Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T05:55:49.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of the use of the FAS endoluminal brush and 20% ethanol flushes to unblock central venous catheters used for long-term parenteral nutrition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2010

W. N. Magambo
Affiliation:
Nutrition Support Team University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
S. Harwood
Affiliation:
Nutrition Support Team University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
M. O'Connell
Affiliation:
Calea WA7 1NT, UK
S. Galliford
Affiliation:
Nutrition Support Team University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
A. Llewellyn-Edwards
Affiliation:
Nutrition Support Team University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
S. Tracey
Affiliation:
Nutrition Support Team University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
L. Hopkins
Affiliation:
Nutrition Support Team University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
A. L. Jukes
Affiliation:
Nutrition Support Team University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
A. B. Hawthorne
Affiliation:
Nutrition Support Team University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009

Catheter occlusion is the second most common problem associated with vascular access devices(Reference Haire, Lieberman and Lund1). In patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN), lipid deposits can form a waxy substance along the lumen of the line which gradually occludes the central venous catheter (CVC)(Reference Baranowski2). The use of 70% ethanol locks has been reported to unblock lipid occlusions(Reference Pennington and Pithie3); while a 20% ethanol flush after lipid infusions has been reported to help prevent the build-up of lipid deposits that occlude the CVC(Reference Hardy4, Reference Tranter and Donoghue5).

Endoluminal brushing of CVC's is more widely known for improving flow rates in catheters used for haemodialysis(Reference Tranter and Donoghue5, Reference Dittrner, Sharp and Williams6). The FAS endoluminal brush has been used successfully to diagnose CVC related sepsis, while the line remains in situ (Reference Dobbins and Kite7Reference Tighe, Kite and Fawley9). In this study, the FAS endoluminal brush is used to salvage occluded CVC's used for long-term PN.

A retrospective audit was done on all the patients receiving long-term PN over the preceding 4 years.

Seventy six FAS endoluminal brushes were performed on 40 patient episodes of line occlusions over a 4-year period.

Eighty five percent of all patient episodes had the CVC salvaged. Fourteen percent of these required a linogram post brushing to fully restore the patency of the CVCs. All the failed patient episodes had CVC occlusion caused by fibrin sheath. The mean no. of patient episodes was 2.5. One patient had a total of 7 episodes of CVC occlusions.

Prior to the introduction of the FAS endoluminal brush, the first line treatment for blocked CVCs used for PN was either urokinase lock or an ethanol lock. This has since changed to FAS endoluminal brushing followed by 20% ethanol flush (5 ml). Weekly flushing of the long-term CVCs with 20% ethanol (5 ml) has since been introduced to maintain patency of the catheter. This has shown to be beneficial more so in the patients who had repeated CVC occlusions due to lipid deposits.

References

1. Haire, WD, Lieberman, RP, Lund, GB, et al. (1990) Cancer 66, 22792285.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Baranowski, L (1993) J Intraven Nurs 16, 167194.Google Scholar
3. Pennington, CR & Pithie, AD (1987) J Parenter Enter Nutr 11, 507508.Google Scholar
4. Hardy, G (2005) Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 8, 277283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Tranter, S & Donoghue, J (2000) Aust Crit Care 13, 10136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Dittrner, ID, Sharp, D, Williams, AJ et al. . (1996) The use of catheter brushes to diagnose internal luminal colonization of haemodualysis catheters. Presentation at the Autumn Meeting of the Royal College of Physicians, London.Google Scholar
7. Dobbins, BM & Kite, P (1999) Nutrition 15, 6667.Google Scholar
8. Kite, P, Dobbins, BM, Wilcox, MH et al. . (1997) J Clin Pathol 50, 278.Google Scholar
9. Tighe, MJ, Kite, P, Fawley, WN et al. . (1996) BMJ 313, 1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar