Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T01:02:38.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Virtual Teams

Conceptualization, Integrative Review, and Research Recommendations

from Part IV - Technology in Leadership and Teams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2019

By
Stanton Mak  and
Steve W. J. Kozlowski
Edited by
Richard N. Landers
Richard N. Landers
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior , pp. 441 - 479
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altschuller, S. & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2013). The pursuit of trust in ad-hoc virtual teams: How much electronic portrayal is too much? European Journal of Information Systems, 22(3),619–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andres, H. P. (2011). Shared mental model development during technology-mediated collaboration. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 7(3), 14–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andressen, P., Konradt, U., & Neck, C. P. (2012). The relation between self-leadership and transformational leadership: Competing models and the moderating role of virtuality. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 19(1), 68–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arling, P. A. and Subramani, M. (2011). The effect of virtuality on individual network centrality and performance in on-going, distributed teams. International Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management, 7(4), 325–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balthazard, P. A., Waldman, D. A., & Warren, J. E. (2009). Predictors of the emergence of transformational leadership in virtual decision teams. Leadership Quarterly, 20(5), 651–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelt, V., Dennis, A.R., Yuan, L., and Barlow, J.B. (2013). Individual priming in virtual team decision‐making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 22(5), 873‐896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazarova, N. N. & Walther, J. B. (2009). Attributions in virtual groups: Distances and behavioral variations in computer-mediated discussions. Small Group Research, 40(2), 138–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazarova, N. N., Walther, J. B., & McLeod, P. L. (2012). Minority influence in computer-mediated groups: A comparison of four theories of minority influence. Communication Research, 39(3), 295–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, B. S. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams. Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 14–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belogolovsky, E., Bamberger, P., Alterman, V., & Wagner, D. T. (2016). Looking for assistance in the dark: Pay secrecy, expertise attribution and efficacious help seeking among members of newly formed virtual work groups. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31, 459–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, B. H., Bauer, J. E., Banford, C. G., & Postlethwaite, B. E. (2013). Team players and collective performance: How agreeableness affects team performance over time. Small Group Research, 44(6), 680–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brahm, T. & Kunze, F. (2012). The role of trust climate in virtual teams. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(6), 595–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branson, L., Claussen, T., & Sung, C. H. (2008). Group style differences between virtual and FTF teams. American Journal of Business, 23(1), 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, J. R., Carlson, D. S., Hunter, E. M., Vaughn, R. L., & George, J. F. (2013). Virtual team effectiveness: Investigating the moderating role experience with computer-mediated communication on the impact of team cohesion and openness. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 25(2), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlier, S. D., Stewart, G. L., Greco, L. M., & Reeves, C. J. (2016). Emergent leadership in virtual teams: A multilevel investigation of individual communication and team dispersion antecedents. Leadership Quarterly, 27(5), 745–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshin, A., Bos, D. N., Kim, Y., Ning, N., & Olson, S. J. (2013). Emergence of differing electronic communication norms within partially distributed teams. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12(1), 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshin, A., Rafaeli, A., & Bos, D. N. (2011). Anger and happiness in virtual teams: Emotional influences of text and behavior on others’ affect in the absence of non-verbal cues. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(1), 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, Y. & Staples, D.S. (2013). Reducing faultlines in geographically-dispersed teams: Self-disclosure and task elaboration, Small Group Research: An International Journal of Theory, Investigation, and Application, 44(5), 498–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chudoba, K. M., Wynn, E., Lu, M., & Watson-Manheim, M. B. (2005). How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization. Information Systems Journal, 15(4), 279–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogliser, C. C., Gardner, W., Trank, C. Q., Gavin, M., Halbesleben, J., & Seers, A. (2013). Not all group exchange structures are created equal: Effects of forms and levels of exchange on work outcomes in virtual teams. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(2), 242–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colazo, J. A. & Fang, Y. (2010). Following the sun: temporal dispersion and performance in open source software project teams. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(11), 684–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connelly, C. & Turel, O. (2016). Effects of team emotional authenticity on virtual team performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(7), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crisp, C. B. & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (2013). Swift trust in global virtual teams: Trusting beliefs and normative actions. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12(1), 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, J. N. & Haas, M. R. (2012). So many teams, so little time: Time allocation matters in geographically dispersed teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(3), 316–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, R., Schalk, R., & Curseu, P. L. (2008). Virtual communicating, conflicts and performance in teams. Team Performance Management. An International Journal, 14, 364–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellwart, T., Happ, C., Gurtner, A., & Rack, O. (2015). Managing information overload in virtual teams: Effects of a structured online team adaptation on cognition and performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(5), 812–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erez, M., Lisak, A., Harush, R., Glikson, E., Nouri, R., & Shokef, E. (2013). Going global: Developing management students’ cultural intelligence and global identity in culturally diverse virtual teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(3), 330–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espevik, R., Johnsen, B. H., & Eid, J. (2011). Outcomes of shared mental models of team members in cross training and high-intensity simulations. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 5(4), 352–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubanks, D., Palanski, M., Olabisi, J., Joinson, A., & Dove, J. (2016). Team dynamics in virtual, partially distributed teams: Optimal role fulfillment. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 556–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, K.T., Chen, Y.H., Wang, C.W., & Chen, M. (2014). E-leadership effectiveness in virtual teams: Motivating language perspective, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(3), 421–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, C., Marett, K., & Twitchell, D. (2012). An examination of deception in virtual teams: Effects of deception on task performance, mutuality, and trust. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 55(1), 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, R. M., Vician, C. M., & Brown, S. A. (2016). Longitudinal Effects of Computer-Mediated Communication Anxiety on Interaction in Virtual Teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 59(3), 166–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gajendran, R. & Joshi, A. (2012). Innovation in Globally Distributed Teams: The Role of LMX, Communication Frequency, and Member Influence on Team Decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1252–1261CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ganesh, M. P. & Gupta, M. (2010). Impact of virtualness and task interdependence on extra-role performance in software development teams. Team Performance Management, 16(3/4), 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, C. B. & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 451–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Young, N. C. J., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giordano, G. & George, J. (2013). The effects of task complexity and group member experience on computer-mediated groups facing deception. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 56(3), 210–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Navarro, P., Orengo, V., Zornoza, A., Ripoll, P., & Peiró, J. M. (2010). Group interaction styles in a virtual context: The effects on group outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1472–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grand, J. A., Braun, M. T., Kuljanin, G., Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Chao, G. T. (2016). The dynamics of team cognition: A process-oriented theory of knowledge emergence in teams [Monograph]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 1353–1385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haines, R. (2014). Group development in virtual teams: An experimental reexamination, Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, H. J., Hiltz, S. R., Fjermestad, J. & Wang, Y. (2011). Does medium matter? A comparison of initial meeting modes for virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 54(4),376–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertel, G. S., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, N. S. & Bartol, K. M. (2016). Empowering leadership and effective collaboration in geographically dispersed teams. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 159–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoch, J. E. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2014). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 390–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, R., Kahai, S., & Jestice, R. (2010). The contingent effects of leadership on team collaboration in virtual teams. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1098–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joshi, A., Lazarova, M. B., & Liao, H. (2009). Getting everyone on board: The role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 20(1), 240–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahai, S., Huang, R., & Jestice, R. (2012). Interaction effect of leadership and communication media on feedback positivity in virtual teams. Group & Organization Management, 37(6), 716–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, D.S. & Murthy, U.S. (2009). Beyond brainstorming: The effectiveness of group support systems for convergence and negotiation tasks, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 10(4), 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkman, B. L. & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31(5), 700–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkman, B. L., Gibson, C. B., & Kim, K. (2012). Across borders and technologies: Advancements in virtual teams research. In Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of organizational psychology (vol. 2, pp. 789–858). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konradt, U., Schippers, M., Garbers, Y., & Steenfatt, C. (2015). Effects of guided reflexivity and team feedback on team performance improvement: The role of team regulatory processes and cognitive emergent states. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(5), 777–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J. & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In Borman, W. C., Ilgen, D. R., & Klimoski, R. J. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (vol. 12, pp. 333–375). London: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Chao, G. T. (2018). Unpacking team process dynamics and emergent phenomena: Challenges, conceptual advances, and innovative methods. American Psychologist, 73(4), 576–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kozlowski, S.W.J, Chao, G.T, Grand, J.A, Braun, M.T, & Kuljanin, G. (2013). Advancing multilevel research design: Capturing the dynamics of emergence. Organizational Research Methods, 16(4), 581–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J. & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams [Monograph]. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kozlowski, S. W. J. & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Klein, K. J. & Kozlowski, S. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kuo, E. W. & Thompson, L. F. (2014). The influence of disposition and social ties on trust in new virtual teammates. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuo, F. & Yu, C. (2009). An exploratory study of trust dynamics in work-oriented virtual teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 823–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lea, M. & Spears, R. (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2, 321–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, C. (2017). Leadership in virtual teams: A multilevel perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 648–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C.P., He, H., Baruch, Y., & Ashforth, B. E. (2017). The effect of team affective tone on team performance: The roles of team identification and team cooperation. Human Resource Management.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lira, E., Ripoll, P., Peiró, J.M. & Zornoza, A. (2008). The role of information and communication technologies on the relationship between group effectiveness and group potency. A longitudinal study. Small Group Research, 39(6), 728–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lira, E. M., Ripoll, P., Peiró, J. M., & Orengo, V. (2008). How do different types of intragroup conflict affect group potency in virtual compared with face-to-face teams? A longitudinal study. Behaviour & Information Technology, 27(2), 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, X., Magjuka, R., & Lee, S. (2008). An examination of the relationship among structure, trust, and conflict management styles in virtual teams. Performance Improvement Quarter, 21(1),77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonnell, R. M., O’Neill, T., Kline, T., & Hambley, L. (2009). Bringing group-level personality to the electronic realm: A comparison of face-to-face and virtual contexts. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 12(1), 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magni, M., Maruping, L. M., Hoegl, M., & Proserpio, L. (2013). Managing the unexpected across space: Improvisation, dispersion and performance in NPD teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(5), 1009–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, A. & Majchrzak, A. (2014). Enhancing performance of geographically distributed teams through targeted use of information and communication technologies. Human Relations, 67(4), 389–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marett, K. & George, J.F. (2013). Barriers to deceiving other group members in virtual settings. Group Decision and Negotiation, 22(1), 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Moreno, E., Zornoza, A., González-Navarro, P., & Thompson, L. F. (2012). Investigating face-to-face and virtual teamwork over time: When does early task conflict trigger relationship conflict? Group Dynamics: Theory Research and Practice, 16(3), 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Moreno, E., Zornoza, A., Orengo, V., & Thompson, L. F. (2015). The effects of team self-guided training on conflict management in virtual teams. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2(5)4, 905–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 805–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, M. T., Mathieu, J. E., Rapp, T. L., & Gilson, L. L. (2012). Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(3): 342–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, J. E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & WinstonGoogle Scholar
McLeod, P. L. (2011). Effects of anonymity and social comparison of rewards on computer-mediated group brainstorming. Small Group Research, 42(4), 475–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, P. L. (2013). Distributed people and distributed information: Vigilant decision-making in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 44(6), 627–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medina, M.N. & Srivastava, S. (2016). The role of extraversion and communication methods on an individual’s satisfaction with the team. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 16(1).Google Scholar
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., DeChurch, L. A., Jimenez-Rodriguez, M., Wildman, J., & Shuffler, M. (2011). A meta-analytic investigation of virtuality and information sharing in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 214–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minton-Eversole, T. (2012). Virtual teams used most by global organizations, survey says. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management.Google Scholar
