¹ Nordhaus, William, “The Political Business Cycle,” Review of Economic Studies, 52 (04 1975), 1969–90.Google Scholar

² Amacher, Ryan C. et al. , “The Political Business Cycle: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Evidence,” Association for Comparative Economic Systems Bulletin (Fall/Winter 1979), 1–42;Google Scholar and Beck, Nathaniel, “Does There Exist a Political Business Cycle: A Box-Tiao Analysis,” Public Choice, 37, no. 2 (1982), 205–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³ Monroe, Kristen R., “Political Manipulation of the Economy: A Closer Look at Political Business Cycles,” Presidential Studies Quarterly, 13 (Winter 1983), 37–49.Google Scholar

⁴ Blaug, Mark, The Methodology of Economics (Cambridge, 1980), pp. 1–9.Google Scholar

⁵ Tufte, Edward, Political Control of the Economy (Princeton, 1978);Google Scholar and Nordhaus, “The Political Business Cycle.”Google Scholar

⁶ For a discussion of rationality, see Downs, Anthony, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York, 1957), pp. 4–11;Google ScholarAmacher, “The Political Business Cycle.”Google Scholar

⁷ Barber, James D., The Presidential Character: Predicting Performance in the White House (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1977, 1972).Google Scholar For a critique of Barber's typology of political leaders, refer to George, Alexander L., “Assessing Presidential Character,” in Perspectives on the Presidency, ed. Wildausky, Aaron (Boston, 1975), pp. 91–134.Google Scholar

⁸ Barber, The Presidential Character, p. 353.Google Scholar

⁹ Tufte, Political Control of the Economy, p. 23.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Ibid.

¹¹ For a similar approach, refer to Maloney, Kevin J. and Smirlock, Michael L., “Business Cycles and the Political Process,” Southern Economic Journal, 48 (10 1981), 377–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹² Barber, The Presidential Character, pp. 409, 441–42.Google Scholar

¹³ Nixon, Richard M., Six Crises (New York, 1968), pp. 333–34.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Silk, Leonard, “Tapes' Insight on Nixon: They Indicate His Economic Thinking is Heavily Weighted by Political Factors,” New York Times, August 7, 1974, p. 47.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Evans, Rowland Jr, and Novak, Robert D., Nixon in the White House (New York. 1971), p. 178.Google Scholar

¹⁶ White, Theodore, The Making of the President, 1972 (New York, 1973), p. 62.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Wheeler, Michael, Lies. Damn Lies, and Statistics: The Manipulation of Public Opinion in America (New York, 1976), pp. 11–12.Google Scholar

¹⁸ White, The Making of the President, 1972, p. 59.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Ibid.

²⁰ Maisel, Sherman, Managing the Dollar (New York, 1973), pp. 108–13.Google Scholar

²¹ Ibid. Another insider states: “The discussion will associate monetary policy with Arthur Burns, because for all Intents and purposes monetary policy was Burns.” Pierce, James L., “The Political Economy of Arthur Burns,” Journal of Finance, 34 (05 1979), 485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²² Ehrlichman, John, Witness to Power (New York, 1982), p. 244.Google Scholar

²³ Ibid., p. 248.

²⁴ Ehrlichman notes that “Burns was every bit as much a politician as he was an economist.” In Ehrlichman, Witness to Power, p. 244.Google Scholar

²⁵ Pierce, “The Political Economy,” p. 495.Google Scholar

²⁶ Blinder, Alan, Economic Policy and the Great Sragflation (New York, 1979), p. 33.Google Scholar

²⁷ Ibid., p. 34.

²⁸ The orthodox literature investigates the existence of the political business cycle by correlating the performance of economic aggregates such as unemployment and disposable income with voting behavior. See Fair, Ray C., “The Effect of Economic Events on Votes for President,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 50 (05 1978), 159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁹ Tufte, Political Control of the Economy, pp. 45–55.Google Scholar

³⁰ Blinder, Economic Policy, p. 32.Google Scholar

³¹ Ibid., p. 145.

³² Ibid.

³³ Refer to: Presidential Campaign Activities of 1972, Watergate and Related Activities: Use of Incumbency-Responsiveness Program (Washington, D.C., 1974), Books 18 and 19.Google Scholar

³⁴ Tufte, Political Control of the Economy.Google Scholar

³⁵ Wheeler, Lies, p. 11. Wheeler talks about the impact that Sindlinger and his poll had on the White House. Also see Gallup Opinion Index, July 1971, Report No. 73, p. 17.Google Scholar

³⁶ Blinder, Economic Policy, p. 111.Google Scholar

³⁷ Gallup Opinion Index, Aug. 1971, Report No. 74, p. 6.Google Scholar

³⁸ Blinder, Economic Policy, p. 27.Google Scholar

³⁹ Gallup Public Opinion Index, Sept. 1971, Report No. 75, p. 3.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Maloney and Smirlock, “Business Cycles,” p. 389.Google Scholar