Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 December 2018
Summary
The introduction outlines the background of this collection and offers a summary of the articles in this volume, clarifying both the theme issues and how different authors use terminology. This volumes cover a range of typological and theoretical issues in the study of stress/accent. On the typological side, various authors are concerned with the array of word-prosodic types and their distinguishing phonetic properties. Of specific theoretical concern is the question of foot structure and how it is manifested in different ways in different systems. Also, several chapters explicitly discuss the role of morphological structure, as well as of lexical marking of accent. The 13 chapters collected here present a lively testimony of a field of inquiry that shows progress, while also identifying questions of ongoing concern.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Study of Word Stress and AccentTheories, Methods and Data, pp. 1 - 12Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Donegan, P. J. and Stampe, D.. (1983). Rhythm and the holistic organization of language structure. Papers from the Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology and Syntax. Chicago Linguistic Society, 337–353.Google Scholar
Goedemans, R., Heinz, J. and van der Hulst, H. (2014). StressTyp2. http://st2.ullet.net.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. (2002). A factorial typology of quantity insensitive stress. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 491–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, M. and van der Hulst, H. Forthcoming.Word stress. In Gussenhoven, C. and Aoju, C. (eds.) The Handbook of Prosody. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D. and Comrie, B. (eds.) (2005). The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heinz, J., Goedemans, R. W. N. and van der Hulst, H. G. (eds.) (2016). Dimensions of Phonological Stress. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heuven, V. J. van and Sluijter, A. M. C.. (1996). Notes on the phonetics of word prosody. In Goedemans, R., van der Hulst, H. and Visch, E. (eds.) Stress Patterns of the World, Part 1: Background. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics, 233–269.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der. (1996). Separating primary accent and secondary accent. In Goedemans, R., van der Hulst, H. and Visch, E. (eds.) Stress Patterns of the World, Part 1: Background. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics, 1–26.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der (1997). Primary accent is non-metrical. Rivista di Linguistica 9: 99–127.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der (1999a). Word accent. In van der Hulst, H. (ed.) Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 3–116.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der (ed.) (1999b). Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin and New York:Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der (2010). Word accent: Terms, typologies and theories. In van der Hulst, H. G., Goedemans, R. and van Zanten, E. (eds.) Stress Patterns of the World, Part 2: The Data. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 3–54.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der (2011). Pitch accent systems. In van Oostendorp, M., Even, C., Hume, E. and Rice, K. (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Phonology: Vol. 2. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 1003–26.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der (2014a). The study of word accent and stress: Past, present and future. In van der Hulst, H. (ed.) Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge University Press, 3–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulst, H. van der (2014b). Representing rhythm. In van der Hulst, H.G. (ed.) Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 325–65.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der (ed.) (2014c). Word Stress: Typological and Theoretical Issues. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der (2017). Phonological typology. In Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Typological Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, 39–77.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. G. van der, Goedemans, R. and van Zanten, E.. (eds.) (2010). A Survey of Word Accentual Patterns in the Languages of the World. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Inkelas, S. and Zoll, C.. (2007). Is grammar dependence real? A comparison between cophonological and indexed constraint approaches to morphologically conditioned phonology. Linguistics 45: 133–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kager, R. (2012). Stress in windows: Language typology and factorial typology. Lingua 122: 1454–93.Google Scholar
Martínez-Paricio, V. (2012). Superfeet as recursion. In Arnett, N. and Bennett, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 30). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, 259–69.Google Scholar
Martínez-Paricio, V. (2013). An exploration of minimal and maximal metrical feet. PhD dissertation, CASTL, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Martínez-Paricio, V. and Kager, R. (2015). The binary-to-ternary rhythmic continuum in stress typology: Layered feet and non-intervention constraints. Phonology 32(3): 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plank, F. (1998). The co-variation of phonology with morphology and syntax: A hopeful history. Linguistic Typology 2: 195–230.Google Scholar
Roca, I. (2006). The Spanish stress window. In Martínez-Gil, F. and Colina, S. (eds.) Optimality Theoretic Studies in Spanish Phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 239–77.Google Scholar
Roca, I. (2014). Dogma and fact: Spanish stress 30 years on (a personal history). Paper read at the Workshop on Word Stress and Accent, Leiden, 15–17 August.Google Scholar
Roca, I. (2016). Gliding ghosts or ghostly glides, and does it matter which? In Nuñez Cedeño, R. A. (ed.) The Syllable and Stress: Studies in Honor of James W. Harris. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 51–104.Google Scholar
Vuillermet, M. (2012). A grammar of Ese Ejja, a Takanan language of the Bolivian Amazon. PhD dissertation, Université Lumière Lyon 2. www.marinevuillermet.com/these/complete-thesis/Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by