Monzani, L., Ripoll, P., Peiro, J.M., & Van Dick, R. (2014). Loafing in the digital age: The role of computer mediated communication in the relation between perceived loafing and group affective outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montoya, M.M., Massey, A.P., & Lockwood, N.S. (2011). 3D collaborative virtual environments: Exploring the link between collaborative behaviors and team performance. Decision Sciences, 42(2), 451–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muethel, M., Gehrlein, S., & Hoegl, M. (2012). Socio‐demographic factors and shared leadership behaviors in dispersed teams: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management, 51(4), 525–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, K., Watt, J. H., & Walther, J. B. (2009). Computer mediated teamwork and the efficiency framework: Exploring the influence of synchrony and cues on media satisfaction and outcome success. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5), 1108–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Leary, M. B. & Cummings, J. N. (2007). The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion. MIS Quarterly, 31(3), 433–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Leary, M. B. & Mortensen, M. (2010). Go con(figure): Subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 21(1), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, T. A., Hancock, S. E., Zivkov, K., Larson, N. L., and Law, S. J. (2016). Team decision making in virtual and face-to-face environments. Group Decision and Negotiation, 25(5), 995–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, A., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Rico, R. (2010) Team learning and effectiveness in virtual project teams: The role of beliefs about interpersonal context. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 266–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paul, R., Drake, J. R., & Liang, H. (2016). Global virtual team performance: The effect of coordination effectiveness, trust, and team cohesion. IEEE Transaction on Professional Communication, 59(3), 186–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pazos, P. & Beruvides, M. G. (2011). Performance patterns in face-to-face and computer-supported teams. Team Performance Management, 17(1/2), 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pazos, P. (2012). Conflict management and effectiveness in virtual teams. Team Performance Management, 18(7/8), 401–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peñarroja, V., Orengo, V., Zornoza, A., & Hernandez, A. (2013). The effects of virtuality level on task-related collaborative behaviors: The mediating role of team trust. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 967–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peñarroja, V., Orengo, V., Zornoza, A., Sánchez, J., & Ripoll, P. (2015). How team feedback and team trust influence information processing and learning in virtual teams: A moderated mediation model. Computers In Human Behavior, 48, 489–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentland, A. S. (2010). To signal is human. Real-time data mining unmasks the power of imitation, kith and charisma in our face-to-face social networks. American Scientist, 98(3), 204–211.Google Scholar
Perry, J. S., Lorinkova, N. M., Hunter, E. M., Hubbard, A., & McMahon, J. T. (2013). When does virtuality really “work”? Examining the role of work-family and virtuality in social loafing. Journal of Management, 2, 345–357.Google Scholar
Pinjani, P. & Palvia, P. (2013). Trust and knowledge sharing in diverse global virtual teams. Information & Management, 50, 144–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purvanova, K.R. & Bono, E.J. (2009). Transformational leadership in context: Face-to-face and virtual teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 343–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purvanova, R. (2013). The role of feeling known for team member outcomes in project teams. Small Group Research, 44(3), 298–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rack, O., Ellwart, T., Hertel, G. & Konradt, U. (2011) Team based rewards in computer-mediated groups. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26, 419–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rentsch, J. R., Delise, L. A., Mello, A. L., & Staniewicz, M. J. (2014). The integrative team knowledge building training strategy in distributed problem-solving teams. Small Group Research, 45(5), 568–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rico, R., Bachrach, D. G., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Collins, & B. J. (2011). The interactive effects of person-focused citizenship behaviour, task interdependence, and virtuality on team performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(5), 700–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, L. P. (2016). Healthy divide or detrimental division? Subgroups in virtual teams. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 56(3), 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, L. P., Denis, A. R., & Hung, Y. T. C. (2009). Individual swift trust and knowledge-based trust in face-to-face and virtual team members. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(2), 241–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romeike, P., Nienaber, A.-M, & Schewe, G. (2016). How differences in perceptions of own and team performance impact trust and job satisfaction in virtual teams. Human Performance, 29(4), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggieri, S. (2009). Leadership in virtual teams: A comparison of transformational and transactional leaders. Social Behavior and Personality, 37, 1017–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarker, S., Ahuja, M., Sarker, S., & Kirkeby, S. (2011). The role of communication and trust in global virtual teams: A social network perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(1), 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarker, S., Sarker, S., & Schneider, C. (2009). Seeing remote team members as leaders: A study of US–Scandinavian teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 52(0), 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarker, S., Kirkeby, S., Sarker, S., & Chakraborty, S. (2011) Road to “stardom” in globally distributed teams: An examination of a knowledge-centered perspective using social network analysis, Decision Sciences Journal, 42(2), 339–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, S., Mennecke, B., Nah, F., & Luse, A. (2014). Institutional boundaries and trust of virtual teams in collaborative design in a virtual environment, Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 565–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, M. & Engelmann, T. (2010). Knowledge and information awareness for initiating transactive memory system processes of computer-supported collaborating ad hoc groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1701–1709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweitzer, L. & Duxbury, L. (2010). Conceptualizing and measuring the virtuality of teams. Information Systems Journal, 20(3), 267–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohrabi, B., Gholipour, A., & Amiri, B. (2011). The influence of information technology on organizational behavior: Study of identity challenges in virtual teams. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 7(2), 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, E., Bierly, P., & Harper, S.R. (2014). The interactive influences of conflict, task interdependence and cooperation on perceptions of virtualness in co-located teams. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 20(5/6), 221–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, N. J. & Posey, M. (2008). Understanding Coordination in Computer-Mediated versus Face-to-Face Groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 827–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straus, S. G. & McGrath, J. E. (1994). Does the medium matter: The interaction of task and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suh, A. & Shin, K. (2010). Exploring the effects of online social ties on knowledge sharing: A comparative analysis of collocated vs dispersed teams. Journal of Information Science, 36 (4), 443–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suh, A., Shin, K.-S., Ahuja, M., & Kim, M. S. (2011). The influence of virtuality on social networks within and across work groups: A multilevel approach. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(1), 351–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaab, R. I., Phillips, K. W., & Schaerer, M. (2016). Secret conversation opportunities facilitate minority influence in virtual groups: The influence on majority power, information processing, and decision quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 133, 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D. & Bostrom, R. (2008). Building trust and cooperation through technology adaptation in virtual teams: Empirical field evidence, Information Systems Management, 25(1), 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tran, T. B., Oh, C. H., & Choi, S. B. (2016). Effects of learning orientation and global mindset on virtual team members’ willingness to cooperate in: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Journal of Management & Organization, 22(3), 311-327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turel, O. & Connelly, C. (2012). Team spirit: The influence of psychological collectivism on the usage of e-collaboration tools. Group Decision and Negotiation, 21(5), 703–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turel, O. & Zhang, Y. (2010). Does virtual team composition matter? Trait and problem-solving configuration effects on team performance. Behaviour & Information Technology, 29(4), 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turel, O. & Zhang, Y. J. (2011). Should I e-collaborate with this group? A multilevel model of usage intentions. Information & Management, 48, 62–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzabbar, D. & Vestal, A., 2015. Bridging the social chasm in geographically distributed R&D teams: The moderating effects of relational strength and status asymmetry on the novelty of team innovation. Organization Science, 26(3), 811–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Kleij, R., de Jong, A., te Brake, G., & de Greef, T. (2009). Network-aware support for mobile distributed teams. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 940–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Kleij, R., Lijkwan, J. T. E., Rasker, P. C., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2009). Effects of time pressure and communication environment on team processes and outcomes in dyadic planning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(5), 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Kleij, R., Schraagen, J. M., Werkhoven, P., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2009). How conversations change over time in face-to-face and video-mediated communication. Small Group Research, 40(4), 355–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Ven, A. H., Delbecq, A. L., & Koenig, R. (1976). Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review, 41, 322–328.Google Scholar
Walther, J. B. & Bazarova, N. N. (2008). Validation and application of electronic propinquity theory to computer-mediated communication in groups. Communication Research, 35(5), 622–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C., Hsieh, C., Fan, K., Menefee, M. L. (2009). Impact of motivating language on team creative performance. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(1), 133–140.Google Scholar
Weber, M. & Kim, H. (2015). Virtuality, technology use, and engagement within organizations. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 43(4), 385–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, E. A. & Castro, S. L. (2010) The effects of teamwork on individual learning and perceptions of team performance: A comparison of face‐to‐face and online project settings. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 16(3/4), 124–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, X., Zhu, Y. & Wang, Z. (2009). Effect of the amount of task-relevant information on shared mental models in compute-mediated and face-to-face teams: Is more always better? Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 37(9), 1153–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, Y., Liang, H., Hauser, R., & O’Hara, M. (2012). An empirical study of knowledge sharing intention within virtual teams. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(3), 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, G. & Peña, J. (2014). The influence of social categories and interpersonal behaviors on future intentions and attitudes to form subgroups in virtual teams. Communication Research, 41(3), 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, S., Zeng, X., & Zhang, C. (2016). The effects of role variety and ability disparity on virtual group performance. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3468–3477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zornoza, A., Orengo, V., & Penarroja, V. (2009). Relational capital in virtual teams: The role played by trust. Social Science Information, 48(2), 257–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×