Bibliography

John Collins

doi:10.1017/9781009058278.012

Barrett, Damon. ‘Reflections on Human Rights and International Drug Control’. In Governing the Global Drug Wars, edited by Collins, John. London: LSE, 2012. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/47122/1/Governing%20the%20global%20drug%20wars%28published%29.pdf.Google Scholar

Barrett, Damon, Bewley-Taylor, David, and Jelsma, Martin. ‘Fatal Attraction: Brownfield’s Flexibility Doctrine and Global Drug Policy Reform’. Huffington Post Politics UK (blog), 18 November 2014. www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/damon-barett/drug-policy-reform_b_6158144.html.Google Scholar

Becker, Howard Saul. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. Free Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Bello, David. ‘The Venomous Course of Southwestern Opium: Qing Prohibition in Yunnan, Sichuan, and Guizhou in the Early Nineteenth Century’. The Journal of Asian Studies 62, no. 4 (2003): 1109–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3591761.Google Scholar

Bentham, Mandy. The Politics of Drug Control. New York: Macmillan, 1998.Google Scholar

Berridge, Virginia. ‘Illicit Drugs and Internationalism: The Forgotten Dimension’. Medical History 2, no. 45 (2001): 282–8.Google Scholar

Berridge, Virginia. Opium and the People: Opiate Use and Drug Control Policy in Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century England. London: Free Association Books, 1999.Google Scholar

Bewley-Taylor, David R. International Drug Control: Consensus Fractured. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Bewley-Taylor, , The United States and International Drug Control, 1909–1997. London: Continuum, 1999.Google Scholar

Biermann, Frank, Pattberg, Philipp, Van Asselt, Harro, and Zelli, Fariborz. ‘The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis’. Global Environmental Politics 9, no. 4 (2009): 14–40. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2009.9.4.14.Google Scholar

Block, Alan A. ‘European Drug Traffic and Traffickers between the Wars: The Policy of Suppression and Its Consequences’. Journal of Social History 23, no. 2 (1 December 1989): 315–37.Google Scholar

Bradford, J.T. Poppies, Politics, and Power: Afghanistan and the Global History of Drugs and Diplomacy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2019. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=iapzDwAAQBAJ.Google Scholar

Brook, Timothy. ‘Opium and Collaboration in Central China 1938–1940’. In Opium Regimes: China, Britain, and Japan, 1839–1952, edited by Brook, Timothy and Wakabayashi, Bob Tadashi. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Brown, Richard Harvey. ‘The Opium Trade and Opium Policies in India, China, Britain, and the United States: Historical Comparisons and Theoretical Interpretations’. Asian Journal of Social Science 30, no. 3 (2002): 623–56. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853102320945420.Google Scholar

Brownfield, William R. ‘Trends in Global Drug Policy’. US Department of State press office. New York City, 9 October 2014. http://fpc.state.gov/232813.htm.Google Scholar

Bruun, Kettil, Pan, Lynn, and Rexed, Ingemar. The Gentlemen’s Club: International Control of Drugs and Alcohol. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Herald, Buenos Aires. ‘Mujica Blasts UN Official Raymond Yans over Marijuana Law’, 15 December 2013. www.buenosairesherald.com/article/147539/mujica-blasts-un-official-raymond-yans-over-marijuana-law (accessed 8/10/2015)Google Scholar

Campos, Isaac. Home Grown: Marijuana and the Origins of Mexico’s War on Drugs. University of North Carolina Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Chouvy, Pierre-Arnaud. ‘Drug Trafficking in and out of the Golden Triangle’. In An Atlas of Trafficking in Southeast Asia. The Illegal Trade in Arms, Drugs, People, Counterfeit Goods and Natural Resources in Mainland, 1–32. I.B. Tauris, 2013. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01050968.Google Scholar

Cogan, Jacob, Matz-Lück, Nele, Prost, Mario, and Singh, Sahib. ‘Fragmentation of International Legal Orders and International Law: Ways Forward?’ In American Society of International Law. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, 123–32. Washington: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Colgan, Jeff, Keohane, Robert, and Van de Graaf, Thijs. ‘Punctuated Equilibrium in the Energy Regime Complex’. The Review of International Organizations 7, no. 2 (2012): 117–43.Google Scholar

Collins, John. ‘A Brief History of Cannabis and the Drug Conventions’. AJIL Unbound (October 2020).CrossRef Google Scholar

Collins, John. ‘Breaking the Monopoly System: American Influence on the British Decision to Prohibit Opium Smoking and End Its Asian Monopolies, 1939–1945’. International History Review 39, no. 5 (February 2017): 770–90.Google Scholar

Collins, John. ‘Evaluating Trends and Stakeholders in the International Drug Control Regime Complex’. International Journal of Drug Policy 90 (1 April 2021): 103060, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.103060.Google Scholar

Collins, John. ‘Imperial Drug Economies, Development, and the Search for Alternatives in Asia, from Colonialism to Decolonisation’. Drug Policies and Development (27 August 2020): 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004440494_004.Google Scholar

Collins, John. ‘Losing UNGASS? Lessons from Civil Society, Past and Present’. Drugs and Alcohol Today 17, no. 2 (2017): 88–97.Google Scholar

Collins, John. ‘Regulations and Prohibitions: Anglo-American Relations and International Drug Control, 1939–1964’. London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), 2015. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/3107/.Google Scholar

Collins, John. ‘Rethinking “Flexibilities” in the International Drug Control System – Potential, Precedents and Models for Reforms’. International Journal of Drug Policy 60 (2018): 107–14.Google Scholar

Collins, John. ‘The State Department’s Move to a More Flexible Diplomatic Policy on Drugs Is a Rational Approach to a Difficult Question’. USAPP (blog), 1 December 2014. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2014/12/01/the-u-s-new-more-flexible-diplomatic-doctrine-on-drugs-is-a-rational-approach-to-a-difficult-question/.Google Scholar

Collins, John. ‘War, Decolonisation and the Birth of the Illicit Opium Trade in Burma’. In Historical Perspectives on Organised Crime and Terrorism, edited by Windle, James, Mirrison, John, Winter, Aaron, and Silke, Andrew. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar

Collins, John. Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971. New York: United Nations, 1971. www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/psychotropics.html.Google Scholar

Courtwright, David. ‘A Short History of Drug Policy or Why We Make War on Some Drugs but Not on Others’. In Governing the Global Drug Wars, edited by Collins, John. London: LSE IDEAS, 2012. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/47122/1/Governing%20the%20global%20drug%20wars%28published%29.pdf.Google Scholar

Csete, Joanne. ‘Overhauling Oversight: Human Rights at the INCB’. Edited by John Collins. Governing the Global Drug Wars, LSE IDEAS Special Reports, October 2012. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/47122/1/Governing%20the%20global%20drug%20wars%28published%29.pdf.Google Scholar

Denza, Eileen. ‘The Relationship Between International and National Law’. In International Law, edited by Evans, Malcolm D., Edition, Fourth. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Edwards, Lee. Missionary for Freedom: The Life and Times of Walter Judd. Paragon House, 1990.Google Scholar

Engle Merry, Sally. ‘Legal Pluralism’. Law and Society Review 22, no. 5 (1 January 1988): 869–96.Google Scholar

Friman, H. Richard. NarcoDiplomacy: Exporting the U.S. War on Drugs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Ghiabi, Maziyar. Drugs Politics: Managing Disorder in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Cambridge University Press, 2019. https://books.google.be/books?id=HoOWDwAAQBAJ.Google Scholar

Gootenberg, Paul. Andean Cocaine: The Making of a Global Drug. University of North Carolina Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Greenwood, Sean. Britain and the Cold War, 1945–1991. St. Martin’s Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Hansen, Bradley. ‘Learning to Tax: The Political Economy of the Opium Trade in Iran, 1921–1941’. The Journal of Economic History 61, no. 1 (1 March 2001): 95–113.Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R. ‘Regime Shifting in the International Intellectual Property System’. Perspectives on Politics 7, no. 1 (2009): 39–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hoopes, Townsend, and Brinkley, Douglas. Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the Creation of the U.N . Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Jelsma, Martin. ‘UN Common Position on Drug Policy – Consolidating System-Wide Coherence’. Transnational Institute, December 2019. www.tni.org/en/publication/un-common-position-on-drug-policy-consolidating-system-wide-coherence.Google Scholar

Jelsma, Martin, and Bewley-Taylor, David. ‘UNGASS 2016: A Broken or B-r-o-a-d Consensus?’ Transnational Institute (blog), 5 July 2016. www.tni.org/en/publication/ungass-2016-a-broken-or-b-r-o-a-d-consensus.Google Scholar

Jelsma, Martin, and Bewley-Taylor, David R.. ‘The UN Drug Control Conventions: The Limits of Latitude’. Series on Legislative Reform of Drug Policies. Transnational Institute and International Drug Policy Consortium, March 2012. www.tni.org/sites/www.tni.org/files/download/dlr18.pdf.Google Scholar

Jenks, C. Wilfred, . ‘The Conflict of Law-Making Treaties’. BYBIL 3 (1953).Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O, and Victor, David G. ‘The Regime Complex for Climate Change’. Perspectives on Politics 9, no. 1 (2011): 7–23.Google Scholar

Kinder, Douglas Clark. ‘Bureaucratic Cold Warrior: Harry J. Anslinger and Illicit Narcotics Traffic’. Pacific Historical Review 50, no. 2 (1 May 1981): 169–91.Google Scholar

Kinder, Douglas Clark. ‘Shutting Out the Evil: Nativism and Narcotics Control in the United States’. In Drug Control Policy: Essays in Historical Comparative Perspective, edited by Walker, William O. III. Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law’. In Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission. United Nations, 2006. http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_l682.pdf.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, and Leino, Pivi. ‘Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties’. Leiden Journal of International Law 15, no. 3 (2002): 553–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156502000262.Google Scholar

Kranton, Rachel, and Swamy, Anand V.. ‘Contracts, Hold-Up, and Exports: Textiles and Opium in Colonial India’. American Economic Review 98, no. 3 (1 June 2008): 967–90. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.3.967.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D. ‘Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’. International Organization 36, no. 2 (1982): 185–205.Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico. Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law. 1st ed. Oxford Constitutional Theory. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Kuyper, Jonathan W. ‘Global Democratization and International Regime Complexity’. European Journal of International Relations 20, no. 3 (2014): 620–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113497492.Google Scholar

Latin American Commission on Drugs and Democracy. ‘Drugs and Democracy: Toward a Paradigm Shift’, February 2009. www.globalcommissionondrugs.org/the-latin-american-commission-on-drugs-and-democracy.Google Scholar

Lewy, Jonathan. ‘The Drug Policy of the Third Reich’. Social History of Alcohol and Drugs 22, no. 2 (2008): 144–67.Google Scholar

Lines, Richard. Drug Control and Human Rights in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zNqiDgAAQBAJ.Google Scholar

Lines, Rick, and Barrett, Damon. ‘The Human Rights Win at UNGASS on Drugs That No One Is Talking About and How We Can Use It’, 9 May 2016. https://hrcessex.wordpress.com/2016/05/09/the-human-rights-win-at-the-ungass-on-drugs-that-no-one-is-talking-about-and-how-we-can-use-it/.Google Scholar

Maule, Robert. ‘British Policy Discussions on the Opium Question in the Federated Shan States, 1937–1948’. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 33, no. 2 (June 2002): 203–24.Google Scholar

Maule, Robert. ‘The Opium Question in the Federated Shan States, 1931-36: British Policy Discussions and Scandal’. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 23, no. 1 (March 1992): 14–36.Google Scholar

McAllister, William B. ‘A Limited Enterprise: The History of International Efforts to Control Drugs in the Twentieth Century’. PhD Dissertation, University of Virginia, 1996.Google Scholar

McAllister, William B. Drug Diplomacy in the Twentieth Century: An International History. New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar

McAllister, William B. In Governing the Global Drug Wars, edited by Collins, John. London: LSE, 2012. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/47122/1/Governing%20the%20global%20drug%20wars%28published%29.pdf. Google Scholar

McAllister, William B. ‘The Global Political Economy of Scheduling: The International–Historical Context of the Controlled Substances Act’. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 76, no. 1 (5 October 2004): 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.02.012.Google Scholar

McCoy, Alfred W. The Politics of Heroin: CIA Complicity in the Global Drug Trade, Afghanistan, Southeast Asia, Central America, Colombia. 3rd ed. Brooklyn, NY: Lawrence Hill Books, 2003.Google Scholar

McWilliams, John C. The Protectors: Harry J. Anslinger and the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 1930–1962. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Meyer, Kathryn, and Parssinen, Terry M.. Webs of Smoke: Smugglers, Warlords, Spies, and the History of the International Drug Trade. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002.Google Scholar

Mills, James H. Cannabis Britannica : Empire, Trade, and Prohibition 1800–1928: Empire, Trade, and Prohibition 1800–1928. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Mills, James H. Cannabis Nation: Control and Consumption in Britain, 1928–2008. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Mills, James H. ‘Cocaine and the British Empire: The Drug and the Diplomats at the Hague Opium Conference, 1911–12’. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 42, no. 3 (2014): 400–419.Google Scholar

Morgan, H. Wayne. Drugs in America: A Social History, 1800–1980. Syracuse University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Musto, David F. The American Disease: Origins of Narcotic Control. 3rd ed. London: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Muzaka, Valbona. ‘Linkages, Contests and Overlaps in the Global Intellectual Property Rights Regime’. European Journal of International Relations 17, no. 4 (2011): 755–76.Google Scholar

Nadelmann, Ethan A. ‘Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society’. International Organization 44, no. 4 (1 October 1990): 479–526.Google Scholar

Organization of American States. ‘Scenarios for the Drug Problem in the Americas, 2013–2025’. Cartagena de Indias: OAS, 2012. www.oas.org/documents/eng/press/scenarios_report.pdf.Google Scholar

Paoli, Letizia, Greenfield, Victoria A., and Reuter, Peter. The World Heroin Market: Can Supply Be Cut? Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Peters, Anne. ‘The Refinement of International Law: From Fragmentation to Regime Interaction and Politicization’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 15, no. 3 (2017): 671–704. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mox056.Google Scholar

Raustiala, Kal, and Victor, David G.. ‘The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources’. International Organization 58, no. 2 (2004): 277–309. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582036.Google Scholar

Richards, John F. ‘Opium and the British Indian Empire: The Royal Commission of 1895’. Modern Asian Studies 36, no. 2 (2002): 375–420. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X02002044.CrossRef Google Scholar

Russell, Thomas. Egyptian Service: 1902–1946. Murray, 1949.Google Scholar

Santos, Juan Manuel. ‘Re-Examining the Drug Problem Through a Fresh Lens’. Edited by John Collins. Governing the Global Drug Wars, LSE IDEAS Special Reports, October 2012, 2–3. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/47122/1/Governing%20the%20global%20drug%20wars%28published%29.pdf.Google Scholar

Schur, Edwin M. Narcotic Addiction in Britain and America: The Impact of Public Policy. Oxfordshire: Taylor & Francis, 1962.Google Scholar

Spillane, Joseph, and Mcallister, William B.. ‘Keeping the Lid On: A Century of Drug Regulation and Control’. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 70, no. 3 (2003): S5–12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12759194/.Google Scholar

Stein, S. D. International Diplomacy, State Administrators, and Narcotics Control: The Origins of a Social Problem. Aldershot: Gower, 1985.Google Scholar

Strang, John, and Gossop, Michael, eds. Heroin Addiction and the British System: Origins and Evolution. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

Strang, John, and Gossop, Michael, eds. ‘Misreported and Minunderstood – the “British System” of Drug Policy’. In Heroin Addiction and the British System: Origins and Evolution, edited by Strang, John and Gossop, Michael. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

Taylor, Arnold H. American Diplomacy and the Narcotics Traffic, 1900–1939: A Study in International Humanitarian Reform. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

The Global Commission on Drug Policy. ‘War on Drugs’. New York: GCDP, 2011. www.globalcommissionondrugs.org/reports/war-on-drugs/.Google Scholar

The Global Commission on Drug Policy. ‘The Hague International Opium Convention’. The Hague, 1912.Google Scholar

Traver, Harold H. ‘Colonial Relations and Opium Control Policy in Hong Kong, 1841–1945’. In Drugs, Law, and the State, edited by Traver, Harold H. and Gaylord, Mark S.. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1992.Google Scholar

Trocki, Carl A. ‘Opium and the Beginnings of Chinese Capitalism in Southeast Asia’. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 33, no. 2 (2002): 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463402000152.Google Scholar

Trocki, Carl A. Opium, Empire and the Global Political Economy: A Study of the Asian Opium Trade, 1750–1950. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar

UK All Party Parliamentary Group on Drug Policy Reform. ‘Guidance on Drug Policy: Interpreting the UN Drug Conventions’, 2015.Google Scholar

UNDP. ‘Addressing the Development Dimensions of Drug Policy’. New York: United Nations Development Programme, June 2015. www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/hiv-aids/addressing-the-development-dimensions-of-drug-policy.html.Google Scholar

United Nations. ‘Commentary on the Convention on Psychotropic Substances, 1971’. New York: United Nations, 1976.Google Scholar

United Nations. ‘Commentary on the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961’. New York: United Nations Secretariat, 1973. www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/organized_crime/Drug%20Convention/Commentary_on_the_single_convention_1961.pdf.Google Scholar

United Nations. ‘Commentary on the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961’. New York: United Nations, 1973.Google Scholar

United Nations. ‘Commentary on the United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances 1988’. New York: United Nations, 1998.Google Scholar

United Nations. Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 as Amended by the 1972 Protocol. New York: Nations, United, 1961.Google Scholar

United Nations. United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, 1988. Vienna: United Nations, 1988. www.unodc.org/pdf/convention_1988_en.pdf.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly. ‘Our Joint Commitment to Effectively Addressing and Countering the World Drug Problem’. New York: United Nations, 19 April 2016.Google Scholar

UNODC. ‘A Century of International Drug Control’. Vienna: United Nations, 2008. www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/Studies/100_Years_of_Drug_Control.pdf.Google Scholar

Walker, III, William, O. ‘Bibliographic Essay’. In Drug Control Policy: Essays in Historical and Comparative Perspective, edited by Walker, William O. III. Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Walker, III, William, O. ed. Drug Control Policy: Essays in Historical and Comparative Perspective. Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Walker, III, William, O. Opium and Foreign Policy: The Anglo-American Search for Order in Asia, 1912–1954. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991.Google Scholar

WHO Expert Committee on Drug Dependence. ‘Seventeenth Report’. WHO Technical Report Series, n.d.Google Scholar

Williams, Adam, and Cattan, Nacha. ‘Biden Says Drug Legalization Debate Is “Totally Legitimate”’. Bloomberg News, 3 June 2012. www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-03-05/biden-visits-mexico-honduras-amid-calls-to-debate-drug-strategy.Google Scholar

Windle, James. ‘How the East Influenced Drug Prohibition’. The International History Review 35, no. 5 (October 2013): 1185–99.Google Scholar

Gao, Yanli. ‘Judd’s China: A Missionary Congressman and US-China Policy’. Journal of Modern Chinese History 2, no. 2 (December 2008): 197–219.Google Scholar

Young, Oran, Chambers, W. Bradnee, Kim, Joy, and Ten Have, Claudia. Institutional Interplay: Biosafety and Trade. Tokyo, Japan: UNU, 2008. http://search.proquest.com/docview/903905443/.Google Scholar

Yung-Ning Hoo, Mona. Painting the Shadows: The Extraordinary Life of Victor Hoo. London: Eldridge and Co., 1998.Google Scholar

Zhou, Yongming. Anti-Drug Crusades in Twentieth-Century China: Nationalism, History, and State Building. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.Google Scholar