Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:40:53.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Chromosomal Hybrid Zones

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2019

By
Stanisław Fedyk ,
Svetlana V. Pavlova ,
Włodzimierz Chętnicki  and
Jeremy B. Searle
Edited by
Jeremy B. Searle ,
P. David Polly  and
Jan Zima
Jeremy B. Searle
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
P. David Polly
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Jan Zima
Affiliation:
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Shrews, Chromosomes and Speciation , pp. 271 - 312
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, R., Albach, D., Ansell, S., et al. (2013). Hybridization and speciation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 26, 229–46.Google Scholar
Aniskin, V. M. and Lukianova, I. V. (1989). A new chromosome race and the analysis of hybridization zone of two karyomorphs of Sorex araneus (Insectivora, Soricidae). Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 309, 1260–2. (In Russian, with English summary).Google Scholar
Arslan, A., Kryštufek, B., Matur, F., and Zima, J. (2016). Review of chromosomal races in blind mole rats (Spalax and Nannospalax). Folia Zoologica, 65, 249–301.Google Scholar
Baird, A. B., Hillis, D. M., Patton, J. C., and Bickham, J. W. (2009). Speciation by monobrachial centric fusions: a test of the model using nuclear DNA sequences from the bat genus Rhogeessa. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 50, 256–67.Google Scholar
Baker, R. J. and Bickham, J. W. (1986). Speciation by monobrachial centric fusions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 83, 8245–8.Google Scholar
Bakloushinskaya, I., Romanenko, S. A., Serdukova, N. A., Graphodatsky, A. S., and Lyapunova, E. A. (2013). A new form of the mole vole Ellobius tancrei Blasius, 1884 (Mammalia, Rodentia) with the lowest chromosome number. Comparative Cytogenetics, 7, 163–9.Google Scholar
Banaszek, A. (1994). The structure of the contact zone between the chromosomal races Drużno and Łęgucki Młyn in the common shrew (Sorex araneus) in north-eastern Poland. Folia Zoologica, 43 (Suppl. 1), 11–9.Google Scholar
Banaszek, A. (1997). Chromosome Variation and Breeding Parameters of the Common Shrew (Sorex araneus L., 1758) in an Interracial Hybrid Zone. PhD dissertation, Białystok Branch of Warsaw University. (In Polish).Google Scholar
Barton, N. H. (1983). Multilocus clines. Evolution, 37, 454–71.Google Scholar
Barton, N. H. and Bengtsson, B. O. (1986). The barrier to genetic exchange between hybridising populations. Heredity, 56, 357–76.Google Scholar
Barton, N. H., Briggs, D. E. G., Eisen, J. A., Goldstein, D. B., and Patel, N. H. (2007). Evolution. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
Barton, N. H. and Hewitt, G. M. (1981). Hybrid zones and speciation. In Evolution and Speciation, ed. Atchley, W. R. and Woodruff, D.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 109–45.Google Scholar
Barton, N. H. and Hewitt, G. M. (1985). Analysis of hybrid zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 16, 113–48.Google Scholar
Borisov, Y. M., Gaiduchenko, H. S., Cherepanova, E. V., et al. (2016). The clinal variation of metacentric frequency in the populations of the common shrew, Sorex araneus L., in the Dnieper and Pripyat interfluve. Mammal Research, 61, 269–77.Google Scholar
Borisov, Y. M., Kovaleva, A. A., Irkhin, S. Y., and Orlov, V. N. (2009). Zones of contact and joint occurrence of three chromosomal races of the common shrew Sorex araneus L. (Mammalia) in the southern Valdai Hills. Doklady Biological Sciences, 428, 437–9.Google Scholar
Britton-Davidian, J., Robinson, T. J., and Veyrunes, F. (2012). Systematics and evolution of the African pygmy mice, subgenus Nannomys: a review. Acta Oecologia, 42 (Special Issue SI), 41–9.Google Scholar
Brünner, H. and Hausser, J. (1996). Genetic and karyotypic structure of a hybrid zone between the chromosomal races Cordon and Valais in the common shrew, Sorex araneus. Hereditas, 125, 147–58.Google Scholar
Brünner, H., Lugon-Moulin, N., and Hausser, J. (2002). Alps, genes, and chromosomes: their role in the formation of species in the Sorex araneus groups (Mammalia, Insectivora), as inferred from two hybrid zones. Cytogenetic and Genome Research, 96, 85–96.Google Scholar
Bulatova, N., Jones, R. M., White, T. A., et al. (2011). Natural hybridization between extremely divergent chromosomal races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus, Soricidae, Soricomorpha): hybrid zone in European Russia. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 24, 573–86.Google Scholar
Bulatova, N., Shchipanov, N. A., and Searle, J. B. (2007). The Seliger–Moscow hybrid zone between chromosomal races of common shrews – an initial description. Russian Journal of Theriology, 6, 111–16.Google Scholar
Butlin, R. K., Ritchie, M. G., and Hewitt, G. M. (1991). Comparisons among morphological characters and between localities in the Chorthippus parallelus hybrid zone (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 334, 297–308.Google Scholar
Faria, R. and Navarro, A. (2010). Chromosomal speciation revisited: rearranging theory with pieces of evidence. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25, 660–9.Google Scholar
Feder, J. L., Egan, S. P., and Nosil, P. (2012). The genomics of speciation-with-gene-flow. Trends in Genetics, 28, 342–50.Google Scholar
Fedyk, S. (1986). Genetic differentiation of Polish populations of Sorex araneus L. II. Possibilities of gene flow between chromosome races. Bulletin of Polish Academy of Sciences, Biological Science, 34, 161–71.Google Scholar
Fedyk, S. (1995). Regional Differentiation and Hybrid Zones Between Chromosomal Races of Sorex araneus L. in North-Eastern Poland. Dissertationes 439, Universitatis Varsoviensis, Białystok.Google Scholar
Fedyk, S., Bajkowska, U., Chętnicki, W., Banaszek, A., and Jadwiszczak, K. (2007). New type of recombined karyotype of Sorex araneus in a hybrid zone. Russian Journal of Theriology, 6, 154.Google Scholar
Fedyk, S., Banaszek, A., Chętnicki, W., Cichomska, A., and Szałaj, K. A. (2000). Reassessment of the range of the Drnholec race: studies on meiosis in Sorex araneus hybrids. Acta Theriologica, 45, 59–67.Google Scholar
Fedyk, S. and Chętnicki, W. (2009). Whole-arm reciprocal translocation in a hybrid population of Sorex araneus. Chromosome Research, 17, 451–4.Google Scholar
Fedyk, S., Chętnicki, W., and Banaszek, A. (1991). Genetic differentiation of Polish populations of Sorex araneus L. III. Interchromosomal recombination in a hybrid zone. Evolution, 45, 1384–92.Google Scholar
Fedyk, S., Wójcik, J. M., Chętnicki, W., and Mączewski, S. (2008). Invalidation of Stobnica chromosome race of the common shrew Sorex araneus. Acta Theriologica, 53, 375–80.Google Scholar
Fedyk, S., Zajkowska, M., and Chętnicki, W. (1993). Study of a contact between two chromosomally monomorphic races of Sorex araneus L. (common shrew). Heredity, 71, 221–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fredga, K. and Narain, Y. (2000). The complex hybrid zone between the Abisko and Sidensjö chromosome races of Sorex araneus in Sweden. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 70, 285–307.Google Scholar
Giménez, M. D., Panithanarak, T., Hauffe, H. C., and Searle, J. B. (2016). Empirical demonstration of hybrid chromosomal races in house mice. Evolution, 70, 1651–8.Google Scholar
Gündüz, İ., Pollock, C. L., Giménez, M. D., et al. (2010). Staggered chromosomal hybrid zones in the house mouse: relevance to reticulate evolution and speciation. Genes, 1, 193–209.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. G., ed. (1993). Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. G. and Rand, D. M. (1989). Mosaic hybrid zones and the nature of species boundaries. In Speciation and its Consequences, ed. Otte, D. and Endler, J.. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, pp. 111–33.Google Scholar
Hatfield, T., Barton, N., and Searle, J. B. (1992). A model of a hybrid zone between two chromosomal races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus). Evolution, 46, 1129–45.Google Scholar
Hauffe, H. C., Giménez, M. D., and Searle, J. B. (2012). Chromosomal hybrid zones in the house mouse. In Evolution of the House Mouse (Cambridge Studies in Morphology and Molecules: New Paradigms in Evolutionary Biology), ed. Macholán, M., Baird, S. J. E., Munclinger, P., and Piálek, J.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 407–30.Google Scholar
Hewitt, G. M. (1988). Hybrid zones – natural laboratories for evolutionary studies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 158–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, B. C. (2011). Recombination-suppression: how many mechanisms for chromosomal speciation? Genetica, 139, 393–402.Google Scholar
Jadwiszczak, K. A. (2002). Chromosome Structure of the Hybrid Zone Between the Drnholec and Białowieża Races of the Common Shrew, Sorex araneus Linnaeus, 1758. PhD dissertation, University of Białystok. (In Polish).Google Scholar
Jiggins, C. D. and Mallet, J. (2000). Bimodal hybrid zones and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 250–5.Google Scholar
Jones, R. M. and Searle, J. B. (2003). Mapping the course of the Oxford–Hermitage chromosomal hybrid zone in the common shrew (Sorex araneus) – a GIS approach. Mammalia, 68, 193–200.Google Scholar
Key, K. H. (1968). The concept of stasipatric speciation. Systematic Zoology, 17, 14–22.Google Scholar
Kidwell, M. G. (2001). Hybrid dysgenesis. In Encyclopedia of Genetics, ed. Brenner, S. and Miller, J. H.. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 984–5.Google Scholar
Lavrenchenko, L. A. and Bulatova, N. S. (2016). The role of hybrid zones in speciation: a case study on chromosome races of the house mouse Mus domesticus and common shrew Sorex araneus. Biology Bulletin Reviews, 6, 232–44.Google Scholar
López-Fuster, M. J., Ventura, J., Garcia-Perea, R., and Gisbert, J. (1999). The Sorex araneus group in the northern Iberian System (Spain): a contact zone between S. coronatus and S. granarius? Acta Theriologica, 44, 113–22.Google Scholar
Lukáčová, L., Piálek, J., and Zima, J. (1994). A hybrid zone between the Ulm and Drnholec karyotypic races of Sorex araneus in the Czech Republic. Folia Zoologica, 43 (Suppl. 1), 37–42.Google Scholar
Lyapunova, E. A., Bakloushinskaya, I.Y., Saidov, A. S., and Saidov, K. K. (2010). Dynamics of chromosome variation in mole voles Ellobius tancrei (Mammalia, Rodentia) in Pamiro-Alay in the period from 1982 to 2008. Russian Journal of Genetics, 46, 566–71.Google Scholar
Lyapunova, E. A., Vorontsov, N. N., Korobitsyna, K. V., et al. (1980). A Robertsonian fan in Ellobius talpinus. Genetica, 52/53, 239–47.Google Scholar
Matveevsky, S., Pavlova, S. V., Acaeva, М., and Kolomiets, О. L. (2012). Synaptonemal complex analysis of interracial hybrids between the Moscow and Neroosa chromosomal races of the common shrew Sorex araneus showing regular formation of a complex meiotic configuration (ring-of-four). Comparative Cytogenetics, 6, 301–14.Google Scholar
Mercer, S. J. and Searle, J. B. (1991). Preliminary analysis of a contact zone between karyotypic races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus). Mémoires de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, 19, 73–8.Google Scholar
Mitchell-Jones, A. J., Amori, G., Bogdanowicz, W., et al. (1999). The Atlas of European Mammals. London: Poyser.Google Scholar
Moska, M. (2003). A hybrid zone between the chromosomal races Łęgucki Młyn and Popielno of the common shrew in north-eastern Poland: preliminary results. Acta Theriologica, 48, 441–55.Google Scholar
Nachman, M. W. and Searle, J. B. (1995). Why is the house mouse karyotype so variable? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 397–402.Google Scholar
Nadjafova, R. S. (2013). Bibliography of studies on hybrid zones of the common shrew chromosome races distributed in Russia. Comparative Cytogenetics, 7, 293–303.Google Scholar
Narain, Y. and Fredga, K. (1996). A hybrid zone between the Hällefors and Uppsala chromosome races of Sorex araneus in central Sweden. Hereditas, 125, 137–45.Google Scholar
Neet, C. R. and Hausser, J. (1989). Chromosomal rearrangements, speciation and reproductive isolation: the example of two karyotypic species of the genus Sorex. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2, 373–8.Google Scholar
Neet, C. R. and Hausser, J. (1990). Habitat selection in zones of parapatric contact between the common shrew Sorex araneus and Millet’s shrew S. coronatus. Journal of Animal Ecology, 59, 235–50.Google Scholar
Nevo, E., Ivanitskaya, E., and Beiles, A. (2001). Adaptive Radiation of Blind Subterranean Mole Rats. Leiden: Backhuys.Google Scholar
Olert, J. (1973). A case of chromosome dissociation in a shrew. Genetical Research, 22, 323–4.Google Scholar
Orlov, V. N. and Borisov, Y. M. (2007). Chromosome races of the common shrew Sorex araneus Linnaeus, 1758 (Mammalia: Insectivora) from the south part of Valdai Heights (Russia). Comparative Cytogenetics, 1, 101–6.Google Scholar
Orlov, V. N., Kozlovsky, A. I., Okulova, N. M., and Balakirev, A. E. (2007). Postglacial recolonisation of European Russia by the common shrew Sorex araneus. Russian Journal of Theriology, 6, 97–104.Google Scholar
Orlov, V. N., Borisov, Y. M., Cherepanova, E. V., et al. (2012). Narrow hybrid zone between Moscow and West Dvina chromosomal races and specific features of population isolation in common shrew Sorex araneus (Mammalia). Russian Journal of Genetics, 48, 70–8.Google Scholar
Orlov, V. N., Borisov, Y. M., Cherepanova, E. V., and Milishnikov, A. N. (2013). Assortative mating in the hybrid zones of the common shrew (Sorex araneus Mammalia) chromosome race West Dvina. Doklady Biological Sciences, 451, 217–20.Google Scholar
Orlov, V. N., Borisov, Y. M., Irkhin, S. Y., and Kovaleva, A. A. (2010). Characteristics of the contact zone of three chromosome races of the common shrew Sorex araneus L. (Mammalia) as indices of interpopulation competition. Russian Journal of Ecology, 41, 519–23.Google Scholar
Pavlova, S. V. (2013). Cytogenetic analysis of a hybrid zone between the Moscow and Neroosa chromosomal races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus) differing by a single WART-like chromosome rearrangement. Tsitologiya, 55, 271–4.Google Scholar
Pavlova, S. V. and Bulatova, N. (2010). Identification of a novel WART-like chromosome rearrangement in complex heterozygotes in an interracial hybrid zone of the common shrew Sorex araneus L. Russian Journal of Genetics, 46, 1125–6.Google Scholar
Pavlova, S. V., Kolomiets, O. L., Bulatova, N., and Searle, J. B. (2008). Demonstration of a WART in a hybrid zone of the common shrew (Sorex araneus Linnaeus, 1758). Comparative Cytogenetics, 2, 115–20.Google Scholar
Pavlova, S. V. and Shchipanov, N. A. (2014). A hybrid zone between the Kirillov and Petchora chromosomal races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus L., 1758) in north-eastern European Russia. Preliminary description. Acta Theriologica, 59, 415–26.Google Scholar
Piálek, J., Hauffe, H. C., Rodríguez-Clark, K. M., and Searle, J. B. (2001). Raciation and speciation in house mice from the Alps: the role of chromosomes. Molecular Ecology, 10, 613–25.Google Scholar
Piálek, J., Hauffe, H. C., and Searle, J. B. (2005). Chromosomal variation in the house mouse. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 84, 535–63.Google Scholar
Polyakov, A. V., Volobouev, V. T., Aniskin, V. M., et al. (2003). Altitudinal partitioning of two chromosome races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus) in West Siberia. Mammalia, 66, 201–7.Google Scholar
Polyakov, A. V., Volobouev, V. T., Borodin, P. M., and Searle, J. B. (1996). Karyotypic races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus) with exceptionally large range: the Novosibirsk and Tomsk races of Siberia. Hereditas, 125, 109–15.Google Scholar
Polyakov, A. V., White, T. A., Jones, R. M., Borodin, P. M., and Searle, J. B. (2011). Natural hybridisation between extremely divergent chromosomal races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus, Soricidae, Soricomorpha): hybrid zone in Siberia. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 24, 1393–402.Google Scholar
Polyakov, A. V., Zima, J., Banaszek, A., Searle, J. B., and Borodin, P. M. (2000a). New chromosome races of the common shrew Sorex araneus from Eastern Siberia. Acta Theriologica. 45, 11–17.Google Scholar
Polyakov, A. V., Zima, J., Searle, J. B., Borodin, P. M., and Ladygina, T. (2000b). Chromosome races of the common shrew Sorex araneus in the Ural Mts: a link between Siberia and Scandinavia? Acta Theriologica, 45, 19–26.Google Scholar
Poplavskaya, N. S., Lebedev, V. S., Bannikova, A. A., Meshcherskii, I. G., and Surov, A. V. (2013). Superspecies complex Cricetulus barabensis sensu lato: karyotype divergence and interrelation in natural contact zones. Biology Bulletin Reviews, 3, 73–83.Google Scholar
Potter, S., Moritz, C., and Eldridge, M. D. B. (2015). Gene flow despite complex Robertsonian fusions among rock-wallaby (Petrogale) species. Biology Letters, 11, 20150731.Google Scholar
Rieseberg, L. H. (2001). Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 351–8.Google Scholar
Searle, J. B. (1986). Factors responsible for a karyotypic polymorphism in the common shrew, Sorex araneus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 229, 277–98.Google Scholar
Searle, J. B. (1988). Karyotypic variation and evolution in the common shrew, Sorex araneus. In Kew Chromosome Conference III, ed. Brandham, P. E.. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (HMSO), pp. 97–107.Google Scholar
Searle, J. B. (1990). A cytogenetical analysis of reproduction in common shrews (Sorex araneus) from a karyotypic hybrid zone. Hereditas, 113, 121–32.Google Scholar
