Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T23:25:48.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - The Politics of Protection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2022

Michael J. Aminoff
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco
Get access

Summary

Horsley was not one to win friends with an easy smile, gentle asides, and whispered confidences, and he certainly did not always bother with subtleties or even genteel niceties in expressing his views. Some have wondered what drove an outspoken and confrontational man like Horsley into the “muddy pool of politics.”1 He became involved early in a number of social issues in which he had a personal stake, such as opposing the clamor and charges of the antivivisectionists and speaking in support of the temperance movement, as discussed in other chapters. The challenges, verbal sparring, and camaraderie were to his liking and he gained increasing national prominence by his stands. This led him to become more engaged in the cut and thrust of medical and then national politics, enjoying the support of many of his contemporaries in doing so. It was as if he needed something with which to challenge himself, something to fight about. The experience of having to deal with his son’s epilepsy and his own failure to cure it by surgery may well have caused Horsley to turn further from clinical work and become even more immersed in social and political activities.2

Type
Chapter
Information
Victor Horsley
The World's First Neurosurgeon and His Conscience
, pp. 105 - 116
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

Osler, W: Obituary of Sir Victor Horsley, C.B., F.R.S., M.B., F.R.C.S. Personal appreciation. Br Med J 1916; 2: 165.Google Scholar
Robinson, P [Victor Horsley’s daughter]: Letter to Sir Geoffrey Jefferson dated August 9, 1957. Archives, John Rylands Library (University of Manchester). Sir Geoffrey Jefferson Papers. JEF/1/2/4/2/2/18. Available at: http://archiveshub.ac.uk/data/gb133-jef.xml [last accessed June 22, 2021].Google Scholar
Anon: A miscarriage of justice. Med Press Circ 1885; 90: 1314.Google Scholar
Anon: Medical notes in parliament. The case of Dr. David Bradley. Lancet 1885; 126: 136 and 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon: The case of Dr. Bradley: Presentation by the medical profession. Lancet 1885; 126: 1162; The case of Dr. Bradley: Dinner and presentation at Sheffield. Med Press Circ 1885; 91: 580–581.Google Scholar
Anon: Proposed Medical Defence Union. Br Med J 1886; 1: 943944.Google Scholar
Rideal, CF: The Medical Defence Union. [Letter to the editor.] Br Med J 1885; 2: 936; Lancet 1885; 126: 924.Google Scholar
Anon: The Medical Defence Union. Br Med J 1887; 2: 1227.Google Scholar
Anon: Medico-legal and medico-ethical. Denholm v. Tait. Br Med J 1892; 1: 739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon: Denholm v. Tait. Lancet 1892; 139: 761762.Google Scholar
Hempson, Elgar: Collie v. Bloxham: Bloxham v. Collie. [Letter to the editor.] Lancet 1894; 143: 1591.Google Scholar
Forbes, R: Sixty Years of Medical Defence. pp. 1530. Medical Defence Union: London, 1948.Google Scholar
Anon: Medical Defence Union. Br Med J 1894; 2: 780781.Google Scholar
Anon: Medical Defence Union. Med Press Circ 1894; 108: 529.Google Scholar
Sanger, EF: Report on malpractice. Boston Med Surg J 1879; 100: 4150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powel, AM: Surgical malpractice. St Louis Med Surg J 1882; 42: 231236.Google Scholar
De Ville, KA: Medical Malpractice in Nineteenth-Century America. pp. 204206. New York University Press: New York, 1990.Google Scholar
Anon: Stogdale vs. Baker. Boston Med Surg J 1887; 117: 610611.Google Scholar
Anon: Organized medical defense. JAMA 1902; 38: 37 and 43.Google Scholar
Horsley, V: The Medical Defence Union, Limited, and the London and Counties Medical Protection Society, Limited. [Letter to the editor.] Lancet 1896; 147: 735.Google Scholar
