Book contents
- State and Nation Making in Latin America and Spain
- State and Nation Making in Latin America and Spain
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Economic and Territorial Power
- Part III Infrastructural Power: Reform Strategies
- 6 Two Roads of Neoliberal Reform in Higher Education
- 7 Reinvented Governments in Latin America
- 8 The Devil Hides in the Details
- 9 Neoliberal Reform of Transport Institutions in Brazil, Argentina, and Chile
- 10 The End Game of Social Policy in a Context of Enduring Inequalities
- Part IV Symbolic Power: Identities and Social Protest
- Part V Conclusions
- Index
- References
9 - Neoliberal Reform of Transport Institutions in Brazil, Argentina, and Chile
The Tortoise Beats the Hare
from Part III - Infrastructural Power: Reform Strategies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 August 2023
Book contents
- State and Nation Making in Latin America and Spain
- State and Nation Making in Latin America and Spain
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Economic and Territorial Power
- Part III Infrastructural Power: Reform Strategies
- 6 Two Roads of Neoliberal Reform in Higher Education
- 7 Reinvented Governments in Latin America
- 8 The Devil Hides in the Details
- 9 Neoliberal Reform of Transport Institutions in Brazil, Argentina, and Chile
- 10 The End Game of Social Policy in a Context of Enduring Inequalities
- Part IV Symbolic Power: Identities and Social Protest
- Part V Conclusions
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter takes the case of Conditional Cash Transfer programs (CCTs) as an invitation to examine a trade-off faced by many Latin American neoliberal states: Their promise of making states both more efficient and more inclusive. More specifically, I use the case of CCTs to explore variations in how the Brazilian and Mexican states understood and acted on the promise of increasing inclusivity in official safety nets by making poverty management more efficient. I argue that while Brazil and Mexico equally chose CCTs as their main strategy to reinvent social policy provision for low-income families in a neoliberal era, they did so for different reasons, which resulted in the implementation of programs that followed distinct operational logic. In Mexico, the state invested in a very precise regime to select and monitor low-income families, while Brazil adopted a looser strategy. These differences depended on the strategies of legitimation of each CCT and were influenced by the distinct approaches to neoliberalism adopted by each country. My findings are based on analyzing a rich set of qualitative data, including the study of official documents and 100 in-depth interviews with political and bureaucratic elites in the two countries.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- State and Nation Making in Latin America and SpainThe Neoliberal State and Beyond, pp. 289 - 316Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Abers, Rebecca, and Keck, Margaret E.. Practical Authority: Agency and Institutional Change in Brazilian Water Politics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
ACIJ (Asociación Civil por la Igualdad y la Justicia). La situación institucional actual de los entes de control de servicios públicos. Buenos Aires: ACIJ, March 1, 2008.Google Scholar
AGN (Auditoría General de la Nación). Apoyo a la Reconversión del Instituto Nacional de Servicios Sociales para Jubilados y Pensionados (INSSJP). Resolución Número 146–02, 1999.Google Scholar
Andrews, Matt. The Limits of Institutional Reform in Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Andrews, Matt, Pritchett, Lant, and Woolcock, Michael. “Escaping Capability Traps Through Problem Driven Iterative Adaptation (PDIA).” World Development 51 (2013): 234–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araneda, Ignacio. “La metodología de la tarificación del uso de la infraestructura y la eficacia del sistema de transporte nacional,” 85–101. Santiago, Chile: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, 1993.Google Scholar
Armijo, Leslie, and Rhodes, Sybil D.. “Explaining Infrastructure Underperformance in Brazil: Cash, Political Institutions, Corruption, and Policy Gestalts.” Policy Studies 38, no. 3 (May 4, 2017): 231–47.Google Scholar
Åslund, Anders. “The Case for Radical Reform.” Journal of Democracy 5, no. 4 (1994): 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, Werner, and Montes-Rojas, Gabriel. “From Privatization to Re-Nationalization: What Went Wrong with Privatizations in Argentina?” Oxford Development Studies 36, no. 3 (September 2008): 323–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barat, Josef. Logística, transporte e desenvolvimento econômico. São Paulo, Brazil: Editora CLA, 2007.Google Scholar
Bersch, Katherine. When Democracies Deliver: Governance Reform in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Bersch, Katherine, Praça, Sérgio, and Taylor, Matthew M.. “Bureaucratic Capacity and Political Autonomy within National States: Mapping the Archipelago of Excellence in Brazil.” In States in the Developing World, 157–83. Edited by Atul Kohli, Deborah J. Yashar, and Centeno, Miguel A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Blustein, Paul. And the Money Kept Rolling In (and Out): Wall Street, the IMF, and the Bankrupting of Argentina. New York: Public Affairs, 2005.Google Scholar
Bocarejo, Juan Pablo and Ricardo Oviedo, Daniel, “Transport Accessibility and Social Inequities: A Tool for Identification of Mobility Needs and Evaluation of Transport Investments.” Journal of Transport Geography 24 (2012): 142–54.Google Scholar
Briones, Ignacio. “Transantiago: un problema de información.” Estudios Públicos 116 (2009): 37–91.Google Scholar
Burki, Shahid Javed, and Perry, Guillermo. Beyond the Washington Consensus: Institutions Matter. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications, 1998.Google Scholar
Campos-Méndez, Javier, Trujillo, Lourdes, and Estache, Antonio. Processes, Information, and Accounting Gaps in the Regulation of Argentina’s Private Railways. Policy Research Working Paper No. 2636. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2001.Google Scholar
Carrasco, Juan Antonio and Lucas, Karen. “Measuring the Influence of Social Capital and Personal Networks on Transport Disadvantage.” In Measuring Transport Equity, 231–46. Edited by Lucas, Karen, Martens, Karel, Di Ciommo, Floridea, and Dupont-Kieffer, Ariane. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2019.Google Scholar
Carbajo, José, and Estache, Antonio. “Railway Concessions: Heading Down the Right Track in Argentina.” Viewpoint, Note No. 88. Washington, DC: World Bank, September 1996.Google Scholar
Cavalcanti, Celso de Oliveira Bello. “Impactos da reforma administrativa do governo Collor na modelagem organizacional do DNER.” Dissertation, Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública, Fundação Getúlio Vargas, 1995.Google Scholar
Centro de Estudios Económicos de la Regulación (CEER). “Las empresas privadas de servicios públicos en la Argentina. Un análisis de su contribución a la competitividad del País.” Buenos Aires: Universidad Argentina de la Empresa, 2001.Google Scholar
CNT (Confederação Nacional Do Transporte). “Pesquisa CNT de Rodovias 2014.” Brasília: CNT, 2014.Google Scholar
Correia, Marcelo Bruto da Costa. “Por que as reformas permanecem? A trajetória gradualista de mudanças no setor de infraestrutura rodoviária no Brasil entre 1985–2010.” PhD diss., Fundação Getúlio Vargas, 2011.Google Scholar
Cunha, Bruno Queiroz, Karine Pereira, Ana, and de Ávila Gomide, Alexandre. “State Capacity and Utilities Regulation in Brazil: Exploring Bureaucracy.” Utilities Policy 49 (2017): 116–26.Google Scholar
De Castro, Newton. “Privatization of the Transportation Sector in Brazil.” In Privatization in Brazil: The Case of Public Utilities, 177–218. Edited by Armando, C. Pinheiro and Fukasaku, Kiichiro. Rio de Janeiro: BNDES, 1999.Google Scholar
Durand, Francisco, and Thorp, Rosemary. “Reforming the State: A Study of the Peruvian Tax Reform.” Oxford Development Studies 26, no. 2 (June 1, 1998): 133–51.Google Scholar
Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray, and Newman, Peter, eds. Utility and Probability. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1990.Google Scholar
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). Toward an Integrated Transport Policy: Institutions, Infrastructure and Logistics – The Case in Chile. FAL Bulletin No. 282. Santiago, Chile: ECLAC, 2010.Google Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit, The. “The 2014 Infrascope: Evaluating the Environment for Public-Private Partnerships in Latin America.” London: The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2014.Google Scholar
Engel, Eduardo. “Privatizing Highways in Latin America: Fixing What Went Wrong.” Economía Journal 4, no. 1 (Fall 2003): 129–64.Google Scholar
Estache, Antonio, Carbajo, Jose C., and de Rus, Gines. “Argentina’s Transport Privatization and Re-Regulation: Ups and Downs of a Daring Decade-Long Experience.” Policy Research Working Paper Series. Washington, DC: World Bank, 1999.Google Scholar
Estache, Antonio, Goldstein, Andrea, and Pittman, Russell. “Privatization and Regulatory Reform in Brazil: The Case of Freight Railways.” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 1, no. 2 (2001): 203–35.Google Scholar
Figueroa, Oscar. “Four Decades of Changing Transport Policy in Santiago, Chile.” Research in Transportation Economics, Urban Transport in Developing Countries: CODATU Special Issue 40, no. 1 (April 1, 2013): 87–95.Google Scholar
Fuentes González, Claudio. “De estimaciones y modelamientos: el rol de los técnics en la formulación del Transantiago.” In Gambi, Mauricio Olavarría, ed. ¿ Cómo se formulan las políticas públicas en Chile?: Tomo 3. El transantiago. Vol. 3. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria de Chile ¿Cómo se formulan las políticas públicas en Chile?: Tomo 3, El Transantiago, 121–50. 2010.Google Scholar
Fundación de Investigaciones Económicas Latinoamericanas (FIEL). La regulación de la competencia y de los servicios públicos: teoría y experiencia argentina reciente. Buenos Aires: Fundación de Investigaciones Económicas Latinoamericanas, 1999.Google Scholar
Gómez-Ibáñez, José A. Regulating Infrastructure: Monopoly, Contracts, and Discretion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Gómez-Lobo, Andrés. “The Ups and Downs of a Public Transport Reform: The Case of Transantiago.” Documentos de Trabajo 354. Santiago, Chile: Universidad de Chile, 2012.Google Scholar
Gomide, Alexandre de Ávila. “A política das reformas institucionais no Brasil: a reestuturação do setor de transportes.” Ph.D. Diss., Fundação Getulio Vargas, 2011.Google Scholar
Graham, Carol, and Naím, Moisés. “The Political Economy of Institutional Reform in Latin America.” In Beyond Tradeoffs, 321–61. Edited by Birdsall, Nancy, Graham, Carol, and Sabot, Richard. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, 1998.Google Scholar
Greaves, Edward. “Municipality and Community in Chile: Building Imagined Civic Communities and Its Impact on the Political.” Politics & Society 32, no. 2 (June 1, 2004): 203–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grindle, Merilee Serrill. Despite the Odds: The Contentious Politics of Education Reform. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Guasch, J. Luis. Granting and Renegotiating Infrastructure Concessions: Doing It Right. WBI Development Studies. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2004.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. Journeys Toward Progress: Studies of Economic Policy-Making in Latin America. New York: Norton, 1973.Google Scholar
Höhnke, Carolin. “Potentials and Pitfalls of Transport Innovations: Lessons from Santiago de Chile.” Trialog 110, no. 3 (2011–12): 13–16.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. Democracy and the Left: Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Iglesias, Vicente, Giraldez, Francisca, Tiznado-Aitken, Ignacio, and Carlos Muñoz, Juan. “How Uneven Is the Urban Mobility Playing Field? Inequalities among Socioeconomic Groups in Santiago de Chile.” Transportation Research Record 2673, no. 11 (November 1, 2019): 59–70.Google Scholar
Kogan, Jorge H. “Experiencias Ferroviarias: Una Revisión del Caso de Buenos Aires.” Presentation, The World Bank Seminar on Transport Regulation, Las Palmas, Spain, 1999.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Marcus J. Latin American State Building in Comparative Perspective: Social Foundations of Institutional Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Brian. Working with the Grain: Integrating Governance and Growth in Development. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
LIBRA Ingenieros Consultores. “Análisis de la seguridad en el transporte ferroviario.” Santiago, Chile: Ministerio de Transportes y Telecomunicaciones de Chile, July 2008.Google Scholar
Lora, Eduardo, ed. The State of State Reform in Latin America. In Latin American Development Forum Series. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6575-5Google Scholar
Manzetti, Luigi. “Political Manipulations and Market Reforms Failures.” World Politics 55, no. 3 (2003): 315–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzetti, Luigi. Privatization South American Style. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Manzetti, Luigi. “Public Opinion Backlashes and the Risk of Re-Nationalization in Latin America.” Law and Business Review of the Americas 15, no. 1 (2009): 63–80.Google Scholar
Martin, Helen, Briceno-Garmendia, Cecilia, and Sirtaine, Sophie. “Caribbean Infrastructure PPP Roadmap.” Board Report. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2014.Google Scholar
MT (Ministério dos Transportes). “Plano Nacional de Logística de Transportes.” Brasília: MT, 2007.Google Scholar
N’haux, Enrique M. Menem-Cavallo: el poder mediterráneo. Buenos Aires: Corregidor, 1993.Google Scholar
Olavarría-Gambi, Mauricio. “De la formulación a la implementación del Transantiago: análisis del proceso político de una política pública.” Revista Gestión Y Política Pública 22 (2013): 355–400.Google Scholar
Olavarría-Gambi, Mauricio. “Policy Failure Revisited: Conceptual Implications from the Chilean Case of Transantiago.” Administration & Society 52, no. 5 (2020): 690–717.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Brazil: Strengthening Governance for Growth. In OECD Reviews of Regulatory Reform. Paris: OECD, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264042940-en.Google Scholar
Page, Scott E. The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Pereira, Carlos. Brazil in Transition: Beliefs, Leadership, and Institutional Change. The Princeton Economic History of the Western World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Pérez, Verónica. “Cambios y continuidades en la organización social de los servicios de trenes del Área Metropolitana de Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1990–2010.” Revista Transporte y Territorio, no. 11 (2014): 114–34.Google Scholar
Pinheiro, Armando Castelar. “Two Decades of Privatization in Brazil.” In The Economies of Argentina and Brazil: A Comparative Perspective. Edited by Baer, Werner and Fleischer, David. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011, pp. 252–78.Google Scholar
Private Participation in Infrastructure. “Road Transport Project,” Washington, DC: World Bank, 2014.Google Scholar
Quijada, Rodrigo, Tirachini, Alejandro, Henríquez, Rodrigo, and Hurtubia, Ricardo. “Investigación al Transantiago: Sistematización de declaraciones hechas ante la Comisión Investigadora, resumen de contenidos de los principales informes técnicos, información de documentos públicos adicionales y comentarios críticos.” CIPER Chile (2007). http://ciperchile.cl/wp-content/uploads/Reporte_Transantiago.pdf, accessed February 2021.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Bo. “Anti-Corruption: The Indirect ‘Big Bang’ Approach.” Review of International Political Economy 18, no. 2 (May 1, 2011): 228–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Bo. The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust, and Inequality in International Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Sagaris, Lake. “Citizens’ Anti-Highway Revolt in Post-Pinochet Chile: Catalyzing Innovation in Transport Planning.” Planning Practice & Research 29, no. 3 (May 27, 2014): 268–86.Google Scholar
Saylor, Ryan. State Building in Boom Times: Commodities and Coalitions in Latin America and Africa. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schenoni, Luis L. “Bringing War Back in: Victory and State Formation in Latin America.” American Journal of Political Science 65, no. 2 (2021): 405–21.Google Scholar
Sharp, Richard. Results of Railway Privatization in Latin America. Transport Papers, no. TP-6. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2005.Google Scholar
Silva, Enrique R. “Deliberate Improvisation: Planning Highway Franchises in Santiago, Chile.” Planning Theory 10, no. 1 (2011): 35–52.Google Scholar
Silva, Patricio. In the Name of Reason: Technocrats and Politics in Chile State College, PA: Penn State Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. “Invariants of Human Behavior.” Annual Review of Psychology 41, no. 1 (January 1, 1990): 1–20.Google Scholar
Soifer, Hillel David. State Building in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soto, Raimundo. “Rail Transport in Chile.” In Priorities and Pathways in Services Reform, Part II – Political Economy Studies, 129–49. Edited by Findlay, Christopher. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co., 2013.Google Scholar
Teichman, Judith. “Mexico and Argentina: Economic Reform and Technocratic Decision Making.” Studies in Comparative International Development 32 (February 28, 1997): 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teichman, Judith. “The World Bank and Policy Reform in Mexico and Argentina.” Latin American Politics & Society 46, no. 1 (2004): 39–74.Google Scholar
Tendler, Judith. Good Government in the Tropics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Violich, Francis and Daughters, Robert. Urban Planning for Latin America: The Challenge of Metropolitan Growth. United Kingdom: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain, 1987.Google Scholar
Willis, Eliza J. “Explaining Bureaucratic Independence in Brazil: The Experience of the National Economic Development Bank.” Journal of Latin American Studies 27, no. 3 (October 1995): 625–61.Google Scholar
World Bank. “Federal Railways Restructuring and Privatization Project.” Washington, DC: World Bank, 1996.Google Scholar
World Bank. “Federal Railways Restructuring and Privatization Project.” Washington, DC: World Bank, 2003.Google Scholar
World Bank. “Implementation Completion and Results Report: Road Transport Project.” Washington, DC: World Bank, 2013.Google Scholar
World Bank. “Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Sector Project.” Washington, DC: World Bank, 1993.Google Scholar
Zrari, Sabah. “Les Concessions routières au Chili: rupture ou continuité institutionnelles?” Master’s thesis, Political Sciences Institute of Paris, 2005.Google Scholar