Book contents
- Complications and Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction
- Complications and Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Ovarian Cancer Following Use of Clomiphene and Gonadotropin in Assisted Reproduction
- 2 Congenital Anomalies Following Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 3 Extra-uterine Pregnancy After Artificial Reproductive Technology
- 4 Minimizing Multiple Pregnancy After Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 5 Prevention of Multiple Pregnancy after IUI and Ovarian Stimulation
- 6 Obstetric Complications of Twin Pregnancy Following Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 7 Selection of a Single Embryo for Transfer
- 8 Complications of Oocyte Retrieval in Assisted Reproduction
- 9 Ultrasound Monitoring in ART Have We Made Any Progress?
- 10 Complications of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Assisted Reproduction Technology
- 11 Classification and Pathophysiology of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 12 Genetics of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 13 Prediction and Prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 14 Treatment of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 15 Elimination of OHSS by GnRH Agonist and Freezing Embryos
- 16 Ethical and Legal Issues Arising from Complications of ART
- 17 Complications of Gestational Surrogacy
- 18 Complications of Male Fertility Surgery for Sperm Retrieval in the Azoospermic Male
- 19 Impediments, Challenges, and Hurdles for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Persons Seeking Reproductive Medicine
- 20 Political Emotions and Reproductive Medicine From Individual Suffering to European Regulation
- Index
- References
17 - Complications of Gestational Surrogacy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 March 2017
Book contents
- Complications and Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction
- Complications and Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Ovarian Cancer Following Use of Clomiphene and Gonadotropin in Assisted Reproduction
- 2 Congenital Anomalies Following Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 3 Extra-uterine Pregnancy After Artificial Reproductive Technology
- 4 Minimizing Multiple Pregnancy After Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 5 Prevention of Multiple Pregnancy after IUI and Ovarian Stimulation
- 6 Obstetric Complications of Twin Pregnancy Following Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 7 Selection of a Single Embryo for Transfer
- 8 Complications of Oocyte Retrieval in Assisted Reproduction
- 9 Ultrasound Monitoring in ART Have We Made Any Progress?
- 10 Complications of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Assisted Reproduction Technology
- 11 Classification and Pathophysiology of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 12 Genetics of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 13 Prediction and Prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 14 Treatment of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 15 Elimination of OHSS by GnRH Agonist and Freezing Embryos
- 16 Ethical and Legal Issues Arising from Complications of ART
- 17 Complications of Gestational Surrogacy
- 18 Complications of Male Fertility Surgery for Sperm Retrieval in the Azoospermic Male
- 19 Impediments, Challenges, and Hurdles for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Persons Seeking Reproductive Medicine
- 20 Political Emotions and Reproductive Medicine From Individual Suffering to European Regulation
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Complications and Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction , pp. 177 - 185Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Holy Bible. The Book of Genesis. 16:1–15; 17:15–19; 21:1–4.Google Scholar
Ory, S, Devroey, P, Banker, M, et al. International Federation of Fertility Societies (IFFS) Surveillance 2013. Oct. 2013. (www.iffs-reproduction.org/resource/resmgr/iffs_surveillance_09-19-13.pdf).Google Scholar
Utian, W H, Sheean, L A, Goldfarb, J M, Kiwi, R. Successful pregnancy after in vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer from an infertile woman to a surrogate. N Engl J Med 1985;313:1351–1352.Google ScholarPubMed
Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology London. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1984.Google Scholar
Brinsden, P R, Appleton, T C, Murray, E, et al. Treatment by in vitro fertilisation with surrogacy – the experience of a single centre in the United Kingdom. Br Med J 2000;320:924–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinsden, P R. IVF surrogacy. In: Brinsden, P R, ed. A Textbook of In Vitro Fertilization and Assisted Reproduction. London: Taylor and Francis, 2005: 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meniru, G I, Craft, I L. Experience with gestational surrogacy as a treatment for sterility resulting from hysterectomy. Hum Reprod 1997;12(1):51–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Utian, W F, Goldfarb, J M, Kiwi, R, et al. Preliminary experience with in vitro fertilization–surrogate gestational pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1989;52:633–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldfarb, J M, Austin, C, Peskin, B, et al. Fifteen years of experience with an in-vitro fertilization surrogate gestational pregnancy programme. Hum Reprod 2000;15:1075–1078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smotrich, D B, Ross, R J, Arnold, L L, Batzofin, D. Gestational surrogacy – ART’s stepchild. Fertil Steril 2008;90:S387–S388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corson, S L, Kelly, M, Braverman, A, English, M E. Gestational carrier pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1998;69:670–674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkinson, J, Tran, C, Tan, T, et al. Peri-natal outcome after in vitro fertilization – surrogacy. Hum Reprod 1999;14(3):671–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, S, Gillman, I. Surrogate motherhood: attachment, attitudes and social support. Psychiatry 1991;54:13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, E. Interviews with surrogate mothers in Britain. J Reprod Infert Psychol 1994;12:189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Akker, O B A. Organisational selection and assessment of women entering a surrogacy agreement in the UK. Hum Reprod 1999;14(1):262–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jadva, V, Murray, C, Lycett, E J, et al. Surrogacy: the experience of surrogate mothers. Hum Reprod 2003;18:2196–2024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golombok, S, Murray, C, Jadva, V, et al. Families created through a surrogacy arrangement: parent–child relationships in the first year of life. Dev Psychol 2004;40:400–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCallum, F, Lycett, E, Murray, C, et al. Surrogacy: the experience of commissioning couples. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1334–1342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, B, Friend, T L. Legal and ethical implications of surrogacy mother contracts. Clin Perinatal 1987;14:281–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuster, E. When genes determine motherhood: problems in gestational surrogacy. Hum Reprod 1992;7(7):1029–1033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surrogate mom vows to take care of ill twin ‘abandoned’ by parents. CNN. August 7, 2014. Available at: http://edition.cnn.com/2014/08/04/world/asia/thailand-australia-surrogacy/Google Scholar
Another Aussie couple reject surrogate baby. The New Zealand Herald. October 9, 2014. Available at: www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11339854Google Scholar
Shenfield, F, Pennings, G, Cohen, J, et al. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law. Chap. 10. Surrogacy. Hum Reprod 2005;20:2705–2707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine and Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2015;103(1):e1–e8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Consideration of the gestational carrier. Fertil Steril 2013;99(7):1838–1841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddle, N, Sarrel, P, Whitehead, M. The effect of hysterectomy on the age at ovarian failure: identification of a subgroup of women with premature loss of ovarian function and literature review. Fertil Steril 1987;47:94–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ben-Raphael, Z, Barr-Hava, I, Levy, T, Orvieto, R. Simplifying ovulation induction for surrogacy in women with Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome. Hum Reprod 1998;13(6):1470–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrozza, J C, Gray, M R, Davies, A J, Reindollar, R H. Congenital absence of the uterus and vagina is not commonly transmitted as a dominant genetic trait: outcomes of surrogate pregnancies. Fertil Steril 1997;67(2):387–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balen, A H, Hadyn, C A. British Fertility Society Survey of all licensed clinics that perform surrogacy in the UK. Hum Fertil 1998;1:6–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadruplets born to surrogate mother. Los Angeles Times. April 11, 1998. Available at: www.articles.latimes.com/1998/apr/11/local/me-38204.Google Scholar
Woman, 55, delivers triplets for her daughter. USA Today. December 28, 2004. Available at: www.usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2004-12-28-surrogate-mother_x.htmGoogle Scholar
Duffy, D A, Nulsen, J C, Maier, D B, Schmidt, D, Benadiva, C. Obstetrical complications in gestational carrier pregnancies. Fertil Steril 2005;83(3):749–754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dar, S, Lazer, T, Swanson, S, et al. Assisted reproduction involving gestational surrogacy: an analysis of the medical, psychological and legal issues: experience from a large surrogacy program. Hum Reprod 2015;30(2):345–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jadva, V, Imrie, S. Children of surrogate mothers: psychological well-being, family relationships and experience of surrogacy. Hum Reprod 2014;29(1):90–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jadva, V, Blake, L, Casey, P, Golombok, S. Surrogacy families 10 years on: relationship with the surrogate, decisions over disclosure and children’s understanding of their surrogacy origin. Hum Reprod 2012;27(10):3008–3012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, W, Hudson, N, Culley, L. Gay men seeking surrogacy to achieve parenthood. RBM Online 2013;27:271–279.Google ScholarPubMed
Crokin, S L. Growing families in a shrinking world: legal and ethical challenges in cross-border surrogacy. RBM Online 2013;27:733–741.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, K H, Baby, M, The surrogacy contract, and the healthcare professional: unanswered questions. Law Med Health Care 1988;16:113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith v Jones. Los Angeles Superior Court, Los Angeles County. June 9, 1987. No CF 025653.Google Scholar
James, S, Chilkvers, R, Havemann, D, Phelps, J Y. Avoiding legal pitfals in surrogacy arrangements. RBM Online 2012;21:862–867.Google Scholar
The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Access to treatment by gays, lesbians, and unmarried persons. Fertil Steril 2006;86:1333–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, R A. Surrogacy: a Catholic perspective. Creighton Law Rev 1992;25:1617–1625.Google ScholarPubMed
Schenker, J G. Infertility evaluation and treatment according to Jewish Law. Am J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 1997;71:113–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hussain, F A. Reproductive issues from the Islamic perspective. Hum Fertil 2000;3:124–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar