Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:57:12.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brassica cover cropping: I. Effects on weed and crop establishment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Erin R. Haramoto  and
Eric R. Gallandt
Erin R. Haramoto
Affiliation:
Sustainable Agriculture Program, Department of Plant, Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5722
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Brassicaceae contain glucosinolates, which hydrolyze to form compounds toxic to plants, fungi, nematodes, and certain insects. Lower weed density and biomass in crops grown following incorporation of brassica cover crops suggest that they may contribute to weed management in agricultural systems. Field experiments were conducted to determine whether incorporated brassica cover crops, including canola, rapeseed, and yellow mustard, reduce subsequent weed and crop establishment; a companion paper describes separate but related field experiments that examined the influence of brassica cover crops on plant growth. Emergence rate and total emergence of sixteen weed and crop bioassay species were measured following brassica cover crops, fallow, or incorporated residues of other short-season cover crops including oat, crimson clover, and buckwheat. The bioassay species, representing a range of seed sizes, were chosen to determine whether larger seed size confers protection from residue-mediated effects on emergence. Averaged over bioassay species, brassica cover crops reduced emergence by 23 to 34% compared with fallow; emergence following brassicas was delayed by approximately 2 d. The effects of the incorporated brassica residues were similar to those of the other short-season cover crops, which reduced emergence of the bioassay species by 19 to 39% and delayed emergence by 2 d. Seed size was a poor predictor of a species' establishment. These results suggest that brassica residues are capable of delaying seedling emergence and reducing establishment, although the magnitude of their effects were comparable to other widely available cover crops.

Keywords

Canola, ‘Hyola’, Brassica napus L.rapeseed, ‘Dwarf Essex’, Brassica napus L.yellow mustard, ‘Idagold’, Sinapis alba L.crimson clover, Trifolium incarnatum L.oat, Avena sativa L.buckwheat, Fagopyrum esculentum MoenchAllelopathybiofumigantseed sizeweed emergence
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 53 , Issue 5 , October 2005 , pp. 695 - 701
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Al-Khatib, K., Libbey, C., and Boydston, R. 1997. Weed suppression with Brassica green manure crops in green pea. Weed Sci 45:439–445.Google Scholar
Bárberi, P. 2002. Weed management in organic agriculture: are we addressing the right issues? Weed Res 42:177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, D. T. and Muller, C. H. 1973. Dominance of California annual grasslands by Brassica nigra . Am. Midl. Nat 90:277–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, P. A., Feeny, P., Contardo, L., and Robson, D. S. 1978. Allylglucosinolate and herbivorous caterpillars: a contrast in toxicity and tolerance. Science 200:1296–1298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boydston, R. and Hang, A. 1995. Rapeseed (Brassica napus) green manure crop suppresses weeds in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol 9:669–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradow, J. M. and Connick, W. J. Jr. 1990. Volatile seed germination inhibitors from plant residues. J. Chem. Ecol 16:645–666.Google Scholar
Brown, P. D. and Morra, M. J. 1996. Hydrolysis products of glucosinolates in Brassica napus tissues as inhibitors of seed germination. Plant Soil 181:307–316.Google Scholar
Brown, P. D. and Morra, M. J. 1997. Control of soil-borne plant pests using glucosinolate-containing plants. Adv. Agron 61:167–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chee-Sanford, J. and Sims, G. 2004. Do microbes influence seedbank dynamics?. Page 141 in Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the North Central Weed Science Society, Columbus, OH. Champaign, IL: NCWSS.Google Scholar
Dyck, E. and Liebman, M. 1994. Soil fertility management as a factor in weed control: the effect of crimson clover residue, synthetic nitrogen fertilizer, and their interaction on emergence and early growth of lambsquarters and sweet corn. Plant Soil 167:227–237.Google Scholar
Dyck, E., Liebman, M., and Erich, M. 1995. Crop–weed interference as influenced by a leguminous or synthetic fertilizer nitrogen source, I: doublecropping experiments with crimson clover, sweet corn, and lambsquarters. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 56:93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallandt, E. R. 2004. Soil improving practices for ecological weed management. Pages 267–284, in Inderjit, ed. Principles and Practices in Weed Management: Weed Biology & Weed Management. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Gallandt, E., Liebman, M., and Huggins, D. 1999. Improving soil quality: implications for weed management. J. Crop. Prod 2:95–121.Google Scholar
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. New York: Wiley. 680 p.Google Scholar
Haramoto, E. R. and Gallandt, E. R. 2004. Brassica cover cropping for weed management: a review. Renew. Agric. Food Syst 19:187–198.Google Scholar
Haramoto, E. R. and Gallandt, E. R. 2005. Brassica cover cropping: II. Effects on growth and interference of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Sci 53:702–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, F. R. and Berkenkamp, B. 1975. Revised growth-stage key for Brassica campestris and B. napus . Can. J. Plant Sci 55:657–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, M. and Taylorson, R. B. 1984. Hardseededness and germinability of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) as affected by temperature and moisture. Weed Sci 32:111–115.Google Scholar
Krishnan, G., Holshouser, D. L., and Nissen, S. J. 1998. Weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with green manure crops. Weed Technol 12:97–102.Google Scholar
Liebman, M. and Davis, A. S. 2000. Integration of soil, crop and weed management in low-external-input farming systems. Weed Res 40:27–47.Google Scholar
Liebman, M. and Gallandt, E. 1997. Many little hammers: ecological management of crop–weed interactions. Pages 291–343, in Jackson, L. ed. Ecology in Agriculture. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Liebman, M. and Gallandt, E. R. 2002. Differential responses to red clover residue and ammonium nitrate by common bean and wild mustard. Weed Sci 50:521–529.Google Scholar
Megie, C. A., Pearson, R. W., and Hiltbold, A. E. 1967. Toxicity of decomposing crop residues to cotton germination and seedling growth. Agron. J 59:197–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithen, R. 2001. Glucosinolates and the degradation products. Pages 214–262, in Callow, J. ed. Advances in Botanical Research. Volume 35. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mohler, C. L. 1996. Ecological bases for the cultural control of annual weeds. J. Prod. Ag 9:468–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mojtahedi, H., Santo, G., Wilson, J., and Hang, A. N. 1993. Managing Meloidogyne chitwoodi on potato with rapeseed as green manure. Plant Dis 77:42–46.Google Scholar
Muehlchen, A., Rand, R., and Parke, J. 1990. Evaluation of crucifer green manures for controlling aphanomyces root rot of peas. Plant Dis 74:651–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, J., Belz, R., Walker, F., and Hurle, K. 2001. Weed suppression by release of isothiocyanates from turnip–rape mulch. Agron. J 93:37–43.Google Scholar
Rosa, E., Heaney, R., Fenwick, G., and Portas, C. 1997. Glucosinolates in crop plants. Pages 99–215, in Janick, J. ed. Horticultural Reviews. Volume 19. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
[SYSTAT] Systat Software Inc. 2003. Release 10.2.01. Richmond, CA: SYSTAT.Google Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. and Taylorson, R. B. 1986. Weed seed response to methyl isothiocyanate and metham. Weed Sci 34:520–524.Google Scholar
Vaughn, S. F. and Boydston, R. A. 1997. Volatile allelochemicals released by crucifer green manures. J. Chem. Ecol 23:2107–2116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vera, C., McGregor, D., and Downey, R. 1987. Detrimental effects of volunteer Brassica on production of certain cereal and oilseed crops. Can. J. Plant Sci 67:983–995.Google Scholar
Waddington, J. 1978. Growth of barley, bromegrass, and alfalfa in the greenhouse in soil containing rapeseed and wheat residues. Can. J. Plant Sci 58:241–248.Google Scholar
Westoby, M., Leishman, M., and Lord, J. 1996. Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci 351:1309–1318.Google Scholar
White, R. H., Worsham, A. D., and Blum, U. 1989. Allelopathic potential of legume debris and aqueous extracts. Weed Sci 37:674–679.Google Scholar
Wolf, R. B., Spencer, G. F., and Kwolek, W. F. 1984. Inhibition of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) germination and growth by benzyl isothiocyanate, a natural toxicant. Weed Sci 32:612–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar