Book contents
- The Study of Word Stress and Accent
- The Study of Word Stress and Accent
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Phonetic Correlates and Prominence Distinctions
- Part II Typology
- Part III Case Studies
- 7 Persistence and Change in Stem Prominence in Dene (Athabaskan) Languages
- 8 Spanish Word Stress
- 9 Metrically Conditioned Pitch Accent in Uspanteko
- 10 Focus Prosody in Kagoshima Japanese
- 11 Where Is the Dutch Stress System?
- 12 Morphologically Assigned Accent and an Initial Three-Syllable Window in Ese’eja
- 13 The Scales-and-Parameters Approach to Morpheme-Specific Exceptions in Accent Assignment
- Language Index
- Subject Index
- References
7 - Persistence and Change in Stem Prominence in Dene (Athabaskan) Languages
from Part III - Case Studies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 December 2018
By
Book contents
- The Study of Word Stress and Accent
- The Study of Word Stress and Accent
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Phonetic Correlates and Prominence Distinctions
- Part II Typology
- Part III Case Studies
- 7 Persistence and Change in Stem Prominence in Dene (Athabaskan) Languages
- 8 Spanish Word Stress
- 9 Metrically Conditioned Pitch Accent in Uspanteko
- 10 Focus Prosody in Kagoshima Japanese
- 11 Where Is the Dutch Stress System?
- 12 Morphologically Assigned Accent and an Initial Three-Syllable Window in Ese’eja
- 13 The Scales-and-Parameters Approach to Morpheme-Specific Exceptions in Accent Assignment
- Language Index
- Subject Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Study of Word Stress and AccentTheories, Methods and Data, pp. 227 - 255Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Alderete, J. and Bob, T.. (2005). A corpus-based approach to Tahltan stress. In Hargus, S. and Rice, K. (eds.) Athabaskan Prosody. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 369–391.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. (2004). Positional weight constraints in Optimality Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 692–703.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. and Luna, E.. (2004). An intergenerational study of Hupa stress. Berkeley Linguistic Society 30: 105–117.Google Scholar
Hargus, S. (2005a). Prosody in two Athabaskan languages of northern British Columbia. In Hargus, S. and Rice, K. (eds.) Athabaskan Prosody. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 393–423.Google Scholar
Hargus, S(2005b). Stress in polysyllabic morphemes: Sekani and Deg Xinag. Proceedings of the (2005) Athabaskan Languages Conference. Alaska Native Language Center Working Papers Number 5. University of Alaska Fairbanks, 39–66.Google Scholar
Hargus, S(2007). Witsuwit’en grammar. Phonetics, Phonology, Morphology. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Hargus, S(2010). Vowel quality in Deg Xinag. In Tuttle, S. and Spence, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the (2009) Dene (Athabaskan) Languages Conference. Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 39–66.Google Scholar
Hargus, S(2013). Dene. In Hargus, S., Vajda, E., and Hieber, D. W. (eds.) Working Papers in Athabaskan (Dene) Languages 2012. Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 13–23.Google Scholar
Jaker, A. (2012). Prosodic reversal in Dogrib (Weledeh dialect). PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Kari, J. (1978). Deg Xinag: Ingalik Noun Dictionary (Preliminary). Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Kari, J(1990). Ahtna Athabaskan Dictionary. Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Kari, J(2007). Dena’ina Topical Dictionary. Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Krauss, M. E. and Leer, J.. (1981). Athabaskan, Eyak, and Tlingit sonorants. Alaska Native Language Center Research Papers Number 5. University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Leer, J. (1996). Comparative Athabaskan lexicon fileslips. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Archive. www.uaf.edu/anla/collections/search/resultDetail.xml?resource=(1641).5&sessionId=&searchId=Google Scholar
Leer, J(2005). How stress shapes the stem-suffix complex in Athabaskan. In Hargus, S. and Rice, K. (eds.) Athabaskan Prosody. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 278–318.Google Scholar
Manker, J. (2012). An acoustic analysis of stem prominence in Hän Athabascan. MA thesis, University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Manker, J(2013). Reanalysis of stem prominence in Hän Athabascan: Evidence from disyllabic stems. Proceedings of the (2012) Athabascan Languages Conference. Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 43–55.Google Scholar
Rice, K. (2014). Convergence of prominence systems? In van der Hulst, H. (ed.) Word Stress. Theoretical and Typlogical Issues. Cambridge University Press, 194–227.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1925). Pitch accent in Sarcee: An Athabaskan language. Journal de la Société des Américanistes de Paris 17: 185–205.Google Scholar
Tuttle, S. (1994). The peg prefix, the foot, and the word minimum: Evidence from Salcha Athabaskan. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Tuttle, S(1998). Metrical and tonal structures in Tanana Athabaskan. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Tuttle, S(2008). Phonetics and word definition in Ahtna Athabascan. Linguistics 46(2): 439–470.Google Scholar
Tuttle, S. G. and Hargus, S.. (2004). Explaining variability in affix order: The Athabaskan areal and third person prefixes. In Holton, G. and Tuttle, S. (eds.) Working Papers in Athabaskan Linguistics 4. Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 70–99.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by