Book contents
- Dimensions of Phonological Stress
- Dimensions of Phonological Stress
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 Metrical Incoherence: Diachronic Sources and Synchronic Analysis
- 2 The Role of Phenomenal Accent
- 3 Foot Alignment in Spanish Secondary Stress
- 4 The Interaction of Metrical Structure and Tone in Standard Chinese
- 5 Prominence, Contrast, and the Functional Load Hypothesis: An Acoustic Investigation
- 6 Iquito: The Prosodic Colon and Evaluation of OT Stress Accounts
- 7 Investigating the Efficiency of Parsing Strategies for the Gradual Learning Algorithm
- 8 Covert Representations, Contrast, and the Acquisition of Lexical Accent
- 9 One or Many? In Search of the Default Stress in Greek
- 10 The Development of Rhythmic Preferences by Dutch-learning Infants
- 11 Acoustic Characteristics of Infant-directed Speech as a Function of Prosodic Typology
- Index
- References
9 - One or Many? In Search of the Default Stress in Greek
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 November 2016
Book contents
- Dimensions of Phonological Stress
- Dimensions of Phonological Stress
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 Metrical Incoherence: Diachronic Sources and Synchronic Analysis
- 2 The Role of Phenomenal Accent
- 3 Foot Alignment in Spanish Secondary Stress
- 4 The Interaction of Metrical Structure and Tone in Standard Chinese
- 5 Prominence, Contrast, and the Functional Load Hypothesis: An Acoustic Investigation
- 6 Iquito: The Prosodic Colon and Evaluation of OT Stress Accounts
- 7 Investigating the Efficiency of Parsing Strategies for the Gradual Learning Algorithm
- 8 Covert Representations, Contrast, and the Acquisition of Lexical Accent
- 9 One or Many? In Search of the Default Stress in Greek
- 10 The Development of Rhythmic Preferences by Dutch-learning Infants
- 11 Acoustic Characteristics of Infant-directed Speech as a Function of Prosodic Typology
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Dimensions of Phonological Stress , pp. 263 - 290Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Alderete, John. 1999. Morphologically governed accent in Optimality Theory. Amherst: UMass dissertation.Google Scholar
Alderete, John. 2001a. Morphologically governed accent in Optimality Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alderete, John. 2001b. Dominance effects as transderivational anti-faithfulness. Phonology 18. 201–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anastassiadis-Symeonidis, Anna. 2002. Αντίστροφο λεξικό της Νέας Ελληνικής. [Reverse dictionary of Modern Greek.] Thessaloniki: Institute of Modern Greek Studies (Manolis Triantafyllidis Foundation).Google Scholar
Anastassiadis-Symeonidis, Anna. 2012. Το Νεοελληνικό κλιτικό σύστημα των ουσιαστικών και οι τάσεις του. [The Modern Greek nouns inflections and their trends.] In Gavriilidou, Zoe, Efthymiou, Aggeliki, Thomadaki, Evaggelia & Kambaki-Vougioukli, Penelope (eds.), 10th International Conference on Greek Linguistics (ICGL10), 23–40. Komitini: Democritus University of Thrace.Google Scholar
Αnastassiadis-Symeonidis, Anna & Cheila-Markopoulou, Despoina. 2003. Συγχρονικές και διαχρονικές τάσεις στο γένος της Ελληνικής (Μια θεωρητική πρόταση). [Synchronic and diachronic tendencies in Modern Greek gender (A theoretical proposal).] In Αnna Αnastassiadis-Symeonidis, Angela Ralli & Cheila-Markopoulou, Despoina (eds.), Tο γένος [Gender], 13–56. Αthens: Patakis.Google Scholar
Apostolouda, Vasso. 2012. O τόνος των ουσιαστικών της Ελληνικής: Μια πειραματική προσέγγιση. [Nominal stress in Greek: An experimental approach.] Thessaloniki: AUTh MA thesis.Google Scholar
Apostolouda, Vasso, Papadopoulou, Despina & Revithiadou, Anthi. 2011. Phonological factors outrank frequency effects. 9th Old Conference in Phonology (OCP9). ZAS Berlin: Berlin.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia. 2000. The phonetics of stress in Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 1. 9–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia. 2007. Greek phonetics: The state of the art. Journal of Greek Linguistics 8. 97–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltazani, Mary & Jun, Sun-Ah. 1999. Focus and topic intonation in Greek. 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XIV), 1305–1308. San Francisco.Google Scholar
Becker, Michael F., Ketrez, Nihan & Nevins, Andrew. 2011. The surfeit of the stimulus: Analytical biases filter lexical statistics in Turkish laryngeal alternations. Language 87. 84–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 1997. How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam, 43–58. www.fon.hum.uva.nl/Proceedings/Proceedings21/CONTP21.html. (June 20, 2014.)Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 1998. Functional phonology: Formalizing the interaction between articulatory and perceptual drives. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics LOT Dissertation Series 1.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Hayes, Bruce. 2001. Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32. 45–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2011. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.2.27). www.praat.org. (June 24, 2011.)Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi & Tantalou, Niki. 2007. Modern Greek accent and faithfulness constraints in OT. Lingua 117. 1080–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosswhite, Katherine, Alderete, John, Beasly, Tim & Markman, Vita. 2003. Morphological effects on default stress placement in Russian novel words: An experimental approach. In Garding, Gina & Tsujimura, Mimu (eds.), 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 22), 151–164. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Dresher, Elan B. 2016. (This volume). Covert representations, contrast, and the acquisition of lexical accent. In Heinz, Jeffrey, Goedemans, Rob & van der Hulst, Harry (eds.) Dimensions of phonological stress, 231–262. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dupoux, Emmanuel & Peperkamp, Sharon. 2002. Fossil markers of language development: Phonological deafnesses in adult speech processing. In Durand, Jacques & Laks, Bernard (eds.), Phonetics, phonology, and cognition, 168–190. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, Emmanuel, Sebastian-Galles, Núria, Navarrete, Eduardo & Peperkamp, Sharon. 2008. Persistent stress “deafness”: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition 106. 682–706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Embick, David & Noyer, Rolf. 2007. Distributed Morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. In Ramchand, Gillian & Reiss, Charles (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fainleib, Lena. 2008. Default stress in unpredictable stress languages: Evidence from Russian and Hebrew. Tel Aviv University, MA thesis.Google Scholar
Fodor, Janet D. 1998. Learning to parse? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27. 285–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, Lynn. 1995. Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24. 437–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halle, Morris. 1997. On stress and accent in Indo-European. Language 73. 275–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & William, Idsardi J. 1995. General properties of stress and metrical structure. In Goldsmith, John, Riggle, Jason & Yu, Alan C. L. (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 403–443. Oxford & Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel J. (eds.), The view from building 20. 111–176. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & Londe, Zsuzsa. 2006. Stochastic phonological knowledge: Τhe case of Hungarian vowel harmony. Phonology 23. 59–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce, Tesar, Bruce & Zuraw, Kie. 2013. OTSoft 2.3.2. www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/hayes/otsoft. (June 2, 2014.)Google Scholar
Holton, David, Mackridge, Peter & Philippaki-Warburton, Irene. 2012. Greek: A comprehensive grammar. Second revised edition. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulst, Harry van der. 1999. Word stress. In van der Hulst, Harry (ed.), Word prosodic systems in the languages of Europe, 3–115. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon. 1999. Exceptional stress-attracting suffixes in Turkish: Representations vs. the Grammar. In van der Hulst, Harry, Kager, René & Zonneveld, Wim (eds.), The prosody-morphology interface, 134–187. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul & Halle, Morris. 1977. Toward a reconstruction of the Indo-European accent. In Hyman, Larry M. (ed.), Studies in stress and accent, 209–238. University of Southern California: Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Lavitskaya, Yulia & Kabak, Barış. 2011a. Russian accentual system revisited: Experimental and diachronic evidence. 8th Old Conference in Phonology (OCP8). Marrakesh, Casablanca.Google Scholar
Lavitskaya, Yulia Lavitskaya, Yulia & Kabak, Barış. 2011b. Default stress in Russian: An experimental study. International Workshop on Suprasegmentals in Acquisition and Processing. University of Konstanz, Konstanz.Google Scholar
Lavitskaya, Yulia Lavitskaya, Yulia & Kabak, Barış. 2014. Phonological default in the lexical stress system of Russian: Evidence from noun declension. Lingua 150. 363–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malikouti-Drachman, Angeliki & Drachman, Gaberell. 1989. Stress in Greek. Studies in Greek linguistics 1989, 127–143. University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Melvold, Janis Leanne. 1990. Structure and stress in the phonology of Russian. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Tatiana. 1971. Mesto udareniia i foneticheskii sostav slova (rasstanovka udareniia v neizvestnykh slovakh inostrannogo proizkhozhdeniia). In Filin, Fedot P. (ed.), Fonetika. Fonologiia. Grammatika. K semidesiatiletiiu A.A. Reformatskogo [Phonetics. Phonology. Grammar. For the 70th birthday of A.A. Reformatskii]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Nikolou, Kalomoira, Revithiadou, Anthi & Papadopoulou, Despina. 2012. Exceptional stress patterns in the absence of morphological conditioning. In Gavriilidou, Zoe, Efthymiou, Aggeliki, Thomadaki, Evaggelia & Kambaki-Vougioukli, Penelope (eds.), 10th International Conference on Greek Linguistics (ICGL10), 472–479. Komitini: Democritus University of Thrace.Google Scholar
Oltra-Massuet, Isabel & Arregi, Carlos. 2005. Stress-by-structure in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 43–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon. 2004. Lexical exceptions in stress systems: Arguments from early language acquisition and adult speech perception. Language 80. 98–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon & Dupoux, Emmanuel. 2002. A typological study of stress “deafness.” In Gussenhoven, Carlos & Warner, Natasha (eds.), Laboratory phonology 7, 203–240. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gryuter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Protopapas, Athanassios, Gerakaki, Svetlana & Alexandri, Stella. 2006. Lexical and default stress assignment in reading Greek. Journal of Research in Reading 29. 418–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Protopapas, Athanassios, Tzakosta, Marina, Chalamandaris, Aimilios & Tsiakoulis, Pirros. 2010. IPLR: An online resource for Greek word-level and sublexical information. Language resources and evaluation. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10579-010-9130-z.Google Scholar
Ralli, Angela. 2002. The role of morphology in gender determination: Evidence from Modern Greek. Linguistics 40. 519–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralli, Angela. 2003. Ο καθορισμός του γραμματικού γένους στα ουσιαστικά της Νέας Ελληνικής [Determining grammatical gender in Modern Greek nouns]. In Αnastassiadis-Symeonidis, Αnna, Ralli, Angela & Cheila-Markopoulou, Despoina (eds.), Tο γένος [Gender], 57–99. Αthens: Patakis.Google Scholar
Ralli, Angela & Touratzidis, Loudovikos. 1992. A computational treatment of stress in Greek inflected forms. Language and Speech 35. 435–453.Google Scholar
Revithiadou, Anthi. 1999. Headmost accent wins: Head dominance and ideal prosodic form in lexical accent systems. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics LOT Dissertation Series 15.Google Scholar
Revithiadou, Anthi. 2007. Colored Turbid accents and Containment: A case study from lexical stress. In Blaho, Sylvia, Bye, Patrick & Krämer, Martin (eds.), Freedom of Analysis?, 149–174. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revithiadou, Anthi, Ioannou, Dimitra, Chatzinikolaou, Maria & Aivazoglou, Katerina. 2012. Constructing pseudowords for experimental research: A case study. 4th Conference on Language Disorders in Greek. TEI of Patras, Patras.Google Scholar
Revithiadou, Anthi, Nikolou, Kalomoira & Papadopoulou, Despina. 2015. Stress in the absence of morphological conditioning: An experimental investigation of stress in Greek acronyms. Journal of Greek Linguistics 15. 187–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 2008. Lecture notes for the class Language and its structure I: Phonology. Fall 2008, MIT.Google Scholar
Topintzi, Nina & Kainada, Evia. 2012. Acronyms and the placement of default stress in Greek. In Gavriilidou, Zoe, Efthymiou, Aggeliki, Thomadaki, Evaggelia & Kambaki-Vougioukli, Penelope (eds.), 10th International Conference on Greek Linguistics (ICGL10), 559–570. Komotini: Democritus University of Thrace.Google Scholar
Varlokosta, Spyridoula. 2011. The role of morphology in grammatical gender assignment: A psycholinguistic study in Greek. In Galani, Alexandra, Hicks, Glyn & Tsoulas, George (eds.), Morphology and its interfaces, 49–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.Google Scholar
Zuraw, Kie. 2000. Patterned exceptions in phonology. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA dissertation.Google Scholar
Zuraw, Kie. 2007. The role of phonetic knowledge in phonological patterning: Corpus and survey evidence from Tagalog. Language 83. 277–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2
- Cited by