Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:46:47.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Superb fairy-wrens: Making the worst of a good job

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2015

Walter D. Koenig
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Janis L. Dickinson
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Cooperative Breeding in Vertebrates
Studies of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior
, pp. 133 - 149
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boland, C. R. J. and Cockburn, A. (2002). Short sketches from the long history of cooperative breeding in Australian birds. Emu, 102, 917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, E. and Bradley, J. (1958). Notes on the behaviours and plumage of colour-ringed blue wrens. Emu, 58, 313326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooker, M. and Rowley, I. (1995). The significance of territory size and quality in the mating strategy of the splendid fairy-wren. J. Anim. Ecol., 64, 614627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooker, M. G., Rowley, I., Adams, M., and Baverstock, P. R. (1990). Promiscuity: an inbreeding avoidance mechanism in a socially monogamous species? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 26, 191200.Google Scholar
Brouwer, L., van de Pol, M., Atema, E., and Cockburn, A. (2011). Strategic promiscuity helps avoid inbreeding at multiple levels in a cooperative breeder where both sexes are philopatric. Mol. Ecol., 20, 47964807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, L., van de Pol, M., and Cockburn, A. (2014). The role of social environment on parental care: offspring benefit more from the presence of female than male helpers. J. Anim. Ecol., 83, 491503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, J. L. (1975). The Evolution of Behavior. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Buchanan, K. L. and Cockburn, A. (2013). Fairy-wrens and their relatives (Maluridae) as model organisms in evolutionary ecology: the scientific legacy of Ian Rowley and Eleanor Russell. Emu, 113, I–VII.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhim, S., Double, M. C., Margraf, N., Birkhead, T. R., and Cockburn, A. (2011). Maintenance of sperm variation in a highly promiscuous wild bird. PLoS One, 6, e28809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockburn, A. (2004). Mating systems and sexual conflict. In: Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds, ed. Koenig, W. D. and Dickinson, J. L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 81101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockburn, A. (2006). Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds. Proc. R. Soc. London B, 273, 13751383.Google ScholarPubMed
Cockburn, A. (2013). Cooperative breeding in birds: towards a richer conceptual framework. In: Cooperation and its Evolution, ed. Sterelny, K., Joyce, R., Calcott, B., and Fraser, B.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 223245.Google Scholar
Cockburn, A. and Double, M. C. (2008). Cooperatively breeding superb fairy-wrens show no facultative manipulation of offspring sex ratio despite plausible benefits. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 62, 681688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockburn, A., Osmond, H. L., Mulder, R. A., Green, D. J., and Double, M. C. (2003). Divorce, dispersal and incest avoidance in the cooperatively breeding superb fairy-wren Malurus cyaneus. J. Anim. Ecol., 72, 189202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockburn, A., Osmond, H. L., and Double, M. C. (2008a). Swingin’ in the rain: condition dependence and sexual selection in a capricious world. Proc. R. Soc. London B, 275, 605612.Google Scholar
Cockburn, A., Osmond, H. L., Mulder, R. A., Double, M. C., and Green, D. J. (2008b). Demography of male reproductive queues in cooperatively breeding superb fairy-wrens Malurus cyaneus. J. Anim. Ecol., 77, 297304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cockburn, A., Sims, R. A., Osmond, H. L., Green, D. J., Double, M. C., et al. (2008c). Can we measure the benefits of help in cooperatively breeding birds: the case of superb fairy-wrens Malurus cyaneus? J. Anim. Ecol., 77, 430438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cockburn, A., Dalziell, A. H., Blackmore, C. J., Double, M. C., Kokko, H., et al. (2009). Superb fairy-wren males aggregate into hidden leks to solicit extragroup fertilizations before dawn. Behav. Ecol., 20, 501510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockburn, A., Brouwer, L., Double, M., Margraf, N., and van de Pol, M. (2013). Evolutionary origins and persistence of infidelity in Malurus: the least faithful birds. Emu, 113, 208217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalziell, A. H. and Cockburn, A. (2008). Dawn song in superb fairy-wrens: a bird that seeks extrapair copulations during the dawn chorus. Anim. Behav., 75, 489500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, J. L. and Hatchwell, B. J. (2004). Fitness consequences of helping. In: Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds, ed. Koenig, W. D. and Dickinson, J. L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 4866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Double, M. and Cockburn, A. (2000). Pre-dawn infidelity: females control extra-pair mating in superb fairy-wrens. Proc. R. Soc. London B, 267, 465470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Double, M. C. and Cockburn, A. (2003). Subordinate superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus) parasitize the reproductive success of attractive dominant males. Proc. R. Soc. London B, 270, 379384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Double, M. C., Peakall, R., Beck, N. R., and Cockburn, A. (2005). Dispersal, philopatry, and infidelity: dissecting local genetic structure in superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus). Evolution, 59, 625635.Google ScholarPubMed
Dunn, P. O. and Cockburn, A. (1996). Evolution of male parental care in a bird with almost complete cuckoldry. Evolution, 50, 25422548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, P. O. and Cockburn, A. (1999). Extrapair mate choice and honest signaling in cooperatively breeding superb fairy-wrens. Evolution, 53, 938946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, P. O., Cockburn, A., and Mulder, R. A. (1995). Fairy-wren helpers often care for young to which they are unrelated. Proc. R. Soc. London B, 259, 339343.Google Scholar
Gould, J. (1841). The Birds of Australia, Vol. III. London: Taylor.Google Scholar
Grafen, A. (1984). Natural selection, kin selection and group selection. In: Behavioural Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach. 2nd ed., ed. Krebs, J. R. and Davies, N.B.. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 6284.Google Scholar
Green, D. J., Cockburn, A., Hall, M. L., Osmond, H., and Dunn, P. O. (1995). Increased opportunities for cuckoldry may be why dominant male fairy-wrens tolerate helpers. Proc. R. Soc. London B, 262, 297303.Google Scholar
Green, D. J., Osmond, H. L., Double, M. C., and Cockburn, A. (2000). Display rate by male fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus) during the fertile period of females has little influence on extra-pair mate choice. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 48, 438446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, P. J., Peter, J. M., and Steele, W. K. (eds.) 2001. Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. Vol. 5. Tyrant-flycatchers to Chats. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kingma, S. A., Hall, M. L., Segelbacher, G., and Peters, A. (2009). Radical loss of an extreme extra-pair mating system. BMC Ecology, 9, 111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kingma, S. A., Hall, M. L., and Peters, A. (2011). Multiple benefits drive helping behavior in a cooperatively breeding bird: an integrated analysis. Am. Nat., 177, 486495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGregor, N. A. and Cockburn, A. (2002). Sex differences in parental response to begging nestlings in superb fairy-wrens. Anim. Behav., 63, 923932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margraf, N. and Cockburn, A. (2013). Helping behaviour and parental care in fairy-wrens (Malurus). Emu, 113, 294301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, A. P. (1992). Frequency of female copulations with multiple males and sexual selection. Am. Nat., 139, 10891101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, R. A. (1997). Extra-group courtship displays and other reproductive tactics of superb fairy-wrens. Aust. J. Zool., 45, 131143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, R. A. and Langmore, N. E. (1993). Dominant males punish helpers for temporary defection in superb fairy-wrens. Anim. Behav., 45, 830833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, R. A., Dunn, P. O., Cockburn, A., Lazenby-Cohen, K. A., and Howell, M. J. (1994). Helpers liberate female fairy-wrens from constraints on extra-pair mate choice. Proc. R. Soc. London B, 255, 223229.Google Scholar
Peters, A. (2002). Testosterone and the trade-off between mating and paternal effort in extrapair-mating superb fairy-wrens. Anim. Behav., 64, 103112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A., Astheimer, L. B., Boland, C. R. J., and Cockburn, A. (2000). Testosterone is involved in acquisition and maintenance of sexually selected male plumage in superb fairy-wrens, Malurus cyaneus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 47, 438445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A., Astheimer, L. B. and Cockburn, A. (2001). The annual testosterone profile in cooperatively breeding superb fairy-wrens, Malurus cyaneus, reflects their extreme infidelity. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 50, 519527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A., Cockburn, A. and Cunningham, R. (2002). Testosterone treatment suppresses paternal care in superb fairy-wrens, Malurus cyaneus, despite their concurrent investment in courtship. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 51, 538547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruett-Jones, S. G. and Lewis, M. J. (1990). Sex ratio and habitat limitation promote delayed dispersal in superb fairy-wrens. Nature, 348, 541–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, M. and Pruett-Jones, S. (2011). Sperm competition selects for sperm quantity and quality in the Australian Maluridae. PLoS One, 6, e15720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowley, I. (1957). Cooperative feeding of young by superb blue wrens. Emu, 57, 356357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, I. (1965). The life history of the superb blue wren. Emu, 64, 251297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, I. and Russell, E. (1991). Demography of passerines in the temperate southern hemisphere. In: Bird Population Studies, ed. Perrins, C. M., Lebreton, J.-D., and Hirons, G. J. M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 2244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, I. and Russell, E. (1997). Fairy-wrens and Grasswrens: Maluridae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rowley, I., Russell, E., Payne, R. B., and Payne, L. L. (1989). Plural breeding in the splendid fairy-wren, Malurus splendens (Aves, Maluridae), a cooperative breeder. Ethology, 83, 229247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royle, N. J., Schuett, W., and Dall, S. R. X. (2010). Behavioral consistency and the resolution of sexual conflict over parental investment. Behav. Ecol., 21, 11251130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, A. F., Langmore, N. E., Cockburn, A., Astheimer, L. B., and Kilner, R. M. (2007). Reduced egg investment can conceal helper effects in cooperatively breeding birds. Science, 317, 941944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, E. M. and Rowley, I. (1993). Demography of the cooperatively breeding splendid fairy-wren, Malurus splendens (Maluridae). Aust. J. Zool., 41, 475505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, E. and Rowley, I. (2000). Demography and social organisation of the red-winged fairy-wren, Malurus elegans. Aust. J. Zool., 48, 161200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuett, W., Tregenza, T., and Dall, S. R. X. (2010). Sexual selection and animal personality. Biol. Rev., 85, 217246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tidemann, S. C. (1986). Breeding in 3 species of fairy-wrens (Malurus): do helpers really help? Emu, 86, 131138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuttle, E. M. and Pruett-Jones, S. (2004). Estimates of extreme sperm production: morphological and experimental evidence from reproductively promiscuous fairy-wrens (Malurus). Anim. Behav., 68, 541550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Pol, M., Osmond, H. L., and Cockburn, A. (2012). Fluctuations in population composition dampen the impact of phenotypic plasticity on trait dynamics in superb fairy-wrens. J. Anim. Ecol., 81, 411422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van de Pol, M., Brouwer, L., Brooker, L. C., Brooker, M. G., Colombelli-Negrel, D., et al. (2013). Problems with using large-scale oceanic climate indices to compare climatic sensitivities across populations and species. Ecography, 36, 249255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×