Book contents
- Designing in Ethics
- Designing in Ethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 The Design Turn in Applied Ethics
- 2 Designing Responsibility: The Problem of Many Hands in Complex Organizations
- 3 Dealing with Moral Dilemmas through Design
- 4 Designing the Morality of Things: The Ethics of Behaviour-Guiding Technology
- 5 The Health Impact Fund: Aligning Incentives
- 6 Poverty, Exclusion and the Design of Microfinance Institutions
- 7 Designing-in-Ethics: A Compulsory Retirement Savings System
- 8 Pacifism: Designing a Moral Defence Force
- 9 An Anti-Corruption System for Police Organizations
- 10 Good Governance for the Commons: Design for Legitimacy
- 11 The Ethical Obligation to Beauty in the Design of Buildings
- Index
- References
Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 October 2017
Book contents
- Designing in Ethics
- Designing in Ethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 The Design Turn in Applied Ethics
- 2 Designing Responsibility: The Problem of Many Hands in Complex Organizations
- 3 Dealing with Moral Dilemmas through Design
- 4 Designing the Morality of Things: The Ethics of Behaviour-Guiding Technology
- 5 The Health Impact Fund: Aligning Incentives
- 6 Poverty, Exclusion and the Design of Microfinance Institutions
- 7 Designing-in-Ethics: A Compulsory Retirement Savings System
- 8 Pacifism: Designing a Moral Defence Force
- 9 An Anti-Corruption System for Police Organizations
- 10 Good Governance for the Commons: Design for Legitimacy
- 11 The Ethical Obligation to Beauty in the Design of Buildings
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Designing in Ethics , pp. 1 - 10Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Agar, N. (2004). Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMarco, J. P., and Fox, R. M. (1986). New Directions in Ethics: The Challenge of Applied Ethics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1998). The need for a recovery of philosophy. (1917). The Essential Dewey, 1, 46–70.Google Scholar
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., and Borning, A. (2006). Value sensitive design and information systems. In Zhang, P. and Galletta, D. (eds), Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations, 348–372. London: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E. (1996). Institutions and their design. In Goodin, R. E. (ed.), The Theory of Institutional Design, 1–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, R. (1996). Institutional morality. In Goodin, R. E. (ed.), The Theory of Institutional Design, 126–153. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. (2003). Individual autonomy and sociality. In Schmitt, F. (ed.), Socialising Metaphysics: Nature of Social Reality, 269–300. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Miller, S. (2006). Collective moral responsibility: An individualist account. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 30(1), 176–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice. Rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (2007). The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Savulescu, J., and Bostrom, N., eds. (2009). Human Enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, S. (1995). Individual responsibility in a global age. Social Philosophy and Policy, 12(1), 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H., and Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. (2005). Restoring Responsibility: Ethics in Government, Business, and Healthcare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van den Hoven, M. J. (1997). Computer ethics and moral methodology. Metaphilosophy, 28(3), 234–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Hoven, M. J., Blaauw, M., Pieters, W., and Warnier, M. (2014). Privacy and information technology. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2014 ed. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/it-privacy/.Google Scholar
van den Hoven, M. J., Vermaas, P. E., and van de Poel, I. (2015). Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design: Sources, Theory, Values and Application Domains. Houten, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency and Design. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Whitbeck, C. (1996). Ethics as design: Doing justice to moral problems. The Hastings Center Report, 26(3), 9–16.Google Scholar
Whitbeck, C. (2011). Ethics in Engineering Practice and Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar