimal timing of misoprostol administration in nulliparous women undergoing office hysteroscopy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Fertil Steril 2016; 106: 196–201.Google Scholar
Ahmad, G, O’Flynn, H, Attarbashi, S, Duffy, JM, Watson, A. Pain relief for outpatient hysteroscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (11): CD007710.Google Scholar
Bellati, U, Bonaventura, A, Costanza, L, Zulli, S, Gentile, C Tramadol hydrochloride versus mepivacaine hydrochloride: comparison between two analgesic procedures in hysteroscopy. Giornale Italiano di Ostetricia e Ginecologia 1998; 20: 469–72.Google Scholar
Floris, S, Piras, B, Orru, M, et al. Efficacy of intravenous tramadol treatment for reducing pain during office diagnostic hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 147–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagele, F, Lockwood, G, Magos, AL. Randomised placebo controlled trial of mefenamic acid for premedication at outpatient hysteroscopy: a pilot study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 842–4.Google Scholar
Hassa, H, Aydin, Y, Oge, T, Cicek, K. Effectiveness of vaginal misoprostol and rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug in vaginoscopic diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy in primarily infertile women: double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013; 20: 880–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tam, WH, Yuen, PM. Use of diclofenac as an analgesic in outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Fertil Steril 2001; 76(5): 1070–2.Google Scholar
Lin, YH, Hwang, JL, Huang, LW, Chen, HJ. Use of sublingual buprenorphine for pain relief in office hysteroscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005; 12: 347–50.Google Scholar
Teran-Alonso, MJ, De Santiago, J, Usandizaga, R, Zapardiel, I. Evaluation of pain in office hysteroscopy with prior analgesic medication: a prospective randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014; 178: 123–7.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Best Practice in Outpatient Hysteroscopy. Green-top Guideline No. 59. London: RCOG; 2011. www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg59 (accessed November 2019).Google Scholar
Thiel, JA, Lukwinski, A, Kamencic, H, Lim, H. Oral analgesia vs intravenous conscious sedation during Essure Micro-Insert sterilization procedure: randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011; 18: 108–11.Google Scholar
Clark, TJ, Samuel, N, Malick, S, et al. Bipolar radiofrequency compared with thermal balloon endometrial ablation in the office: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 109–18.Google Scholar
Glasser, MH, Heinlein, PK, Hung, YY. Office endometrial ablation with local anesthesia using the HydroThermAblator system: comparison of outcomes in patients with submucous myomas with those with normal cavities in 246 cases performed over 5½ years. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009; 16: 700–7.Google Scholar
Prasad, P, Powell, MC. Prospective observational study of Thermablate Endometrial Ablation System as an outpatient procedure. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008; 15: 476–9.Google Scholar
Ahmad, G, Attarbashi, S, O’Flynn, H, Watson, AJ. Pain relief in office gynaecology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 155: 3–13.Google Scholar
Joint Formulary Committee. British National Formulary. London: BMJ Group and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain; 2014.Google Scholar
Press, CD, Chang, AK, Talavera, F, Lovato, LM, Shlamovitz, GZ. Infiltrative local anesthetic agents. MedScape 2013. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/149178-overview#a30 (accessed October 2019).Google Scholar
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). Summary of Product Characteristics: Citanest with Octapressin Dental, Prilocaine Hydrochloride 3% w/v, Felypressin 0.03 IU/ml Solution for Injection. 2014. www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/spcpil/documents/spcpil/con1506660533105.pdf (accessed October 2019).Google Scholar
Cooper, NA, Khan, KS, Clark, TJ. Local anaesthesia for pain control during outpatient hysteroscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2010; 340: c1130.Google Scholar
Davies, A, Richardson, RE, O’Connor, H, et al. Lignocaine aerosol spray in outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril 1997; 67: 1019–23.Google Scholar
Guida, M, Pellicano, M, Zullo, F, et al. Outpatient operative hysteroscopy with bipolar electrode: a prospective multicentre randomized study between local anaesthesia and conscious sedation. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 840–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaneshiro, B, Grimes, DA, Lopez, LM. Pain management for tubal sterilization by hysteroscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (8): CD009251.Google Scholar
Chudnoff, S, Einstein, M, Levie, M Paracervical block efficacy in office hysteroscopic sterilization: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115: 26–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skensved, H. Global-local anaesthesia: combining paracervical block with intramyometrial prilocaine in the fundus significantly reduces patients’ perception of pain during radio-frequency endometrial ablation (Novasure) in an office setting. Gynecol Surg 2012; 9: 207–12.Google Scholar
Kumar, V, Gupta, JK. Hysteroscopic local anaesthetic intrauterine cornual ‘focal local’ block before endometrial ablation with direct cervical block in an outpatient setting: a feasibility study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 170: 222–4.Google Scholar
Kumar, V, Tryposkiadis, K, Gupta, JK. Hysteroscopic local anesthetic intrauterine cornual block in office endometrial ablation: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2016; 105: 474–80.e1.Google Scholar
Kanagsundaram, SA, Lane, LJ, Cavelletto, BP, Keneally, JP, Cooper, MG. Efficiacy and safety of nitrous oxide in alleviating pain and anxiety during painful procedures. Arch Dis Child 2001; 84: 492–5.Google Scholar
Harding, TA, Gibson, JA. The use of inhaled nitrous oxide for flexible sigmoidoscopy: a placebo controlled trial. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 457–60.Google Scholar
Maslekar, S, Gardiner, A, Hughes, M, Culbert, B, Duthie, GS. Randomized clinical trial of Entonox versus midazolam–fentanyl sedation for colonoscopy. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 361–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welchman, S, Cochrane, S, Minto, G, Lewis, S. Systematic review: the use of nitrous oxide gas for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32: 324–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. Safe Sedation Practice for Healthcare Procedures: Standards and Guidance. London: AOMRC; 2013. www.aomrc.org.uk/reports-guidance/safe-sedation-practice-1213 (accessed October 2019).Google Scholar
Gambadauro, P, Navaratnarajah, R, Carli, V. Anxiety at outpatient hysteroscopy. Gynecol Surg 2015; 12: 189–96.Google Scholar
Toledano, RD, Kodali, BS, Camann, WR. Anesthesia drugs in the obstetric and gynecologic practice. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2009; 2: 93–100.Google Scholar
Winton, AL, Eastwood, J, Powell, MC, Norris, AM. An evaluation of conscious sedation using propofol and remifentanil for tension-free vaginal tape insertion. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 932–7.Google Scholar
Checketts, MR, Jenkins, B, Pandit, JJ. Implications of the 2015 AAGBI recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery. Anaesthesia 2017; 72(S1): 3–6.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×