Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T07:05:03.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Rate of formation of stars suitable for the development of intelligent life, R*, 1961 to the present

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2015

Douglas A. Vakoch
Affiliation:
SETI Institute, California
Matthew F. Dowd
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Indiana
Frank Drake
Affiliation:
SETI Institute, California
Get access

Summary

Abstract

The first term in the Drake Equation is R*, the number of newly formed stars in the galaxy per year. The estimate given in 1961 was ten stars per year. Over the past fifty years, new instruments and methods have allowed us to better understand how stars begin their lives and how efficiently gas can create new ones.

Powerful instruments specifically adapted to the study of star formation include both space facilities – the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX), the Spitzer Space Telescope (SST), the Herschel Space Observatory (HSO), and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) – and a host of ground-based optical, infrared, submillimeter, and radio telescopes. These instruments have described in unprecedented detail the key phases and physical processes that lead to the formation of individual stars.

In-depth case studies of individual star-forming regions have yielded an understanding of the central physical processes that determine how molecular clouds contract and fragment into clumps and cores and, finally, clusters and individual stars. The determination of the global star formation rate (SFR) for the Milky Way is rigorously based on measurements of the global parameters of several local star-forming regions. In general, any total flux measure that is related to the SFR of a galaxy (including the Milky Way) is completely dominated by high-mass stars, since these are responsible for virtually all of the luminosity of a galaxy.

The detailed picture of how gas is transformed into stars requires not only knowledge of the SFR but also the distribution of mass of stars at their birth, a function called initial mass function (IMF). Theoretical simulations have explored how large molecular clouds fragment into stars under very different physical conditions. These works have permitted us to identify the most important physical parameters and have led to analytical formulations of the SFR and the IMF. In particular, they give estimates of a factor that is particularly important for the Drake Equation: the fraction of stars that are binary.

Most estimates of the SFR of the Milky Way have relied on global observables. Such studies generally rely on indirect tracers of massive (O- and early-B-type) stars to determine a massive SFR. This value is then extrapolated to lower masses to derive a global SFR for our galaxy. For example, an analysis from the late 1970s led to a value of five solar masses per year by making use of the fact that the integrated flux density from an HII region is a direct measure of the number of ionizing photons required to maintain that HII region, and is therefore an indirect measure of the number of O- and early B-type stars. In 2006, an estimate of four solar masses per year was derived from observations using the European Space Agency's International Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory (INTEGRAL) mission, which measured the gamma rays emitted by radioactive aluminum as a proxy for the massive star population of the Milky Way. Another study from 2006 gave a value of 2.7 solar masses per year, by using the total 100-micron flux of our galaxy. Along the line of these examples, this chapter will review in detail the evolution of estimates of R*, which is now closer to five solar masses per year than the ten assumed in 1961.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Drake Equation
Estimating the Prevalence of Extraterrestrial Life through the Ages
, pp. 38 - 52
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bastian, Nate, Covey, Kevin R., and Meyer, Michael R.. 2010. “A Universal Stellar Initial Mass Function? A Critical Look at Variations.” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 48: 339–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnell, Ian, and Bastien, Pierre. 1992. “Fragmentation of Elongated Cylindrical Clouds. V-Dependence of Mass Ratios on Initial Conditions.” The Astrophysical Journal 401: 654–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabrier, Gilles. 2003. “Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function.” The Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 115: 763–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cignoni, Michele, Degl'Innocenti, S., Prada Moroni, P. G., and Shore, S. N.. 2006. “Recovering the Star Formation Rate in the Solar Neighborhood.” Astronomy and Astrophysics 459: 783–96.Google Scholar
Diehl, Roland, Halloin, Hubert, Kretschmer, Karsten, Lichti, Giselher G., Schönfelder, Volker, et al. 2006. “Radioactive 26Al from Massive Stars in the Galaxy.” Nature 439: 4547.Google Scholar
Evans, Neal J., and Lada, Elisabeth A.. 1991. “Star Formation in Three Nearby Molecular Cloud Complexes.” In Fragmentation of Molecular Clouds and Star Formation, ed. Falgarone, E., Boulanger, F., and Duvert, G., 293315. International Astronomical Union Symposium 147. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Fall, S. Michael, Charlot, Stéphane, and Pei, Yichuan C.. 1996. “Cosmic Emissivity and Background Intensity from Damped Lyman-Alpha Galaxies.” The Astrophysical Journal 464: L4346.Google Scholar
François, Patrick. 1986. “Chemical Evolution of the Galaxy – A Comparison of the Abundances of Light Metals in Disk and Halo Dwarfs.” Astronomy and Astrophysics 160: 264–76.Google Scholar
Ho, Luis C., and Keto, Eric. 2007. “The Mid-Infrared Fine-Structure Lines of Neon as an Indicator of Star Formation Rate in Galaxies.” The Astrophysical Journal 658: 314–18.Google Scholar
Jeans, James H. 1902. “The Stability of a Spherical Nebula.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 199: 153.Google Scholar
Kennicutt, Robert C. Jr. 1990. “Large Scale Star Formation and the Interstellar Medium.” In The Interstellar Medium in Galaxies, ed. Thronson, H. A. and Shull, J. M., 405–35. Proceedings of the 2nd Teton Conference, Grand Teton National Park, WY. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kroupa, Pavel, Tout, Christopher A., and Gilmore, Gerard. 1993. “The Distribution of Low-Mass Stars in the Galactic Disc.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 262: 545–87.Google Scholar
Krumholz, Mark R. 2011. “On the Origin of Stellar Masses.” The Astrophysical Journal 743: 110–16.Google Scholar
Krumholz, Mark R., Klein, Richard I., and McKee, Christopher F.. 2012. “Radiation-Hydrodynamic Simulations of the Formation of Orion-Like Star Clusters. II. The Initial Mass Function from Winds, Turbulence, and Radiation.” The Astrophysical Journal 754: 7188.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard B. 1981. “Turbulence and Star Formation in Molecular Clouds.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 194: 809–26.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard B. 1992. “Galaxy Formation and Evolution.” In Star Formation in Stellar Systems, ed. Tenorio-Tagle, G., Prieto, M., and Sanchez, F., 125–28. Proceedings of the III Canary Islands Winter School of Astrophysics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lilly, Simon J., Le Fevre, Olivier Claude, Hammer, Francois, and Crampton, David. 1996. “The Canada-France Redshift Survey: The Luminosity Density and Star Formation History of the Universe to Z Approximately 1.” The Astrophysical Journal 460: L14.Google Scholar
Madau, Piero, Ferguson, Henry C., Dickinson, Mark E., Giavalisco, Mauro, Steidel, Charles C., and Fruchter, Andrew. 1996. “High-Redshift Galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field: Colour Selection and Star Formation History to Z~4.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 283: 13881404.Google Scholar
Matteucci, Francesca, and François, Patrick. 1989. “Galactic Chemical Evolution: Abundance Gradients of Individual Elements.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 239: 885904.Google Scholar
Miller, Glen E., and Scalo, John M.. 1979. “The Initial Mass Function and Stellar Birthrate in the Solar Neighborhood.” The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 41: 513–47.Google Scholar
Robitaille, Thomas P., and Whitney, Barbara A.. 2010. “The Present-Day Star Formation Rate of the Milky Way Determined from Spitzer-Detected Young Stellar Objects.” The Astrophysical Journal Letters 710: L1115.Google Scholar
Salpeter, E. 1955. “The Luminosity Function and Stellar Evolution.” The Astrophysical Journal 121: 161–67.Google Scholar
Smith, Lisa F., Biermann, Peter, and Mezger, Peter G.. 1978. “Star Formation Rates in the Galaxy.” Astronomy and Astrophysics 66: 6576.Google Scholar
Spaans, Marco, and Silk, Joseph. 2000. “The Polytropic Equation of State of Interstellar Gas Clouds.” The Astrophysical Journal 538: 115–20.Google Scholar
Steidel, Charles C., Giavalisco, Mauro, Pettini, Max, Dickinson, Mark, and Adelberger, Kurt L.. 1996. “Spectroscopic Confirmation of a Population of Normal Star-Forming Galaxies at Redshifts Z > 3.” The Astrophysical Journal Letters 462: L1721.Google Scholar
Tinsley, Beatrice M. 1968. “Evolution of the Stars and Gas in Galaxies.” The Astrophysical Journal 151: 547–65.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×