Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T18:24:20.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Stroke after endovascular cardiac procedures and cardiothoracic surgery

from Section II - Iatrogenic ischemic strokes: stroke after endovascular procedures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2016

Alexander Tsiskaridze
Affiliation:
Sarajishvili Institute of Neurology, Tblisi State University, Georgia
Arne Lindgren
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Lund, Sweden
Adnan I. Qureshi
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Treatment-Related Stroke
Including Iatrogenic and In-Hospital Strokes
, pp. 97 - 105
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gottesman, R F, McKhann, G, Hogue, C V. Neurological complications of cardiac surgery. Semin Neurol. 2008; 703–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karalis, D G, Quinn, V, Victor, M F, et al. Risk of catheter-related emboli in patients with atherosclerotic debris in the thoracic aorta. Am Heart J. 1996; 131(6):1149–55.Google Scholar
Eggebrecht, H, Oldenburg, O, Dirsch, O et al. Potential embolization by atherosclerotic debris dislodged from aortic wall during cardiac catheterization: histological and clinical findings in 7,621 patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000; 49(4):389–94.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qureshi, A I, Luft, A R, Sharma, M, Guterman, L R, Hopkins, L N. Prevention and treatment of thromboembolic and ischemic complications associated with endovascular procedures: Part I – Pathophysiological and pharmacological features. Neurosurgery. 2000; 46(6):1344–59.Google Scholar
Hoffman, S J, Holmes, D R Jr, Rabinstein, A A, et al. Trends, predictors, and outcomes of cerebrovascular events related to percutaneous coronary intervention: A 16-year single-center experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 4(4):415–22.Google Scholar
Lund, C, Nes, R B, Ugelstad, T P, et al. Cerebral emboli during left heart catheterization may cause acute brain injury. Eur Heart J. 2005; 26(13):1269–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keeley, E C, Grines, C L. Scraping of aortic debris by coronary guiding catheters: A prospective evaluation of 1,000 cases. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32(7):1861–5.Google Scholar
Hilliard, A A, From, A M, Lennon, R J, et al. Percutaneous revascularization for stable coronary artery disease temporal trends and impact of drug-eluting stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 3(2):172–9.Google Scholar
Dukkipati, S, O’Neill, W W, Harjai, K J, et al. Characteristics of cerebrovascular accidents after percutaneous coronary interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43(7):1161–7.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, A, Dai, D, Rumsfeld, J S, Klein, L W, Roe, M T. Incidence and predictors of stroke associated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2009; 104(3):349–53.Google Scholar
Hoffman, S J, Routledge, H C, Lennon, R J, et al. Procedural factors associated with percutaneous coronary intervention-related ischemic stroke. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 5(2):200–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cappato, R, Calkins, H, Chen, S A, et al. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010; 3(1):32–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maan, A, Shaikh, A Y, Mansour, M, Ruskin, J N, Heist, E K. Complications from catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2011; 10(2):7683.Google Scholar
Haeusler, K G, Kirchhof, P, Endres, M. Left atrial catheter ablation and ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2012; 43(1):265–70.Google Scholar
Haeusler, K G, Koch, L, Herm, J, et al. 3 Tesla MRI-detected brain lesions after pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: results of the MACPAF study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013; 24(1):1421.Google Scholar
Oral, H, Chugh, A, Ozaydin, M, et al. Risk of thromboembolic events after percutaneous left atrial radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2006; 114(8):759–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemola, K, Desjardins, B, Sneider, M, et al. Effect of left atrial circumferential ablation for atrial fibrillation on left atrial transport function. Heart Rhythm. 2005; 2(9):923–8.Google Scholar
Di Biase, L, Burkhardt, J D, Mohanty, P, et al. Periprocedural stroke and management of major bleeding complications in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the impact of periprocedural therapeutic international normalized ratio. Circulation. 2010; 121(23):2550–6.Google Scholar
Rastegar, R, Harnick, D J, Weidemann, P, et al. Spontaneous echo contrast videodensity is flow-related and is dependent on the relative concentrations of fibrinogen and red blood cells. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41(4):603–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ren, J F, Marchlinski, F E, Callans, D J. Left atrial thrombus associated with ablation for atrial fibrillation: identification with intracardiac echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43(10):1861–7.Google Scholar
Ren, J F, Marchlinski, F E, Callans, D J, et al. Increased intensity of anticoagulation may reduce risk of thrombus during atrial fibrillation ablation procedures in patients with spontaneous echo contrast. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005; 16(5):474–7.Google Scholar
Handke, M, Harloff, A, Olschewski, M, Hetzel, A, Geibel, A. Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke in older patients. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(22):2262–8.Google Scholar
Furlan, A J, Reisman, M, Massaro, J, et al. Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(11):991–9.Google Scholar
Carroll, J D, Saver, J L, Thaler, D E, et al. Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(12):1092–100.Google Scholar
Meier, B, Kalesan, B, Mattle, H P, et al. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic embolism. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(12):1083–91.Google Scholar
Dowson, A, Mullen, M J, Peatfield, R, et al. Migraine Intervention with STARFlex Technology (MIST) trial: a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, sham-controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of patent foramen ovale closure with STARFlex septal repair implant to resolve refractory migraine headache. Circulation. 2008; 117(11):1397–404.Google Scholar
Khairy, P, O’Donnell, C P, Landzberg, M J. Transcatheter closure versus medical therapy of patent foramen ovale and presumed paradoxical thromboemboli: A systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 139(9):753–60.Google Scholar
Ricotta, J J, Faggioli, G L, Castilone, A, Hassett, J M. Risk factors for stroke after cardiac surgery. J Vasc Surg. 1995; 21:359–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roach, G W, Kanchuger, M, Mora-Mangano, C, et al. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335:1857–63.Google Scholar
Hogue, C W, Murphy, S F, Schechtman, K B, Davilla-Roman, V G. Risk factors for early or delayed stroke after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999; 100:642–7.Google Scholar
Almassi, G H, Sommers, T, Moritz, T E, et al. Stroke in cardiac surgical patients: determinants and outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999; 68:391–8.Google Scholar
Tarakji, K G, Sabik, JF III, Bhudia, S K, Batzy, L H, Blackstone, E H. Temporal onset, risk factors, and outcomes associated with stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting. JAMA. 2011; 305:381–90.Google Scholar
Selnes, O A, Gottesman, R F, Grega, M A, et al. Cognitive and neurologic outcomes after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366:250–7.Google Scholar
Raja, S G, Berg, G A. Impact of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery on systemic inflammation: Current best available evidence. J Card Surg. 2007; 22:445–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Gottesman, R F, Sherman, P M, Grega, M A et al. Watershed strokes after cardiac surgery: diagnosis, etiology and outcome. Stroke. 2006; 37:2306–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, L R, Hennerici, M. Impaired clearance of emboli (washout) is an important link between hypoperfusion, embolism, and ischemic stroke. Arch Neurol. 1998; 55:1475–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedberg, M, Boivie, P, Engström, K G. Early and late stroke after coronary surgery: An analysis of risk factors and the impact of short-term and long-term survival. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011; 40:379–87.Google Scholar
McKhann, G M, Grega, M A, Borowicz, L M Jr, Baumgartner, W A, Selnes, O A. Stroke and encephalopathy after cardiac surgery. An update. Stroke. 2006; 37:562–71.Google Scholar
Karkouti, K, Djalani, G, Borger, M A, et al. Low hematocrit during cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with increased risk of perioperative stroke in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005; 80:1381–7.Google Scholar
Goto, T, Baba, T, Honma, K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging findings and postoperative neurologic dysfunction in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 72:137–42.Google Scholar
Selnes, O A, Gottesman, R F, Grega, M A, et al. Cognitive and neurologic outcomes after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366:250–7.Google Scholar
Shroyer, A L, Grower, F L, Hattler, B, et al. On-pump vs. off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361:1827–37.Google Scholar
Møller, C H, Perko, M J, Lund, J T, et al. No major differences in 30-day outcomes in high-risk patients randomized to off-pump vs. on-pump coronary bypass surgery. The Best Bypass Surgery Trial. Circulation. 2010; 121:498504.Google Scholar
Nishijama, K, Horiguchi, M, Shizuta, S, et al. Temporal pattern of strokes after on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009; 87:1839–44.Google Scholar
Bouchard, D, Carrier, M, Demers, P, et al. Statins in combination with beta-blocker therapy reduces postoperative stroke after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011; 91:654–9.Google Scholar
Mangano, D T. Aspirin and mortality from coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347:1309–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leon, M B, Smith, C R, Mack, M, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363:1597–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, C R, Leon, M B, Mack, M J, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364:2187–98.Google Scholar
Thomas, M, Schymik, G, Walther, T, et al. Thirty-day results of the SAPIEN aortic Bioprosthesis European Outcome (SOURCE) registry: A European registry of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN valve. Circulation. 2010; 122:62–9.Google Scholar
Walther, T, Kasimir, M T, Doss, M, et al. One-year interim follow-up of the TRAVERSE trial: the initial feasibility study for transapical aortic valve implantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010; 39:532–7.Google Scholar
Svenson, L G, Dewey, T, Kapadia, S, et al. United States feasibility study of transcatheter insertion of a stented aortic valve by the left ventricular apex. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008; 86:4655.Google Scholar
Piazza, N, Grube, E, Gerckens, U, et al. Procedural and 30-day outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the third generation (18 Fr) CoreValve revalving system: results from the multicentre, expanded evaluation registry 1-year following CE mark approval. EuroIntervention. 2008; 4:242–9.Google Scholar
Petronio, A S, De Carlo, M, Bedogni, F, et al. Safety and efficacy of the subclavian approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the CoreValve Revalving system. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 3:359–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zahn, R, Gerckens, U, Grube, E, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry. Eur Heart J. 2011; 32:198204.Google Scholar
Arnold, M, Schulz-Heise, S, Achenbach, S, et al. Embolic cerebral insults after transapical aortic valve implantation detected by magnetic resonance imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Int. 2010; 3:1126–32.Google Scholar
Rodes-Cabau, J, Dumont, E, Boone, R H, et al. Cerebral embolism following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: comparison of transfemoral and transapical approaches. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57:1828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahlert, P, Al-Rashid, F, Döttger, P, et al. Cerebral embolization during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a transcranial Doppler study. Circulation. 2012; 126:1245–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinsfelt, B, Wetsrelind, A, Ioanes, D, et al. Transcranial Doppler microembolic signals and serum evidence of brain injury during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012; 56:240–7.Google Scholar
Vermeer, S E, Prins, N D, den Heijer, T, et al. Silent brain infarcts and the risk of dementia and cognitive decline. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348:1215–22.Google Scholar
Ben-Dor, I, Pichard, A D, Satler, L F, et al. Complications and outcome of balloon aortic valvuloplasty in high-risk or inoperable patients. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2010; 3:1150–6.Google Scholar
O’Brien, S M, Shahain, D M, Filardo, G, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: Part 2-isolated valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009; 88-S23-42.Google Scholar
Ferrari, E, Tozzi, P, Hurni, M, et al. Primary isolated aortic valve surgery in octogenarians. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010; 38:128–33.Google Scholar
Elbardissi, A W, Shekar, P, Couper, G S, Cohn, L H. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in octogenarian, high-risk, transcatheter aortic valve implantation candidates. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010; 141:328–35.Google ScholarPubMed
Leon, M B, Piazza, N, Nikolsky, E, et al. Standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation clinical trials. A consensus report from the valve academic research consortium. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57:253–69.Google Scholar
Daneault, B, Kirtane, A J, Kodali, S K, et al. Stroke associated with surgical and transcatheter treatment of aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58:2143–50.Google Scholar
Drews, T, Pasic, M, Bus, S, et al. Transcranial Doppler sound detection of cerebral microembolism during transapical aortic valve implantation. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 59:237–42.Google Scholar
van der Linden, J, Casimir-Ahn, H. When do cerebral emboli appear during open heart operation? A Transcranial Doppler study. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991; 51:237–41.Google Scholar
Guerrieri Wolf, L, Choudhary, B P, Abu-Omar, Y, Taggert, D P. Solid and gaseous cerebral microembolization after biologic and mechanical aortic valve replacement: investigation with multirange and multifrequency transcranial Doppler ultrasound. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008; 135:512–20.Google Scholar
Filsoufi, F, Rahmanian, P B, Castillo, J G, Bronster, D, Adams, D H. Incidence, imaging analysis, and early and late outcomes of stroke after cardiac valve operation. Am J Cardiol. 2008; 101:1472–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharony, R, Grossi, E A, Saunders, P C, et al. Aortic valve replacement in patients with impaired ventricular function. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003; 75:1808–14.Google Scholar
Ruel, M, Masters, R G, Rubens, F D, et al. Late incidence and determinants of stroke after aortic and mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004; 78:7784.Google Scholar
Sundt, T M, Bailey, M S, Moon, M R, et al. Quality of life after aortic valve replacement at the age of >80 years. Circulation. 2000; 102:III70–4.Google Scholar
Alexander, K P, Anstrom, K J, Muhlbaier, L H, et al. Outcomes of cardiac surgery in patients > or = 80 years: Results from the National Cardiovascular Network. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35:731–8.Google Scholar
Naylor, A R, Mehta, Z, Rothwell, P M, Bell, P R. Carotid artery disease and stroke during coronary artery bypass: a critical review of the literature. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002; 23:283–94.Google Scholar
Li, Y, Walicki, D, Mathiesen, C, Jenny, D, et al. Strokes after cardiac surgery and relationship to carotid stenosis. Arch Neurol. 2009; 66:1091–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naylor, A R. Does the risk of post-CABG stroke merit staged or synchronous reconstruction in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid disease? J Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 50:7181.Google Scholar
Timaran, C H, Rosero, E B, Smith, S T, et al. Trends and outcomes of concurrent carotid revascularization and coronary bypass. J Vasc Surg. 2008; 48:355–61.Google Scholar
Knipp, S C, Scherag, A, Beyersdorf, F, et al. for the CABACS study group. Randomized comparison of synchronous CABG and carotid endarterectomy vs. isolated CABG in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis: The CABACS trial. Int J Stroke. 2012; 7:354–60.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×