Anon: British Medical Association and medical defence. Lancet 1904; 163: 14521454.Google Scholar
Anon: Medical defence. Lancet 1904; 163: 14391440.Google Scholar
Anon: Notes and news. W Lond Med J 1904; 9: 155156.Google Scholar
Anon: Mr. Victor Horsley and medical reform. “Medical politics.” Br Med J 1898; 2: 14371439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon: Reform of the Medical Act, 1858. Br Med J 1896; 1: 14011403.Google Scholar
Finch, E: The centenary of the General Council of Medical Education and Registration of the United Kingdom (The General Medical Council) 1858–1958 in relation to medical education. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1958; 23: 321331.Google Scholar
MacAlister, D: Introductory address on the General Medical Council: Its powers and its work. Br Med J 1906; 2: 817823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Worshipful Society of Apothecaries, founded by Royal Charter in 1617, served from 1815 as an examining authority for the medical profession, licensing and regulating medical practitioners in England and Wales until the end of the twentieth century. Its licentiates initially used the postnominal LSA but, later, LMSSA was used to reflect qualification in both medicine and surgery. Among the society’s licentiates were John Keats, the poet; Elizabeth Garrett Anderson, the first women in Britain to gain a medical qualification; and Sir Ronald Ross, the first British Nobel laureate.Google Scholar
Horsley, V: The General Medical Council and the Hunter case. [Letter to the editor.] Br Med J 1899; 1: 374375.Google Scholar
Anon: The election of a direct representative on the General Medical Council. Lancet 1897; 150: 1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsley, V: On certain undesirable powers possessed by the president of the General Medical Council. Br Med J 1896; 2: 499–502, 699.Google Scholar
Anon: The penal powers of the General Medical Council: A report to the registered practitioners of England and Wales. Lancet 1898; 151: 253254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsley, V: The duties of the president of the General Medical Council. [Letter to the editor.] Lancet 1898; 151: 676.Google Scholar
Horsley, V: The General Medical Council: Inspection of documents. [Letter to the editor.] Br Med J 1899; 1: 5253.Google Scholar
Horsley, V: The Manchester Medico-Ethical Association. Address by Mr. Victor Horsley on the procedure of the General Medical Council and the reform of the Medical Acts. Br Med J 1898; 2: 18831887; Horsley V: Abstract of an address on the work of the General Medical Council. Lancet 1898; 152: 1692–1695.Google Scholar
Horsley, V: The General Medical Council: critics and candidates. [Letter to the editor.] Lancet 1896; 148: 907908.Google Scholar
Carter, B, Horsley, V: The Society of Apothecaries of London. Statement by Mr. Brudenell Carter – reply by Mr. Horsley. Lancet 1899; 154: 15601562.Google Scholar
Horsley, V: The direct representatives’ meeting at Newcastle. Mr. Victor Horsley’s address. Br Med J 1899; 2: 15011504; Lancet 1899; 154: 1474–1477.Google Scholar
Alabone, EW: The Cure of Consumption, Asthma, Bronchitis, and Other Diseases of the Chest; With Chapters on Laryngitis, Tabes Mesenterica, Post-Nasal Catarrh, and Hay Fever. Illustrated by Numerous Cases Pronounced Incurable by the Most Eminent Physicians. 37th edition. Kemp: London, 1903.Google Scholar
Vaile, M, Gilbert, S: The curious case of Dr Alabone – heterodoxy in 19th century medicine. J R Soc Med 2005; 98: 281286.Google Scholar
Anon: The General Medical Council v. Alabone. Lancet 1900; 155: 715.Google Scholar
Horsley, V: Conference on medical organisation at Manchester. The Medical Acts. Lancet 1900; 155: 13021303.Google Scholar
Cheverton, BA: Mr. Victor Horsley and the Medical Acts. [Letter to the editor.] Lancet 1900; 155: 1533.Google Scholar
Horsley V and the Editors of the Lancet: Mr. Victor Horsley and the Medical Acts. [Letter to the editor.] Lancet 1900; 155: 1605.Google Scholar
Alabone, EW: Letter to Victor Horsley dated March 10, 1901. Section E4/1, Horsley Papers, Special Collections, UCL Library Services (London, UK).Google Scholar
Alabone, EW: Infamous Conduct: Edwin W. Alabone versus Victor Horsley. Powage Press: Aspley Guise, Beds., UK, 1901.Google Scholar
Anon: The General Council of Medical Education and Registration. Lancet 1900; 155: 15551562.Google Scholar
Anon: The General Council of Medical Education and Registration. Report of proceedings. The prevention of personation. Br Med J 1902; 1: 14161417.Google Scholar
Anon: The General Council of Medical Education and Registration. Lancet 1902; 160: 1494 and Br Med J 1902; 2: 1718–1719.Google Scholar
Anon: General Medical Council. Med Times Hosp Gaz 1903; 31: 429432.Google Scholar
Horsley, V: The midwives registration bill. [Letter to the editor.] Br Med J 1898; 1: 915.Google Scholar
Horsley, V: The midwives bill. [Letter to the editor.] Br Med J 1899; 2: 313.Google Scholar
Horsley, V: The proposed registration of midwives. Lancet 1899; 153: 17321734.Google Scholar
White, R: Some political influences surrounding the Nurses Registration Act 1919 in the United Kingdom. J Adv Nurs 1976; 1: 209217.Google Scholar
Horsley, V: Witness testimony, May 18, 1905. pp. 61–73. In Report from the Select Committee on Registration of Nurses; Together with the Proceedings of the Committee, Minutes of Evidence, and Appendix. His Majesty’s Stationary Office: London, 1905.Google Scholar
Anon: State registration of nurses. Deputation to the premier. Br Med J 1908; 1: 12471250.Google Scholar
Anon: Registration of nurses. Daily Mail (Lond), May 14, 1909, p. 3.Google Scholar
Horsley, V: State registration of nurses. [Letter to the editor.] Br Med J 1914; 2: 315316.Google Scholar
Anon: Anti-registration tactics. Br J Nurs 1914; 53: 67.Google Scholar
Anon: The nursing and midwifery conference. Br J Nurs 1914; 52: 394396.Google Scholar
Cox, A: Obituary of Sir Victor Horsley, C.B., F.R.S., M.B., F.R.C.S. Work for the British Medical Association. Br Med J 1916; 2: 164165.Google Scholar
Zuck, D: Mr Troutbeck as the surgeon’s friend: The coroner and the doctors – an Edwardian comedy. Med Hist 1995; 39: 259287.Google Scholar
Horsley, V: A coroner on operations. [Letter to the editor.] The Times (Lond), June 6, 1908, p. 12.Google Scholar
Anon: The relation of coroners to the medical profession. Conferences as to the action of the coroner for south-west London. Br Med J 1904; 2 (Suppl. 26): 5261.Google Scholar
Horsley, V: Report on the procedure of the coroner for south-west London and the inaction of the government in relation thereto. Br Med J 1905; 2 (Suppl. 68): 146148.Google Scholar
Anon: The government and the profession. Br Med J 1905; 2: 291292.Google Scholar
Anon: A coroner on operations. The Times (Lond), June 4, 1908, p. 14.Google Scholar
Anon: 1,000 operations daily. Coroner on the need for inquiry. Daily Mail (Lond), June 4, 1908, p. 3.Google Scholar
Shearer, DF: A coroner on operations. [Letter to the editor.] The Times (Lond), June 9, 1908, p. 6.Google Scholar
Biggs, MG: A coroner on operations. [Letter to the editor.] The Times (Lond), June 10, 1908, p. 8.Google Scholar
McManus, LS: A coroner on operations. [Letter to the editor.] The Times (Lond), June 12, 1908, p. 20.Google Scholar
Troutbeck, J: A coroner on operations. [Letter to the editor.] The Times (Lond), June 10, 1908, p. 8.Google Scholar
Horsley, V: A coroner on operations. [Letter to the editor.] The Times (Lond), June 12, 1908, p. 20.Google Scholar
Anon: A coroner on operations. The Times (Lond), June 12, 1908, p. 13.Google Scholar
Davy, H: A coroner on operations. [Letter to the editor.] The Times (Lond), June 19, 1908, p. 14.Google Scholar
Anon: Death after operation: Surgical opinion. Daily Telegraph (Lond), June 16, 1908, p. 4.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×