OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The Mission: Health Equity Challenge Series is a four-part multimedia, interdisciplinary series that raises awareness about health disparities and health equity, cultivates environments for collaboration, and encourages participants to apply learnings via film screenings, a book discussion, community research panel, and un-meeting. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Methods used to collect data include: REDCap for participant profile storage and surveys, Zoom polls and chats, and informal, unsolicited feedback from e-mail communications. Our primary study population includes researchers and healthcare professionals. Secondary populations include: administrative staff and community members. We had approximately 500 individuals, across four of our hospital institution stakeholders (Cleveland Clinic, University Hospitals, MetroHealth, and the VA Northeast Ohio Health Care System), the community at-large, and others from CTSA hubs and related entities participated in one or more of the challenges. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We anticipate that participants in the Mission: Health Equity Challenge Series, whether they participated in one or more of the challenges, will gain increased awareness about health disparities and how research can help close preventable gaps in health outcomes amongst underserved communities as well as advance health equity. Additionally, we suspect that due to the diverse nature of each challenge and attraction of nontraditional audiences to spaces with researchers and healthcare professionals, we will foster environments where cross-institutional, interdisciplinary collaboration can thrive. This is the type of collaboration needed to address complex problems that prevent health equity. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This challenge series elevates the relationship between advancing health equity and clinical and translational science and is one way to create opportunities for the existing research community to meet and collaborate with individuals that are not typically included in the ideation, design, implementation, and dissemination of research.

Attacks on minoritized communities and increasing awareness of the societal causes of health disparities have combined to highlight deep systemic inequities. In response, academic health centers have prioritized justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion (JEDI) in their strategic goals. To have a sustained impact, JEDI efforts cannot be siloed; rather, they must be woven into the fabric of our work and systematically assessed to promote meaningful outcomes and accountability. To this end, the University of Pittsburgh’s Institute for Clinical Research Education assembled a task force to create and apply a rubric to identify short and long-term JEDI goals, assess the current state of JEDI at our Institute, and make recommendations for immediate action. To ensure deep buy-in, we gathered input from diverse members of our academic community, who served on targeted subcommittees. We then applied a three-step process to ensure rapid forward progress. We emerged with concrete actions for priority focus and a plan for ongoing assessment of JEDI institutionalization. We believe our process and rubric offer a scalable and adaptable model for other institutions and departments to follow as we work together across academic medical institutions to put our justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion goals into meaningful action.

The NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) was established to support translational research that spans the entire TS Continuum, with the goal of bridging the gap between preclinical biomedical research and real-world applications to advance treatments to patients more quickly. In 2018, the Translational Science Training (TST) TL1 Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio implemented new strategies to better include and encourage research more broadly across the TS Continuum, including the addition of postdoctoral scientists and a clinically trained Program Co-Director, expansion of team science and community engagement programming, and targeted trainee recruitment from schools of nursing, dentistry, and allied health, in addition to medicine. The objective of this bibliometric analysis was to determine if the program exhibited a more diverse mix of T-types after the adjustments made in 2018. The TST/TL1 Program experienced a shift in T-type, from mostly T0 (preclinical) to more T3/T4 (clinical implementation/public health) research, after new strategies were implemented. This supports the conclusion that strategic programmatic adjustments by an NCATS-funded predoctoral training program resulted in outcomes that better align with NCATS priorities to develop Trainees who contribute across the entire TS Continuum.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Greater blood pressure (BP) reactivity and socioeconomic deprivation (e.g., area deprivation index; ADI) are associated with poor vascular health [1-3]. However, it is unclear if ADI is associated with BP reactivity. Thus, we sought to examine if ADI is associated with BP reactivity in young adults. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Participants completed questionnaires used to derive lifetime ADI averaged from early-, mid-childhood, and adolescence. Participants completed a handgrip (HG) exercise protocol including 10 minutes of rest, 2 minutes of static HG at 40% of their maximal voluntary contraction, 3 minutes of post-exercise ischemia (PEI), and 2 minutes of recovery (REC). Beat-to-beat BP (photoplethysmography) and heartrate (HR; electrocardiogram) were continually assessed. We used the Shapiro-Wilk test to assess data for normality. We examined associations between ADI, BP reactivity, and HR using unadjusted and body mass index (BMI), sex, and race-adjusted Pearson’s correlation (set a priori to 0.05). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: This study included 53 (27Males/26Females; 21 ± 1 years; 24Black/29White; BP 107 ± 9/64 ± 9 mmHg) participants. There were racial differences (Black compared to White adults) for several BP reactivity metrics (e.g., PEI minute 3 diastolic BP: 96 ± 15 vs. 84 ± 19 mmHg, p=0.014) and lifetime ADI (p0.050). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our data suggest racial differences exist in socioeconomic deprivation in a modestly sized young adult sample living in the southeast. While additional data are needed for other stressors, socioeconomic deprivation was not independently associated with BP or HR reactivity during acute exercise.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, translational scientists sought to provide scientific and data expertise to school districts serving diverse and disadvantaged students to enable equitable access to in-person learning. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We showcase two CTSA examples. One is a partnership with the second largest U.S. school district; the second is a national network of scientists and urban and rural school districts. In each example, CTSAs assembled expert science teams to support data-driven decision-making. The teams provided honest brokering of COVID-19 science, scientific interpretation that is sensitive to local context, and responses to community-driven questions. The teams collaborated with school district partners to design actionable data displays on key metrics including primary COVID-19 cases, school-acquired cases, quarantines, and missed school. The national ABC Science Collaborative) provided a platform for shared learning and reproducibility and credibility of science using district data. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The CTSAs developed easily interpretable and actionable data displays. Partnered school districts observed data in real time to identify signals of change. Districts in the national network were able to learn in real time from variation across districts based on policies and procedures that they adopted, such as quarantine, masking, and physical distancing. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This scientific collaboration is a model of rapid CTSA response, informing science and real-time action. The data displays enable school districts to explain decisions regarding student and staff health and safety. These partnerships and data designs are infrastructure that can be quickly mobilized for emergent and for ongoing information needs.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Missed appointments (MAs) negatively impact the health outcomes of adults living with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), causing disruptions in clinic operation and added financial cost to healthcare providers and systems. This study aimed to identify risk factors for MAs in both in-person and telehealth settings among adults living with T2DM. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Using a sequential multi-method design guided by the modified Quality-Caring Model, the quantitative phase of this study used electronic health records (EHR) data in Calendar Years 2019 and 2020 with 7,276 encounters made by 2,235 patients with T2DM from four diabetes clinics within a tertiary academic medical center in Baltimore, MD. Multivariable random effect logistic regression were used to examine the association between MAs and included predictors (i.e., patient characteristics [e.g., age, race, health status], health provider factors [e.g., types of provider], and health system factors [e.g., scheduling lag]). Based on the results of the quantitative phase, a purposive sample of 23 adults with T2DM and 10 providers were then interviewed individually via phone or zoom. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The EHR data found that the following variables decreased the odds of MAs: having an activated patient portal account, patients with age over 46 or with white race. Telehealth was associated with 50% decreased odds of MAs during COVID (after 3/23/2020). On the other hand, longer scheduling lag increased the odds of MAs. Qualitative interviews revealed that MAs were often related to social needs, such as lack of/limited health-related transportation and its associated financial burden. Telehealth helped break these barriers for some adults with T2DM, but technical challenges in telehealth persisted for those with low digital health literacy and people who did not have a digital device and/or with unstable internet connection. Providers worried that these challenges might undermine the quality of diabetes care. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Disparities in MAs by age and race were noted, which might reflect the impact of unmeasured social needs in EHR. Perceived convenient telehealth may reduce MAs in T2DM care. However, the persistent technical challenges of telehealth should be addressed to optimize the quality of diabetes care and to promote care continuity for underserved populations.

Advances in translational science require innovative solutions, and engagement of productive transdisciplinary teams play a critical role. While various forms of scientific meetings have long provided venues for sharing scientific findings and generating new collaborations, many conferences lack opportunities for active discussions. We describe the use of an Un-Meeting to foster innovative translational science teams through engaged discussions across multidisciplinary groups addressing a shared theme. The Un-Meeting was delivered by the University of Rochester Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration, the national coordinating center for the National Institutes of Health Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) program. This pilot CTSA program Un-Meeting focused on engaging translational scientists, policy-makers, community members, advocates, and public health professionals to address the opioid crisis. The participant-driven format leveraged lightning talks, attendee-led idea generation, and extensive breakout discussions to foster multidisciplinary networking. Results indicated participation by a broad set of attendees and a high level of networking during the meeting. These results, coupled with the growth of the Un-Meeting across the CTSA Consortium, provide practices and models to potentially advance team and translational science. While future work will further assess the impact of Un-Meetings, this format presents a promising approach to enhance translational science.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: At the Saturday Clinic for the Uninsured (SCU), a Milwaukee student-run free clinic affiliated with the Medical College of Wisconsin, we screened patients for food insecurity and evaluated associations of food security status with nine separate social determinants of health (SDOH) needs and eight chronic medical conditions influenced by diet. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This cross-sectional study took place from October 2021-April 2022 at SCU, which only sees uninsured patients. We added the USDA six-item food insecurity form to the clinic’s larger SDOH survey, which screens for medication financing, housing stability, energy assistance, legal issues, educational/work opportunities, substance use, mental health, health insurance options, and dental care needs. We then completed chart review for demographic, diagnostic, lab, and medication information pertaining to obesity, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease (CKD), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), anxiety, and depression. We conducted descriptive statistics on demographics and measured associations using both Kendall’s tau correlation and odds ratios from binomial regression. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Of the 157 patients seen during this time, most were middle-aged (mean age = 49.4 years ± 14.5 years), female (n = 98, 62.4%), Black or African American (n = 66, 42%) and resided in Milwaukee County (n = 144, 92.9%). 22 (16%) screened as food insecure and had greater odds and positively correlated with needing resources for medication financing (OR = 7.28, I2 = 0.33), housing (OR = 129.99, I2 = 0.28), energy assistance (OR = 3.94,I2= 0.2), mental health (OR = 4.54, I2= 0.28), insurance (OR = 2.86, I2= 0.18), and dental care (OR=3.65,I2= 0.28), but not legal concerns, education/work opportunities, or substance use. Food insecure patients had higher odds and positively correlated with having anxiety (OR = 3.26,I2= 0.23) or depression (OR = 2.88,I2= 0.19), but not obesity, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, CKD, or GERD. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Patients without health insurance and experiencing food insecurity were more likely to have multiple SDOH needs and mental health diagnoses. Risk factors separate from food security status may explain associations with other chronic medical conditions, including uninsured status, socioeconomic status, eating behaviors, or food accessibility.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The goal of this project is to investigate dementia caregivers’ needs, barriers to access, and current utilization of community-based dementia-care services in Alabama, and how these vary across rural/urban settings and racial groups. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We partnered with Marketry Inc. to recruit and conduct interviews among three groups: dementia caregivers, healthcare providers, and aging services representatives. We recruited caregivers from dementia support groups and aging services in 2 rural and 2 urban Alabama counties. Purposive and snowball sampling was used to recruit healthcare providers and aging services representatives. Interviews were conducted by trained Marketry staff, recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Rapid content analysis was conducted by three investigators using the Social Determinants of Health as a coding framework to assess patterns in barriers and facilitators to utilizing community-based dementia resources. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We interviewed 5 healthcare providers, 32 caregivers, and 15 aging services representatives. Providers thought that the process of memory loss care is not streamlined and they lack key information necessary to fulfill their role. Caregivers expressed a need for more dementia education, social connection, and access to financial resources. Aging services agencies need more funding and volunteers to sustain community-based dementia services. Dementia resources, like memory clinics, were more available in urban than in rural counties. African-American caregivers mentioned a reluctance to accept outside help for taking care of their loved ones with dementia, potentially due to distrust. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: There is a need for more accessible dementia services in rural AL and a need to build service trust and familiarity, especially among African-American caregivers. Future research should develop tools for providers and caregivers to start conversations and increase awareness of service availability.

The Community Research Advisory Council (C-RAC) of the Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational Research was established in 2009 to provide community-engaged research consultation services. In 2016–2017, C-RAC members and researchers were surveyed on their consultation experiences. Survey results and a 2019 stakeholder meeting proceeding helped redesign the consultation services. Transitioning to virtual consultations during COVID-19, the redesigning involved increasing visibility, providing consultation materials in advance, expanding member training, and effective communications. An increase in consultations from 28 (2009–2017) to 114 (2020–2022) was observed. Implementing stakeholder-researcher inputs is critical to holistic and sustained community-engaged research.

The University of Kansas Cancer Center (KU Cancer Center) initiated an engagement program to leverage the lived experience of individuals and families with cancer. KU Cancer Center faculty, staff, and patient partners built an infrastructure to achieve a patient-designed, patient-led, and research-informed engagement program called Patient and Investigator Voices Organizing Together (PIVOT). This special communication offers an engagement roadmap that can be replicated, scaled, and adopted at other cancer centers and academic health systems. PIVOT demonstrates that collaboration among academic leaders, investigators, and people with a lived experience yields a patient-centered, vibrant environment that enriches the research enterprise.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted health systems and exposed disparities in access to health care among underserved populations. We examined how the pandemic shaped social, mental, and physical health among Native American and Latino communities in rural and underserved areas. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Using Theory of Planned Behavior, Social Cognitive Theory, and Social Contextual Factor frameworks, we developed interview guides to examine perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic on social, mental, and physical health among community members. Stakeholders of the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation in Montana and the Hispanic/Latinx population in Yakima Valley in Washington were selected through purposeful community-engagement. A total of six focus group discussions and 30 key informant interviews were administered in both communities. A codebook was developed and deductive coding was applied to informant responses, followed by an inductive, constant comparison approach. The codebook was further refined and inter-rater agreement was completed by three analysts. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Four themes were highlighted as areas impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic (mental and physical health, family dynamics, and social disruptions) with few differences among geographic areas or between focus group (n=39) and key informant (n=28) participants. Perceived impacts on mental health included increased stress, anxiety, and depression, while pandemic-related lifestyle or family changes impacted physical health. Participants reported changes to family routines and dynamics due to staying home, social distancing, and more frequent interactions inside or limited interactions outside the household respectively. Social distruptions reported included impacts on finances, employment, and household staples, though participants highlighted how many community members stepped up to help those in need. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The COVID-19 pandemic had similar impacts on two geographically distinct underserved communities in Montana and Washington. Understanding the community’s experience with the COVID-19 pandemic is critical to identify strategies to support families, community needs, and mental and physical health in underserved communities.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Translating the science of vaccines to health and public health practice requires understanding how vaccine risks and benefits are understood and applying that knowledge to community translation. During the pandemic the lack of this knowledge became apparent. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Through the PACER community engagement special interest group of the ACTS, the University of Florida(UF)/Florida State University and 5 other CTSIs community engagement programs received Center for Disease Control and Prevention funding for the Program to Alleviate National Disparities in Ethnic and Minority Immunizations in the Community (PANDEMIC) to translate vaccinations into the community. At UF, HealthStreet’s Community Health Workers, CTSI Mobile Health Vehicle nurses, and Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences extension agents collaborated to engage adults throughout the North and Central part of the state on their vaccine status and perceptions and to offer them vaccines. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Through UF, 4,587 people have been interviewed in community settings using the Survey of Perceptions; 25% (1,125) had not received any COVID-19 vaccine. Among differences in perceptions, those vaccinated versus unvaccinated perceived people to be getting vaccines because they cut down on disease spread (28.9% vs. 15.2%), and perceived people NOT to be getting vaccinated because of misinformation/ignorance (27.1% vs. 11.0%) and political beliefs (16.3% vs. 6.7%). Both vaccinated and not perceived lack of trust as a reason to not get vaccinated (41.3% vs 46.4%). When asked what people were doing instead of vaccination, those vaccinated versus unvaccinated responded that people were doing nothing/very little much more often (40.6% vs. 21.8%) but were less likely to say ’trying to stay healthy’ (9.1% vs. 18.9%). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The science of translating from bench through clinical trials and to common health and public health practice requires knowledge of reasons for successful adoption. This survey adds to knowledge of perceptions towards vaccines that inhibit translation and biases toward the vaccine-hesitant.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To examine pharmacy students’ and patients’ perspectives on use of an automatic pill dispenser (APD) and adherence device, and secondly, to identify patient characteristics impacting selection of an APD. This knowledge will assist pharmacists in making appropriate device recommendations that improve medication adherence and effectiveness. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: One hundred fifty-three pharmacy students participated in a personal APD simulation, living the life as a person taking medication. Students then each identified an actual patient exhibiting medication nonadherence from pharmacy records at their work setting, provided them with an APD free of charge and instructed them on its use. The students later interviewed their patients and reported on their patients’ ability to use the APD, as well as their perspectives (likes and dislikes) on the features of the device. Students identified individual patient characteristics associated with successful use of the APD. This new knowledge will aid these future pharmacists in making recommendations for medication adherence devices for their patients. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: In general, patients perceived more difficulty with use of the 10 APD features than did students. Over half of the patients indicated that the following features were a distinct advantage in adherence: individual medication compartment size, method of loading medications, alarm, flashing light, ability to lock the dispenser, and method of retrieving the medication from the device. Patients felt that the biggest disadvantage was its bulky size and lack of portability. In spite of individual difficulties with use, the research findings showed that persons who are elderly, homebound, have memory problems, take multiple medications and/or have complex regimens are most likely to benefit from the device features and exhibit improved adherence to their prescribed medication regimen. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Medication adherence rates in the U.S are agreed upon to be about 50% - highly relevant to healthcare practitioners since several studies suggest a correlation between adherence and improved health outcomes. Pharmacists must be knowledgeable about non-adherence tools and consider patient characteristics when recommending an adherence aid.

Our drug development process has produced many life-saving medications, but patients experiencing rare diseases and similar conditions often are left with limited options for treatment. For an approved treatment to be developed, research on a new candidate or existing drug must validate safety and efficacy based on contemporary research expectations. Randomized clinical trials are conducted for this purpose, but they are also costly, laborious, and time-consuming. For this reason, The 21st Century Cures Act mandates that the US Food and Drug Administration look for alternative methods for approving drugs, in particular exploring the uses of real-world data and evidence. Expanded access (“compassionate use”) is a pathway for the clinical treatment of patients using drugs that are not yet approved for prescribing in the United States. Using real-world evidence generated from expanded-access patients presents an opportunity to provide critical data on patient outcomes that can serve regulatory approval in conjunction with other observational datasets or clinical trials, and in limited circumstances may be the best data available for regulatory review. In doing so, we may also support and encourage patient-centered care and a personalized medicine approach to drug development.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Language is the main barrier to equitable access of neuropsychological resources. In our preliminary study, using an Arabic translation of the Global Neuropsychological Assessment (GNA), we assessed 27 Arabic-speaking participants and compared them to English-speaking controls. Our goal was to assess the Arabic GNA’s validity and feasibility. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The Global Neuropsychological Assessment (GNA) is a brief 15-minute assessment of cognition. 27 Arabic-speaking participants were recruited and assessed with the GNA and an Arabic translation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) by community health workers (CHWs). 17 English-speaking participants GNA data were gleaned from a previous validation study and compared to the Arabic sample via independent samples t-tests. Correlations between the GNA sub-tests and Arabic-translated MoCA are reported in the Arabic-speaking sample. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: ): Independent samples t-tests revealed that Arabic and English-speaking groups significantly differed on education (Arabic: M = 10.3, SD = 3.4, English: M = 15.4, SD = 2.43 t(41) = 6.2, p < .05) but not age (p > .05). A one-way ANCOVA model controlling for education revealed that Arabic and English-speaking groups were not significantly different in any GNA subtest (all p’s > .05) except for the perceptual comparison task (Arabic: M = 22.4, SD = 6.9, English: M = 38.4, SD = 9.9, p < .05). Arabic GNA subtests correlated with each other as expected. Logical memory delayed recall was modestly correlated with the MoCA total score (r = .386, p < .05). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our preliminary results suggest that the Arabic translation of the GNA is suitable for assessment of Arabic-speaking individuals. Brief educable assessments like the Arabic GNA are essential to meet the needs of these English new language populations and reduce the need for live translations that reduce the reliability of assessment.