Book contents
- State and Nation Making in Latin America and Spain
- State and Nation Making in Latin America and Spain
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Economic and Territorial Power
- Part III Infrastructural Power: Reform Strategies
- 6 Two Roads of Neoliberal Reform in Higher Education
- 7 Reinvented Governments in Latin America
- 8 The Devil Hides in the Details
- 9 Neoliberal Reform of Transport Institutions in Brazil, Argentina, and Chile
- 10 The End Game of Social Policy in a Context of Enduring Inequalities
- Part IV Symbolic Power: Identities and Social Protest
- Part V Conclusions
- Index
- References
8 - The Devil Hides in the Details
Variations of Conditional Cash Transfers Programs in Latin America*
from Part III - Infrastructural Power: Reform Strategies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 August 2023
Book contents
- State and Nation Making in Latin America and Spain
- State and Nation Making in Latin America and Spain
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Economic and Territorial Power
- Part III Infrastructural Power: Reform Strategies
- 6 Two Roads of Neoliberal Reform in Higher Education
- 7 Reinvented Governments in Latin America
- 8 The Devil Hides in the Details
- 9 Neoliberal Reform of Transport Institutions in Brazil, Argentina, and Chile
- 10 The End Game of Social Policy in a Context of Enduring Inequalities
- Part IV Symbolic Power: Identities and Social Protest
- Part V Conclusions
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter takes the case of Conditional Cash Transfer programs (CCTs) as an invitation to examine a trade-off faced by many Latin American neoliberal states: Their promise of making states both more efficient and more inclusive. More specifically, I use the case of CCTs to explore variations in how the Brazilian and Mexican states understood and acted on the promise of increasing inclusivity in official safety nets by making poverty management more efficient. I argue that while Brazil and Mexico equally chose CCTs as their main strategy to reinvent social policy provision for low-income families in a neoliberal era, they did so for different reasons, which resulted in the implementation of programs that followed distinct operational logic. In Mexico, the state invested in a very precise regime to select and monitor low-income families, while Brazil adopted a looser strategy. These differences depended on the strategies of legitimation of each CCT and were influenced by the distinct approaches to neoliberalism adopted by each country. My findings are based on analyzing a rich set of qualitative data, including the study of official documents and 100 in-depth interviews with political and bureaucratic elites in the two countries.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- State and Nation Making in Latin America and SpainThe Neoliberal State and Beyond, pp. 269 - 288Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Adato, Michelle and Hoddinott, John. Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Alessio, Maria Fernanda, and Ambrozio, Lucas. “A composição da Alta Burocracia no Brasil e no Chile à Luz das Dimensões da Legitimidade e do Desempenho.” Revista do Serviço Público 67 no. 3(2016): 319–50.Google Scholar
Babb, Sarah. Managing Mexico: Economists from Nationalism to Neoliberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bischir, Renata. “Mecanismos federais de coordenação de políticas sociais e capacidades institucionais locais: o caso do programa Bolsa Família.” PhD Dissertation presented at the Political Science Department, IUPERJ, 2011.Google Scholar
Borges, Fabián A. “Neoliberalism with a Human Face? Ideology and the Diffusion of Latin America’s Conditional Cash Transfers.” Comparative Politics 50, no. 2 (2018): 147–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boschi, Renato. “Estado Desenvolvimentista no Brasil: continuidades e incertidumbres.” Ponto de Vista no. 2 (2010): 1–34. http://neic.iesp.uerj.br/pontodevista/pdf/Ponto_de_vista_01fev2010.pdfGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel. Reputation and Power – Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Centeno, Miguel. Democracy within Reason: Technocratic Revolution in Mexico. University Park, PA: Penn State Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Cohn, Amélia. Cartas Ao Presidente Lula – Bolsa Família E Direitos Sociais. Literatura Brasileira Edition. Beco do Azougue, 2011.Google Scholar
Coraggio, José Luis. “Crítica de la política social neoliberal: las nuevas tendencias.” 2007. http://coraggioeconomia.org/jlc/archivos%20para%20descargar/ponencia%20FLACSO%202007.doc.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne, Craig, Ann L., and Fox, Jonathan. Transforming State-Society Relations in Mexico: The National Solidarity Strategy. San Diego: University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Cortés, Fernando, and Rubavalca, Rosa. “El Progresa como respuesta a la Crisis de 1994.” In Rocha, de La and Escobar, , eds. Pobreza, transferencias condicionadas y sociedad. Mexico: CIESAS, 2012. https://ipcig.org/sites/default/files/pub/en/IPCOnePager169Google Scholar
Dávila Lárraga, Laura. “How Does Prospera Work?” Technical Note. IDB Publications, 2016.Google Scholar
De La, O, Lorena, Ana. Crafting Policies to End Poverty in Latin America: The Quiet Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Souza Leão, Luciana. “A Double-Edged Sword: The Institutional Foundations of the Brazilian Developmental State, 1930–1985.” In Agustin, E. Ferraro and Centeno, Miguel A., eds. State and Nation Making in Latin America and Spain: The Rise and Fall of the Developmental State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, pp. 157–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G.. The internationalization of palace wars: lawyers, economists, and the contest to transform Latin American states. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Diaz-Carneiro, Alberto. “Fiscal Federalism and Redistribution in Mexico.” In Greet, Scott, Trench, Alan and Elliot, Heather, eds. Federalism in Good Times and Bad. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2016. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2886703Google Scholar
Diniz, Eli. Globalização, Estado e Desenvolvimento – Dilemas do Brasil no novo milênio. Rio de Janeiro: FGV Editora, 2007.Google Scholar
Ferguson, James. The Anti-Politics Machine: Development, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Ferguson, James. Give a Man a Fish: Reflections on the New Politics of Redistribution. Durham, Duke University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Fernández de Castro, Rafael, Neto, Octavio Amorim, and Mena, Antonio Ortiz. Brasil y México: Encuentros Desencuentros. México, D.F.: Instituto Matías Romero, 2005.Google Scholar
Ferraro, Agustin, and Centeno, Miguel. The Rise and Fall of the Developmental State in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Fiszbein, Ariel, and Schady, Nobert. “Conditional Cash Transfers.” Policy Research Report. World Bank, 2009.Google Scholar
Fourcade‐Gourinchas, Marion, and Babb, Sarah. “The Rebirth of the Liberal Creed: Paths to Neoliberalism in Four Countries.” American Journal of Sociology 108, no. 3 (2002): 533–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaarder, Marie, Glassman, Amanda, and Todd, Jessica. “Conditional cash transfers and health: unpacking the causal chain.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 2, no. 1 (2010): 6–50.Google Scholar
Garay, Candelaria. Social Expansion in Latin America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Graizbord, Diana. “Democratic Accountability and its Discontents: Social Policy Evaluation and Expertise in Contemporary Mexico.” PhD Dissertation, Department of Sociology, Brown University, 2017.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephen, and Kaufman, Robert R.. Development, Democracy, and Welfare States: Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Hall, Anthony. “From Fome Zero to Bolsa Família: Social Policies and Poverty Alleviation under Lula.” Journal of Latin American Studies 38, no. 4 (2006): 689–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handa, Sudhanshu, and Davis, Benjamin. “The Experience of Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America.” Development Policy Review 24, no. 5 (2006): 513–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellmann, Aline. “How Does Bolsa Família Work?” Technical Note. IDB Publications, 2015.Google Scholar
Hernández, Daniel. Historia de Oportunidades. Inicio y cambios del programa, México, DF: FCE, 2008.Google Scholar
Hilgers, Tina. Clientelism in Everyday Latin American Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne. “Options for Social Policy in Latin America: Neoliberal versus Social Democratic Models” In Esping-Andersen, Gosta, ed. Welfare States in Transition. London: Sage Publications, 1996, pp. 142–90.Google Scholar
Hulme, David, Hanlon, Joseph, and Barrientos, Armando. Just Give Money to the Poor: The Development Revolution from the Global South. Sterling: Kumarian Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy, and Sugiyama, Nathalia. “Transforming Subjects into Citizens: Insights from Brazil’s Bolsa Família.” Perspectives on Politics 12, no. 4 (2014): 829–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaccoud, Luciana, Bischir, Renata and Mesquita, Ana Cleusa. O SUAS na proteção social brasileira: Transformações recentes e perspectivas, Novos estudos CEBRAP, 36 no. 2 (2017), 37–53.Google Scholar
Krippner, Greta. “The Making of US Monetary Policy: Central Bank Transparency and the Neoliberal Dilemma.” Theory and Society 36 (2007): 477–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladhani, Sheliza and Sitter, Kathleen C.. “Conditional Cash Transfers: A Critical Review.” Development Policy Review 38 (2020): 28–41.Google Scholar
Levy, Santiago. Progress against Poverty. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Levy, Santiago. “Poverty Alleviation in Mexico.” World Bank’s Policy Research Working Paper 679, 1991.Google Scholar
Lindert, Kathy, and Vincensini, V.. “Social Policy, Perceptions and the Press: An Analysis of the Mediá s Treatment of Conditional Cash Transfers in Brazil.” World Bank Social Protection Discussion Paper no. 1008. Washington, D.C.: Word Bank, 2010.Google Scholar
Lindert, Kathy, Linder, Anja, Hobbs, Jason, and De la Brière, Bénédicte. “The Nuts and Bolts of Brazil’s Bolsa Família Program: Implementing Conditional Cash Transfers in a Decentralized Context.” World Bank Publications, no. 0709 (May 2007): 1–144.Google Scholar
Loureiro, Pedro Mendes. “Social Structure and Distributive Policies under the PT Governments: A Poverty-Reducing Variety of Neoliberalism.” Latin American Perspectives 47, no. 2 (2020): 65–83.Google Scholar
Lustig, Nora. “Scholars Who Became Practitioners: The Influence of Research on the Design, Evaluation, and Political Survival of Mexico’s Antipoverty Program Progresa,” Center for Global Development Paper No 263, 2011.Google Scholar
Magaldi, Mariana, and Maldonado, Claudia. La integración de políticas públicas para el desarrollo: Brasil y México en perspectiva comparada. Mexico City: CIDE, 2014.Google Scholar
Maldonado, Claudia. “The Political Economy of Conditional Cash Transfers in Mexico and Brazil (1997–2006).” PhD dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame, IN, 2012.Google Scholar
Medellin, Nadin, Ibarraran, Pablo, Stampini, Marco, and Miguel Vila, Juan. “Moving Ahead – Recertification and Exit Strategies in Conditional Cash Transfer Programs.” IDB Monograph 348, (2015): 1–47.Google Scholar
Montecinos, Verónica, and Markoff, John. Economists in the Americas. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010.Google Scholar
Mudge, Stephanie. “What is Neo-Liberalism?” Socio-Economic Review 6, no. 4 (2008): 703–31.Google Scholar
ODI. “Cash Transfers: What Does the Evidence Say? A rigorous review of programme impact and of the role of design and implementation features,” July, 2016, www.odi.org/publications/10505-cash-transfers-what-does-evidence-say-rigorous-review-impacts-and-role-design-and-implementation.Google Scholar
Paiva, Luis Henrique, Falcão, Tiago and Bartholo, Leticia. “Do Bolsa Família ao Brasil Sem Miséria: Um resumo do percurso brasileiro recente na busca da superação da pobreza.” In Campello, Tereza and Neri, Marcelo (orgs), eds. Programa Bolsa Família: Uma década de inclusão e cidadania. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA, 2013, pp. 25–46.Google Scholar
Rawlings, Laura. “A New Approach to Social Assistance: Latin America’s Experience with Conditional Cash Transfer Programs.” International Social Security Review 58 (2005): 133–61.Google Scholar
Reis, Elisa. “O Estado Nacional como desafio teórico e empírico para a sociologia política contemporânea” In Schwartzman, Felipe, Schwartzman, Isabel, Schwartzman, Luisa and Schwartzman, Michel, eds. O sociólogo e as políticas públicas. Rio de Janeiro: FGV Editora, 2009, pp. 27–52.Google Scholar
Robinson, Joan. “Bringing the Pregnancy Test Home from the Hospital.” Social Studies of Science 46, no. 5 (2016): 649–74.Google Scholar
Rocha, Mercedes, and Escobar, Agustin. Pobreza, transferencias condicionadas y sociedad. Mexico: CIESAS, 2012.Google Scholar
Saad-Filho, Alfredo. “Social Policy for Neoliberalism: The Bolsa Família Programme in Brazil.” Development and Change 46, no. 6 (2015): 1227–52.Google Scholar
Saavedra, Juan, and Garcia, Sandra. “Impacts of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs on Educational Outcomes in Developing Countries: a meta-analysis,” RAND Working Paper, 2012.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe. Interest Conflict and Political Change in Brazil. California: Stanford University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ben. Business and the State in Developing Countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Soares, Fabio. “Brazil’s Bolsa Família: A Review.” Economic and Political Weekly 46, no. 21 (2011): 55–60.Google Scholar
Soares, Fabio, Ribas, Rafael, and Osório, Rafael. “Evaluating the Impact of Brazil’s Bolsa Família: Cash Transfer Programs in Comparative Perspective.” Latin American Research Review 45, no. 2 (2010): 173–90.Google Scholar
Souza, Celina. “Modernisation of the State and Bureaucratic Capacity-Building in the Brazilian Federal Government.” In Vaitsman, Jeni, Ribeiro, Jose M., and Lobato, Lenaura, eds. Policy analysis in Brazil, University Press Scholarship Online, 2013, pp. 39–52.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan, Dunning, Thad, Nazareno, Marcelo, and Brusco, Valeria. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Natasha Borges. “The Diffusion of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs in the Americas.” Global Social Policy 11, no. 2–3 (2011): 250–78.Google Scholar
Tomazini, Carla. “Beyond Consensus: Ideas and Advocacy Coalitions around Cash Transfer Programs in Brazil and Mexico,” Critical Policy Studies 17, no. 1 (2017): 1–20.Google Scholar
Valencia Lomelí, Enrique. “Conditional Cash Transfers as Social Policy in Latin America: An Assessment of their Contributions and Limitations.” Annual Review of Sociology 34, no. 1 (2008): 475–99.Google Scholar
Yaschine, Iliana, and Orozco, Monica. “The Evolving Antipoverty Agenda in Mexico: The Political Economy of PROGRESA and Oportunidades.” In Adato, Michelle and Hoddinott, John, Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America, pgs 55–77. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Yaschine, Iliana. “The Changing Anti-Poverty Agenda in Mexico.” IDS Bulletin 30, no. 2 (1999): 47–60.Google Scholar