OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Our long-term goal is to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with status epilepticus through increasing the level of evidence surrounding guidelines. The specific objective of our proposed work is to compare the outcomes and adverse drug events between the Neurocritical Care and American Epilepsy Society levetiracetam dose recommendations. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This is a retrospective, single site, cohort study comparing outcomes of hospitalized patients with status epilepticus treated with levetiracetam bolus at the University of Kansas Health System. Patients outcomes will be compared based on levetiracetam bolus dose received. The primary outcome will be seizure reoccurrence within 24 hours. Secondary outcomes include number of additional anti-epileptic drugs administered, cumulative dose of benzodiazepines administered within 24 hours of levetiracetam bolus administration and incidence of adverse drug reactions. All study data will be extracted retrospectively from the EPIC chart review following patient list generation through the HERON i2b2 database query. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Aim 1 will characterize levetiracetam dosing among patients admitted to the University of Kansas Medical Center for status epilepticus during routine clinical care. We hypothesize that given the inconsistency in dosing recommendations from various professional societies and drug references, we will observe inconsistent dosing of levetiracetam among those hospitalized due to status epilepticus.

Aim 2 will evaluate effectiveness and safety across the various levetiracetam doses. We estimate that adherence to the higher weight-based dosing recommendations of the 2016 American Epilepsy Society guideline may result in improved outcomes with a similar frequency and severity of adverse drug events compared to lower/fixed-dose levetiracetam dose recommendation of the 2012 Neurocritical Care guideline. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Notable inconsistencies across the dosing recommendations for levetiracetam exist between the guidelines for treatment of status epilepticus and commonly used tertiary drug information databases. This variation in guidance may lead to differences in dosing and warrants further exploration to better support the management of status epilepticus.