Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T15:44:34.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 12 - Tubal Factor Infertility and Tubal Surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2019

By
Mostafa Metwally  and
Tulay Karasu
Edited by
Jane A. Stewart
Jane A. Stewart
Affiliation:
Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Get access

Summary

Tubal factor infertility is a common cause for infertility worldwide. Prior to the introduction of in vitro fertilisation (IVF), tubal surgery was the mainstay of fertility treatment in women with tubal disorders. However, in the era of assisted reproductive technology the use of tubal surgery has gradually declined. This chapter investigates tubal factor infertility and the current role of tubal surgery in the age of assisted reproductive technology. In conclusion, tubal surgery remains an important option that can supplement and in some cases substitute IVF treatment.

Type
Chapter
Information
Subfertility, Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproduction , pp. 86 - 93
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kawwass, J. F., Crawford, S., Kissin, D. M., Session, D. R., Boulet, S. & Jamieson, D. J. 2013. Tubal factor infertility and perinatal risk after assisted reproductive technology. Obstet Gynecol, 121, 1263–71.Google Scholar
Honore, G. M., Holden, A. E. & Schenken, R. S. 1999. Pathophysiology and management of proximal tubal blockage. Fertil Steril, 71, 785–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, E. C., Levens, E. D. & Decherney, A. H. 2008. Infertility surgery is dead: only the obituary remains? Fertil Steril, 89, 232–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cobellis, L., Argano, F., Castaldi, M. A., Acone, G., Mele, D., Signoriello, G. & Colacurci, N. 2012. Selective salpingography: preliminary experience of an office operative option for proximal tubal recanalization. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 163, 62–6.Google Scholar
Wadin, K., Lonnemark, M., Rasmussen, C. & Magnusson, A. 1994. Frequency of proximal tubal obstruction in patients undergoing infertility evaluation. Acta Radiol, 35, 357–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NICE 2016. Fertility problems: assessment and treatment.Google Scholar
Knuttinen, M. G., Jajko, R. & Scoccia, B. 2014. Fluoroscopic tubal recanalization in tubal factor related infertility. Semin Intervent Radiol, 31, 269–71.Google Scholar
Osada, H., Kiyoshi Fujii, T., Tsunoda, I., Tsubata, K., Satoh, K. & Palter, S. F. 2000. Outpatient evaluation and treatment of tubal obstruction with selective salpingography and balloon tuboplasty. Fertil Steril, 73, 1032–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hou, H. Y., Chen, Y. Q., Li, T. C., Hu, C. X., Chen, X. & Yang, Z. H. 2014. Outcome of laparoscopy-guided hysteroscopic tubal catheterization for infertility due to proximal tubal obstruction. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 21, 272–8.Google Scholar
Mekaru, K., Yagi, C., Asato, K., Masamoto, H., Sakumoto, K. & Aoki, Y. 2011. Hysteroscopic tubal catheterization under laparoscopy for proximal tubal obstruction. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 284, 1573–6.Google Scholar
Chung, J. P., Haines, C. J. & Kong, G. W. 2012. Long-term reproductive outcome after hysteroscopic proximal tubal cannulation – an outcome analysis. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 52, 470–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubuisson, J. B., Chapron, C., Ansquer, Y. & Vacher-Lavenu, M. C. 1997. Proximal tubal occlusion: is there an alternative to microsurgery? Hum Reprod, 12, 692–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, B., Turner, K. M., Frolund, M., Ward, H., May, M. T., Rasmussen, S., Benfield, T., Westh, H. & Danish Chlamydia Study, G. 2016. Risk of reproductive complications following chlamydia testing: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Denmark. Lancet Infect Dis, 16, 1057–64.Google Scholar
Johnson, N., Van Voorst, S., Sowter, M. C., Strandell, A. & Mol, B. W. 2010. Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD002125. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002125.pub3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strandell, A., Waldenstrom, U., Nilsson, L. & Hamberger, L. 1994. Hydrosalpinx reduces in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfer pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod, 9, 861–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strandell, A. & Lindhard, A. 2002. Why does hydrosalpinx reduce fertility? The importance of hydrosalpinx fluid. Hum Reprod, 17, 1141–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mukherjee, T., Copperman, A. B., Mccaffrey, C., Cook, C. A., Bustillo, M. & Obasaju, M. F. 1996. Hydrosalpinx fluid has embryotoxic effects on murine embryogenesis: a case for prophylactic salpingectomy. Fertil Steril, 66, 851–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seli, E., Kayisli, U. A., Cakmak, H., Bukulmez, O., Bildirici, I., Guzeloglu-Kayisli, O. & Arici, A. 2005. Removal of hydrosalpinges increases endometrial leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) expression at the time of the implantation window. Hum Reprod, 20, 3012–7.Google Scholar
Zhong, Y., Li, J., Wu, H., Ying, Y., Liu, Y., Zhou, C., Xu, Y., Shen, X. & Qi, Q. 2012. Effect of surgical intervention on the expression of leukemia inhibitory factor and L-selectin ligand in the endometrium of hydrosalpinx patients during the implantation window. Exp Ther Med, 4, 1027–1031.Google Scholar
Du, H. & Taylor, H. S. 2016. The role of hox genes in female reproductive tract development, adult function, and fertility. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med, 6, a023002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Mazny, A., Ramadan, W., Kamel, A. & Gad-Allah, S. 2016. Effect of hydrosalpinx on uterine and ovarian hemodynamics in women with tubal factor infertility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 199, 55–9.Google Scholar
Surana, A., Rastogi, V. & Nirwan, P. S. 2012. Association of the serum anti-chlamydial antibodies with tubal infertility. J Clin Diagn Res, 6, 1692–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Singh, S., Bhandari, S., Agarwal, P., Chittawar, P. & Thakur, R. 2016. Chlamydia antibody testing helps in identifying females with possible tubal factor infertility. Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd), 14, 187–92.Google Scholar
Demir, B., Bozdag, G., Sengul, O., Kahyaoglu, I., Mumusoglu, S. & Zengin, D. 2016. The impact of unilateral salpingectomy on antral follicle count and ovarian response in ICSI cycles: comparison of contralateral side. Gynecol Endocrinol, 1–4.Google Scholar
Qin, F., Du, D. F. & Li, X. L. 2016. The effect of salpingectomy on ovarian reserve and ovarian function. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 71, 369–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singhal, V., Li, T. C. & Cooke, I. D. 1991. An analysis of factors influencing the outcome of 232 consecutive tubal microsurgery cases. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 98, 628–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winston, R. M. & Margara, R. A. 1991. Microsurgical salpingostomy is not an obsolete procedure. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 98, 637–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strandell, A., Lindhard, A. & Eckerlund, I. 2005. Cost--effectiveness analysis of salpingectomy prior to IVF, based on a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod, 20, 3284–92.Google Scholar
Legendre, G., Moulin, J., Vialard, J., Ziegler, D. D., Fanchin, R., Pouly, J. L., Watrelot, A., Belaisch Allart, J., Massin, N. & Fernandez, H. 2014. Proximal occlusion of hydrosalpinges by Essure((R)) before assisted reproduction techniques: a French survey. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 181, 300–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozgur, K., Bulut, H., Berkkanoglu, M., Coetzee, K. & Kaya, G. 2014. ICSI pregnancy outcomes following hysteroscopic placement of Essure devices for hydrosalpinx in laparoscopic contraindicated patients. Reprod Biomed Online, 29, 113–8.Google Scholar
Arora, P., Arora, R. S. & Cahill, D. 2014. Essure((R)) for management of hydrosalpinx prior to in vitro fertilisation – a systematic review and pooled analysis. BJOG, 121, 527–36.Google Scholar
Veersema, S., Mijatovic, V., Dreyer, K., Schouten, H., Schoot, D., Emanuel, M. H., Hompes, P. & Brolmann, H. 2014. Outcomes of pregnancies in women with hysteroscopically placed micro-inserts in situ. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 21, 492–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, S. B., Bouaziz, J., Schiff, E., Simon, A., Nadjary, M., Goldenberg, M., Orvieto, R. & Revel, A. 2016. In vitro fertilization outcomes after placement of essure microinserts in patients with hydrosalpinges who previously failed in vitro fertilization treatment: a multicenter study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 23, 939–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbosa, M. W., Sotiriadis, A., Papatheodorou, S. I., Mijatovic, V., Nastri, C. O. & Martins, W. P. 2016. High miscarriage rate in women submitted to Essure for hydrosalpinx before embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 48, 556–65.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×