Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T07:51:17.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 2 - Assisted Conception and Multiple Pregnancy

Strategies to Reduce Rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2022

By
Mariano Mascarenhas  and
Adam Balen
Edited by
Leanne Bricker ,
Julian N. Robinson  and
Baskaran Thilaganathan
Leanne Bricker
Affiliation:
Corniche Hospital, Abu Dhabi
Julian N. Robinson
Affiliation:
Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston
Baskaran Thilaganathan
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

Assisted conception is associated with a higher risk of multiple pregnancy than natural conception. Both ovulation induction and IVF are associated with a higher risk of multiple pregnancies, but the latter contributes to most of the multiple pregnancies following assisted conception treatment. The adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes of multiple gestations are amplified if the pregnancy was conceived after infertility treatment. The risk of multiple pregnancy after ovulation induction (with or without intrauterine insemination) appears to be linked to the number of follicles recruited whilst the risk after IVF is related to the number of embryos transferred. Aiming for uni-follicular recruitment reduces the risk of multiple pregnancy following ovulation induction and performing a single embryo transfer in IVF cycles reduces the risk of dizygotic twinning. Some of the laboratory techniques used in IVF such as culture to the blastocyst stage and pre-implantation genetic testing elevate the risk of monozygotic twinning.

Type
Chapter
Information
Management of Multiple Pregnancies
A Practical Guide
 , pp. 11 - 17
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bardis, N, Maruthini, D, Balen, AH. Modes of conception and multiple pregnancy: a national survey of babies born during one week in 2003 in the United Kingdom. Fertil Steril 2005 Dec;84(6):1727–32.Google Scholar
Qin, JB, Wang, H, Sheng, X, Xie, Q, Gao, S. Assisted reproductive technology and risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in dichorionic twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2016 May;105(5):1180–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Okby, R, Harlev, A, Sacks, KN, Sergienko, R, Sheiner, E. Preeclampsia acts differently in in vitro fertilization versus spontaneous twins. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018;297(3):653–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yasmin, E, Davies, M, Conway, G, Balen, AH. British Fertility Society null. British Fertility Society. ‘Ovulation induction in WHO Type 1 anovulation: guidelines for practice’. Produced on behalf of the BFS Policy and Practice Committee. Hum Fertil Camb Engl 2013 Dec;16(4):228–34.Google Scholar
Balen, AH, Morley, LC, Misso, M, Franks, S, Legro, RS, Wijeyaratne, CN et al. The management of anovulatory infertility in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance. Hum Reprod Update 2016;22(6):687–708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schenker, JG, Yarkoni, S, Granat, M. Multiple pregnancies following induction of ovulation. Fertil Steril 1981 Feb;35(2):105–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Mitwally, MF, Biljan, MM, Casper, RF. Pregnancy outcome after the use of an aromatase inhibitor for ovarian stimulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005 Feb;192(2):381–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franik, S, Eltrop, SM, Kremer, JA, Kiesel, L, Farquhar, C. Aromatase inhibitors (letrozole) for subfertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018 24;5:CD010287.Google Scholar
Weiss, NS, Kostova, E, Nahuis, M, Mol, BWJ, Van der Veen, F, Van Wely, M. Gonadotrophins for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Aug 23];(1). Available from www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD010290.pub3/fullGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farquhar, C, Brown, J, Marjoribanks, J. Laparoscopic drilling by diathermy or laser for ovulation induction in anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2019 Aug 23];(6). Available from www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD001122.pub4/fullGoogle Scholar
Veltman-Verhulst, SM, Hughes, E, Ayeleke, RO, Cohlen, BJ. Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;2(100909747):CD001838.Google ScholarPubMed
Cissen, M, Bensdorp, A, Cohlen, BJ, Repping, S, De Bruin, JP, Van Wely, M. Assisted reproductive technologies for male subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016 Feb 26;2:CD000360.Google Scholar