Searle, J. B. (1993). Chromosomal hybrid zones in eutherian mammals. In Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process, ed. Harrison, R. G.. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 309–53.Google Scholar
Searle, J. B., Fedyk, S., Fredga, K., Hausser, J., and Volobouev, V. T. (1991). Nomenclature for the chromosomes of the common shrew (Sorex araneus). Mémoires de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, 19, 13–22.Google Scholar
Searle, J. B., Hübner, R., Wallace, B. M. N., and Garagna, S. (1990). Robertsonian variation in wild mice and shrews. Chromosomes Today, 10, 253–63.Google Scholar
Searle, J. B. and Wójcik, J. M. (1998). Chromosomal evolution: the case of Sorex araneus. In Evolution of Shrews, ed. Wójcik, J. M. and Wolsan, M.. Białowieża: Mammal Research Institute, pp. 221–68.Google Scholar
Servedio, M. R. and Noor, M. A. F. (2003). The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34, 339–64.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. D., Wilkinson, P., and Coates, D. J. (1983). Increased chromosomal mutation rate after hybridization between two subspecies of grasshoppers. Science, 220, 1165–7.Google Scholar
Shchipanov, N. A., Bulatova, N., Demidova, T. B., and Bobretsov, A. V. (2008a). Chromosomal races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus L.) inhabiting north-eastern European Russia: do physical obstacles restrict their distribution? Doklady Biological Sciences, 422, 348–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shchipanov, N. A., Bulatova, N., and Pavlova, S. V. (2008b). Distribution of two chromosome races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus L.) in the hybrid zone: may a change of the dispersal mode maintain independent gene frequencies? Russian Journal of Genetics, 44, 734–45.Google Scholar
Shchipanov, N. A., Bulatova, N., Pavlova, S. V., and Shchipanov, A. N. (2009). The common shrew (Sorex araneus) as a model species in ecological and evolutionary studies. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 88, 975–89. (In Russian, with English summary).Google Scholar
Shchipanov, N. A. and Pavlova, S. V. (2013). Contact zones and ranges of chromosomal races of the common shrew, Sorex araneus, in north-eastern European Russia. Folia Zoologica, 62, 24–35.Google Scholar
Shchipanov, N. A. and Pavlova, S. V. (2017). Density-dependent processes determine the distribution of chromosomal races of the common shrew Sorex araneus (Lipotyphla, Mammalia). Mammal Research, 62, 267–82.Google Scholar
Sheftel, B. J., Demidova, T. B., Krysanov, E. Y., et al. (2008). Contact zone between three races of Sorex araneus in Ryazan region (central of European part of Russia). Proceedings of the 8th Meeting of the International Sorex araneus Cytogenetics Committee (abstracts of meeting), 8–12 August 2008, York.Google Scholar
Shurtliff, Q. R. (2013). Mammalian hybrid zones: a review. Mammal Review, 43, 1–21.Google Scholar
Szałaj, K. A., Fedyk, S., Banaszek, A., and Chętnicki, W. (1995). Maximization of the frequency of recombinants in the hybrid zones of Sorex araneus in northern Poland. Acta Theriologica, 40, 225–36.Google Scholar
Szałaj, K. A., Fedyk, S., Banaszek, A., Chętnicki, W., and Ratkiewicz, M. (1996). A hybrid zone between two chromosome races of the common shrew, Sorex araneus, in eastern Poland: preliminary results. Hereditas, 125, 169–76.Google Scholar
Veyrunes, F., Catalan, J., Sicard, B., et al. (2004). Autosome and sex chromosome diversity among the African pygmy mice, subgenus Nannomys (Muridae; Mus). Chromosome Research, 12, 369–82.Google Scholar
Volleth, M., Heller, K.-G., Yong, H.-S., and Müller, S. (2014). Karyotype evolution in the horseshoe bat Rhinolophus sedulus by Whole-Arm Reciprocal Translocation (WART). Cytogenetic and Genome Research, 143, 241–50.Google Scholar
White, T. A., Bordewich, M., and Searle, J. B. (2010). A network approach to study karyotypic evolution: the chromosomal races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus) and house mouse (Mus musculus) as model systems. Systematic Biology, 59, 262–76.Google Scholar
Yannic, G., Dubey, S., Hausser, J., and Basset, P. (2010). Additional data for nuclear DNA give new insights into the phylogenetic position of Sorex granarius within the Sorex araneus group. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 57, 1062–71.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×