Book contents
- Dimensions of Phonological Stress
- Dimensions of Phonological Stress
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 Metrical Incoherence: Diachronic Sources and Synchronic Analysis
- 2 The Role of Phenomenal Accent
- 3 Foot Alignment in Spanish Secondary Stress
- 4 The Interaction of Metrical Structure and Tone in Standard Chinese
- 5 Prominence, Contrast, and the Functional Load Hypothesis: An Acoustic Investigation
- 6 Iquito: The Prosodic Colon and Evaluation of OT Stress Accounts
- 7 Investigating the Efficiency of Parsing Strategies for the Gradual Learning Algorithm
- 8 Covert Representations, Contrast, and the Acquisition of Lexical Accent
- 9 One or Many? In Search of the Default Stress in Greek
- 10 The Development of Rhythmic Preferences by Dutch-learning Infants
- 11 Acoustic Characteristics of Infant-directed Speech as a Function of Prosodic Typology
- Index
- References
10 - The Development of Rhythmic Preferences by Dutch-learning Infants
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 November 2016
Book contents
- Dimensions of Phonological Stress
- Dimensions of Phonological Stress
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 Metrical Incoherence: Diachronic Sources and Synchronic Analysis
- 2 The Role of Phenomenal Accent
- 3 Foot Alignment in Spanish Secondary Stress
- 4 The Interaction of Metrical Structure and Tone in Standard Chinese
- 5 Prominence, Contrast, and the Functional Load Hypothesis: An Acoustic Investigation
- 6 Iquito: The Prosodic Colon and Evaluation of OT Stress Accounts
- 7 Investigating the Efficiency of Parsing Strategies for the Gradual Learning Algorithm
- 8 Covert Representations, Contrast, and the Acquisition of Lexical Accent
- 9 One or Many? In Search of the Default Stress in Greek
- 10 The Development of Rhythmic Preferences by Dutch-learning Infants
- 11 Acoustic Characteristics of Infant-directed Speech as a Function of Prosodic Typology
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Dimensions of Phonological Stress , pp. 291 - 310Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Adriaans, F. 2006. PhonotacTools (Test version) [Computer program]. Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Adriaans, F. Adriaans, F. & Kager, R.. 2010. Adding generalization to statistical learning: The induction of phonotactics from continuous speech. Journal of Memory and Language 62. 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, G. & Hawkins, S.. 1978. The development of phonological rhythm. In Bell, A. & Hooper, J. Bybee (eds.) Syllables and Segments, 173–185. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Allen, G. Allen, G. & Hawkins, S.. 1980. Phonological rhythm: Definition and development. Child Phonology 1. 227–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, H., Piepenbrock, R. & Gulikers, L.. 1995. The CELEX lexical database, [CD-ROM]. Release 2. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2011). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program].Google Scholar
Dember, W. & Earl, R.. 1957. Analysis of exploratory manipulative and curiosity behavior. Psychological Review 64. 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A., Friedrich, M. & Christophe, A.. 2007. Brain responses in 4-month-old infants are already language specific. Current Biology 17. 1208–1211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haugen, J. & Joos, M.. 1972. Tone and intonation in East Norwegian. In Bolinger, D. (ed.) Intonation, 414–436. England: Penguin.Google Scholar
Herold, B., Höhle, B.,Walch, E.,Weber, T. & Obladen, M.. 2008. Impaired stress pattern discrimination in very low birth weight infants during the first six months of life. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 50. 678–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuven, V. van & Hagman, P.. 1988. Lexical statistics and spoken word recognition in Dutch. In Coopmans, P. & Hulk, A. (eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands 1988, 59–68. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Höhle, B., Bijeljac-Babic, R., Herolda, B., Weissenborn, J. & Nazzi, T.. 2009. Language specific prosodic preferences during the first half year of life: Evidence from German and French infants. Infant Behavior and Development 32. 262–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, M. & Ames, E.. 1988. A multifactor model of infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. In Rovee-Collier, C. & Lipsitt, L. (eds.) Advances in Infancy Research, 69–95. Stanford: Ablex.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, P. & Thompson, E.. 1978. Perception of a phonetic contrast in multisyllabic utterances by 2-month-old infants. Perception and Psychophysics 23. 105–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jusczyk, P., Cutler, A. & Redanz, N.. 1993a. Infants’ preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Development 64. 675–687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jusczyk, P., Friederici, A., Wessels, J., Svenkerud, V. & Jusczyk, A.. 1993b. Infants’ sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words. Journal of Memory and Language 32. 402–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, E. 1970. Intonation and language acquisition. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 1. Stanford University: California Committee on Linguistics.Google Scholar
Mehler, J., Jusczyk, P., Lambertz, G., Halsted, N., Bertoncini, J. & Amiel-Tison, C.. 1988. A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition 29. 143–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nazzi, T., Jusczyk, P. & Johnson, E.. 2000. Language discrimination by English-learning 5-month-olds: Effects of rhythm and familiarity. Journal of Memory and Language 43. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Querleu, D., Renard, X., Versyp, F., Paris-Delrue, L. & Crepin, G.. 1988. Fetal hearing. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 29. 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar