Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Review process

This journal uses a single-anonymised model of peer review. The author does not know the identity of the reviewers, but the reviewers know the identity of the author. 

All papers published in this journal are peer reviewed. All submissions are initially assessed for suitability by the Editor-in-Chief. Following that assessment, manuscripts are reviewed by an expert Associate Editor and two independent referees, with the exception of Letters to the Editor which are reviewed by members of the Editorial Board. A decision will be made by the Associate Editor based on the referees’ reports and their own review of the manuscript.

If an Editorial Board member submits a manuscript to the journal, they do so via ScholarOne in the usual way and do not take part in the review or decision-making process regarding their own paper. Editorial Board members who have submitted papers to the journal are blinded from accessing information on their paper in the system and are notified of decisions in the usual way.