Book contents
- Rethinking Media Research for Changing Societies
- Communication, Society and Politics
- Rethinking Media Research for Changing Societies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figure
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Living in a Datafied World
- Part II Journalism in Times of Change
- Part III Media and Problems of Inclusion
- Part IV Engagement with and through Media
- Part V The Role of Scholars
- Other Books in the Series (continued from page ii)
- References
Part V - The Role of Scholars
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2020
Book contents
- Rethinking Media Research for Changing Societies
- Communication, Society and Politics
- Rethinking Media Research for Changing Societies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figure
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Living in a Datafied World
- Part II Journalism in Times of Change
- Part III Media and Problems of Inclusion
- Part IV Engagement with and through Media
- Part V The Role of Scholars
- Other Books in the Series (continued from page ii)
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Rethinking Media Research for Changing Societies , pp. 169 - 218Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
References
Carlson, Matt, Robinson, Sue, Lewis, Seth C., and Berkowitz, Daniel A. (2018). “Journalism Studies and its Core Commitments: The Making of a Communication Field.” The Journal of Communication, 68(1), 6–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couldry, Nick and Hepp, Andreas (2018). The Mediated Construction of Reality. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Duffy, Brooke, Erin, and Pooley, Jefferson D. (2017). “Facebook for Academics: The Convergence of Self-Branding and Social Media Logic on Academia.edu.” Social Media + Society, 3(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Christian and Qiu, Jack Linchuan (2018). “Ferments in the Field: Introductory Reflections on the Past, Present and Future of Communication Studies.” The Journal of Communication, 68(2), 219–232.Google Scholar
Ladd, J. M. (2011). Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Luce, Edward (2017). The Retreat of Western Liberalism. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Seth C. (2020). “The Objects and Objectives of Journalism Research During the Coronavirus Pandemic and Beyond.” Digital Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1773292Google Scholar
Newman, Nic and Fletcher, Richard (2017, December 1). “Bias, Bullshit and Lies: Audience Perspectives on Low Trust in the Media.” https://ssrn.com/abstract=3173579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Nic, Fletcher, Richard, Kalogeropoulos, Antonis, et al. (2018, June 14). Reuters Institute Digital News Report. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3245355.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis (2018). “No One Cares What We Know: Three Responses to the Irrelevance of Political Communication Research.” Political Communication, 35(1), 145–149.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis, and Graves, Lucas (2017). ‘News You Don’t Believe: Audience Perspectives on Fake News. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.Google Scholar
Peters, John Durham (1986). “Institutional Sources of Intellectual Poverty in Communication Research.” Communication Research, 13(4), 527–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pooley, Jefferson D. (2016). “The Field, Fermented: Prestige and the Vocational Bind in Communication Research.” International Communication Gazette, 78(7), 621–626.Google Scholar
Robinson, Sue, Lewis, Seth C., and Carlson, Matt (2019). “Locating the ‘Digital’ in Digital Journalism Studies: Transformations in Research.” Digital Journalism, 7(3), 368–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, Pamela J. and Reese, Stephen D. (2014). Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stroud, Natalie Jomini (2017). “Helping Newsrooms Work Toward Their Democratic and Business Objectives.” In Boczkowski, P. J. and Anderson, C. W. (eds.) Remaking the News: Essays on the Future of Journalism Scholarship in the Digital Age (pp. 157–176), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stroud, Natalie Jomini, Muddiman, Ashley, and Lee, Jae Kook (2014). “Seeing Media as Group Members: An Evaluation of Partisan Bias Perceptions.” The Journal of Communication, 64(5), 874–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waisbord, Silvio (2019a). Communication: A Post-discipline. Cambridge, UK: Polity Books.Google Scholar
References
Benjamin, Walter (1968). “The Task of the Translator.” In Benjamin, W. (ed.), H. Zohn (trans.) and Arendt, H. (intro.), Illuminations. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre and Wacquant, Loic J. D. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill (1990/2008). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Couldry, Nick (2000). Inside Culture: Reimagining the Method of Cultural Studies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Dayan, Daniel and Katz, Elihu (1994). Media Events: The Live Broadcasting of History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Emerson, Caryl (1984). “Editor’s Preface.” In Bakhtin, M. (ed.) and C. Emerson (trans.) Problems in Dostoevsky’s Poetics (pp. xxix–iliii). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Krippendorff, Klaus (2009). On Communicating: Otherness, Meaning, and Information. Bermejo, F. (ed.) New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lingel, Jessa (2017). Digital Countercultures and the Struggle for Community. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright (2000). The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nancy, Jean-Luc (1991). The Inoperative Community. Connor, P. (ed.) and Connor, P. et. al. (trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rabassa, Gregory (1971/1987). “The Ear in Translation.” In The World in Translation. New York: PEN American Center.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul (1995). “Reflections on a New Ethos for Europe.” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 5/6 (21), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, George (1998). After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation. New York: Open Road.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond (1960). Culture and Society: 1780–1950. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion (1986, Spring). “The Ideal of Community and the Politics of Difference.” Social Theory and Practice, 12(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
References
Burawoy, Michael (2004). “For Public Sociology.” American Sociological Review, 70, 4–28.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (2014). “Ordinary, Incredulous.” In Brooks, P. and Jewett, H. (eds.), The Humanities in Public Life (pp 15–40). New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dean, Jodi (2009). Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies: Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Dussel, Enrique (2003). Philosophy of Liberation. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Kathleen (2019). Generous Thinking: A Radical Approach to Saving the University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gilson, Erinn (2011). “Vulnerability, Ignorance, and Oppression.” Hypatia, 26(2), 308–332.Google Scholar
Grosfoguel, Ramón (2015). “Epistemic Racism/Sexism, Westernized Universities and the Four Genocides/Epistemicides of the Long Sixteenth Century.” In Araújo, M. and Maeso, S. Rodriguez (eds.) Eurocentrism, Racism and Knowledge (pp. 23–46). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mignolo, Walter (2009). “Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and De-Colonial Freedom.” Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7–8), 1–23.Google Scholar
Said, Edward (1994). Representations of the Intellectual: The 1993 Reith Lectures. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
References
Benkler, Yochai, Faris, Robert, and Roberts, Hal (2018). Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blasi, Vincent (2004). “Holmes and the Marketplace of Ideas.” The Supreme Court Review, 2004, 1–46.Google Scholar
Blumler, Jay G. and Coleman, Stephen (2015). “Democracy and the Media – Revisited.” Javnost – The Public, 22(2), 111–128.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance and Pfetsch, Barbara (2018). “Rethinking Political Communication in a Time of Disrupted Public Spheres.” Journal of Communication, 68(2), 243–253.Google Scholar
Citron, Danielle (2014). Hate Crimes in Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2018). Democracy at Risk: Threats and Attacks against Media Freedom in Europe. Annual Report by the partner organizations to the Council of Europe platform to promote the protection of journalism and the safety of journalists.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, Lincoln (2018). “Visibility and the Public Sphere: A Normative Conceptualisation.” Javnost – The Public, 25(1–2), 35–42.Google Scholar
Fenton, Natalie (2018). “Fake Democracy: The Limits of Public Sphere Theory.” Javnost – The Public, 25(1–2), 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedland, Lewis A., Hove, Thomas, and Rojas, Hernando (2006). “The Networked Public Sphere.” Javnost – The Public, 13(4), 5–26.Google Scholar
Ganesh, Bharath (2018). “The Ungovernability of Digital Hate Culture.” Journal of International Affairs, 71(2), 30–49.Google Scholar
Guerrero, Manuel and Márquez-Ramírez, Mireya (eds.) (2014). Media Systems and Communication Policies in Latin America. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar
Hindman, Matthew (2018). The Internet Trap: How the Digital Economy Builds Monopolies and Undermines Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Sarah J. and Foucault Welles, Brooke (2015). “Hijacking# myNYPD: Social Media Dissent and Networked Counterpublics.” Journal of Communication, 65(6), 932–952.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Jonas, Fähnrich, Birte, Rhomberg, Markus, and Filzmaier, Peter (2017). “What Happened to the Public Sphere? The Networked Public Sphere and Public Opinion Formation.” In Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F. J., and Efthymiopoulos, M. P. (eds.), Handbook of Cyber-development, Cyber-democracy, and Cyber-defense (pp. 1–28). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Margetts, Helen, John, Peter, Hale, Scott, and Yasseri, Taha (2015). Political Turbulence: How Social Media Shape Collective Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Meikle, Graham (ed.) (2018). The Routledge Companion to Media and Activism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pfetsch, Barbara (2018). “Dissonant and Disconnected Public Spheres as Challenge for Political Communication Research.” Javnost – The Public, 25(1–2), 59–65.Google Scholar
Peters, John Durham (2004). “The ‘Marketplace of Ideas’: A History of the Concept.” In Calabrese, A. and Sparks, C. (eds.), Toward a Political Economy of Culture: Capitalism and Communication in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 65–82). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Picard, Robert G. (2017). “The Sisyphean Pursuit of Media Pluralism: European Efforts to Establish Policy and Measurable Evidence.” Communication Law and Policy, 22(3), 255–273.Google Scholar
Stremlau, Nicole, Gagliardone, Iginio, and Price, Monroe (eds.) (2018). World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development 2018. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
Strossen, Nadine (2018). HATE: Why We Should Resist It with Free Speech, Not Censorship. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tumber, Howard and Waisbord, Silvio (eds.) (2017). Routledge Companion to Media and Human Rights. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Valcke, Peggy, Sukosd, Miklos, and Picard, Robert (eds.). (2015). Media Pluralism and Diversity: Concepts, Risks and Global Trends. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Jan A. (2017). “Digital Divide: Impact of Access.” In Rössler, P. (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects (pp. 1–11). London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Waisbord, Silvio (2018). “Why Populism is Troubling for Democratic Communication.” Communication Culture & Critique, 11(1), 21–34.Google Scholar
Zuboff, Shishana (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York, NY: Public Affairs.Google Scholar