Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T21:26:26.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 10 - Not So Trivial Pursuits: The Slide into Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2022

Michael J. Aminoff
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco
Get access

Summary

In addition to the leading role he played in various professional organizations that served to protect doctors and the general public, each from the other, Horsley attempted unsuccessfully to reform certain aspects of the Royal College of Surgeons and then assumed an important role in reforming and leading the British Medical Association, ensuring that it became more representative of the profession and more concerned with the welfare of its members. He enjoyed being in the public eye, having his views heard, and influencing the course of events in accord with his liberal principles. He used his position in the association to support legislation to improve the health and welfare of children and then became an ardent advocate of the National Insurance Bill, which caused him to be cast aside by many of his friends. An idealistic man of strong opinions who was always ready to help those less fortunate than himself, his support of social legislation was not for personal gain. Indeed, it cost him dear, for his private practice withered as colleagues stopped referring patients to him, either in anger or in the belief that he was turning from a clinical to a political career.

Type
Chapter
Information
Victor Horsley
The World's First Neurosurgeon and His Conscience
, pp. 117 - 127
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

Anon: Deputations to the Privy Council relative to the proposed new charter of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Br Med J 1887; 2: 11101117; Anon: The Royal College of Surgeons. Br Med J 1888; 2: 1053–1054, 1118–1119, 1170–1171, 1234–1235 [four parts]; Correspondence: Royal College of Surgeons. Br Med J 1889; 1: 437–438; Anon: The Royal College of Surgeons and its members. Br Med J 1889; 1: 603 and 606; Anon: Parliamentary Bills Committee. Government of the College of Surgeons. Br Med J 1890; 1: 740–743; Anon: Royal College of Surgeons of England. Annual meeting of fellows and members. Direct representation of members on the council. Br Med J 1907; 2: 1624. [Similar articles can also be found in the Lancet over this same time period.] Horsley twice introduced resolutions for the direct representation of members on the college council [Anon: Royal College of Surgeons of England. Annual meeting of fellows and members. Lancet 1912; 180; 1532–1533; Anon: Annual meeting of the Royal College of Surgeons. Representation of members. Br Med J 1914; 2: 951.]Google Scholar
Horsley, V: The conference on medical politics at Newcastle-on-Tyne. Lancet 1899; 2: 14741477.Google Scholar
Little, EM: History of the British Medical Association 1832–1932. British Medical Association: London, 1982.Google Scholar
.Horsley, V: Conference on medical organisation at Manchester. The Medical Acts. Lancet 1900; 1: 13021303; Conference on medical organisation. The Medical Acts. Br Med J 1900; 1: 1123–1124.Google Scholar
Anon: British Medical Association. Extraordinary General Meeting. Br Med J 1900; 2: 189191.Google Scholar
Horsley, V: Reconstitution of the Association. Sixty-eighth annual meeting of the British Medical Association, held at Ipswich, July 31st, August 1st, 2nd, and 3rd. Br Med J 1900; 2: 320321.Google Scholar
Manknell, A: The British Medical Association and its work for the general practitioner. Br Med J 1928; 2 (Suppl. 1258): 125128.Google Scholar
Cox, A: Obituary of Sir Victor Horsley, C.B., F.R.S., M.B., F.R.C.S. Work for the British Medical Association. Br Med J 1916; 2: 164165.Google Scholar
Horsley, V: The journal. Sixty-eighth annual meeting of the British Medical Association, held at Ipswich, July 31st, August 1st, 2nd, and 3rd. Br Med J 1900; 2: 316317.Google Scholar
Williams, D: The journal. Sixty-eighth annual meeting of the British Medical Association, held at Ipswich, July 31st, August 1st, 2nd, and 3rd. Br Med J 1900; 2: 317318.Google Scholar
Heggie, V: Lies, damn lies, and Manchester’s recruiting statistics: Degeneration as an “urban legend” in Victorian and Edwardian Britain. J Hist Med Allied Sci 2008; 63: 178216.Google Scholar
Newman, G: The Building of a Nation’s Health. pp. 194195. Macmillan: London, 1939.Google Scholar
Robinson, W: Historiographical reflections on the 1902 Education Act. Oxf Rev Educ 2002; 28: 159172.Google Scholar
Earl of Mansfield, Cochrane, T, Glen-Coats, T, Craik, H, Stewart, MHS, Alston, JC, Fergusson, JB, McCrae, G, Ogston, A: The Royal Commission on Physical Training (Scotland). Volume 1. Report and Appendix. His Majesty’s Stationery Office: Edinburgh, 1903.Google Scholar
Anon: The Royal Commission on Physical Training (Scotland). Br Med J 1903; 1: 817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inter-Departmental Committee on Physical Deterioration: Report of the Inter-Departmental Committee on Physical Deterioration. Vol. 1: Report and Appendix. His Majesty’s Stationery Office: London, 1904.Google Scholar
Anon: Medical inspection of school children. The Times (Lond), March 17, 1911, p. 6.Google Scholar
Anon: Parliament: House of Commons. Tuesday March 21. Medical inspection in schools. The Times (Lond), March 22, 1911, p. 12.Google Scholar
Anon: Medical treatment of school children. Mr. Runciman and the London County Council. The Times (Lond), June 28, 1911, p. 4.Google Scholar
Anon: Medical inspection and treatment of school children under the London County Council. Deputation from the British Medical Association to the President of the Board of Education. Br Med J 1912; 1 (Suppl. 422): 545547.Google Scholar
Anon: Medical inspection of school children. The Times (Lond), November 14, 1912, p. 3.Google Scholar
Gilbert, BB: The Evolution of National Insurance in Great Britain: The Origin of the Welfare State. pp. 149152. Joseph: London, 1966.Google Scholar
Macdonald, JA: Matters referred to divisions. Medico-political committee. Medical inspection of school children. Report: Provision for treatment of children found, upon medical inspection, to be defective. Br Med J 1908; 2 (Suppl. 222): 4142.Google Scholar
Anon: Medical treatment of school children. The distribution of grants. The Times (Lond), April 11, 1912, p. 11.Google Scholar
Turner, ES: Call the Doctor: A Social History of Medical Men. Joseph: London, 1958.Google Scholar
Medico-Political Committee of the British Medical Association: An investigation into the economic conditions of contract medical practice in the United Kingdom. Br Med J 1905; 2 (Suppl. 66): 129.Google Scholar
Anon: Contract medical practice. Notice as to districts in which disputes exist. Br Med J 1905; 2: 207208.Google Scholar
Goodall, EW, Horsley, V, Keay, JH, Rice-Oxley, AJ, Shaw, LE: The great “betrayal.” A reply to Dr. Smith. [Letter to the editor.] The Times (Lond), December 7, 1911, p. 10.Google Scholar
Goodall, EW, Horsley, V, Keay, JH, Rice-Oxley, AJ, Shaw, LE: The great betrayal. Policy of the doctors. [Letter to the editor.] The Times (Lond), December 11, 1911, p. 10.Google Scholar
Anon: The doctors’ protest. Enthusiastic meeting in London. Sir Victor Horsley refused a hearing. The Times (Lond), December 20, 1911, p. 9.Google Scholar
Horsley, V: The profession and politicians. [Letter to the editor.] Br Med J 1912; 1: 462.Google Scholar
Horsley, V, Keay, JH, Rice-Oxley, AJ, Shaw, LE: The Council’s position. The Association and the profession. [Letter to the editor.] The Times (Lond), December 20, 1911, p. 10.Google Scholar
Osler, W: Note to Horsley, dated December 20 [1911]; Horsley V: Draft of reply to Osler. Section A54, Horsley Papers, Special Collections, UCL Library Services (London, UK). See also Dunnill MS: Victor Horsley (1857–1915) and national insurance. J Med Biogr 2013; 21: 249254.Google Scholar
Anon: National Insurance: The Chancellor of the Exchequer on the medical aspects. Br Med J 1912; 1 (Suppl. 408): 177180.Google Scholar
Lloyd George, D: The National Insurance Act. An open letter from Mr. Lloyd George. Lancet 1912; 180; 124125.Google Scholar
Marsh, H: Medicine: individual and social. The value of prevention. [Letter to the editor]. The Times (Lond), June 4, 1912, p. 4.Google Scholar
Horsley, V: Medicine and the Insurance Act. [Letter to the editor.] The Times (Lond), June 8, 1912, p. 6.Google Scholar
Barr, J: President’s Address, delivered at the eighteenth annual meeting of the British Medical Association. Br Med J 1912; 2: 157163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, EB: Reply to Sir Victor Horsley. Obligation of the pledge. [Letter to the editor.] The Times (Lond), December 28, 1912, p. 6.Google Scholar
Cooter, R: The rise and decline of the medical member: Doctors and parliament in Edwardian and interwar Britain. Bull Hist Med 2004; 78: 59107.Google Scholar
Papers on political matters. Section C, Horsley Papers, Special Collections, UCL Library Services (London, UK).Google Scholar
Papers on the 1910 general election. Section C4, Horsley Papers, Special Collections, UCL Library Services (London, UK).Google Scholar
Barlow, Sir Thomas: Letter to Victor Horsley dated January 7, 1911. Section C4, Horsley Papers, Special Collections, UCL Library Services (London, UK).Google Scholar
Anon: Sir Victor Horsley. Attitude towards suffragettes. Daily Telegraph (Lond), November 15, 1913, p. 12; Harborough division. Radical candidature. Daily Telegraph (Lond), November 24, 1913, p. 11.Google Scholar
Anon: Sir Victor Horsley’s denial. Daily Mail (Lond), November 21, 1913, p. 5.Google Scholar
Anon: London by-elections. Opening of short campaigns in the east. Polling days fixed. The Times (Lond), February 13, 1914, p. 8.Google Scholar
Paget, S: Sir Victor Horsley: A Study of His Life and Work. p. 208. Constable: London, 1919.Google Scholar
Papers on tariff reforms, free trade, and home rule. Section C5, Horsley Papers, Special Collections, UCL Library Services (London, UK).Google Scholar
Proportional Representation Society: Report for the Year 1914–15. P.R. Pamphlet No. 27: London, 1915.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×