Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T03:55:52.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thirteen - Conflictive Trade, Values, and Power Relations in Maritime Trading Polities of the Tenth to the Sixteenth Centuries in the Philippines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2018

Kristian Kristiansen
Affiliation:
Göteborgs Universitet, Sweden
Thomas Lindkvist
Affiliation:
Göteborgs Universitet, Sweden
Janken Myrdal
Affiliation:
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Trade and Civilisation
Economic Networks and Cultural Ties, from Prehistory to the Early Modern Era
, pp. 354 - 388
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. (1991). Trade and site distribution in early historic-period Kedah: Geoarchaeological, historic and locational evidence. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association, 10, pp. 307319.Google Scholar
Andaya, B. (1992). Political developments between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries. In Tarling, N., ed., The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 402459.Google Scholar
Bacus, E. (1996). Political economy and interaction among the late prehistoric polities in the central Philippines: Current research in the Dumaguete-Bacong area of southeastern Negros. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association, 14, pp. 226241.Google Scholar
Barretto-Tesoro, G. (2008). Identity and Reciprocity in 15th Century Philippines. BAR International Series 1813. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, J. (1977). Notes on piracy and slaving in Philippine history. Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society, 5, pp. 270272.Google Scholar
Beckett, J. (1982). The defiant and the compliant: The datus of Magindanao under colonial rule. In McCoy, A. W. and de Jesus, C., eds., Philippine Social History. Asian Studies Association of Australia Monograph No. 7. Quezon City, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila University Press, pp. 391414.Google Scholar
Bentley, G. C. (1986). Indigenous states of Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology, 15, pp. 275305.Google Scholar
Biernatzki, W. E. (1985). Bukidnon datuship in the Upper Pulangi River Valley. In Guzman, A. and Pacheco, E., eds., Bukidnon Politics and Religion. Institute for Philippine Culture Papers No. 11. Quezon City, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila Press, pp. 1549.Google Scholar
Claver, F. (1985). Dinawit Ogil: High datu of Namnam. In Guzman, A. and Pacheco, E., eds., Bukidnon Politics and Religion. Institute for Philippine Culture papers 11. Quezon City, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila Press, pp. 51114.Google Scholar
Cole, F. C. (1913). Wild Tribes of the Davao District. Field Museum of Natural History publication 170. Anthropological series 12(2). Chicago: Field Museum of Natural History Press.Google Scholar
Cole, F. C. (1956). The Bukidnon of Mindanao. Chicago: Chicago Natural History Museum Press.Google Scholar
Dennison, R. (2013). Chemical analysis of Chinese porcelain trade: A preliminary analysis of sourcing patterns on 10th to 16th century tradeware at three Philippine sites. In 78th Annual Meeting for the Society of American Archaeology, Honolulu, Hawaii, 3–7 April.Google Scholar
Dizon, E. (1998). The emergence of the elite. In Ma Custodio, T. and Dalisay, J. Y., eds., Kasaysayan: The Story of the Filipino People. Vol. 2. Hong Kong: Asia Publishing Company, pp. 157165.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1980). Negara: The Theater State in Nineteenth-Century Bali. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gilcrist, R. (2005). Scales and voices in world historical archaeology. World Archaeology, 37(3), pp. 329336.Google Scholar
Graham, S. (2006). Networks, agent-based models and the Antonine Itineraries: Implications for Roman archaeology. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology, 19(1), pp. 4564.Google Scholar
Green, D. (2010). Geoarchaeology of prehispanic agricultural landscapes in the Bais-Tanjay basin Negros, Oriental. PhD thesis. University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
Gullick, J. (1958). Indigenous Political Systems of Western Malaya. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Gunn, M. (1997). The development of social networks: Subsistence production and exchange between the sixth and sixteenth centuries A.D. in the Tanjay region, Negros Oriental, Philippines. PhD thesis. University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar
Hall, K. (1984). Small Asian nations in the shadow of the large: Early Asian history through the eyes of Southeast Asia. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 27(1), pp. 5688.Google Scholar
Hall, K. (1992). Economic history of early Southeast Asia. In Tarling, N., ed., The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia, Vol. 1: From Early Times to c. 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 183275.Google Scholar
Hall, K. (2004). Local and international trade and traders in the Straits of Melaka region: 600–1500. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 47(2), pp. 213260.Google Scholar
Hall, K. (2011). History of Early Southeast Asia: Maritime Trade and Societal Development, 100–1500. Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hall, T., Kardulias, P. N. and Chase-Dunn, C. (2011). World-systems analysis and archaeology: Continuing the dialogue. Journal of Archaeological Research, 19, pp. 233279.Google Scholar
Hayden, B. (2001). Fabulous feasts: A prolegomenon to the importance of feasting. In Dietler, M. and Hayden, B., eds., Feasts: Archaeological and Ethnographic Perspectives on Food, Politics and Power. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 2363.Google Scholar
Hutterer, K. L. (1973). An Archaeological Picture of Prehispanic Cebuano Community. Cebu City, Philippines: University of San Carlos Press.Google Scholar
Hutterer, K. L. (1977). Prehistoric trade and the evolution of Philippine societies: A reconsideration. In Hutterer, K., ed., Economic Exchange and Social Interaction in Southeast Asia: Perspectives from Prehistory. Michigan Papers on South and Southeast Asia No. 13. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, pp. 177196.Google Scholar
Hutterer, K. L. and MacDonald, W. K., eds. (1982). Houses Built on Scattered Poles: Prehistory and Ecology in Negros Oriental, Philippines. Cebu City, Philippines: University of San Carlos Publications.Google Scholar
Junker, L. L. (1990). The organization of intra-regional and long-distance trade in prehispanic complex societies. Asian Perspectives, 29(2), pp. 167209.Google Scholar
Junker, L. L. (1993). Craft good specialization and prestige good exchange in 15th–16th century Philippine chiefdoms. Asian Perspectives, 32(1), pp. 135.Google Scholar
Junker, L. L. (1994a). The development of centralized craft production systems in A.D. 500–1600 Philippine chiefdoms. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 25(1), pp. 130.Google Scholar
Junker, L. L. (1994b). Trade competition, conflict and political transformations in 15th–16th century Philippine chiefdoms. Asian Perspectives, 33(2), pp. 229260.Google Scholar
Junker, L. L. (1996). Hunter-gatherer landscapes and lowland trade in the prehispanic Philippines. World Archaeology, 27(2), pp. 389410.Google Scholar
Junker, L. L. (1998). Integrating history and archaeology in the study of contact period Philippine chiefdoms. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 2(4), pp. 291320.Google Scholar
Junker, L. L. (1999a). Raiding, Trading and Feasting: The Political Economy of Philippine Chiefdoms. Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Junker, L. L. (1999b). Warrior burials and the nature of warfare in prehispanic Philippine chiefdoms. Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society, 27(4), pp. 120161.Google Scholar
Junker, L. L. (2001a). The evolution of ritual feasting systems in prehispanic Philippine chiefdoms. In Dietler, M. and Hayden, B., eds., Feasts: Archaeological and Ethnographic Perspectives on Food, Politics and Power. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 267310.Google Scholar
Junker, L. L. (2001b). Long-term change and short-term shifting in the economy of Philippine forager traders. In Habu, J. and Fitzhugh, T. D., eds., Beyond Foraging and Collecting: Evolutionary Change in Hunter-Gatherer Settlement Systems. Madison, WI: Plenum Press, pp. 338385.Google Scholar
Junker, L. L. (2002). Economic specialization and inter-ethnic trade between foragers and farmers in the prehispanic Philippines. In Morrison, K. and Junker, L., eds., Forager-Traders in South and Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 203241.Google Scholar
Junker, L. L. (2003). Political economy in the historic period chiefdoms and states of Southeast Asia. In Feinman, G. and Nicholas, L., eds., Archaeological Perspectives on Political Economies. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, pp. 223252.Google Scholar
Junker, L. L. (2005). Population dynamics and urbanism in pre-modern island Southeast Asia. In Storey, G., ed., Urbanism in the Pre-Industrial World: Cross-Cultural Approaches. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, pp. 186215.Google Scholar
Junker, L. L. (2008). The impact of captured women on cultural transmission in contact period Philippine slave-raiding chiefdoms. In Cameron, C., ed., Invisible Citizens: Slavery in Ancient Pre-State Societies. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, pp. 110137.Google Scholar
Junker, L. L. and Niziolek, L. (2009). Food preparation and feasting in the household and political economy of prehispanic Philippine chiefdoms. In Klarich, E., ed., Archaeological Perspectives on Food Preparation in Household and Ritual Contexts. Gainesville: University of Florida Press, pp. 1753.Google Scholar
Junker, L. L., Mudar, K. and Schwaller, M. (1994). Social stratification, household wealth and competitive feasting in 15th–16th century Philippine chiefdoms. Research in Economic Anthropology, 15, pp. 101157.Google Scholar
Kiefer, T. (1972). The Tausug polity and the Sultanate of Sulu: A segmentary state in the southern Philippines. In Rixhon, G., ed., Sulu Studies, Volume 1. Jolo, Philippines: Notre Dame of Jolo College Press, pp. 1964.Google Scholar
Killick, D. (2009). Agency, dependency, and long-distance trade: East Africa and the Islamic world, ca. 700–1500 CE. In Falconer, S. E. and Redman, C. L., eds., Polities and Power: Archaeological Perspectives on the Landscapes of Early States. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, pp. 179207.Google Scholar
Kolb, M. and Snead, J. (1997). It’s a small world after all: Comparative analyses of community organization in archaeology. American Antiquity, 62(4), pp. 609628.Google Scholar
Lape, P. (2006). On the use of archaeology and history in Island Southeast Asia. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 45(4), pp. 468491.Google Scholar
Mallari, F. (1986). Muslim raids in Bicol, 1580–1792. Philippine Studies, 34, pp. 257286.Google Scholar
Manuel, E. A. (1971). Manuvu Social Organization. Quezon City, Philippines: University of the Philippines Press.Google Scholar
Miksic, J. (1984). A comparison between some long-distance trading institutions of the Malacca Straits area and of the western Pacific. In Bayard, D., ed., Southeast Asian Archaeology at the 15th Pacific Science Conference, Studies in Prehistoric Archaeology, Vol. 1B. Otago, NZ: University of Otago, pp. 235253.Google Scholar
Mudar, K. (1997). Patterns of animal utilization in the Holocene of the Philippines: A comparison of faunal samples from four archaeological sites. Asian Perspectives, 36(1), pp. 67105.Google Scholar
Niziolek, L. (2013). Earthenware production and distribution in the prehispanic Philippine polity of Tanjay: Results from laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). Journal of Archaeological Science, 40, pp. 2824–2839.Google Scholar
Reid, A. (1983). Introduction: Slavery and bondage in Southeast Asian history. In Reid, A., ed., Slavery, Bondage and Dependency in Southeast Asia. New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 156181.Google Scholar
Reid, A. (1988). Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce 1450–1680: Land Below the Winds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, A. (1993). Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce 1450–1680: Expansion and Crisis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rouse, L. (2011). Specialization and social inequality in Bronze Age SE Arabia: Analyzing the development of production strategies and economic networks using agent-based modeling. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(7), 15831590.Google Scholar
Schlegel, S. (1979). Tiruray Subsistence. Quezon City, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, W. H. (1983). Oripun and alipin in the sixteenth century Philippines. In Reid, A., ed., Slavery, Bondage and Dependency in Southeast Asia. New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 138155.Google Scholar
Scott, W. H. (1984). Prehispanic Source Material for the Study of Philippine History. Quezon City, Philippines: New Day Publications.Google Scholar
Scott, W. H. (1994). Barangay: Sixteenth Century Philippine Culture and Society. Quezon City, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila Press.Google Scholar
Sindbaek, S. M. (2007). The small world of the Vikings: Networks in Early Medieval communication and exchange. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 40(1), pp. 5974.Google Scholar
Smith, L. (2012). The ethnoarchaeology of Southeast Asian foragers: Resiliency in Ata indigenous knowledge and cultural expression in the pre-hispanic and later Philippines. In 14th International Conference of the European Association of Southeast Asian Archaeologists, Dublin, Ireland, 9–13, September.Google Scholar
Spoehr, A. (1973). Zamboanga and Sulu: An Archaeological Approach to Ethnic Diversity. University of Pittsburgh Ethnology Monograph No. 1. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Stark, M. (2006). Early mainland Southeast Asian landscapes in the first millennium A.D. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, pp. 407432.Google Scholar
Stein, G. J. (1999). Rethinking World-Systems, Diasporas, Colonies, and Interaction in Uruk Mesopotamia. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Stein, G. J. (2002). From passive periphery to active agents: Emerging perspectives in the archaeology of interregional interaction. American Anthropologist, 104(3), pp. 903916.Google Scholar
Tambiah, S. (1976). World Conqueror and World Renouncer: A Study in Religion and Polity in Thailand against an Historical Background. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2007). The Sulu Zone, 1768–1898: The Dynamics of External Trade, Slavery, and Ethnicity in the Transformation of a Southeast Asian Maritime State. Singapore: NUS Press.Google Scholar
Winzeler, R. (1981). The study of the Southeast Asian state. In Claessen, H. and Skalnik, P., eds., The Study of the State. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 455467.Google Scholar
Wolters, O. W. (1999). Early Southeast Asia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×