OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Research Education Towards Opportunities (RETO) Mentoring Offering Training Opportunities for Research (MOTOR) 1 – 2 and the elective courses (INTD 5998/ MDCL 101) in CTR of Title V Coop were designed to provide the participants from higher education institution (HEI) in Puerto Rico (PR), interdisciplinary – interprofesional knowledge in CTR. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Since April 2017, Research Education Towards Opportunities (RETO) and Mentoring Offering Training Opportunities for Research (MOTOR) 1 - 2 trainings were offered as part of the Title V Coop. In addition, since January 2020, as part of the institutionalization of the trainings in CTR, two elective courses (INTD 5998 and MDCL 101) were created-offered. The trainings/courses present the main concepts underlying CTR performance through lectures, workshops and presentations, in hybrid modalities, as well as the services-resources of the Center Research Education and Science Commnunication Opportunities (CRESCO). These programs have given students (undergraduate and graduate) and faculty the opportunity to get started in CTR and to integrate in Clinical and Translational Mentoring Teams (CTMT). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Eight (8) cycles of RETO-MOTOR 1 and seven (7) cycles of RETO-MOTOR 2; two sessions of INTD 5998 and one session of MDCL 101 were offered. The RETO-MOTOR 1 training was completed by 219 participants and RETO-MOTOR 2 by 130 participants. The INTD 5998 course was completed by 22 students and the MDCL 101 course by 18 students. A total of 389 participants have been initiated in the CTR. Of the trainings, 90% indicated that the knowledge acquired in CTR was invaluable, 85% understand that the most significant achievement, as students, was present at a scientific conference, and 100% indicated interest in continuing to do CTR. Of the courses, 100% indicated that they were a good learning experience, helped them increase their knowledge in CTR, met their expectations and would recommend other students to take the course. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The RETO-MOTOR 1, RETO-MOTOR 2 trainings and CTR courses provide a based of research knowledge and valuable interprofessional experience for those who whish to start in the clinical and translational research. The Title V Cooperative Project provides this opportunity to undergraduate and graduate students such as faculty of HEI in PR.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The goal of this study is to highlight the unique characteristics of Miami CTSIs Master of Science in Clinical and Translational Investigation (MSCTI) as part of CTSIs overall translational workforce development program and to describe program outcomes. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The MSCTI at the University of Miami offers a structured, individualized, and mentored educational program that trains students in the principles and practice of translational science and clinical research. Based on student feedback and needs assessment, three courses were specifically created for the program to include additional scientific cognates and promote essential skills for the translational research workforce – team science and entrepreneurship, research ethics, and writing for clinical and translational science. A fourth course on applied statistics is currently under development that provides training in practical statistical knowledge required for clinician-researchers. Career trajectory of graduates and academic output were tracked through surveys and secondary data collection. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The MSCTI Program has enrolled 76 students over its lifetime, including KL2 scholars, NIH K scholars and T32 trainees; with 25% of students holding foreign degrees. In addition to traditional outcomes such as funding and publications, qualitative case studies will highlight scientific impact and career progress of students. The program has performed exceptionally well in recruiting underrepresented persons in research, with 41% of the students identifying as Hispanic, and 52% of the students as female. Of the graduates, 84% have gone on to achieve leadership positions in NIH and pursue research careers in academic institutions, while 16% have moved to industry, government, or non-profit careers. Overall, 92% of graduates were engaged in research after two years of graduating from the program. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Miami CTSIs MSCTI Program has trained students with a wide range of incoming experience to establish successful careers in clinical and translational research and is a critical component of CTSIs translational workforce development program.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The goal of this study is to describe the implementation of a formal research mentoring training program at Miami CTSI in collaboration with University of Colorado CTSI, to build effective mentor-mentee relationships that help build successful research careers for junior faculty. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The Miami CTSI Research Mentoring Training is a three-part series for early stage faculty and their mentors to strengthen mentoring skills and build successful relationships. The curriculum uses evidence-based strategies and is modeled after University of Colorado CTSIs CO-Mentor Training Program. The pilot training was conducted as a train-the-trainer program with subsequent workshops led by Miami CTSI faculty. The program has mentee-only, mentor-only, and joint sessions covering topics such as networking skills, managing financial aspects of an academic career, and career mapping. To assess program effectiveness, pre/post surveys were conducted and follow up surveys are planned. Data collected will assess participant diversity, research productivity, and mentoring relationship status. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: A total of 49 mentor-mentee teams from 18 departments participated in the training over two cohorts. An upcoming third cohort will be included in the analysis. Overall, 100% mentors and 86% mentees reported the overall value of the program as positive. Post-training, mentees reported an increase in confidence in creating career development plans and articulating career goals. Mentors reported an increase in confidence in providing guidance tailored to mentees needs. Mentees reported improvement in their knowledge of developing personal narratives and handling financial aspects of research; both mentors and mentees reported improvement in insights into achieving work-life balance. Follow up survey results will provide insight into the evolution of the mentoring relationships. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Miami CTSIs mentoring training demonstrated successful participation and positive feedback from mentors and mentees and is poised to become a critical component of the Miami CTSIs research career development pipeline.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Use an easily accessible medium to educate life science researchers and academic innovators interested in the commercialization of academic research at the University of Michigan (UM). METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Life science research investigators and academic innovators interested in research commercialization and technology development from across the state of Michigan were invited to attend the Idea to Impact: The Translation & Commercialization of Academic Research webinar series, presented by Fast Forward Medical Innovation at the University of Michigan. The webinar series outlined the significance and critical milestones of developing novel therapeutics, medical devices, diagnostics, and digital health innovations, as well as essential collaborations with industry partners to translate a research-based idea into a product of impact. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 113 investigators and innovators from 28 different institutions, organizations, and companies, registered for the webinar series. Results (N=24) of an evaluation immediately following each webinar revealed that 100% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed that the series was effective in helping them to identify and describe commercialization resources, including funding, education, and mentorship, available at the University of Michigan and within the state. Participants stated that they “loved the practical information” “shared” and that the series was a “great overview that inspired a lot more questions.” The Fast Forward Medical Innovation team was then able to consult with participants to connect them with additional resources. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The data suggests that easily accessible and digestible commercialization education can make navigating the academic entrepreneurial ecosystem easier for investigators and innovators. The recorded webinar series, Idea to Impact: The Translation & Commercialization of Academic Research, serves this purpose.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The New Jersey Alliance for Clinical & Translational Science conducted an observational study of current clinical research training to establish a comprehensive infrastructure. The goal was to develop a cross training catalogue of available resources for trainees to fill gaps in their Clinical Research training. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The focus of this observational study is the evaluation of (1) available clinical research training programs, (2) training areas aligned with the Joint Task Force competency domains, (3) specific target audiences who utilize trainings offered nationally, and (4) availability of resource toolboxes. This assessment was extracted by clicking on each of the hubs Education & Training and Resources tabs. The determination of the training areas and competency skills that aligned with the JTFs eight domains was confirmed by reviewing the course description on each website. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: CTSA hub website analysis of each hub revealed that each CTSA hub region has their own regional focus on training areas targeted for specific audiences. The validation of the NJ ACTS Education and Offering Inventory study allowed authors to categorize available training programs which significantly showed that Basic Training Programs targeted 22% of Undergraduate Students, Community Engagement Training Programs targeted 15% of Early Career Faculty, Experiential Training targeted 20% of Early Career Faculty and Undergraduate Students, Scholarly & Certificate Training targeted 20.5% of Graduate Students, and Graduate/Post Graduate Programs targeted 22.5% of Graduate Students and KL2 scholars. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This information helps build the infrastructure of a National Cross-Training Resource Platform in aid to encourage trainees to take advantage of available trainings across the CTSA Consortium.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Participants will learn about the Connections IN Health partnership. Participants will learn about the mixed-methods, multi-level evaluation model used to evaluate health coalitions. Participants will learn about how the Connections IN Health partnership promoted coalition growth among Indiana chronic disease coalitions. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Chronic disease coalitions under the Connections IN Health (CINH) partnership were evaluated using a novel mixed-methods, multi-level evaluation framework that triangulates coalition functioning and effectiveness (F/E) surveys, social network analysis (SNA), and health data. F/E and SNA surveys were distributed to active coalition members of the chronic disease coalitions before, 1 year, and 2 years after CINH was implemented. F/E data was analyzed to detect significant changes in coalition members’ perceptions of coalition functioning and effectiveness using unpaired, two sample t-tests in R. SNA data was analyzed to detect changes in partnership networks over time, such as membership growth and strength of connections using R software. County-level health data will be evaluated at year 5. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The results of our longitudinal analysis of perceptions of functioning and effectiveness demonstrated significant increases in perceived leadership, satisfaction with the coalition, outcome efficacy, and members’ commitment to the coalition after Connections IN Health (CINH) was implemented. Social network analysis (SNA) demonstrated growth of coalition membership and strength of connections over time, including health information sharing, formal relationships, trust, and communication. SNA results also demonstrated increases in centralization and clustering among local vs. statewide organizations in coalition networks over time. Results were shared back with coalition members to make data-driven decisions about future coalition processes and functioning. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Health coalitions are a nationally recognized vehicle to promote and translate evidence-based practices to communities; however, evidence to support their effectiveness is limited at best. Our results provide evidence of CINH’s efficacy and identifies factors required to build effective and sustainable health coalitions.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The objective of this study was to estimate the cost differences of a telerehabilitation versus outpatient session. A secondary objective was to identify areas to improve telerehabilitation delivery efficiency. We aim to improve the translation/adoption of telerehabilitation for clinical use. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This study used a time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) approach including 1) observation of rehabilitation sessions and creation of manual time stamps, 2) structured and recorded interviews with two occupational therapists familiar with outpatient therapy and two therapists familiar with telerehabilitation, 3) collection of standard wages for providers, and 4) the creation of an iterative flowchart of both an outpatient and telerehabilitation session care delivery process. This study followed the reporting guidelines to ensure a standardization for TDABC research. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Overall, telerehabilitation ($225.41) was more costly than outpatient therapy ($168.29) per session for a cost difference of $57.12. Primary time drivers of this finding were initial phone calls (0 mins for OP therapists versus 35 mins for TR) and post documentation (5 mins for OP versus 30 mins for TR) demands for telerehabilitation. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Telerehabilitation is an emerging platform with the potential to reduce costs, improve healthcare inequities, and facilitate better patient outcomes. Improvements in documentation practices, staffing, technology, and reimbursement structuring would allow for a more successful translation.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Our long-term goal is to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with status epilepticus through increasing the level of evidence surrounding guidelines. The specific objective of our proposed work is to compare the outcomes and adverse drug events between the Neurocritical Care and American Epilepsy Society levetiracetam dose recommendations. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This is a retrospective, single site, cohort study comparing outcomes of hospitalized patients with status epilepticus treated with levetiracetam bolus at the University of Kansas Health System. Patients outcomes will be compared based on levetiracetam bolus dose received. The primary outcome will be seizure reoccurrence within 24 hours. Secondary outcomes include number of additional anti-epileptic drugs administered, cumulative dose of benzodiazepines administered within 24 hours of levetiracetam bolus administration and incidence of adverse drug reactions. All study data will be extracted retrospectively from the EPIC chart review following patient list generation through the HERON i2b2 database query. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Aim 1 will characterize levetiracetam dosing among patients admitted to the University of Kansas Medical Center for status epilepticus during routine clinical care. We hypothesize that given the inconsistency in dosing recommendations from various professional societies and drug references, we will observe inconsistent dosing of levetiracetam among those hospitalized due to status epilepticus.

Aim 2 will evaluate effectiveness and safety across the various levetiracetam doses. We estimate that adherence to the higher weight-based dosing recommendations of the 2016 American Epilepsy Society guideline may result in improved outcomes with a similar frequency and severity of adverse drug events compared to lower/fixed-dose levetiracetam dose recommendation of the 2012 Neurocritical Care guideline. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Notable inconsistencies across the dosing recommendations for levetiracetam exist between the guidelines for treatment of status epilepticus and commonly used tertiary drug information databases. This variation in guidance may lead to differences in dosing and warrants further exploration to better support the management of status epilepticus.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Pilot grants are small financial investments given out by CTSA hubs to facilitate new clinical and translational research projects. The New Jersey Alliance of Clinical and Translational Science (NJ ACTS) is one of 65 CTSA hubs. The goal of this project was to evaluate and improve the NJ ACTS program by learning from pilot programs across the consortium. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The initial research on pilot programs was conducted using the CTSA Search Solutions tool, a tool developed at NJ ACTS which provides links to individual pages by topic in all the hub websites. Using the tool, public information was accessed, including common award amounts, significant dates, and preferred categories of research. Then, a survey created in REDCap was distributed to colleagues at all CTSA hubs to gather additional information and thoughts on pilot programs. The data were compiled in an excel database to observe and analyze trends. These trends were graphically presented in figures developed from the data to see how NJ ACTS compares to other CTSA hubs in how they focus and operate their pilot programs. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: There are both similarities and differences between NJ ACTS and other hubs. NJ ACTS utilizes a REDCap form for its application, as do 14 other CTSA hubs. Surveys also show that NJ ACTS follows similar processes for: letter of intent and application due dates; having a standing review committee; and the categories of awards. Award categories for Clinical/Translational Innovation, Methodology/Infrastructure, and Partnership/Collaboration are shared with 47, 25, and 41 institutions, respectively. NJ ACTS requires collaboration between its multiple institutions, as do 28 other hubs. It does not, however, have a public notification of award date, and notifications tend to go out relatively late. NJ ACTS funded multiple proposals pertaining to COVID-19, something 11 other CTSA hubs did as well. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Although a new CTSA hub, NJ ACTSs Pilot Program operates comparably to more mature CTSA hubs. Using the survey data, NJ ACTS can implement modest changes, better serving its scientific community. CTSA Search Solutions has proven an excellent tool and can be used by any hub to understand how they compare and implement changes to improve their programs.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The objective of this study is to examine the independent and combined effectiveness of a multiple micronutrient supplementation and responsive caregiving intervention on early child development in southwestern Guatemala. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We conducted a double blind, 2 x 2, cluster randomized controlled trial combining micronutrient supplementation and responsive caregiving treatments. We enrolled 309 infants (6-18 months) and 387 preschoolers (36-52 months) at nutritional risk (height-for-age z-score < -1) (51% male; 17% indigenous ethnicity; 76% of caregivers completed ≤ primary school). The supplementation arm received a maize-soy product fortified with 21 micronutrients for 6 months; the control was fortified with B2. The responsive caregiving intervention was adapted from the UNICEF Care for Child Development program and delivered over 6 home visits. We examined changes in early child development from baseline (2015) to endline (2017) using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III and Bracken Scales of School Readiness. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Among infants, age standardized Bayley cognitive development scores declined over time in each treatment arm. Infant Bayley motor development scores significantly increased in the combined multiple micronutrient supplementation + responsive caregiving arm (â^† = 3.67 [95% CI: 0.17, 7.17], p = 0.04). Among preschoolers, school readiness decreased over time in each treatment arm. The rates of change in infant development and preschooler school readiness did not differ between treatment arms. Further analysis will explore effect modification of the intervention by pre-specified child and household factors. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Combined multiple micronutrient supplementation and responsive caregiving supported motor development while cognitive and school readiness were not impacted by the intervention. These findings will inform the effectiveness and beneficiaries of multisectoral interventions to promote early child development in adverse environments.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The Fulkerson Home Food Inventory (HFI) is widely used to assess the home food environment, a key target of behavioral weight loss trials. However, no standardized report is available. We created publicly available procedures to automate and standardize HFI reporting, yielding a personalized report to enhance this measures clinical utility. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Parents in the TEENS adolescent behavioral weight loss trial complete the HFI at 0-, 2-, 4-, 8-, and 12m and receive personalized reports at each timepoint. In REDCap, participants identify foods available in their home. HFI syntax is applied to calculate the obesogenic home food availability score. Categories of foods found are identified, with specific guidance provided to enhance their home food environment. Prior to automation, procedures were time intensive and error prone. To address this, HFI data are exported into Excel by a PowerShell (v7.2) command-line script using Python (v3.10) with the REDCap API. Results are calculated with F# (v6.0) using Microsoft Excel Interop API and inserted into a report template with F# using the Microsoft Publisher Interop API. This process is repeated at each timepoint. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The new automated procedures significantly reduce time to generate reports and enhance accuracy. Procedures yield a 2-page individualized report that includes the obesogenic home food environment score and identifies categories of healthy items found (e.g., fruits, vegetables, whole grains) as well as areas of improvement (e.g., high-fat dairy products, processed meats). Specific items found in each category are identified. The report identifies food found in the home (e.g., chicken nuggets) with suggested healthier substitutions (e.g., lean chicken breast). This syntax and commands will be made publicly available for use in the scientific and clinical community. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: These publicly available procedures optimize, automate, and standardize reporting for the HFI. Procedures improve efficiency within large-scale clinical trials and yield a personalized report to enhance the clinical utility of this measure and empower participants to make informed decisions about their health behaviors.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: eHealth programs centered on cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) can be supported by physical therapists to feasibly deliver psychologically-informed physical therapy (PIPT). This study assessed patient and physical therapist (PT) perspectives of adding a CBT-based eHealth program to physical therapy. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: In our uncontrolled pilot study, PTs were trained in motivational interviewing (MI) to support patient engagement with a 7-module eHealth CBT-based pain self-management program that accompanied a course of PT. Interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of 13 patients with chronic back and/or neck pain and 9 PTs to evaluate experiences with the eHealth program, perceived benefits, barriers and facilitators to integration, and future recommendations for implementation from both perspectives. Interview data were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis for core themes. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Patients benefited from the eHealth program, especially relaxation (69% of respondents) and meditation/mindfulness (62%). Time and technology were barriers for eHealth engagement (23% and 15%). Most (92%) patients reported their therapist reviewed eHealth progress, although one-third of patients wanted more discussion and feedback on eHealth content. PTs felt the eHealth program was valuable (67%), user-friendly (56%), and took minimal effort to support (78%). Some (44%) therapists felt more confident after MI training to support patient engagement. PTs recommended offering patients tablets (i.e., iPads) for clinic or home use and additional therapist training in MI. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: PTs and patients valued a clinician-supported eHealth program, suggesting an acceptable option for PIPT. Future implementation work aims to identify optimal therapist training in MI and additional strategies to overcome time or technology barriers.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The first aim was to construct a controlled and high resolution FUS water tank characterization system with 1 micron step-sizes. The second aim was to create two unique standardized protocols for mapping the generated acoustic field from FUS transducers; protocol one maps the full 3D field while protocol two rapidly detects changes to the original plot. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: To accomplish aim one, the focused ultrasound mapping platform was constructed with a water conditioning unit for water degassing and temperature control, a three-axis stage with 1 micron step-size capabilities, and a data plotting software. To measure the outcomes of aim one, the water temperature was monitored, and axis step sizes were measured through ten independent axis translation recordings. To accomplish aim two, FUS acquisitions were executed at different resolutions. For FUS localization at the cellular level, a 1-5 micron step size is required. Once the initial scan was performed, duplicate scans were executed to detect inherent perturbations or errors in the system. Once calculated, the best methods of detecting true changes to FUS signals are proposed. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The FUS characterization system maintained water temperature and performed 1 micron step-sizes. While pre-existing platforms have demonstrated a resolution of one thousand recordings per cubic millimeter, the proposed system (time and computing power willing) can record one billion recordings per cubic millimeter. In practice, a resolution of 20 micron was sufficient for non-cellular level FUS characterizations. Successive 2D scans were reliably stacked to form a 3D rendering of the generated acoustic field with the average focal point intensity yielding a 1% coefficient of variation between identical scans. This inherent variation can be used as the threshold of significance for true change detection; to rapidly detect changes to the FUS signal, sampling can be performed at regions of high baseline values. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Focused ultrasound medical devices are gaining popularity for treatments including tumor ablation, neuromodulation, and drug delivery; however, the field lacks a standardized method to characterize these FUS transducers. The presented platform and protocols enable a rigorous and high quality translation through verification and validation.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The goal of this project was to perform an exploratory analysis of the research themes of scientific publications from the Miami Clinical and Translational Science Institute using text mining techniques and using bibliometric characterization and network analysis to further assess research trends. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Publications were identified from the Web of Science database using Miami CTSI grant numbers as search criteria for the period 2013-2021 and KL2 scholar publications. Following data pre-processing, topic modeling was performed using the Latent Dirichlet Allocation algorithm and cluster analysis in the R programming language. The resulting themes will be further analyzed by employing a citation-based impact assessment approach to identify trends over time. Network analysis of publications will be performed using the VOSviewer package to visualize publication networks using citation and co-authorship relations within each major theme and their evolution over time. Findings will be evaluated for alignment with institutional research strategy. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: About 400 CTSI publications from 2013-2021 to date were used for analysis. Twenty topics and five major research themes were identified among the Miami CTSI publications – neuroscience, cancer, community and public health, metabolics, and HIV/infectious diseases. Top keywords within each topic were aligned with the most frequent author-assigned keywords for that topic. The CTSI research themes were also well-aligned with the institutional vision for research and focus areas. Trends using citations and networks for each research theme are currently being analyzed and results will be included in the overall findings post analysis. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Text mining was successfully used in identifying topics and research themes for clinical and translational research publications of the Miami CTSI, and in combination with bibliometric characterization, will be helpful in shaping CTSI strategy and alignment with the universitys research priorities.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Despite the importance of addressing maternal weight to promote healthy pregnancies, previous gestational weight management programs have overlooked rural women. Accordingly, this study used an optimization framework to develop and refine a prototype for an online gestational weight management intervention targeting rural women. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Methods were guided by the Obesity-Related Behavioral Intervention Trials (ORBIT) model, an optimization framework focused on intervention development and refinement. In line with this framework, three major steps were followed. First, qualitative interviews were conducted with 16 rural women who were currently or had recently been pregnant to identify barriers, facilitators, and desired resources for gestational weight management. A template analysis approach was applied to the resulting interview transcripts to identify pertinent themes. Second, themes derived from the initial interviews were used to inform the development of an online intervention prototype. Third, feedback on this prototype was sought from an additional sample of 15 rural women who were currently or had recently been pregnant. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Themes from the initial interviews highlighted numerous barriers, facilitators, and desired resources for rural gestational weight management that aligned with common social determinants of health (e.g., neighborhood and built environment, social and community context) and pregnancy-specific factors. Women also described wanting an online gestational weight management program that included a user-friendly interface, psychoeducation, tailored health recommendations, accountability, and simple behavior-logging tools. Using this feedback, an online intervention prototype was developed. Results from the feedback interviews are currently being qualitatively analyzed for themes and will be used to further refine the prototype prior to feasibility testing. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This study used an optimization framework to develop an online intervention aimed at supporting healthy maternal weight outcomes in rural communities. Because rural women experience notable weight disparities compared to their urban peers, this intervention has the potential to promote more equitable maternal health outcomes in rural areas.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Our purpose is to promote traffic toward the NJ ACTS Regulatory Cores recently launched website and increase investigator engagement through marketing strategies on LinkedIn. Landscaping to characterize the profiles of researchers on LinkedIn was also completed to estimate the feasibility of engaging with a target population on LinkedIn. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Insight gathering was performed to analyze what percentage of researchers possessed a LinkedIn profile and actively used their accounts. A sample population consisting of 284 NJ ACTS members were analyzed to summarize the type of researchers on LinkedIn, and their likelihood of responding to LinkedIn marketing campaigns. Efforts to launch a company LinkedIn page and collect followers were completed. Different methods of promotion were evaluated, including direct vs. mass email outreach to over 600+ researchers at Rutgers. Effectiveness of our platform was measured by comparing/overlaying Regulatory website traffic with LinkedIn traffic, as well as tracking the metrics of LinkedIn posts. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Among 284 NJ ACTS members, 76% (n=215) possess a LinkedIn profile, but only 21% (n=59) are actively interacting with material on LinkedIn, such as creating, commenting, or sharing posts. Among the NJ ACTS LinkedIn users, 27% of individuals (n=57/215) responded to a direct outreach. Retention of the created organizational page was strong, as most users who visited the Regulatory Core page were likely to become followers. Massive email outreach to 600+ researchers within RBHS did not yield a strong LinkedIn following, however it did result in strong signals of website traffic during the days after the promotion was sent. Engagement with posts on LinkedIn can also be amplified and messaging proliferated when colleagues reshare Regulatory posts on their personal feeds. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: 3/4 of academic researchers are likely to be on LinkedIn but may not be active users of the platform. The most effective outreach is through direct messaging as opposed to broader, less individualized tactics (including mass email outreach). Evidence suggests potential to utilize LinkedIn to proactively engage in regulatory-related activities.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The LHS concept has been promoted as a means for health systems to improve quality, safety, efficiency and equity. NAMs definition has been widely adopted, but is broad and has led to variation in how LHS is operationalized. Drawing on a taxonomy developed through a review of literature, we developed a tool that shows how LHSs are implemented in practice. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The LHS Implementation Assessment Tool (LHS-IAT) will indicate which forms of work are being carried out by a health system that purports to operate a LHS. LHS-IAT is based on the LHS Consolidated Framework (LHS-CF); which was developed through a qualitative analysis of LHS literature. LHS-CF contains 38 primary elements’ and 56 secondary elements’ that have been associated with the LHS construct. These elements are organized into 5 bodies of work• (e.g.; translating evidence into practice) and 4 enabling conditions• (e.g.; supportive culture). LHS-IAT assesses whether a health system operating as an LHS is implementing each of the key elements in LHS-CF. The usefulness of LHS-IAT will be demonstrated by applying the tool to 5 LHSs that have been described in the literature. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: LHS-IAT produces a quantitative profile for any given health system operating as a LHS; each LHS element is assessed as either emphasized; otherwise present; or absent. With this information, we create profiles for each implementation of LHS, using spider graphs. Systems that emphasize different elements will have different shapes for their spider graphs. Based on our initial coding of publications, we expect at least 4 distinct profiles within our sample, reflecting differences in emphasis on factors such as: continuous improvement practices, adoption of internally and externally tested interventions, research conducted to address patient care issues prioritized by institutional leaders, investigator-initiated research, clinician-engaged research, and engagement of patients and families. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The LHS-IAT will show differences in how health systems are translating the LHS concept into practice. This will allow for a shared language for those studying and/or implementing LHS. With the ability to map out an approach, health system leaders will have a tool to clarify intent and gain consensus as to which LHS model they want to implement and invest in.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: In 2021, Duke University expanded the myRESEARCHsuite (MRS) of research support services with the launch of myRESEARCHpath (MRP), an interactive roadmap for navigating the project lifecycle. MRP integrates with the existing MRS services, which include a personalized research portal (myRESEARCHhome) and team of experts (myRESEARCHnavigators). METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: MRP was developed as a collaborative effort to centralize essential research-related information across Duke University into one location. MRP provides a web-based platform to integrate policies, processes, and resources from over 40 research support offices, organized into topic-based pages throughout the project lifecycle. Each topic-based page provides integrated guidance, categorized related resources, and contact information for personalized support from subject matter experts. Additional features of MRP include a curated search function, and filters that refine the topic-based pages and related resources to only those applicable to selected project inclusions and organizational unit. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Since the launch of MRP in January 2021 through the third quarter of 2021, 5,947 unique users accessed MRP for a total of 17,452 sessions. The most commonly accessed topic-based pages during this time period were: Activity disclosures (Other Support and Current and Pending) – 3,231 pageviews Animal welfare – 1,882 pageviews Proposal review and submission – 1,306 pageviews NIH research grants (R series) – 686 pageviews Proposal planning – 669 pageviews The most frequently searched terms (including spelling variants) were Other Support, Biosketch, NIH, and no-cost extensions. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This data suggests users are accessing MRP for guidance on new or recently updated requirements. Maintaining clear, unified, and current site content should be prioritized to continue emphasizing MRP as a central location for research-related information. Duke also plans to explore further integration of MRP with the other MRS services.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: CTRUs support clinical research. RUN is a Learning Research System that is created to enhance CTSA and non-CTSA research units capacity through implementing, assessing, and disseminating discoveries in methods, approaches, education, and training in clinical and translational science. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The RUN association began in July 2018 with eight universities. The association has grown to 44 hospitals, research, and academic institutions (including 36 CTSA institutions). A RUN Discussion Forum has been approved by the National Center for Advancing Science (NCATS) and utilized by RUN. The Discussion Forums are created with the goal of advancing CTSA Program objectives in high priority areas of clinical and translational science. RUN actively engages members through in depth scheduled monthly meeting discussions with various relevant topics regarding the development and evaluation of clinical trials metrics, benchmarks, and scholarly publication and presentation activities. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Topics covered in RUN monthly meetings include research units general budget guidelines, staff recruitment and retainment strategies, EPIC use in scheduling CRU research visits, and PPE for investigational drugs in context of USP800 requirements. RUN members vary in geographic location, type of clinical research (outpatient vs inpatient), resources, and research subject volume. They are engaged in online discussion and learning opportunities to improve translational science practices. A recent article titled “Impact of COVID-19 on Clinical Research Units (CRUs)” in JCTS is an example of best practices learned by RUN members and shared with the broader research community. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: RUN as a Learning Research System enhances clinical and translational research unit capacity and efficiency, encouraging collaboration to contribute with improving public health. This network is aligned with the CTSAs mission of developing innovative solutions to improve translational science.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: CTSA Search Solutions (https://ctsa-search.rutgers.edu/search/) is a database that allows users to systematically conduct structured searches among the 60+ CTSA hub websites for information related to NCATS goals and CTSA hub activities. It was created with the objective of providing a novel process to evaluating and benchmarking CTSA hubs. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The CTSA Search Solutions database is an information tool that includes structured search terms relating to 3 main CTSA categories: NCATS goals, CTSA activities, and COVID 19 information. Subcategories from these topics were also identified and organized. Each CTSA hub website was systematically searched for content related to each of the identified terms and categories. The uniform resource locator (URL) for the primary webpage that provided content for each term was collected and stored in the CTSA Search Solutions database for user friendly access. URLs are validated monthly for changes or discrepancies. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The final database includes access to 63 CTSA Hub websites with 89 structured search term options and over 800 links collected, organized, and published. Hub content can be searched by state, region, or even hub age to make detailed comparisons with the data identified. The CTSA Search Solutions tool allows researchers, administrators, evaluators, and community partners to find the needed links, to learn about specific CTSA hub program highlights as well as conduct research into program hub outputs and best practices across the nationwide CTSA continuum. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: On the most practical level, CTSA Search Solutions has the potential to help hub evaluators identify the content of hubs in their first cycle compared to those in their 3rd Cycle. It can help core leads determine common best practices. It can help researchers understand the variety of COVID 19 outreach among the CTSA continuum.