Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T16:39:34.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 28 - Technology and Social Problems

from Part III - Problems of Global Impact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2018

A. Javier Treviño
Affiliation:
Wheaton College, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Many social problems have important technological aspects. At the same time, it is usually impossible to identify a single, purely technological cause for the problem, nor is it in most cases possible to identify a single technological solution. In practice, such problems can best be understood by conceptualizing the social and the technical as mutually constitutive. It then follows that specific technologies can help reproduce and exacerbate social inequalities, and that unjust social relations can be conducive to the emergence of “bad” technologies. Social exclusion, offshoring, and humankind's proliferating ecological footprint are exemplary problems that have significant social as well as technological aspects. In addition, it is important to realize that technological change in general comes together with social change, and that these at a deeper level correlate with changing moralities, epistemologies, and ontologies. By consequence, technological societies are highly dynamic and reflexive, and the ensuing complexity might itself become socially problematic.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achterhuis, H. J. 1998. De erfenis van de utopie. Amsterdam: Ambo.Google Scholar
Agar, Nicholas. 2004. Liberal Eugenics – In Defence of Human Enhancement. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
BBC. 2009. HP camera “can't see” black faces. BBC. December 24. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8429634.stm.Google Scholar
Bijker, Wiebe E. 1995. Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bimber, Bruce. 1990. Karl Marx and the three faces of technological determinism. Social Studies of Science 20(2):333–51.Google Scholar
Borgmann, Albert. 1984. Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: a Philosophical Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel, Lascoumes, Pierre, and Barthe, Yannick. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, Katie, and Gordon, Gill. 1998. Reproductive health technologies and gender: Is participation the key? In Gender and Technology, edited by Sweetman, Caroline, 3444. Oxford: Oxfam GB.Google Scholar
Feenberg, Andrew. 1991. Critical Theory of Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feenberg, Andrew. 1995. Alternative Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Feenberg, Andrew. 2002. Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feenberg, Andrew. 2005. Critical theory of technology: An overview. Tailoring Biotechnologies 1(1):4764.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1973. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1990. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. Translated by Hurley, Robert. Toronto: Random House.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1995. Discipline & Punish. The Birth of the Prison. 2nd ed. Translated by Sheridan, Alan. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2003. Governmentality. In The Essential Foucault. Selections form Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, edited by Rabinow, Paul and Rose, Nikolas, 229–44. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, James J. 1977. The theory of affordances. In Perceiving, acting, and knowing: toward an ecological psychology, edited by Shaw, Robert E. and Bransford, John, 6782. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Haggerty, Kevin D., and Ericson, Richard V.. 2000. The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology 51(4):605–22.Google Scholar
Hargittai, Eszter, and Hinnant, Amanda. 2008. Digital inequality. Differences in young adults' use of the Internet. Communication Research 35(5):602–21.Google Scholar
Hilberg, Raul. 1998. German railroads/Jewish souls. Society 35(2):162–74.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Arjen Y., and Wiedmann, Thomas O.. 2014. Humanity's unsustainable environmental footprint. Science 344(6188):1114–17.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila, ed. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Edited by Urry, J.. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joerges, Bernward. 1999. Do politics have artefacts? Social Studies of Science 29(3):411–31.Google Scholar
Keulartz, Jozef, Schermer, Maartje, Korthals, Michiel, and Swierstra, Tsjalling E.. 2004. Ethics in technological culture: A programmatic proposal for a pragmatist approach. Science, Technology, & Human Values 29(1):329.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1993a. La clef de Berlin et autres leçons d'un amateur de sciences. Paris: Éditions la Découverte.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1993b. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Wheatsheaf, Harvester. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Wendy. 2015. How tech's lack of diversity leads to racist software. SF Gate. July 22. www.sfgate.com/business/article/How-tech-s-lack-of-diversity-leads-to-racist-6398224.php.Google Scholar
Lyon, David. 1994. The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 2013. Capital: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production. Wordsworth Classics of World Literature 1 and 2. Hertfordshire, UK: Wordsworth Editions.Google Scholar
Miah, Andy. 2003. Gene-doping: Sport, values and bioethics. In The Ethics of Human Genetics: Challenges of the (Post) Genomic Era, edited by Glasa, Jozef, 171–80. Strasburg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Mol, Annemarie. 2005. Het leven met technieken voorbij de mythe van de rationaliteit. Tijdschrift voor Humanistiek 6(23):7076.Google Scholar
Monahan, Torin. 2006. Questioning surveillance and security. In Surveillance and Security: Technological Politics and Power in Everyday Life, edited by Monahan, Torin, 123. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Monahan, Torin. 2011. Surveillance as cultural practice. The Sociological Quarterly 52:495508.Google Scholar
Nauta, Lolle. 1984. Historical roots of the concept of autonomy in Western philosophy. PRAXIS International 1984(4):363–77.Google Scholar
Nordmann, Alfred. 2007. If and then: A critique of speculative nanoethics. NanoEthics 1(1):3146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, Donald. A. 1988. The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Oudshoorn, Nelly. 1995. Technologie en zorg: Vrienden en vijanden. Het voorbeeld van nieuwe anticonceptiemiddelen voor vrouwen en mannen. Gezondheid 3(3):278–89.Google Scholar
Pfaffenberger, Bryan. 1992. Technological dramas. Science, Technology & Human Values 17(3):282312.Google Scholar
Rip, Arie, and Kemp, René. 1998. Technological change. In Human Choice and Climate Change: Resources and Technology, vol. 2, edited by Rayner, Steve and Malone, Liz, 327–99. Columbus, OH: Batelle Press.Google Scholar
Roco, Mihail C., and Bainbridge, William Sims, eds. 2004. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Sarewitz, Daniel. 2013. The idea of progress. In A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology, edited by Olsen Friis, Jan Kyre Berg, Pedersen, Stig Andur, and Hendricks, Vincent F., 303–7. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Solove, Daniel J. 2007. “I've got nothing to hide” and other misunderstandings of privacy. San Diego Law Review 44:747–72.Google Scholar
Swierstra, Tsjalling E., Est, Rinie Van, and Boenink, Marianne. 2009. Taking care of the symbolic order. How converging technologies challenge our concepts. NanoEthics 3(3):269–80.Google Scholar
Urry, John. 2014. Offshoring. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Valkenburg, Govert, and Van derPloeg, Irma. 2015. Materialities between security and privacy: A constructivist account of airport security scanners. Security Dialogue 46(4):326–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Ploeg, Irma. 2005. Keys to privacy: Translations of “the privacy problem” in information technologies. In The Machine-Readable Body: Essays on Biometrics and the Informatization of the Body, edited by Van der Ploeg, Irma, 1536. Maastricht, Netherlands: Shaker.Google Scholar
Van der Ploeg, Irma, and Pridmore, Jason, eds. 2016. Digitizing Identities: Doing Identity in a Networked World. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, J.A.G.M. 2005. The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Van Hilvoorde, Ivo, Vos, Rein, and De Wert, Guido. 2007. Flopping, klapping and gene doping: Dichotomies between “natural” and “artificial” in elite sport. Social Studies of Science 37(2):173200.Google Scholar
Van Lente, Harro. 2000. Forceful futures: From promise to requirement. In Contested Futures. A Sociology of Prospective Techno-science, edited by Brown, Nik, Rappert, Brian, and Webster, Andrew, 4364. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Winner, Langdon. 1988. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109(1):121–36.Google Scholar
Winner, Langdon. 1993. Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values 18(3):362–78.Google Scholar
Woolgar, Steve, and Cooper, Geoff. 1999. Do artefacts have ambivalence? Moses' bridges, winner's bridges and other urban legends in S&TS. Social Studies of Science 29(3):433–49.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2013. Warming climate to hit Bangladesh hard with sea level rise, more floods and cyclones, World Bank report says. www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2013/06/19/warming-climate-to-hit-bangladesh-hard-with-sea-level-rise-more-floods-and-cyclones-world-bank-report-says.Google Scholar
Wyatt, Sally. 2008. Technological determinism is dead; Long live technological determinism. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Hacket, Edward J., Amsterdamska, Olga, Lynch, Michael and Wajcman, Judy, 165–80. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×