Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T20:35:29.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards understanding side-skin surface characteristics in laser powder bed fusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2020

Sagar Patel
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ONN2L 3G1, Canada
Allan Rogalsky
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ONN2L 3G1, Canada
Mihaela Vlasea*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ONN2L 3G1, Canada
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: mihaela.vlasea@uwaterloo.ca
Get access

Abstract

Additively manufactured parts produced via laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) have limitations in their applications due to post-processing requirements caused by high surface roughness. The characteristics of side-skin surfaces are generally assumed to be dominated by adhered powder particles. This work aims to analyze and interpret the effects of LPBF processing parameters on side-skin surfaces. As such, this work has two sections to investigate the effect of (i) core and (ii) border LPBF parameters on side-skin surface roughness for Ti–6Al–4V. The findings show that there is a robust correlation between both core and border LPBF parameters on side-skin surface morphologies. In terms of core LPBF parameters, an interaction between laser power and beam velocity is shown to influence side-skin surface roughness, resulting in Sa values in the range of 11–26 μm. Additionally, a preliminary investigation into the effect of melting mode phenomena at the border leads to a possibility of obtaining Sa values of <10 μm, with reduced effects of adhered and partially fused powder.

Type
Invited Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Wohlers, T., Campbell, I., Diegel, O., Kowen, J., and Huff, R.: Wohlers Report 2019: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing State of the Industry; Annual Worldwide Progress Report; Wohlers Associates, Fort Collins CO, 2019.Google Scholar
Wang, Y.M., Voisin, T., McKeown, J.T., Ye, J., Calta, N.P., Li, Z., Zeng, Z., Zhang, Y., Chen, W., and Roehling, T.T.: Additively manufactured hierarchical stainless steels with high strength and ductility. Nat. Mater. 17, 6371 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, M.K., Moroni, G., Vaneker, T., Fadel, G., Campbell, R.I., Gibson, I., Bernard, A., Schulz, J., Graf, P., and Ahuja, B.: Design for additive manufacturing: Trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints. CIRP Ann. 65, 737760 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calignano, F.: Investigation of the accuracy and roughness in the laser powder bed fusion process. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 13, 97104 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, S., Morandeau, A., Chalon, F., and Leroy, R.: Influence of finish machining on the surface integrity of Ti6Al4V produced by selective laser melting. Procedia CIRP 45, 127130 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marimuthu, S., Triantaphyllou, A., Antar, M., Wimpenny, D., Morton, H., and Beard, M.: Laser polishing of selective laser melted components. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 95, 97104 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bose, S., Robertson, S.F., and Bandyopadhyay, A.: Surface modification of biomaterials and biomedical devices using additive manufacturing. Acta Biomater. 66, 622 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuomi, J., Paloheimo, K.-S., Vehviläinen, J., Björkstrand, R., Salmi, M., Huotilainen, E., Kontio, R., Rouse, S., Gibson, I., and Mäkitie, A.A.: A novel classification and online platform for planning and documentation of medical applications of additive manufacturing. Surg. Innov. 21, 553559 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ngo, T.D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K.T.Q., and Hui, D.: Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos. B Eng. 143, 172196 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantada, A.D. and Morgado, P.L.: Rapid prototyping for biomedical engineering: Current capabilities and challenges. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 14, 7396 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koptioug, A., Rännar, L.E., Bäckström, M., and Cronskär, M.: Additive manufacturing for medical and biomedical applications: Advances and challenges. Mater. Sci. Forum. 783–786, 12861291 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.783-786.1286.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Ramakrishna, S., and Singh, R.: Material issues in additive manufacturing: A review. J. Manuf. Process 25, 185200 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stübinger, S., Mosch, I., Robotti, P., Sidler, M., Klein, K., Ferguson, S.J., and von Rechenberg, B.: Histological and biomechanical analysis of porous additive manufactured implants made by direct metal laser sintering: A pilot study in sheep. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 101, 11541163 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, B.V., Xue, W., Bose, S., and Bandyopadhyay, A.: Engineered porous metals for implants. JOM 60, 4548 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z., Wu, X., Tomus, D., and Davies, C.H.J.: Surface roughness of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V alloy components. Addit. Manuf. 21, 91103 (2018).Google Scholar
Calignano, F., Manfredi, D., Ambrosio, E.P., Iuliano, L., and Fino, P.: Influence of process parameters on surface roughness of aluminum parts produced by DMLS. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 67, 27432751 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadroitsev, I. and Smurov, I.: Surface morphology in selective laser melting of metal powders. Phys. Procedia 12, 264270 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abele, E. and Kniepkamp, M.: Analysis and optimisation of vertical surface roughness in micro selective laser melting. Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop. 3, 034007 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, Y., Tomus, D., Rometsch, P., and Wu, X.: Influences of processing parameters on surface roughness of Hastelloy X produced by selective laser melting. Addit. Manuf. 13, 103112 (2017).Google Scholar
Fox, J.C., Moylan, S.P., and Lane, B.M.: Effect of process parameters on the surface roughness of overhanging structures in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 45, 131134 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiu, C., Panwisawas, C., Ward, M., Basoalto, H.C., Brooks, J.W., and Attallah, M.M.: On the role of melt flow into the surface structure and porosity development during selective laser melting. Acta Mater. 96, 7279 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, B.-Q., Li, Z., Bai, P., Liu, B., and Kuai, Z.: Research on surface roughness of AlSi10Mg parts fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. Metals 8, 524 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebhardt, A., Hötter, J.-S., and Ziebura, D.: Impact of SLM build parameters on the surface quality. RTejournal – Forum Für Rapid Technol. 2014 (2014). http://www.rtejournal.de/ausgabe11/3852.Google Scholar
Patel, S. and Vlasea, M.: Melting modes in laser powder bed fusion. Materialia. 100591 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2020.100591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, T., Wei, H.L., De, A., and DebRoy, T.: Heat and fluid flow in additive manufacturing – Part II: Powder bed fusion of stainless steel, and titanium, nickel and aluminum base alloys. Comput. Mater. Sci. 150, 369380 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, W.E., Barth, H.D., Castillo, V.M., Gallegos, G.F., Gibbs, J.W., Hahn, D.E., Kamath, C., and Rubenchik, A.M.: Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 214, 29152925 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M., Baxter, G.J., and Todd, I.: Normalised model-based processing diagrams for additive layer manufacture of engineering alloys. Acta Mater. 108, 2635 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seede, R., Shoukr, D., Zhang, B., Whitt, A., Gibbons, S., Flater, P., Elwany, A., Arroyave, R., and Karaman, I.: An ultra-high strength martensitic steel fabricated using selective laser melting additive manufacturing: Densification, microstructure, and mechanical properties. Acta Mater. 186, 199214 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, M.F. and Easterling, K.E.: The transformation hardening of steel surfaces by laser beams—I. Hypo-eutectoid steels. Acta Metall. 32, 19351948 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trapp, J., Rubenchik, A.M., Guss, G., and Matthews, M.J.: In situ absorptivity measurements of metallic powders during laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. Appl. Mater. Today 9, 341349 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye, J., Khairallah, S.A., Rubenchik, A.M., Crumb, M.F., Guss, G., Belak, J., and Matthews, M.J.: Energy coupling mechanisms and scaling behavior associated with laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Adv. Eng. Mater. 21, 1900185 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201900185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, P.A.: Melt pool temperature and cooling rates in laser powder bed fusion. Addit. Manuf. 22, 548559 (2018).Google Scholar
Johnson, L., Mahmoudi, M., Zhang, B., Seede, R., Huang, X., Maier, J.T., Maier, H.J., Karaman, I., Elwany, A., and Arróyave, R.: Assessing printability maps in additive manufacturing of metal alloys. Acta Mater. 176, 199210 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogalsky, A., Rishmawi, I., Brock, L., and Vlasea, M.: Low cost irregular feed stock for laser powder bed fusion. J. Manuf. Process 35, 446456 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amrhein, V., Greenland, S., and McShane, B.: Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature 567, 305 (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wasserstein, R.L., Schirm, A.L., and Lazar, N.A.: Moving to a world beyond “p < 0.05.” Am. Stat. 73, 119 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, H.: Statistical significance should be abandoned, say scientists. BMJ 364, l1374 (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, M.J., Guss, G., Khairallah, S.A., Rubenchik, A.M., Depond, P.J., and King, W.E.: Denudation of metal powder layers in laser powder bed fusion processes. Acta Mater. 114, 3342 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khairallah, S.A. and Anderson, A.: Mesoscopic simulation model of selective laser melting of stainless steel powder. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 214, 26272636 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y., and Zhang, W.: Mesoscopic simulation of heat transfer and fluid flow in laser powder bed additive manufacturing. In Int. Solid Free Form Fabr. Symp., Austin, TX, USA (2015), pp. 1154–1165.Google Scholar
Yasa, E., Deckers, J., Craeghs, T., Badrossamay, M., and Kruth, J.-P.: Investigation on occurrence of elevated edges in selective laser melting. In Int. Solid Free. Fabr. Symp., Austin, TX, USA (2009), pp. 673–685.Google Scholar
Nakamura, H., Kawahito, Y., Nishimoto, K., and Katayama, S.: Elucidation of melt flows and spatter formation mechanisms during high power laser welding of pure titanium. J. Laser Appl. 27, 032012 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadroitsev, I., Bertrand, P., and Smurov, I.: Parametric analysis of the selective laser melting process. Appl. Surf. Sci. 253, 80648069 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusarov, A. and Smurov, I.: Modeling the interaction of laser radiation with powder bed at selective laser melting. Phys. Procedia 5, 381394 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar