Book contents
- Complications and Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction
- Complications and Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Ovarian Cancer Following Use of Clomiphene and Gonadotropin in Assisted Reproduction
- 2 Congenital Anomalies Following Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 3 Extra-uterine Pregnancy After Artificial Reproductive Technology
- 4 Minimizing Multiple Pregnancy After Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 5 Prevention of Multiple Pregnancy after IUI and Ovarian Stimulation
- 6 Obstetric Complications of Twin Pregnancy Following Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 7 Selection of a Single Embryo for Transfer
- 8 Complications of Oocyte Retrieval in Assisted Reproduction
- 9 Ultrasound Monitoring in ART Have We Made Any Progress?
- 10 Complications of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Assisted Reproduction Technology
- 11 Classification and Pathophysiology of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 12 Genetics of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 13 Prediction and Prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 14 Treatment of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 15 Elimination of OHSS by GnRH Agonist and Freezing Embryos
- 16 Ethical and Legal Issues Arising from Complications of ART
- 17 Complications of Gestational Surrogacy
- 18 Complications of Male Fertility Surgery for Sperm Retrieval in the Azoospermic Male
- 19 Impediments, Challenges, and Hurdles for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Persons Seeking Reproductive Medicine
- 20 Political Emotions and Reproductive Medicine From Individual Suffering to European Regulation
- Index
- References
18 - Complications of Male Fertility Surgery for Sperm Retrieval in the Azoospermic Male
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 March 2017
Book contents
- Complications and Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction
- Complications and Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Ovarian Cancer Following Use of Clomiphene and Gonadotropin in Assisted Reproduction
- 2 Congenital Anomalies Following Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 3 Extra-uterine Pregnancy After Artificial Reproductive Technology
- 4 Minimizing Multiple Pregnancy After Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 5 Prevention of Multiple Pregnancy after IUI and Ovarian Stimulation
- 6 Obstetric Complications of Twin Pregnancy Following Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 7 Selection of a Single Embryo for Transfer
- 8 Complications of Oocyte Retrieval in Assisted Reproduction
- 9 Ultrasound Monitoring in ART Have We Made Any Progress?
- 10 Complications of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Assisted Reproduction Technology
- 11 Classification and Pathophysiology of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 12 Genetics of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 13 Prediction and Prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 14 Treatment of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 15 Elimination of OHSS by GnRH Agonist and Freezing Embryos
- 16 Ethical and Legal Issues Arising from Complications of ART
- 17 Complications of Gestational Surrogacy
- 18 Complications of Male Fertility Surgery for Sperm Retrieval in the Azoospermic Male
- 19 Impediments, Challenges, and Hurdles for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Persons Seeking Reproductive Medicine
- 20 Political Emotions and Reproductive Medicine From Individual Suffering to European Regulation
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Complications and Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction , pp. 186 - 194Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Jarow, J P, Espeland, M A, Lipshultz, L I. Evaluation of the azoospermic patients. J Urol 1989;142:62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temple-Smith, P D, Southwick, G J, Yates, C A, Trounson, A O, de Kretser, D M. Human pregnancy by in vitro fertilization (IVF) using sperm aspirated from the epididymis. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 1985;2:119–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schoysman, R, Vanderzwalmen, P, Nijs, M, et al. Pregnancy after fertilisation with human testicular spermatozoa. Lancet 1993;342:1237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devroey, P, Liu, J, Nagy, Z, et al. Pregnancies alter testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 1995;10:1457–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdel Raheem, A, Rushwan, N, Garaffa, G, et al. Factors influencing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome in men with azoospermia. BJU Int 2013;112(2):258–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silber, S J, Van Sterirteghem, A, Nagy, Z, et al. Normal pregnancies resulting from testicular extraction and intracytoplasmatic sperm injection for azoospermia due to maturation arrest. Fertil Steril 1996;66:110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramasamy, R, Lin, K, Veeck Gosden, L, et al. High serum FSH levels in men with nonobstructive azoospermia does not affect success of microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Fertil Steril 2009;92:590–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteves, S C. Clinical management of infertile men with nonobstructive azoospermia. Asian J Androl 2015;17(3):459–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abdel Raheem, A, Garaffa, G, Rushwan, N, et al. Testicular histopathology as a predictor of a positive sperm retrieval in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. BJU Int 2013;111(3):492–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deruyver, Y, Vanderschueren, D, Van der Aa, F. Outcome of microdissection TESE compared with conventional TESE in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review. Andrology 2014;2:20–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vicari, E, Grazioso, C, Burrello, N, et al. Epididymal and testicular sperm retrieval in azoospermic patients and the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in relation to the etiology of azoospermia. Fertil Steril 2001;75:215–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin-du-Pan, R C, Bischof, P. Increased follicle stimulating hormone in infertile men. Is increased plasma FSH always due to damaged germinal epithelium? Hum Reprod 1995;10:1940–1945.Google ScholarPubMed
Takahira, H, Sakatoku, J, Fujii, M, et al. Significance of testicular size measurement in andrology. 1. A new orchidometer and its clinical application. Fertil Steril 1983;39:836–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, P J, Pareek, S S. Scrotal ultrasound in male infertility. Eur Urol 1989;16:423–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krausz, C. Male infertility: pathogenesis and clinical diagnosis. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;25(2):271–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raman, J D, Nobert, C F, Goldstein, M. Increased incidence of testicular cancer in men presenting with infertility and abnormal semen analysis. J Urol 2005;174:1819–1822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raviv, G, Levron, J, Menashe, Y, et al. Sonographic evidence of minimal and short-term testicular damage after testicular sperm aspiration procedures. Fertil Steril 2004;82(2):442–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedler, S, Raziel, A, Strassburger, D, et al. Testicular sperm retrieval by percutaneous fine needle sperm aspiration compared with testicular sperm extraction by open biopsy in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1488–1493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ezeh, U I, Moore, H D M, Cooke, I D. A prospective study of multiple needle biopsies versus a single open biopsy for testicular sperm extraction in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 1998;13:3075–3080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tournaye, H. Surgical sperm recovery for intracytoplasmic sperm injection: which method is to be preferred? Hum Reprod 1999;14(Suppl 1):71–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hauser, R, Yogev, L, Paz, G, et al. Comparison of efficacy of two techniques for testicular sperm retrieval in nonobstructive azoospermia: multifocal testicular sperm extraction versus multifocal testicular sperm aspiration. J Androl 2006;27:28–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlegel, P N. Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod 1999;14:131–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlegel, P N. Nonobstructive azoospermia: a revolutionary surgical approach and results. Semin Reprod Med 2009;27:165–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsujimura, A, Matsumiya, K, Miyagawa, Y, et al. Conventional multiple or microdissection testicular sperm extraction: a comparative study. Hum Reprod 2002;17:2924–2929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramasamy, R, Fisher, E S, Ricci, J A, Leung, R A, Schlegel, P N. Duration of microdissection testicular sperm extraction procedures: relationship to sperm retrieval success. J Urol 2011;185:1394–1397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amer, M, Ateyah, A, Hany, R, Zohdy, W. Prospective comparative study between microsurgical and conventional sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia: follow-up by serial ultrasound examinations. Hum Reprod 2000;15:653–656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramasamy, R, Yagan, N, Schlegel, P N. Structural and functional changes to the testis after conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Urology 2005;65:1190–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verza, S Jr, Esteves, S C. Microsurgical versus conventional single-biopsy testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia: a prospective controlled study. Fertil Steril 2011;96(Suppl):S53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, S, Thomas, K, Sephton, V, et al. Postoperative pain, complications, and satisfaction rates in patients who undergo surgical sperm retrieval. Fertil Steril 2003;79(1):56–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silber, S J. Microsurgical TESE and the distribution of spermatogenesis in non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 2000;15:2278–2284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlegel, P N, Su, L M. Physiological consequences of testicular sperm extraction. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1688–1692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrington, T G, Schauer, D, Gilbert, B R. Percutaneous testis biopsy: an alternative to open testicular biopsy in the evaluation of the subfertile man. J Urol 1996;156:1647–1651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okada, H, Dobashi, M, Yamazaki, T, et al. Conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol 2002;168(3):1063–1067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tash, J A, Schlegel, P N. Histologic effects of testicular sperm extraction on the testicle in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. Urology 2001;57:334–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shufaro, Y, Prus, D, Laufer, N, Simon, A. Impact of repeated testicular fine needle aspirations (TEFNA) and testicular sperm extraction (TESE) on the microscopic morphology of the testis: an animal model. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1795–1799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esteves, S C, Agarwal, A. Sperm retrieval techniques. In: Gardner, D K, Rizk, B R M B, Falcone, T. Human Assisted Reproductive Technology: Future Trends in Laboratory and Clinical Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komori, K, Tsujimura, A, Miura, H, et al. Serial follow-up of serum testosterone and anti-sperm antibodies in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia after conventional or micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction. Int J Androl 2004;27:32–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2
- Cited by