Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T08:47:31.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Rate of formation of stars suitable for the development of intelligent life, R*, pre-1961

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2015

Douglas A. Vakoch
Affiliation:
SETI Institute, California
Matthew F. Dowd
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Indiana
Frank Drake
Affiliation:
SETI Institute, California
Get access

Summary

Abstract

The rate of star formation, past and present, in the galaxy is an important astronomical question that lies at the heart of our modern understanding of the nature of stars, their distribution in space and time, and the history of the galaxy itself. Here we look at history, to 1961, concentrating on the question of how stars form and what is the rate of formation of stars in the galaxy. It is related to what astronomers call the luminosity function for stars, or the frequency distribution of luminosities for all stars in the galaxy. Our recounting will encompass the correlation era of stellar statistics, when astronomers began to conceptualize evolutionary models for the galaxy: that the luminosity function changes with time, and that the rate of change is determined not only by the rate of star formation but also by the nature and rate of the evolution of stars once they have been formed. We will show that, throughout much of the first half of the twentieth century, these rates were debated and revised many times, first by the recognition that there exists a main sequence of stars, which was interpreted as the distribution of stars existing in some form of quasi-stability. Later came the recognition of giant stars and instability, then the mass–luminosity law for stars, then an awareness of the energy sources of the stars and the subsequent revision of the evolutionary place and nature of giant stars, and finally, the fact that populations of stars existed within the galaxy that were generationally distinct. Based on this review, we will then argue that Drake estimated R* (regarded by most as the number of stars forming per year in the galaxy) in a manner consistent with the state of knowledge at the time.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Drake Equation
Estimating the Prevalence of Extraterrestrial Life through the Ages
, pp. 21 - 37
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Astrophysics Data System (ADS). N.d. Available online at http://adsabs.harvard.edu/.Google Scholar
Baade, Walter. 1944. “The Resolution of Messier 32, NGC 205, and the Central Region of the Andromeda Nebula.” Contributions from the Mount Wilson Observatory 696: 110. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.Google Scholar
Baade, Walter. 1963. Evolution of Stars and Galaxies. Payne-Gaposchkin, Cecilia, ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brush, Stephen G. 1996. Transmuted Past: The Age of the Earth and the Evolution of the Elements from Lyell to Patterson. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burchfield, Joe D. 1990. Lord Kelvin and the Age of the Earth. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVorkin, D. 1978. An Astronomical Symbiosis: Stellar Evolution and Spectral Classification, 1860–1910. Unpubl. diss., U. Leicester. Available online at https://lra.le.ac.uk/handle/2381/10909/.Google Scholar
DeVorkin, D. 2000. Henry Norris Russell: Dean of American Astronomers. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
DeVorkin, D. 2006. “The Changing Place of Red Giant Stars in the Evolutionary Process.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 37: 429–69.Google Scholar
Drake, Frank. 2003. “The Drake Equation Revisited: Part I.” Available online at www.astrobio.net/index.php?option=com_retrospection&task=detail&id=610.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S. 1914. Stellar Movements and the Structure of the Universe. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Faber, Sandra. 1981. “Beatrice Tinsley.” Physics Today 34(9): 110.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H.. 1856. “LXIV. On the Interaction of Natural Forces.” Philosophical Magazine, 4th series, 11: 489518.Google Scholar
Holden, E. S. 1881. Sir William Herschel. New York: C. Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Hoskin, M. 1959. William Herschel and the Construction of the Heavens. London: Sched and Ward. Reprinted 1963, London: Oldbourne.Google Scholar
Hoskin, M. 1967. “Apparatus and Ideas in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Cosmology.” Vistas in Astronomy 9: 7985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Su-Shu. 1957. “Star Formation.” Astronomical Society of the Pacific Leaflet 7(340), September.Google Scholar
Huang, Su-Shu. 1959. “The Problem of Life in the Universe and the Mode of Star Formation.” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 71: 421–24.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, Karl. 1981. “Astronomers Take Up the Stellar-Energy Problem, 1917–1920.” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 11: 277303.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, Karl. 1991. Exploring the Sun: Solar Science since Galileo. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kapteyn[Kapteijn], J. C. 1902. “No. II. On the Luminosity of the Fixed Stars.” Publications of the Kapteyn Astronomical Laboratory Groningen 11: 332. Formerly Publications of the Astronomical Laboratory at Groningen.Google Scholar
Kapteyn, J. C., and van Rhijn, P. J.. 1920. “No. 188. On the Distribution of the Stars in Space Especially in the High Galactic Latitudes.” Contributions from the Mount Wilson Observatory 188: 116. Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O. 1960. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
McClean, Frank. 1896. “Photographs of the Spectra of Twenty-Three Characteristic Helium Stars; also Photographs of the Spectra of Six Stars of the Third Magnitude, Showing the Transitions from Type to Type.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 56: 428–29.Google Scholar
McClean, Frank. 1897. “On Comparative Photographic Spectra of Stars to the 3–1/2 Magnitude.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 61: 213–16.Google Scholar
Meadows, A. J. 1972. Science and Controversy: A Biography of Sir Norman Lockyer. London: Macmillan. Second ed., Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar
Paul, E. Robert. 1993. The Milky Way Galaxy and Statistical Cosmology, 1890–1924. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plaskett, J. S. 1915. “The Sidereal Universe.” Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada 9: 3756.Google Scholar
Rolston, W. E. 1907. “A Proposed International Attack on the Sidereal Problem.” Nature 75: 427–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagan, Carl. 1974. “An Introduction to the Problem of Interstellar Communication.” In Interstellar Communication: Scientific Perspectives, ed. Ponnamperuma, C. and Cameron, A. G. W., 125. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Salpeter, E, 1955. “The Luminosity Function and Stellar Evolution,” Astrophysical Journal 121: 161–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, M. 1962. “Evolution of Stellar Content of Galaxies.” In Problems of Extra-Galactic Research, Proceedings from IAU Symposium no. 15, ed. McVittie, G., 170–76. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, Martin. 1958. The Structure and Evolution of the Stars. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Robert W. 1982. The Expanding Universe: Astronomy's “Great Debate,” 1900–1931. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Struve, Otto. 1950. Stellar Evolution: An Exploration from the Observatory. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tinsley, Beatrice. 1968. “Evolution of the Stars and Gas in Galaxies.” Astrophysical Journal 151: 547–65.Google Scholar
Trimble, Virginia. 2006. “‘The Light of Other Days,’ First Light, and Reionization: Theoretical Study and Experimental Detection of First Luminous Sources in the Universe.” New Astronomy Reviews 50: 1318.Google Scholar
Trumpler, R. J. 1925. “Spectral Types in Open Clusters.” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 37: 307–18.Google Scholar
Turnbull, H. W. 1961. The Correspondence of Sir Isaac Newton, vol. 3. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Rhijn, P. J. 1925. “The Number of Stars between Definite Limits of Proper Motion, Visual Magnitude and Galactic Latitude for Spectral Class.” Publications of the Kapteyn Astronomical Laboratory Groningen 36: 116.Google Scholar
van Rhijn, P. J. 1929. “Distribution of Stars According to Apparent Magnitude, Galactic Latitude and Galactic Longitude.” Publications of the Kapteyn Astronomical Laboratory Groningen 43: 1104.Google Scholar
van Rhijn, P. J. 1936. “The Absorption of Light in Interstellar Galactic Space and the Galactic Density Distribution.” Publications of the Kapteyn Astronomical Laboratory Groningen 47: 134.Google Scholar
Wilford, John N. 1992. “Astronomers Open New Search for Alien Life: A Message, Like Columbus, Would Mean a New World.” New York Times, Oct. 6, 1992: C1.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×