Tjon-Kon-Fat, RI, Bensdorp, AJ, Bossuyt, PMM, Koks, C, Oosterhuis, GJE, Hoek, A et al. Is IVF – served two different ways – more cost-effective than IUI with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation? Hum Reprod. 2015 Oct 1;30(10):2331–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Rumste, MME, Custers, IM, Van der Veen, F, Van Wely, M, Evers, JLH, Mol, BWJ. The influence of the number of follicles on pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination with ovarian stimulation: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2008 Nov 1;14(6):563–70.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Use of exogenous gonadotropins in anovulatory women: a technical bulletin. Fertil Steril 2008 Nov;90(5Suppl):S7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fong, SA, Palta, V, Oh, C, Cho, MM, Loughlin, JS, McGovern, PG. Multiple pregnancy after gonadotropin-intrauterine insemination: an Unavoidable event? ISRN Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2019 Dec 29]. Available from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3255317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, J, Cruz, M, González-Ravina, C, Caligara, C, Prados, N, Martínez, JC et al. Small-sized follicles could contribute to high-order multiple pregnancies: outcomes of 6552 intrauterine insemination cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2018 Nov;37(5):549–54.Google Scholar
Ledger, WL, Anumba, D, Marlow, N, Thomas, CM, Wilson, ECF. Cost of Multiple Births Study Group (COMBS Group): the costs to the NHS of multiple births after IVF treatment in the UK.BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2006 Jan;113(1):21–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, GM, Illingworth, PJ, Sullivan, EA. Assisted reproductive technology: public funding and the voluntary shift to single embryo transfer in Australia. Med J Aust 2011;195(10):594–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prados, N, Quiroga, R, Caligara, C, Ruiz, M, Blasco, V, Pellicer, A et al. Elective single versus double embryo transfer: live birth outcome and patient acceptance in a prospective randomised trial. Reprod Fertil Dev 2015 Jun;27(5):794–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza, R, Jáuregui, T, Diaz-Nuñez, M, De la Sota, M, Hidalgo, A, Ferrando, M et al. Infertile couples prefer twins: analysis of their reasons and clinical characteristics related to this preference. J Reprod Infertil 2018 Sep;19(3):167–73.Google Scholar
Sunderam, S, Boulet, SL, Jamieson, DJ, Kissin, DM. Effects of patient education on desire for twins and use of elective single embryo transfer procedures during ART treatment: a systematic review. Reprod Biomed Soc Online 2018 Aug;6:102–19.Google Scholar
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Fertility treatment 2017: trends and figures. 2019. www.hfea.gov.uk/about-us/publications/research-and-data/fertility-treatment-2019-trends-and-figuresGoogle Scholar
Pandian, Z, Marjoribanks, J, Ozturk, O, Serour, G, Bhattacharya, S. Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013 Jul 29;(7):CD003416.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2013). Fertility problems: assessment and treatment (NICE Quality Standard No. 156). Retrieved from www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg156.Google Scholar
Kamath, MS, Antonisamy, B, Sunkara, SK. Zygotic splitting following embryo biopsy: a cohort study of 207 697 single embryo transfers following IVF treatment. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. [cited 2019 Dec 29];n/a(n/a). Available from https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1471-0528.16045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knopman, JM, Krey, LC, Oh, C, Lee, J, McCaffrey, C, Noyes, N. What makes them split? Identifying risk factors that lead to monozygotic twins after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2014 Jul;102(1):82–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hack, KEA, Vereycken, MEMS, Torrance, HL, Koopman‐Esseboom, C, Derks, JB. Perinatal outcome of monochorionic and dichorionic twins after spontaneous and assisted conception: a retrospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018 Jun;97(6):717–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mascarenhas, M, Kamath, MS, Muthukumar, K, Mangalaraj, AM, Chandy, A, Aleyamma, T. Obstetric outcomes of monochorionic pregnancies conceived following assisted reproductive technology: a retrospective study. J Hum Reprod Sci 2014;7(2):119–24.Google Scholar
Mascarenhas, M, Sunkara, SK, Antonisamy, B, Kamath, MS. Higher risk of preterm birth and low birth weight following oocyte donation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017 Nov;218:60–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clua, E, Tur, R, Coroleu, B, Rodríguez, I, Boada, M, Gómez, MJ et al. Is it justified to transfer two embryos in oocyte donation? A pilot randomized clinical trial. Reprod Biomed Online 2015 Aug;31(2):154–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laskov, I, Michaan, N, Cohen, A, Tsafrir, Z, Maslovitz, S, Kupferminc, M et al. Outcome of Twin pregnancy in women ≥45 years old: a retrospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013 May 1;26(7):669–72.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×