Book contents
- Designing in Ethics
- Designing in Ethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 The Design Turn in Applied Ethics
- 2 Designing Responsibility: The Problem of Many Hands in Complex Organizations
- 3 Dealing with Moral Dilemmas through Design
- 4 Designing the Morality of Things: The Ethics of Behaviour-Guiding Technology
- 5 The Health Impact Fund: Aligning Incentives
- 6 Poverty, Exclusion and the Design of Microfinance Institutions
- 7 Designing-in-Ethics: A Compulsory Retirement Savings System
- 8 Pacifism: Designing a Moral Defence Force
- 9 An Anti-Corruption System for Police Organizations
- 10 Good Governance for the Commons: Design for Legitimacy
- 11 The Ethical Obligation to Beauty in the Design of Buildings
- Index
- References
1 - The Design Turn in Applied Ethics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 October 2017
Book contents
- Designing in Ethics
- Designing in Ethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 The Design Turn in Applied Ethics
- 2 Designing Responsibility: The Problem of Many Hands in Complex Organizations
- 3 Dealing with Moral Dilemmas through Design
- 4 Designing the Morality of Things: The Ethics of Behaviour-Guiding Technology
- 5 The Health Impact Fund: Aligning Incentives
- 6 Poverty, Exclusion and the Design of Microfinance Institutions
- 7 Designing-in-Ethics: A Compulsory Retirement Savings System
- 8 Pacifism: Designing a Moral Defence Force
- 9 An Anti-Corruption System for Police Organizations
- 10 Good Governance for the Commons: Design for Legitimacy
- 11 The Ethical Obligation to Beauty in the Design of Buildings
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Designing in Ethics , pp. 11 - 31Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Alfano, M., and Loeb, D. (2016). Experimental moral philosophy. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2016 ed., https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/experimental-moral/.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1975). The first person. In Guttenplan, S. D. (ed.), Mind and Language, 45–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bellamy, L. J. (2015). Exploring the relationship between major hazards, fatal and non-fatal accidents through outcomes and causes. Safety Science, 71, 93–103.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. S. (1983). More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Dabekaussen, M. (2007). Improving incident analysis in the Dutch railway sector. Safety Science Monitor, 11(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1998). The need for a recovery of philosophy. 1917. The Essential Dewey, 1, 46–70.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (2013). Securities against Misrule: Juries, Assemblies, Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, M., Howe, D. C., and Nissenbaum, H. (2005). Values at play: Design tradeoffs in socially-oriented game design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 751–760. New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, M., Howe, D. C., and Nissenbaum, H. (2008). Embodying values in technology: Theory and practice. In Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, 322–353. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, B. (1999). Value-Sensitive Design: A Research Agenda for Information Technology. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Friedman, B., Kahn, P., and Borning, A. (2002). Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods. CSE Technical Report 02-12-01. Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
Geuss, R. (2008). Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, T. (ed.). (2012). Comparative Constitutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E. (1998). The Theory of Institutional Design. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. (1993). How we do ethics now. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 35, 159–177.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. (1998). Value Judgement: Improving Our Ethical Beliefs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, R. (1996). Institutional morality. In Goodin, R. (ed.), The Theory of Institutional Design, 126–153. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (2012). Preludes to Pragmatism: Toward a Reconstruction of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knobel, C., and Bowker, G. C. (2011). Values in design. Communications of the ACM, 54(7), 26–28.Google Scholar
Lansing, J. S. (1991). Priests and Programmers: Technologies of Power in the Engineered Landscape of Bali. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? In Bijker, W. and Law, J. (eds), Shaping Technology – Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, 225–259. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Manders-Huits, N. L. J. L., and Van den Hoven, J. (2009). Value-sensitive design. In Blackwell Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Marcus, R. B. (1980). Moral dilemmas and consistency. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(3), 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, L. (1964). Authoritarian and democratic technics. Technology and Culture, 5(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Posner, R. A. (1998). The problematics of moral and legal theory. Harvard Law Review, 111, 1637–1717.Google Scholar
Scheffler, S. (1995). Individual responsibility in a global age. Social Philosophy and Policy, 12(1), 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. (2012). The Evolved Apprentice: How Evolution Made Humans Unique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H., and Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H., Sunstein, C. R., and Balz, J. P. (2012). Choice architecture. Chapter 25 in Shafir, Eldar (ed.), The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. (2005). Restoring Responsibility: Ethics in Government, Business, and Healthcare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van den Hoven, M. J. (2005). Design for values and values for design. Information Age, 4, 4–7.Google Scholar
Van den Hoven, M. J., and Van de Poel, L. (2012). Engineering and the problem of moral overload. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(11), 143–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Hoven, M. J., Vermaas, P. E., and van de Poel, I., eds. (2015). Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design: Sources, Theory, Values and Application Domains. Houten, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- 13
- Cited by