Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:08:24.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Motivations for fruit and vegetable consumption in the UK Women's Cohort Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Jennie Pollard ,
Darren Greenwood ,
Sara Kirk  and
Janet Cade
Jennie Pollard*
Affiliation:
Nutrition Epidemiology Group, Nuffield Institute For Health, University of Leeds, 71–75 Clarendon Road, LeedsLS2 9PL, UK
Darren Greenwood
Affiliation:
Nutrition Epidemiology Group, Nuffield Institute For Health, University of Leeds, 71–75 Clarendon Road, LeedsLS2 9PL, UK
Sara Kirk
Affiliation:
Nutrition Epidemiology Group, Nuffield Institute For Health, University of Leeds, 71–75 Clarendon Road, LeedsLS2 9PL, UK
Janet Cade
Affiliation:
Nutrition Epidemiology Group, Nuffield Institute For Health, University of Leeds, 71–75 Clarendon Road, LeedsLS2 9PL, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Email hssjep@leeds.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Abstract:Background: Despite recommendations to increase fruit and vegetable consumption within the UK population, intakes are still too low. In order to stimulate dietary behaviour change the determinants of food choice need to be explored.

Objectives:

To investigate how the priorities of high consumers of fruit and vegetables differ from those of low consumers, with respect to food choice motivations, and to identify what value high and low consumers place on different aspects of food choice behaviour.

Design:

A 4-day food diary and a questionnaire, including The Food Choice Questionnaire (FCQ) and a measure of Stage of Change (SOC) for fruit and vegetable consumption, were administered to subjects. Motivation scores from the FCQ were compared with fruit and vegetable intake and SOC data.

Subjects:

Nine hundred and ninety-eight females, aged 35–69 years, participating in the UK Women's Cohort Study.

Results:

In a multiple linear regression model, including age, education level and all FCQ motivations, the strongest motivations specifically affecting fruit and vegetable intake were health and natural content. It was found that, for a one point increase (measured on a scale of 0–4) in health and natural content scores, fruit and vegetable consumption increased by 1.11 portions (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5–1.7) and 0.84 portions (95% CI 0.4–1.3), respectively (P>0.01). The SOC evaluation showed significant associations with portions of fruit and vegetables consumed (P>0.01). Women whose SOC was classed as maintenance phase were found to score higher on health, natural content, weight control and ethical concern factors (P>0.01). These women also scored lower on convenience questions (P>0.01).

Conclusion:

In this particular group of women the most important motivating factors for food choice, within the high fruit and vegetable consumers, were health and natural content of the food.

Keywords

FruitVegetablesStages of changeFood choice questionnaireFood choice motivations
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , June 2002 , pp. 479 - 486
Copyright
Copyright © CABI Publishing 2002

References

1World Health Organization (WHO). Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. WHO Technical Report Series, No. 797. Geneva: WHO, 1990.Google Scholar
2 Department of Health. Saving Lives: Our Healthier Nation. London: HMSO, 1999.Google Scholar
3Thompson, RL, Margetts, BM, Speller, VM, McVey, D. The Health Education Authority's health and lifestyle survey 1993: who are the low fruit and vegetable consumers? J. Epidemiol. Community Health 1999; 53(5): 294–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Lefebvre, RC, Lurie, D, Goodman, LS, Weinberg, L, Loughrey, K. Social marketing and nutrition education: inappropriate or misunderstood? J. Nutr. Educ. 1995; 27: 146–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Cox, DN, Anderson, AS, Lean, MEJ, Mela, DJ. UK consumer attitudes, beliefs and barriers to increasing fruit and vegetable consumption. Public Health Nutr. 1998; 1(1): 61–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Institute of European Food Studies. A pan-EU Survey of Consumer Attitudes to Food, Nutrition and Health. Ireland: Institute of European Food Studies, 1996.Google Scholar
7Steptoe, A, Pollard, TM, Wardle, J. Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: the Food Choice Questionnaire. Appetite 1995; 25: 267–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Prochaska, JO, DiClemente, CC. Stages of change in the modification of problem behaviors. Prog. Behav. Modification 1992; 28: 183–218.Google ScholarPubMed
9Pollard, TM, Steptoe, A, Wardle, J. Motives underlying healthy eating: using the Food Choice Questionnaire to explain variation in dietary intake. J. Biosoc. Sci. 1998; 30: 165–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Crawley, H. Food Portion Sizes. London: HMSO, 1994.Google Scholar
11 SPSS, Inc. SPSS for Windows: Release 9.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc., 1998.Google Scholar
12Pollard, J, Greenwood, D, Kirk, S, Cade, J. Lifestyle factors affecting fruit and vegetable consumption in the UK Women's Cohort Study. Appetite 2001; 37: 71–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Kirk, SF, Cade, JE, Barrett, JH, Conner, M. Diet and lifestyle characteristics associated with dietary supplement use in women. Public Health Nutr. 1999; 2(1): 69–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Koivisto Hursti, U, Sjoden, P. Food and general neophobia and their relationship with self-reported food choice: familial resemblance in Swedish families with children of ages 7–17 years. Appetite 1997; 29: 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Heimendinger, J, Van Duyn, MA. Dietary behavior change: the challenge of recasting the role of fruit and vegetables in the American diet. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1995; 61(Suppl. 6): 1397S–401S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Kearney, KM, McElhone, S. Perceived barriers in trying to eat healthier - results of a pan-EU consumer attitudinal survey. Br. J. Nutr. 1999; 81(2): 5133–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Laforge, RG, Greene, GW, Prochaska, JO. Psychosocial factors influencing low fruit and vegetable consumption. J. Behav. Med. 1994; 17(4): 361–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Brug, J, Glanz, K, Kok, G. The relationship between self-efficacy, attitudes, intake compared to others, consumption and stages of change related to fruit and vegetables. Am. J. Health Prom. 1997; 12(1): 25–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19DiClemente, CC. Motivational interviewing and the stages of change. In: Miller, WR, Rollnick, S, eds. Motivational Interviewing. Preparing People to Change Addictive Behavior. New York: The Guilford Press, 1991; 191–202.Google Scholar
20Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. National Food Survey 1998. London: The Stationery Office, 1999.Google Scholar