Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T10:00:43.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Short-term satiating effect of the fat replacer sucrose polyester (SPE) in man

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Toine Hulshof ,
Cees De Graaf  and
Jan A. Weststrate
Toine Hulshof
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, Wageningen Agricultural University, P.O. Box 8129, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands
Cees De Graaf
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, Wageningen Agricultural University, P.O. Box 8129, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands
Jan A. Weststrate
Affiliation:
Unilever Research Laboratorium, Vlaardingen, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effects of different amounts of the non-absorbable fat replacer sucrose polyester (SPE), water, and fat added to six warm preload lunches on feelings of appetite and food intake were investigated in two studies that were replicates of each other. In the first study thirty-nine subjects consumed rice preloads; in the second study thirty-five subjects consumed macaroni preloads. The six preloads were fixed on three energy levels: 1·8, 2·7, or 3·7MJ. At 2 h after preload consumption a test-meal buffet of thirty-one products was presented. Food intake was recorded on the study day, and the day after the study day. For women no energy compensation occurred in either study. Men showed a tendency to compensate for the energy differences between the preloads. However, when the fat of the preloads was replaced by SPE, energy compensation was less than 50% and non-significant. Statistically significant energy-compensation (66 %) was found when fat was replaced by water. No macronutrient-specific compensation occurred in men or women in either study. Lower total fat and energy intakes were found with the preloads where fat was replaced by SPE compared with the preloads containing fat. The appetite ratings were in line with the energy intake values, with no differences in women, and higher appetite ratings after the lower energy preloads in men. This short-term study indicates that SPE may be a useful aid to reduce fat and energy intakes.

Keywords

Sucrose polyesterEnergy intakeAppetite
Type
The satiating power of fat and SPE
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 74 , Issue 4 , October 1995 , pp. 569 - 585
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1995

References

REFERENCES

Beaton, G. H., Tarasuk, V. & Anderson, G. H. (1992) Estimation of possible impact of non-caloric fat and carbohydrate substitutes on macronutrient intake in the human. Appetite 43, 145–153.Google Scholar
Birch, L. L., Johnson, S. L., Jones, M. B. & Peters, J. C. (1993) Effects of a nonenergy fat substitute on children's energy and macronutrient intake. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 58, 326–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blundell, J., Burley, V., Cotton, J. & Lawton, C. (1992) Dietary fat and appetite control: weak effects on satiation (within-meals) and satiety (between meals). In Dietary Fats: Determinants of Preference, Selection and Consumption, pp. 79–101 [Mela, D. J., editor]. London and New York: Elsevier Applied Science.Google Scholar
Cameron, M. E. & van Staveren, W. A. (1988) Manual on Methodology for Food Consumption Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cotton, J. R., Burley, V. J. & Blundell, J. E. (1993) Effect on appetite of replacing natural fat with sucrose polyester in meals or snacks across one whole day. International Journal of Obesity 17, Suppl. 2, 41 Abstr.Google Scholar
de Graaf, C., Hulshof, A. F. J., Weststrate, J. A. & Jas, P. (1992) Short-term effects of different amounts of protein, fats and carbohydrates on satiety. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 55, 33–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durnin, J. V. G. A. & Womersley, J. (1974) Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfolds thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. British Journal of Nutrition 32, 77–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fallat, R. W., Glueck, C. J., Lutmer, R. & Mattson, F. H. (1976) Short term study of sucrose polyester a nonabsorbable fat-like material as a dietary agent for lowering plasma cholesterol. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 29, 1204–1215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foltin, R. W., Fischman, M. W., Emurian, C. S. & Rachlinski, J. J. (1988) Compensation for caloric dilution in humans given unrestricted access to food in a residential laboratory. Appetite 10, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glueck, C. J., Hastings, M. M., Allen, R. D., Hogg, E., Baehler, L., Gartside, P. S., Phillips, D., Jones, M., Hollenbach, E. J., Braun, B. & Anastasia, J. V. (1982) Sucrose polyester and covert caloric dilution. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 35, 1352–1359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, A. J., Magson, L. D. & Blundell, J. E. (1984) Hunger and palatability: tracking ratings of subjective experience before, during and after the consumption of preferred and less preferred food. Appetite 53A, 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulshof, T., de Graaf, C. & Weststrate, J. A. (1993 a) Fat and non-absorbable fat (SPE) in croissants have similar effects on satiety and subsequent short term food intake. International Journal of obesity 17, Suppl. 2, 64 Abstr.Google Scholar
Hulshof, T., de Graaf, C. & Weststrate, J. A. (1993 b) The effects of preloads varying in physical state and fat content on satiety and energy intake. Appetite 21, 273–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hulshof, T., de Graaf, C. & Weststrate, J. A. (1995) Short-term effects of high-fat and low-fat/high SPE croissants on appetite and energy intake at three deprivation periods. Physiology & Behavior 57, 377–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendall, A., Levitsky, D. A, Strupp, B. J. & Lissner, L. (1991) Weight loss on a low-fat diet: consequence of the imprecision of the control of food intake in humans. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 53, 1124–1129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kissileff, H. R. (1984) Satiating efficiency and a strategy for conducting food loading experiments. Neuroscience and Biobehavorial Reviews 8, 129–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louis-Sylvestre, J., Tournier, A., Verger, P., Chabert, M., Delorme, B. & Hossenlopp, J. (1989) Learned caloric adjustment of human intake. Appetite 12, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattes, R. D., Pierce, C. B. & Friedman, M. I. (1988) Daily caloric intake of normal-weight adults: response to changes in dietary energy density of a luncheon meal. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 48, 214–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NEVO (1986) NEVO Dutch Nutrient Database. Zeist, The Netherlands: Stichting NEVO.Google Scholar
Rolls, B. J., Hetherington, M. & Burley, V. J. (1988) The specificity of satiety: the influence of foods of different macronutrient content on the development of satiety. Physiology and Behavior 43, 145–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rolls, B. J., Pirraglia, P. A., Jones, M. B. & Peters, J. C. (1992) Effects of olestra, a noncaloric fat substitute, on daily energy and fat intakes in lean men. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 56, 84–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis Systems (1990) SAS-STAT User's Guide, version 6, 4th ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. van Strien, T. (1986). Eating behaviour, personality traits and body mass (Thesis). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Voorlichtingsbureau voor de voeding (1993) Zo eet Nederland: The National Food Consumption Survey 1992. Den Haag: Voorlichtingsbureau.Google Scholar
Warwick, Z. S., Hall, W. G., Pappas, T. N. & Schiffman, S. S. (1993) Taste and smell sensations enhance the satiating effect of both a high-carbohydrate and a high-fat meal in humans. Physiology and Behavior 53, 553–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooley, O. W., Wooley, S. C. & Dunham, R. B. (1972) Can calories be perceived and do they affect hunger in obese and nonobese humans. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 80, 250–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed