Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Hypatia
  4. Volume 10
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 10 - Spring 1995

Contents

Page 4 of 5

Front matter

  • HYP volume 10 issue 3 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 March 2020, p. f1
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Other

Comment/Reply

  • Reply to Patrick Hopkins

  • Melinda Vadas
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 March 2020, pp. 159-161

  • Patrick Hopkins has claimed that SM is compatible with feminist principles. I argue that his account relies on both mistaken analogies and an untenable account of the allegedly changed meaning of SM scenes.1

Other

Front matter

  • HYP volume 10 issue 1 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    25 March 2020, pp. f1-f2
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Comment/Reply

  • Simulation and the Reproduction of Injustice: A Reply

  • Patrick D. Hopkins
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 March 2020, pp. 162-170

  • Melinda Vadas rejects my claim that there are morally relevant differences between simulations of unjust events and actual unjust events on the ground that I overlook the connection between simulations and that which they simulate. I argue that this purported moral connection can only be understood as either the result of a necessary psychological disposition or as a “magical,” metaphysical attachment, neither of which is defensible or satisfactory.

Book Reviews

Announcement

  • Announcements

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 March 2020, pp. 213-214
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

Book Reviews

Books Received

Book Reviews

Other

Front matter

  • HYP volume 10 issue 4 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 March 2020, pp. f1-f2
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Books Received

Other

Announcement

  • Announcements

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 March 2020, pp. 192-194
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

Other

Page 4 of 5