Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T15:47:33.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Labor Unrest in England, 1910–1914

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

Ronald V. Sires
Ronald V. Sires
Affiliation:
Whitman College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the last four years before the outbreak of war in 1914 the people of England experienced an unprecedented combination of political strife and labor unrest. The struggle over the budget of 1909 had led to a constitutional crisis over the powers of the House of Lords in 1910–1911; suffragettes were resorting to obstructive and exasperating tactics to win the vote for women; the question of home rule almost resulted in civil war in North Ireland and brought what amounted to a threat of dereliction of duty by high military officers, who could not contemplate the use of force against the opponents of home rule; while the restlessness of labor brought a series of massive strikes in which the rank and file of workers often broke from the discipline of their leaders.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , September 1955 , pp. 246 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “Report on Strikes and Lockouts and on Conciliation and Arbitration Boards in the United Kingdom in 1911. With Comparative Statistics for 1902-1910,” Part. Pap., 1912–1913, XLVII, cd. 6472Google Scholar, passim; Parl. Pap., 1914–1916, XXXVI, cd. 7658Google Scholar, xvi; “Settlement of Industrial Disputes in Great Britain,” Monthly Labor Review, XLVII (July 1938), 39–51Google Scholar; Hilton, John, “Strikes and Lockouts,” Encyclopaedia Britannica (1950), XXI, 467–72Google Scholar.

2 Rostow, W. W., British Economy in the Nineteenth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1948), p. 33, Table II; Part. Pap., 1911, LXXXIX, cd. 5849, 3, 9, 30-31.Google Scholar

3 Parl. Pap., 1913, LXVI, cd. 6955, xxxix-lix, passim, and 110-11 ; Cunningham, W., The Causes of the Labour Unrest and the Remedies for It (London: John Murray, 1912), pp. 8–9Google Scholar ; Parl. Deb., 5th Ser., XXXIV, cols. 82-83, February 15, 1912 ; Barker, J. E., “The Labour Unrest and Its Meaning,” Nineteenth Century, LXX (September 1911), 441–60Google Scholar ; “The Claims of Labour,” Nation (London), August 12, 1911, pp. 698–99Google Scholar.

4 “Unrest and Its Cure,” Nation (London), August 19, 1911, pp. 729–31Google Scholar ; “The Claims of Labour,” Ibid., August 12, 1911, pp. 698–99 ; Askwith, George R., Industrial Problems and Disputes (London: John Murray, 1920), p. 177Google Scholar ; Henderson, Fred, The Labour Unrest–What It Is and What It Portends (London: Jarrold and Sons [1912]), pp. 119–48Google Scholar ; Ickornshaw, Snowden of, Philip Snowden, 1st Viscount, Autobiography (2 vols.; London: Ivor Nicholson, 1937). I, 124-25. 127–28Google Scholar.

5 Élie Halévy, A History of the English People in the Nineteenth Century (6 vols.; London: Benn, 1952), VI, 450–59Google Scholar ; Cole, G. D. H. and Postgate, Raymond, The British Common People, 1746-1938 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1939), pp. 429–34Google Scholar.

6 Nation (London), August 19, 1911, pp. 729–31.Google ScholarPubMed

7 Mallock, W. H., “Labour Unrest as a Subject of Official Investigation,” Nineteenth Century, LXXI (June 1912), 1029–45Google Scholar ; Clay, Sir Arthur, “Public Opinion and Industrial Unrest,” Nineteenth Century, LXX (December 1911), 1005–21Google Scholar ; Pall Mall Gazette, August 15, 1911, p. 7Google Scholar ; letter from “Employer,” Pall Mall Gazette, August 14, 1911, p. 7Google Scholar.

8 Seager, H. R., “Legal Status of Trade Unionism in the United Kingdom …,” Political Science Quarterly,XXII (December 1907), 611–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Millis, Harry A. and Montgomery, Royal E., The Economics of Labor (3 vols.; New York and London: McGraw-Hill, 1938-1945), III, 776–77Google Scholar ; Chang, Ducksoo, British Methods of Industrial Peace; a Study of Democracy in Relation to Labor Disputes (Studies in History, Economics and Public Law, No. 425) (New York: Columbia University Press, 1936), pp. 47–52Google Scholar ; Parl. Pap., 1910, XXI, No. 5, 6.

10 , Millis and , Montgomery, Economics of Labor, III, 778Google Scholar ; , Chang, British Methods of Industrial Peace, pp. 57–59Google Scholar ; Part. Pap., 1914, XLVIII, cd. 7089, xli-xlii.

11 Parl. Pap., 1912-13, XLVI, cd. 6472, 21 ; Tillett, Ben, History of the London Transport Workers' Strike, 1911 (London: National Transport Workers' Federation [1912]), pp. 1–3Google Scholar.

12 Devonport, Viscount, The Traveled Road–Some Memories of a Busy Life (Rochester, [England]: Privately printed, 1935), pp. 165–68Google Scholar ; , Tillett, London Transport Workers' Stride, 1911, pp. 1-3, 7–13. Hudson Eubanke Kearly had become Viscount Devonport in June 1911Google Scholar.

13 Parl. Pap., 1912-13, XLVII, cd. 6472, 151-52.

14 , Tillett, London Transport Workers' Strike, 1911, pp. 13–18Google Scholar ; , Devonport, The Traveled Road, pp. 169–70Google Scholar ; , Askwith, Industrial Problems and Disputes, pp. 154–55Google Scholar ; Daily Graphic, August 9, 1911, p. 1Google Scholar ; Daily Express, August 10, 1911, pp. 1, 5Google Scholar ; Part. Deb., 5th Sec, XXIX, cols. 1972-74, August 16, 1911.

15 Copies of the various agreements may be found in Parl. Pap., 1912-13, XLVII, cd. 6472, 153-68.

16 parl. Pap., 1913, XXVIII, cd. 6953, Ques. 366-73, 387, 2024-43; Parl. PaP., 1912-13, LXXXIX, No. 201 ; The Times (London), May-July, 1912, passimGoogle Scholar ; Gosling, Harry, Up and Down Stream (London: Methuen, 1927), pp. 157-59, 163-64, 171–73Google Scholar ; , Devonport, The Traveled Road, pp. 172, 176–84Google Scholar ; , Askwith, Industrial Problems and Disputes, pp. 221-22, 224–30Google Scholar ; Carter, J., “The Transport Workers' Strike in London,” Economic Review, XXII (October 1912), pp. 436–41Google Scholar.

17 , Gosling, Up and Down Stream, p. 164.Google Scholar

18 , Sidney and Webb, Beatrice, Industrial Democracy (2 vols. in one; London, New York: Longmans, 1902), pp. 46, n. 2, and 353-54Google Scholar ; S. and Webb, B., The History of Trade Unionism (London, New York: Longmans, 1902), pp. 393, 426, 429Google Scholar ; Cole, G. D. H. and Arnot, R. Page, Trade Unionism on the Railways … (“Trade Union Series,” No. 2) (Westminster: Fabian Research Department, and London: George Allen and Unwin, 1917), p. 39Google Scholar.

19 Parl. Pap., 1910, XXXI, No. 5, 34–38Google Scholar ; Watney, Charles and Little, James A., Industrial Warfare–the Aims and Claims of Capital and Labour (London: John Murray, 1912), pp. 55–58Google Scholar.

20 , Watney and , Little, Industrial Warfare, pp. 58–59Google Scholar ; Cole, G. D. H., Short History of the British Wording Class Movement, 1787-1947 (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1948), pp. 332–33Google Scholar ; speech of MacDonald, J. Ramsay, Parl. Deb., 5th Ser., XXIX, col. 1953, August 16, 1911Google Scholar.

21 Parl. Pap., 1912–1913, XVII, NO. 87, 5.Google Scholar

22 , Askwith, Industrial Problems and Disputes, pp. 163–64.Google Scholar

23 The Railway Times–a Journal of Finance, Construction and Operation, August 18 and 19, 1911 ; Parl. Pap., 1912–1913, XVII, No. 87, 6Google Scholar.

24 , Cole, British Wording Class Movement, 1787–1947, p. 335Google Scholar ; Sumner, Mary Brown, “Railroad Men and the English Conciliation Boards,” Survey, XXVII (January 20, 1912), 1618-21Google Scholar ; Parl. Pap., 1912–1913, XVII, No. 87, 7Google Scholar.

25 , Cole and , Arnot, Trade Unionism on the Railways, pp. 12-13, 26–30Google Scholar ; , Cole and , Postgate, The British Common People, 1746–1938, pp. 440–43Google Scholar.

26 Register, 1909, pp. 154–55Google Scholar ; Annual Register, 1910, pp. 68, 223–24Google Scholar ; Part. Pap., 1911, XII, No. 96, 3Google Scholar ; Jevons, H. Stanley, The British Coal Trade (London: Kegan Paul, 1915), pp. 489–519Google Scholar.

27 Part. Deb., 5th Ser., XX, cols. 10–17, November 15, 1910 and cols. 406–11, November 24, 1910 ; Reynold's Newspaper (London), November 13, 1910, p. 3Google Scholar.

28 Part. Pap., 1911, LXIV, cd. 5568, gives the day-by-day communications of Churchill, the military officers, and the police authorities in the crisis.Google Scholar

29 This attitude is illustrated in a statement by the manager of a colliery. In a heated conversation with a Metropolitan police officer he said that the police from London were now sworn constables; that he had made a requisition for their services; and that they were his employees as long as he wished. Local police officers had in the past looked on mine managers as having a kind of authority over them. During the strike, a local police officer informed a military officer that “by the kind permission of Mr. (a mine manager) a certain number of police had been drawn from the mine to the town.”–Parl, Pap., 1911, LXIV, cd. 5568, 25-26, 48–49Google Scholar.

30 Parl. Deb., 5th Ser., XX, cols. 3-30, 262-63, 313-17, 406-16, November 15, 22, and 24, 1910.

31 The Times (London), November 9, 1910, p. 11, cols, d, e.Google ScholarPubMed

32 The Times (London), November 16, 1910, p. 11, cols, e, f.Google ScholarPubMed

33 Part. Pap., 1912–1913, XVII, No. 87, 123–24.Google Scholar

34 , Askwith, Industrial Problems and Disputes, pp. 201–9Google Scholar ; , Cole, British Working Class Movement, 1787-1947, pp. 338–40. For a discussion of the Industrial Council, see below, pp. 264-65Google Scholar.

35 , Askwith, Industrial Problems and Disputes, pp. 204, 210–14Google Scholar ; Part. Deb., 5th Ser., XXXIV, February-March 1912, passimGoogle Scholar.

36 , Askwith, Industrial Problems and Disputes, pp. 215–17.Google Scholar

37 , Jevons, The British Coal Trade, pp. 571–600.Google Scholar

38 Congress, Trades Union, Forty-fifth Annual Report, 1972 (hereafter T.U.C.), pp. 90–93.Google Scholar

39 T.U.C., 1913, pp. 149-50, 152–53.Google Scholar

40 Parl. Pap., 1912 1913, XVII, No. 87, pp. 114–20Google Scholar ; T.U.C., 1912, pp. 128–32Google Scholar ; , Chang, British Methods of Industrial Peace, pp. 54–56Google Scholar.

41 Parl. Pap., 1913, XXVIII, cd. 6952.Google Scholar

42 T.U.C., 1912, pp. 97-98 and 239–42Google Scholar ; T.U.C., 1913, pp. 223-24, 239–44Google Scholar.

43 One resolution (moved by Ben Tillett) called on the Parliamentary Committee of the T.U.C. to circularize the unions to get opinions on forming a national federation or confederation of trades. A similar resolution favored corresponding action by unions within specific industries. The discussion of it led to unpleasant remarks about the numerous competing unions ini the Sheffield cutlery trades.– T.U.C., 1910, pp. 122, 124–25Google Scholar.

44 T.U.C., 1912, pp. 70–74Google Scholar ; T.U.C., 1913, pp. 110–14. Five unions voted in favor of both parts of the proposal, six were against both, and one voted for the first part and against the second (the benefit provisions). Only 25,762 ballots were cast in a total of 112,235 distributedGoogle Scholar.