Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:53:14.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rice and red rice interference. II. Rice response to population densities of three red rice (Oryza sativa) ecotypes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Leopoldo E. Estorninos Jr. ,
David R. Gealy ,
Edward E. Gbur ,
Ronald E. Talbert  and
Marilyn R. McClelland
David R. Gealy
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Dale Bumpers National Rice Research Center, P.O. Box 1090, Stuttgart, AR 72160
Edward E. Gbur
Affiliation:
Agricultural Statistics Laboratory, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Ronald E. Talbert
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Marilyn R. McClelland
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Red rice, which grows taller and produces more tillers than domestic rice and shatters most of its seeds early, is a major weed in many rice-growing areas of the world. Field experiments were conducted at Stuttgart, AR in 1997 and 1998 to evaluate the growth response of the Kaybonnet (KBNT) rice cultivar to various population densities of three red rice ecotypes. The ecotypes tested were Louisiana3 (LA3), Stuttgart strawhull (Stgstraw), and Katy red rice (KatyRR). Compared with KBNT alone, LA3, the tallest of the three red rice ecotypes, reduced tiller density of KBNT 51%, aboveground biomass at 91 d after emergence (DAE) 35%, and yield 80%. Stgstraw, a medium-height red rice, reduced KBNT tiller density 49%, aboveground biomass 26%, and yield 61%. KatyRR, the shortest red rice, reduced KBNT tiller density 30%, aboveground biomass 16%, and yield 21%. Tiller density of rice was reduced by 20 to 48% when red rice density increased from 25 to 51 plants m−2. Rice biomass at 91 DAE was reduced by 9 and 44% when red rice densities were 16 and 51 plants m−2. Rice yield was reduced by 60 and 70% at red rice densities of 25 and 51 plants m−2, respectively. These results demonstrate that low populations of red rice can greatly reduce rice growth and yield and that short-statured red rice types may affect rice growth less than taller ecotypes.

Keywords

Red rice, Oryza sativa L. ORYSA, ‘KatyRR’, ‘LA3’, ‘Stgstraw’; rice, Oryza sativa L., ‘Kaybonnet’Competitionleaf area indexpopulation densityrice growthtiller density
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 53 , Issue 5 , October 2005 , pp. 683 - 689
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Diarra, A., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Talbert, R. E. 1985. Interference of red rice (Oryza sativa) with rice (O. sativa). Weed Sci 33:644–649.Google Scholar
Do Lago, A. A. 1982. Characterization of Red Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Phenotypes in Mississippi. Ph.D. dissertation. Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS. 143 p.Google Scholar
Eleftherohorinos, I., Dhima, K. V., and Vasilakoglou, I. B. 2002. Interference of red rice in rice grown in Greece. Weed Sci 50:167–172.Google Scholar
Estorninos, L. E. Jr., Gealy, D. R., and Talbert, R. E. 2002. Growth response of rice (Oryza sativa) and red rice (O. sativa) in a replacement series study. Weed Technol 16:401–406.Google Scholar
Estorninos, L. E. Jr., Gealy, D. R., Talbert, R. E., and Gbur, E. E. 2005. Rice and red rice interference. I. Response of red rice (Oryza sativa) to sowing rates of tropical japonica and indica rice cultivars. Weed Sci 53:676–682.Google Scholar
Fischer, A. J. and Ramirez, A. 1993. Red rice (Oryza sativa L.): competition studies for management decisions. Int. J. Pest Manage 39:133–138.Google Scholar
Gealy, D. R., Dilday, R. H., Baldwin, F. L., and Black, H. L. 1999. Imazethapyr (‘Pursuit’) effect on red rice (Oryza sativa L.) biotypes. Pages 79–88 in Norman, R. J. and Johnston, T. H. eds. B. R. Wells Arkansas Rice Research Studies-1998. Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station. Research Series 468. Also available online at www.uark.edu/depts/agripub/Publications/researchseries.Google Scholar
Gealy, D. R., Saldain, N. E., and Talbert, R. E. 2000. Emergence of red rice (Oryza sativa) ecotypes under dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) culture. Weed Technol 14:406–412.Google Scholar
Gealy, D. R., Tai, T. H., and Sneller, C. H. 2002. Identification of red rice, rice, and hybrid populations using microsatellite markers. Weed Sci 50:333–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gealy, D. R., Wailes, E. J., Estorninos, L. E. Jr., and Chavez, R. C. 2003. Rice (Oryza sativa) cultivar differences in suppression of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) and economics of reduced propanil rates. Weed Sci 51:601–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, K. D., Fischer, A. J., Foin, T. C., and Hill, J. E. 2003. Crop traits related to weed suppression in water-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L). Weed Sci 51:87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gravois, K. A., Moldenhauer, K. A., and Lee, F. N. et al. 1995. Registration of ‘Kaybonnet’ rice. Crop Sci 35:587–588.Google Scholar
Guy, C. B., Beaty, J. D., Helms, R. S., Baldwin, F. L., and Dillon, T. L. 1992. Red rice control programs in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 45:65.Google Scholar
Jennings, P. R. and De Jesus, J. 1968. Studies on the competition in rice. I. Competition in mixture of varieties. Evolution 22:119–124.Google Scholar
Kwon, S. L., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Talbert, R. E. 1991. Interference of red rice (Oryza sativa) densities in rice (O. sativa). Weed Sci 39:169–174.Google Scholar
Kwon, S. L., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Talbert, R. E. 1992. Comparative growth and development of red rice (Oryza sativa L.) and rice (O. sativa). Weed Sci 40:57–62.Google Scholar
Ni, H., Moody, K., Robles, R. P., Paller, E. C. Jr., and Lales, J. S. 2000. Oryza sativa plant traits conferring competitive ability against weeds. Weed Sci 48:200–204.Google Scholar
Noldin, J. A., Chandler, J. M., and McCauley, G. N. 1999. Red rice (Oryza sativa) biology. I. Characterization of red rice ecotypes. Weed Technol 13:12–18.Google Scholar
Rutger, J. N., Bryant, R. J., Bernhart, J. L., and Gibbons, J. W. 2005. Registration of nine indica germplasms of rice. Crop Sci. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saldain, N. E. 1997. Emergence of Red Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Ecotypes under Dry and Water-Seeded Rice Condition. . University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR. 116 p.Google Scholar
Slaton, N. A. and Cartwright, R. 2001. Rice stand establishment. Pages 21–28 in Slaton, N. A. ed. Rice Production Handbook. Little Rock, AR: Univ. of Arkansas Coop. Ext. Serv. MP 192-10M-1-01RV.Google Scholar
Slaton, N. A., Moldenhauer, K., and Gibbons, J. 2001. Rice varieties and seed production. Pages 15–20 in Slaton, N. A. ed. Rice Production Handbook. Little Rock, AR: Univ. of Arkansas Coop. Ext. Serv. MP 192-10M-1-01RV.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1979. How to control hard-to-kill weeds in rice. Weeds Today 10:12–14.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1981. Control of red rice (Oryza sativa) in water seeded rice (O. sativa). Weed Sci 29:663–666.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1988. Weed thresholds in southern U.S. rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 2:232–241.Google Scholar
Vaughan, L. K., Ottis, B. V., Prazak-Havey, A. M., Bormans, C. A., Sneller, C. H., Chandler, J. M., and Park, W. D. 2001. Is all red rice found in commercial rice really Oryza sativa? Weed Sci 49:468–476.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2000. Weed survey—southern states: grass crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 53:247–274.Google Scholar