Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T13:40:05.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2020

José Luis Bermúdez
José Luis Bermúdez
Affiliation:
Texas A & M University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Frame It Again
New Tools for Rational Decision-Making
 , pp. 300 - 315
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackrill, J. L. 1981. Aristotle the Philosopher. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adolphs, R. 2006. How do we know the minds of others? Domain-specificity, simulation, and enactive social cognition. Brain Research 1079, 25–35.Google Scholar
Ahmed, A. 2014. Evidence, Decision, and Causality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ahmed, A. 2017. Exploiting cyclic preference. Mind 126(504), 975–1022.Google Scholar
Ainslie, G. 1974. Impulse control in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 21, 485–89.Google Scholar
Ainslie, G. 1992. Picoeconomics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ainslie, G. 2001. Breakdown of Will. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allais, M. 1979. Criticism of the postulates and axioms of the American school. In Allais, M. and Hagen, O. (Eds.), Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Allingham, M. 2002. Choice Theory: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. 1990. The Adaptive Character of Thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1958. Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy 33, 1–19.Google Scholar
Ariely, D. 2008. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. New York. HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics. See Broadie and Rowe 2002.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. 1982. Risk perception in psychology and economics. Economic Inquiry 20, 1–9.Google Scholar
Attridge, N. and Inglis, M.. 2013. Advanced mathematical study and the development of conditional reasoning skills. PLoS ONE 8(7), e69399.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bacharach, M. 1993. Variable universe games. In Binmore, K., Kirman, A., and Tani, P. (Eds.), Frontiers of Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bacharach, M. 2001. Superagency: beyond an individualistic theory of games. In van Benthem, J. (Ed.), Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Bacharach, M. 2006. Beyond Individual Choice: Teams and Frames in Game Theory. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bacharach, M. and Bernasconi, M.. 1997. The variable frame theory of focal points: an experimental study. Games and Economic Behavior 19(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacharach, M. and Stahl, D.. 2000. Variable-frame level-n theory. Games and Economic Behavior 32, 220–46.Google Scholar
Barberis, N. and Huang, M.. 2008. The loss aversion/narrow framing approach to the equity premium puzzle. In Mehra, R. (Ed.), Handbook of the Equity Risk Premium. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Barberis, N. and Xiong, W. E. I.. 2009. What drives the disposition effect? An analysis of a long-standing preference-based explanation. The Journal of Finance 64, 751–84.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1979. The Presocratic Philosophers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., and Frith, U.. 1985. Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’? Cognition 21(1), 37–46.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1977. The death of the author (S. Heath, Trans.). In Image, Music, Text. New York: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
Bartra, O., McGuire, J. T., and Kable, J. W.. 2013. The valuation system: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value. Neuroimage 76, 412–27.Google Scholar
Battaly, H. 2008. Virtue epistemology. Philosophy Compass 3(4), 639–63.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., and Tice, D. M.. 1994. Losing Control: How and Why People Fail at Self-Regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., and Anderson, S. W.. 1994. Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition 50, 7–15.Google Scholar
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Damasio, A. R., and Lee, G. P.. 1999. Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience 19, 5473–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, A. T. 1976. Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders. Oxford: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Benartzi, S. and Thaler, R. H.. 1995. Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 73–92.Google Scholar
Ben-David, I. and Hirshleifer, D.. 2012. Are investors really reluctant to realize their losses? Trading responses to past returns and the disposition effect. Review of Financial Studies 25, 2485–532.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. 2003a. Thinking without Words. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. 2003b. The domain of folk psychology. In O’Hear, A. (Ed.), Minds and Persons. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. 2009. Decision Theory and Rationality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. 2014. Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the Science of the Mind (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. 2015a. Prisoner’s dilemma cannot be a Newcomb problem. In Peterson, M. (Ed.), The Prisoner’s Dilemma. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. 2015b. Strategic vs. parametric choice in Newcomb’s problem and the prisoner’s dilemma: reply to Walker. Philosophia 43(3), 787–94.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. 2018a. Frames, rationality and self-control. In Bermúdez, J. L. (Ed.), Self-Control, Decision Theory, and Rationality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. 2018b. Inner speech, determinacy, and thinking consciously about thoughts. In Langland-Hassan, P. (Ed.), Inner Speech. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. (Ed.). 2018c. Self-Control, Decision Theory, and Rationality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. 2020. Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the Science of the Mind (3rd edition). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, A., Hadash, Y., and Fresco, D. M.. 2019. Metacognitive processes model of decentering: emerging methods and insights. Current Opinion in Psychology 28, 245–51.Google Scholar
Bernstein, A., Hadash, Y., Lichtash, Y., Tanay, G., Shepherd, K., and Fresco, D. M.. 2015. Decentering and related constructs: a critical review and metacognitive processes model. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science 10(5), 599–617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Binmore, K. 2005. Natural Justice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Binmore, K. 2007. Game Theory: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Binmore, K. 2009a. Rational Decisions. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Binmore, K. 2009b. Interpersonal comparison of utility. In Ross, D. and Kincaid, H. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Economics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. 1996. Spreading the Word. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. 1998. Ruling Passions. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blavatskyy, P. R. and Pogrebna, G.. 2009. Myopic loss aversion revisited. Economics Letters 104, 43–45.Google Scholar
Blavatskyy, P. R. and Pogrebna, G.. 2010. Reevaluating evidence on myopic loss aversion: aggregate patterns versus individual choices. Theory and Decision 68, 159–71.Google Scholar
Bobonich, C. and Destrée, P. (Eds.). 2007. Akrasia in Greek Philosophy: From Socrates to Plotinus. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Botvinick, M. M. 2007. Conflict monitoring and decision making: reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 7, 356–66.Google Scholar
Bratman, M. E. 1999. Toxin, temptation, and the stability of temptation. In Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bratman, M. E. 2014. Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of Acting Together. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. 2003. Intergroup Relations. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. and Kramer, R. M. 1986. Choice behavior in social dilemmas: effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50, 543–49.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. and Rowe, C.. 2002. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics: Translation, Introduction, Commentary. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bromberg-Martin, E. S., Matsumoto, M., and Hikosaka, O.. 2010. Dopamine in motivational control: rewarding, aversive, and alerting. Neuron 68, 815–34.Google Scholar
Broome, J. 1991a. Utility. Economics and Philosophy 7, 1–12.Google Scholar
Broome, J. 1991b. Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty, and Time. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Broome, J. 2013. Rationality through Reasoning. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bruni, L. 2010. Pareto’s legacy in modern economics. Revue Européenne des Sciences Sociales 48, 93–111.Google Scholar
Butler, A. C., Chapman, J. E., Forman, E. M., and Beck, A. T.. 2006. The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology Review 26(1), 17–31.Google Scholar
Camerer, C. and Thaler, R. H.. 2003. In honor of Matthew Rabin: winner of the John Bates Clark Medal. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 17(3), 159–76.Google Scholar
Camille, N., Griffiths, C. A., Vo, K., Fellows, L. K., and Kable, J. W.. 2011. Ventromedial frontal lobe damage disrupts value maximization in humans. Journal of Neuroscience 31, 7527–32.Google Scholar
Carmon, Z. and Ariely, D.. 2000. Focusing on the foregone: how value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. Journal of Consumer Research 27, 360–70.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. and Smith, P. K. (Eds.). 1996. Theories of Theory of Mind. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, R. (Ed.). 1997. Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chater, N. 2018. The Mind Is Flat: The Remarkable Shallowness of the Improvising Brain. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, W.-Y. 2013. Neuroinvesting: How to Build a New Investing Brain. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Cheng, P. W., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., and Oliver, L. M.. 1986. Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning. Cognitive Psychology 18(3), 293–328.Google Scholar
Chipman, J. S. and Moore, J. C.. 1978. The new welfare economics 1939–1974. International Economic Review 19(3), 547–84.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. J. 1981. Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 317–70.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. 1989. The logic of social exchange: has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition 31(3), 187–276.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J.. 1992. Cognitive mechanisms for social exchange. In Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (Eds.), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dancy, J. 2000. Practical Reality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1969. How is weakness of the will possible? In Feinberg, J. (Ed.), Moral Concepts. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, M. and Stone, T. (Eds.). 1995a. Folk Psychology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Davies, M. and Stone, T. (Eds.). 1995b. Mental Simulation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Davis, L. H. 1977. Prisoners, paradox, and rationality. American Philosophical Quarterly 14(4), 319–27.Google Scholar
Davis, L. H. 1985. Is the symmetry argument valid? In Campbell, R. and Sowden, L. (Eds.), Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Davis, M. A. and Bobko, P.. 1986. Contextual effects on escalation processes in public sector decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37, 121–38.Google Scholar
Degomme, O. and Guha-Sapir, D.. 2010. Patterns of mortality rates in Darfur conflict. The Lancet 375, 294–300.Google Scholar
De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., and Dolan, R. J.. 2006. Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science 313, 684–87.Google Scholar
Dhar, R. and Zhu, N.. 2006. Up close and personal: investor sophistication and the disposition effect. Management Science 52, 726–40.Google Scholar
Dimson, E., Marsh, P., and Staunton, M.. 2002. Triumph of the Optimists: 101 Years of Global Investment Returns. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Douven, I. 2013. The lottery and preface paradoxes. Oxford Bibliographies. DOI:10.1093/obo/9780195396577-0196.Google Scholar
Druckman, J. N. and McDermott, R.. 2008. Emotion and the framing of risky choice. Political Behavior 30(3), 297–321.Google Scholar
Duchon, D., Dunegan, K. J., and Barton, S. L.. 1989. Framing the problem and making decisions: the facts are not enough. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 36, 25–27.Google Scholar
Durand, R., Tee, H. W., and Lloyd, P.. 2004. Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle reconsidered. Finance Research Letters 1, 171–77.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. J. 2005. To the Flag: The Unlikely History of the Pledge of Allegiance. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Elster, J. 1979. Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Enderton, H. 1977. Elements of Set Theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Entman, R. M. 1993. Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43, 51–58.Google Scholar
Eriksen, K. W. and Kvaløy, O.. 2010. Do financial advisors exhibit myopic loss aversion? Financial Markets and Portfolio Management 24, 159–70.Google Scholar
Evans, J. S. 2008. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59, 255–78.Google Scholar
Fagles, R. 1977. Aeschylus: The Oresteia. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Fagles, R. and Knox, B.. 1996. Homer: The Odyssey. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Fellows, L. K. and Farah, M. J.. 2007. The role of ventromedial prefrontal cortex in decision making: judgment under uncertainty or judgment per se? Cerebral Cortex 17, 2669–74.Google Scholar
Figner, B., Knoch, D., Johnson, E. J., Krosch, A. R., Lisanby, S. H., Fehr, E., and Weber, E. U.. 2010. Lateral prefrontal cortex and self-control in intertemporal choice. Nature Neuroscience 13, 538–39.Google Scholar
Fishburn, F. C. 1970. Utility Theory for Decision-Making. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. and Ury, W. L.. 1981. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H. 1977. The development of knowledge about visual perception. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 25, 43–76.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H., Everett, B. A., Croft, K., Flavell, E. R.. 1981. Young children’s knowledge about visual perception: further evidence for the Level 1–Level 2 distinction. Developmental Psychology 17(1), 99–103.Google Scholar
Freeman, S. (Ed.). 2003. The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1953. The methodology of positive economics. In Essays in Positive Economics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Frydman, C., Barberis, N., Camerer, C., Bossaerts, P., and Rangel, A.. 2014. Using neural data to test a theory of investor behavior: an application to realization utility. The Journal of Finance 69, 907–46.Google Scholar
Garvey, R. and Murphy, A.. 2004. Are professional traders too slow to realize their losses? Financial Analyst’s Journal 60, 35–43.Google Scholar
Gauthier, D. 1986. Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gauthier, D. 1997. Resolute choice and rational deliberation: a critique and a defense. Noûs 31, 1–25.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M. S. 2005. Forty-five years of split-brain research and still going strong. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6, 653–59.Google Scholar
Genesove, D. and Mayer, C.. 2001. Loss aversion and seller behavior: evidence from the housing market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, 1233–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. 1991. How to make cognitive illusions disappear: beyond “heuristics and biases.” European Review of Social Psychology 2(1), 83–115.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. and Gaissmaier, W.. 2011. Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology 62(1), 451–82.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. and Selten, R.. 2001. Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., and Group, T. A. R.. 1999. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. 1989. On Social Facts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gneezy, U. and Potters, J.. 1997. An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 631–45.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper Colophon.Google Scholar
Gold, N. 2012. Team reasoning, framing, and cooperation. In Okasha, S. and Binmore, K. (Eds.), Evolution and Rationality: Decisions, Co-Operation and Strategic Behaviour. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gold, N. 2013. Team reasoning, framing, and self-control: an Aristotelian account. In Levy, N. (Ed.), Addiction and Self-Control. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gold, N. 2018. Putting willpower into decision theory: the person as a team over time and intrapersonal team reasoning. In Bermúdez, J. L. (Ed.), Self-Control, Decision Theory, and Rationality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gold, N. and Sugden, R.. 2007. Collective intentions and team agency. The Journal of Philosophy 104(3), 109–37.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A. N., and Kuhl, P. K.. 1999. The Scientist in the Crib: Minds, Brains, and How Children Learn. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Govindan, S. and Wilson, R. B.. 2016. Nash equilibrium, Refinements of. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Greaves, H. and Lederman, H.. 2017. Aggregating extended preferences. Philosophical Studies 174(5), 1163–90.Google Scholar
Greaves, H. and Lederman, H.. 2018. Extended preferences and interpersonal comparisons of well-being. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96(3), 636–67.Google Scholar
Green, L. and Myerson, J.. 2018. Preference reversals, delay discounting, rational choice, and the brain. In Bermúdez, J. L. (Ed.), Self-Control, Decision Theory, and Rationality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, P. 2015. The Iliad, Homer: A New Translation. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. 1986. Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement and Moral Importance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gross, L. 1982. The Art of Selling Intangibles: How to Make Your Million($) by Investing Other People’s Money. New York Institute of Finance.Google Scholar
Gupta, R., Koscik, T. R., Bechara, A., and Tranel, D.. 2011. The amygdala and decision-making. Neuropsychologia 49(4), 760–66.Google Scholar
Gurucharri, C. and Selman, R. L.. 1982. The development of interpersonal understanding during childhood, preadolescence, and adolescence: a longitudinal follow-up study. Child Development 53(4), 924–27.Google Scholar
Haber, S. N. 2011. Neuroanatomy of reward: a view from the ventral striatum. In Gottfried, J. A. (Ed.), Neurobiology of Sensation and Reward. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C., and Chatzisarantis, N. L.. 2010. Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 136, 495–525.Google Scholar
Haigh, J. 2012. Probability: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haigh, M. S. and List, J. A.. 2005. Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion? An experimental analysis. The Journal of Finance 60(1), 523–34.Google Scholar
Haines, R. F. 1991. A breakdown in simultaneous information processing. In Obrecht, G. and Stark, L. W. (Eds.), Presbyopia Research: Perspectives in Vision Research. Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H.. 1961. Plato: The Collected Dialogues: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, P. J. 1991. Interpersonal comparisons of utility: why and how they are and should be made. In Elster, J. and Roemer, J. E. (Eds.), Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hand, D. J. 2008. Statistics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science (13 December), 1243–48.Google Scholar
Hare, T. A., Camerer, C. F., and Rangel, A.. 2009. Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science 324, 646–48.Google Scholar
Harman, G. 1986. Change in View. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. 1977. Advances in understanding rational behavior. In Butts, R. E. and Hintikka, J. (Eds.), Foundational Problems in the Special Sciences. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. 1986. Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. and Selten, R.. 1988. A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hofmann, S. G., A. Asnaani, I. J. J. Vonk, A. T. Sawyer, and A. Fang., 2012. The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Research 36(5), 427–40.Google Scholar
Holton, R. 2009. Willing, Wanting, Waiting. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1978 [1739–40]. A Treatise of Human Nature. With text revised and notes by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hurley, S. L. 1991. Newcomb’s problem, prisoners’ dilemma, and collective action. Synthese 86(2), 173–96.Google Scholar
Hurley, S. and Nudds, M.. 2006. Rational Animals? Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hursthouse, R. 1999. On Virtue Ethics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1995. Plato’s Ethics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ishiguro, H. 1990. Leibniz’s Philosophy of Logic and Language (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Janis, I. L. 1983. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Janssen, M. A. 2008. Evolution of cooperation in a one-shot prisoner’s dilemma based on recognition of trustworthy and untrustworthy agents. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 65(3), 458–71.Google Scholar
Kable, J. W. and Glimcher, P. W.. 2007. The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. Nature Neuroscience 10, 1625–33.Google Scholar
Kable, J. W. and Glimcher, P. W.. 2009. The neurobiology of decision: consensus and controversy. Neuron 63, 733–45.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., and Thaler, R. H.. 1990. Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy 98, 1325–48.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A.. 1972. Subjective probability: a judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology 3, 430–54.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A.. 2000. Choices, Values, Frames. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kazantzis, N., Luong, H. K., Usatoff, A. S., Impala, T., Yew, R. Y., and Hofmann, S. G.. 2018. The processes of cognitive behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Research 42(4), 349–57.Google Scholar
Kennerley, S. W. and Walton, M. E.. 2011. Decision making and reward in frontal cortex: complementary evidence from neurophysiological and neuropsychological studies. Behavioral Neuroscience 125, 297–317.Google Scholar
Kross, E. and Ayduk, O.. 2011. Making meaning out of negative experiences by self-distancing. Current Directions in Psychological Science 20, 187–91.Google Scholar
Kross, E., Gard, D., Deldin, P., Clifton, J., and Ayduk, O.. 2012. “Asking why” from a distance: its cognitive and emotional consequences for people with major depressive disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 121(3), 559–69.Google Scholar
Kühberger, A. 1995. The framing of decisions: a new look at old problems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 62, 230–40.Google Scholar
Kuhn, S. 2017. Prisoner’s dilemma. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/prisoner-dilemma/.Google Scholar
Jr. Kyburg, H. E. 1961. Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate.White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
Lee, B. and Veld-Merkoulova, Y.. 2016. Myopic loss aversion and stock investments: an empirical study of private investments. Journal of Banking and Finance 70, 235–46.Google Scholar
Letwin, S. R. 1993. The Anatomy of Thatcherism. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Levi, I. 2002. Money pumps and diachronic books. Philosophy of Science 69, S235–S247.Google Scholar
Levin, I. P. 1987. Associative effects of information framing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25(2), 85–86.Google Scholar
Levin, I. P. and Gaeth, G. J.. 1988. How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research 15, 374–78.Google Scholar
Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., and Gaeth, G. J.. 1998. All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76, 149–88.Google Scholar
Leyton-Brown, K. and Shoham, Y.. 2008. Essentials of Game Theory: A Concise Multidisciplinary Introduction. San Rafael, CA: Claypool & Morgan.Google Scholar
Linville, P. W., Fischer, G. W., and Fischoff, B.. 1993. AIDS risk perception and decision biases. In Pryor, J. B. and Reeder, G. D. (Eds.), The Social Psychology of HIV Infection. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
List, C. and Pettit, P.. 2011. Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lomberg, B. 2001. The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lorenz, H. 2006. The Brute Within: Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Louie, K. and Glimcher, P. W.. 2012. Efficient coding and the neural representation of value. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1251, 13–32.Google Scholar
Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H.. 1957. Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
McClennen, E. F. 1990. Rationality and Dynamic Choice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McClennen, E. F. 1998. Rationality and rules. In Danielson, P. A. (Ed.), Modeling Rationality, Morality, and Evolution. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1980. The role of eudaimonia in Aristotle’s ethics. In Rorty, A. O. (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1995. Might there be external reasons? In Altham, J. E. J. and Harrison, R. (Eds.), World, Mind and Ethics: Essays on the Ethical Philosophy of Bernard Williams. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 1981. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Mack, A. and Rock, I.. 1998. Inattentional Blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. 2010. Philosophy before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary (2nd edition). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
McRaney, D. 2011. You Are Not So Smart. New York: Gotham.Google Scholar
Magen, E., Dweck, C. S., and Gross, J. J.. 2008. The hidden-zero effect: representing a single choice as an extended sequence reduces impulsive choice. Psychological Science 19(7), 648–49.Google Scholar
Magen, E., Kim, B., Dweck, C. S., Gross, J. J., and McClure, S. M.. 2014. Behavioral and neural correlates of increased self-control in the absence of increased willpower. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(27), 9786–91.Google Scholar
Mandel, D. 2013. Do framing effects reveal irrational choices? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143, 1185–98.Google Scholar
Mankiw, N. G. and Zeldes, S.. 1991. The consumption of stockholders and nonstockholders. Journal of Financial Economics 29(1), 97–112.Google Scholar
Masangkay, Z. S., McCluskey, K. A., McIntyre, C. W., Sims-Knight, J., Vaughn, B. E., and Flavell, J. H.. 1974. The early development of inferences about the visual percepts of others. Child Development 45(2), 357–66.Google Scholar
Mehra, R. 2007. The equity premium in India. In Basu, K. (Ed.), The Oxford Companion to Economics in India. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mehra, R. 2008. The equity premium puzzle: a review. Foundations and Trends in Finance 2, 1–81.Google Scholar
Mehra, R. and Prescott, E.. 1985. The equity premium: a puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics 15, 145–61.Google Scholar
Mele, A. R. 1987. Irrationality: An Essay on Akrasia, Self-Deception, and Self-Control. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mele, A. R. 2012. Backsliding: Understanding Weakness of Will: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mellor, D. H. and Oliver, A.. 1997. Properties. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. and Ayduk, O.. 2004. Willpower in a cognitive-affective processing system. In Baumeister, R. F. and Vohs, K. D. (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Mischel, W., Ayduk, O., Berman, M. G., Casey, B. J., Gotlib, I. H., Jonides, J., Kross, E., Teslovich, T., Wilson, N. L., Zayas, V., and Shoda, Y.. 2011. ‘Willpower’ over the life span: decomposing self-regulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 6, 252–56.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. and Baker, N.. 1975. Cognitive appraisals and transformations in delay behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31(2), 254–61.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. and Moore, B.. 1973. Effects of attention to symbolically presented rewards on self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28, 172–79.Google Scholar
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., and Rodriguez, M. I.. 1989. Delay of gratification in children. Science 244, 933–38.Google Scholar
Moll, H. and Meltzoff, A. N.. 2011. How does it look? Level 2 perspective-taking at 36 months of age. Child Development 82(2), 661–73.Google Scholar
Montier, J. 2010. The Little Book of Behavioral Investing: How Not To Be Your Own Worst Enemy. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Moore, A. W. 1987. Points of View. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Myerson, R. B. 1985. Bayesian equilibrium and incentive compatibility: an introduction. In Hurwicz, L., Schmeidler, D., and Sonnenschein, H. (Eds.), Social Goals and Social Organization. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nabi, R. L. 2003. Exploring the framing effects of emotion. Communication Research 30, 224–47.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1986. The View from Nowhere. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neale, M. A. and Bazerman, M. H.. 1985. The effects of framing and negotiator overconfidence on bargaining behaviors and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal 28, 34–49.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. 1979. The control of information pick-up in selective looking. In Pick, A. D. (Ed.), Perception and its Development: A Tribute to Eleanor J. Gibson. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E. and Borgida, E.. 1975. Attribution and the psychology of prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32, 932–43.Google Scholar
Norris, C. 1988. Law, deconstruction, and the resistance to theory. Journal of Law and Society 15(2), 166–87.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. 1993. The Nature of Rationality. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Oakes, P., Haslam, A., and Turner, J. C.. 1994. Stereotyping and Social Reality. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Oaksford, M. and Chater, N.. 2007. Bayesian Rationality: The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Odean, T. 1998. Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? Journal of Finance 53, 1775–98.Google Scholar
Ohman, A. and Mineka, S.. 2001. Fears, phobias, and preparedness: toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review 108, 483–522.Google Scholar
Okasha, S. 2016. On the interpretation of decision theory. Economics and Philosophy 32, 409–33.Google Scholar
Öngür, D. and Price, J. L.. 2000. The organization of networks within the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex of rats, monkeys and humans. Cerebral Cortex 10, 206–19.Google Scholar
Onishi, K. H. and Baillargeon, R.. 2005. Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science 308(5719), 255–58.Google Scholar
Orwell, G. 1957. A Collection of Essays. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. 1960. Logic and metaphysics in some early works of Aristotle. In Logic, Science, Dialectic: Collected Papers in Greek Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Padoa-Schioppa, C. and Assad, J. A.. 2006. Neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex encode economic value. Nature 441, 223–26.Google Scholar
Pan, Z. and Kosicki, G. M.. 1993. Framing analysis: an approach to news discourse. Political Communication 10(1), 55–75.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. 1997. Reasons and motivation. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 71, 99–130.Google Scholar
Pears, D. 1984. Motivated Irrationality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perner, J. and Roessler, J.. 2012. From infants’ to children’s appreciation of belief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16(10), 519–25.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. 2009. An Introduction to Decision Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Petersson, B. 2017. Team reasoning and collective intentionality. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 8(2), 199–218.Google Scholar
Pinto, Y., Neville, D. A., Otten, M., Corballis, P. M., Lamme, V. A., de Haan, E. H., Foschi, N., and Fabri, M.. 2017. Split brain: divided perception but undivided consciousness. Brain 140(5), 1231–37.Google Scholar
Plato, Collected Dialogues. See Hamilton and Huntingdon Cairns 1961.Google Scholar
Pothos, E. M., Perry, G., Corr, P. J., Matthew, M. R., and Busemeyer, J. R.. 2011. Understanding cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Personality and Individual Differences 51(3), 210–15.Google Scholar
Poulin-Dubois, D., Brooker, I., and Chow, V.. 2009. The developmental origins of naive psychology in infancy. Advances in Child Development and Behavior 37, 55–104.Google Scholar
Price, A. W. 1995. Mental Conflict. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Priest, G. 2000. Logic: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Priest, G., Beall, J., and Armour-Garb, B. P. (Eds.). 2004. The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rabbie, J. M., Schot, J. C., and Visser, L.. 1989. Social identity theory: a conceptual and empirical critique from the perspective of a behavioural interaction model. European Journal of Social Psychology 19(3), 171–202.Google Scholar
Rachlin, H. 2000. The Science of Self-Control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rachlin, H. 2018. In what sense are addicts irrational? In Bermúdez, J. L. (Ed.), Self-Control, Decision Theory, and Rationality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. 1931. Truth and probability. In Braithwaite, R. P. (Ed.), Foundations of Mathematics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Rangel, A., Camerer, C., and Montague, P. R.. 2008. Neuroeconomics: the neurobiology of value-based decision-making. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9, 545–56.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Read, S. 1995. Thinking About Logic. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Resnik, M. D. 1987. Choices. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rey, H. G., Ison, M. J., Pedreira, C., Valentin, A., Alarcon, G., Selway, R., Richardson, M. P., and Quian Quiroga, R.. 2015. Single-cell recordings in the human medial temporal lobe. Journal of Anatomy 227, 394–408.Google Scholar
Richardson, H. S. 1994. Practical Reasoning about Final Ends. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Safran, J. D. and Segal, Z. V.. 1990. Interpersonal Processes in Cognitive Therapy. Lanham, MD: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
Sally, D. 1995. Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: a meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Rationality and Society 7(1), 58–92.Google Scholar
Salmon, W. C. (Ed.). 2001. Zeno’s Paradoxes. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. 1948. Existentialism and Humanism. Translated with an Introduction by Philippe Mairet. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Savage, L. J. 1954. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Savage, L. J. 1972. The Foundations of Statistics (2nd revised edition). New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Schick, F. 1986. Dutch bookies and money pumps. The Journal of Philosophy 83, 112–19.Google Scholar
Schick, F. 1991. Understanding Action. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schick, F. 1997. Making Choices. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schick, F. 2003. Ambiguity and Logic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schiller, R. 2019. Narrative Economics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, U. 2004. Alternatives to expected utility: formal theories. In Barberà, S., Hammond, P. J., and Seidl, C. (Eds.), Handbook of Utility Theory, Volume 2: Extensions. Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
Schmitz, M. 2018. Co-subjective consciousness constitutes collectives. Journal of Social Philosophy 49, 137–60.Google Scholar
Schultz, W. 1998. Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology 80, 1–27.Google Scholar
Schultz, W. 2016. Dopamine reward prediction-error signalling: a two-component response. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 17, 183–95.Google Scholar
Schultz, W., Dayan, P., and Montague, P. R.. 1997. A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 275, 1593–99.Google Scholar
Searle, J. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Selman, R. L. and Byrne, D. F.. 1974. A structural-developmental analysis of levels of role taking in middle childhood. Child Development 45(3), 803–806.Google Scholar
Setiya, K. 2004. Against internalism. Noûs 38, 266–98.Google Scholar
Shaffer, D. R. 2008. Social and Personality Development. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Shefrin, H. 2002. Beyond Greed and Fear: Understanding Behavioral Finance and the Psychology of Investing. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shefrin, H. and Statman, M.. 1985. The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: theory and evidence. The Journal of Finance 40, 777–90.Google Scholar
Sher, S. and McKenzie, C. R.. 2006. Information leakage from logically equivalent frames. Cognition 101, 467–94.Google Scholar
Sher, S. and McKenzie, C. R.. 2008. Framing effects and rationality. In Chater, N. and Oaksford, M. (Eds.), The Probabilistic Mind: Prospects for Bayesian Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sher, S. and McKenzie, C. R.. 2011. Levels of information: a framing hierarchy. In Keren, G. (Ed.), Perspectives on Framing. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Shields, C. 1999. Order in Multiplicity: Homonymy in the Philosophy of Aristotle. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shoham, Y. and Leyton-Brown, K.. 2008. Multiagent Systems: Algorithmic, Game-Theoretic, and Logical Foundations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skyrms, B. 2012. The Stag Hunt and the Evolution of Social Structure. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, M. 1995. Internal reasons. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55, 109–31.Google Scholar
Smith, M. 2004. Humean rationality. In Rawling, P. and Mele, A. R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Rationality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. 1978. Psychologism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 8, 165–91.Google Scholar
Sosa, E. 1991. Knowledge in Perspective. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. and West, R. F.. 2000. Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23, 645–726.Google Scholar
Starmer, C. 2000. Developments in non-expected utility theory: the hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. Journal of Economic Literature 38, 332–82.Google Scholar
Stein, E. 1996. Without Good Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, F. L., Hurley, R. A., and Taber, K. H.. 2011. Anterior cingulate cortex: unique role in cognition and emotion. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 23, 121–25.Google Scholar
Stich, S. 1990. The Fragmentation of Reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1950a. The development of utility theory. I. Journal of Political Economy 58(4), 307–27.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1950b. The development of utility theory. II. Journal of Political Economy 58(5), 373–96.Google Scholar
Strotz, R. H. 1956. Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. The Review of Economic Studies 23, 165–80.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. 2000. Team preferences. Economics and Philosophy 16(2), 175–204.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. 2003. The logic of team reasoning. Philosophical Explorations 6(3), 165–81.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. 2004. Alternatives to expected utility: foundations. In Barberà, S., Hammond, P. J., and Seidl, C. (Eds.), Handbook of Utility Theory, Volume 2: Extensions. Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. 2015. Team reasoning and intentional cooperation for mutual benefit. Journal of Social Ontology 1(1), 143–66.Google Scholar
Suppes, P. 1960. Axiomatic Set Theory. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Suppes, P. 1966. Some formal models of grading principles. Synthese 6, 284–306.Google Scholar
Temkin, L. S. 1987. Intransitivity and the mere addition paradox. Philosophy and Public Affairs 16, 138–87.Google Scholar
Temkin, L. S. 1996. A continuum argument for intransitivity. Philosophy and Public Affairs 25, 175–210.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. 1999. Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12, 183–206.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. and Johnson, E. J.. 1991. Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: the effect of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science 36, 643–60.Google Scholar
Tom, S. M., Fox, C. R., Trepel, C., and Poldrack, R. A.. 2007. The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk. Science 315, 515–18.Google Scholar
Tuomela, R. 2013. Social Ontology: Collective Intentionality and Group Agents. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. and Reynolds, K. J.. 2012. Self-categorization theory. In Van Lange, P. A. P., Kruglanski, A. W., and Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of Theories in Social Psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Turri, J., Alfano, M., and Greco, J.. 2011. Virtue epistemology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2011 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/epistemology-virtue/.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211, 453–58.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.. 1986. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. The Journal of Business 59. S251–S278.Google Scholar
von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O.. 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Voorhoeve, A. 2013. Vaulting intuition: Temkin’s critique of transitivity. Economics and Philosophy 29, 409–25.Google Scholar
Wallis, J. D. 2011. Cross-species studies of orbitofrontal cortex and value-based decision-making. Nature Neuroscience 15, 13–19.Google Scholar
Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., and Quan, H.. 2018. Revisiting the marshmallow test: a conceptual replication investigating links between early delay of gratification and later outcomes. Psychological Science 29(7), 1159–77.Google Scholar
Weber, J. 1998. The resilience of the Allais paradox. Ethics 109, 94–118.Google Scholar
Wiggins, D. 1978. Weakness of will, commensurability, and the objects of deliberation and desire. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 79, 251–77.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 1978. Descartes: The Project of Pure Inquiry. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 1979. Internal and external reasons. In Harrison, R. (Ed.), Rational Action. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 1980. Justice as a virtue. In Rorty, A. O. (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. and Perner, J.. 1983. Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition 13, 103–28.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. K. and Beardsley, M. C.. 1946. The intentional fallacy. Sewanee Review 54, 468–88.Google Scholar
Yu, R. and Zhang, P.. 2014. Neural evidence for description dependent reward processing in the framing effect. Frontiers in Neuroscience 8.Google Scholar
Zagefka, H. and James, T.. 2015. The psychology of charitable donations to disaster victims and beyond. Social Issues and Policy Review 9, 155–92.Google Scholar
Zagefka, H., Noor, M., Brown, R., de Moura, G. R., and Hopthrow, T.. 2011. Donating to disaster victims: responses to natural and humanly caused events. European Journal of Social Psychology 41, 353–63.Google Scholar
Zheng, H., Wang, X. T., and Zhu, L.. 2010. Framing effects: behavioral dynamics and neural basis. Neuropsychologia 48, 3198–204.Google Scholar
Zweig, J. 2007. Your Money and Your Brain: How the New Science of Neuroeconomics Can Help Make You Rich. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • José Luis Bermúdez, Texas A & M University
  • Book: Frame It Again
  • Online publication: 15 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108131827.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • José Luis Bermúdez, Texas A & M University
  • Book: Frame It Again
  • Online publication: 15 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108131827.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • José Luis Bermúdez, Texas A & M University
  • Book: Frame It Again
  • Online publication: 15 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108131827.013
Available formats
×