Book contents
- The Science and Practice of Landscape Stewardship
- The Science and Practice of Landscape Stewardship
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 The Emergence of Landscape Stewardship in Practice, Policy and Research
- Part I Foundations of Landscape Stewardship
- 2 Ecological Foundations of Landscape Stewardship
- Case 1 The Blackwater SAMOK Project – A Catchment Management Approach
- 3 Human and Social Dimensions of Landscape Stewardship
- Case 2 Landscape Observatory of Catalonia – A Holistic Documentation of the Landscape
- 4 Building Partnerships for Landscape Stewardship
- Case 3 Olive Farming on Lesbos – Out of Social Capital Emerges Social Enterprise
- 5 Citizen Science Tools for Engaging Local Stakeholders and Promoting Local and Traditional Knowledge in Landscape Stewardship
- Case 4 Citizen Science – Harnessing the Expertise of Farmers to Monitor Biodiversity in Austrian Meadows
- Part II Landscape Stewardship on the Ground
- Part III Visions Towards Landscape Stewardship
- Index
- References
5 - Citizen Science Tools for Engaging Local Stakeholders and Promoting Local and Traditional Knowledge in Landscape Stewardship
from Part I - Foundations of Landscape Stewardship
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2017
Book contents
- The Science and Practice of Landscape Stewardship
- The Science and Practice of Landscape Stewardship
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 The Emergence of Landscape Stewardship in Practice, Policy and Research
- Part I Foundations of Landscape Stewardship
- 2 Ecological Foundations of Landscape Stewardship
- Case 1 The Blackwater SAMOK Project – A Catchment Management Approach
- 3 Human and Social Dimensions of Landscape Stewardship
- Case 2 Landscape Observatory of Catalonia – A Holistic Documentation of the Landscape
- 4 Building Partnerships for Landscape Stewardship
- Case 3 Olive Farming on Lesbos – Out of Social Capital Emerges Social Enterprise
- 5 Citizen Science Tools for Engaging Local Stakeholders and Promoting Local and Traditional Knowledge in Landscape Stewardship
- Case 4 Citizen Science – Harnessing the Expertise of Farmers to Monitor Biodiversity in Austrian Meadows
- Part II Landscape Stewardship on the Ground
- Part III Visions Towards Landscape Stewardship
- Index
- References
Summary
Citizen science has been proposed as one way of engaging local stakeholders in landscape stewardship. In this chapter we analyse the success and challenges of three citizen science schemes that stand out from the majority, because they involve natural resource users directly in monitoring attributes central to their livelihoods (Greenland and Finland) or because of the role of digital technology in facilitating the citizen science activities (Faroe Islands). We describe and explain the activities and outcomes for each of the three schemes, and we present a cross-cutting analysis of the benefits and challenges of such approaches for engaging local stakeholders in landscape stewardship. Our findings suggest that citizen science approaches that involve community members not only in data collection but also in the design of the monitoring and in the interpretation and use of the results for decision-making can be an effective way of facilitating landscape stewardship approaches in the ’real-world’. We suggest that landscape stewardship should include the involvement of citizens in actual monitoring of what is going on. The tools for citizen science, both digital and analogue, however need further development, refinement, and testing to incorporate integration of local and traditional knowledge into national monitoring systems.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Science and Practice of Landscape Stewardship , pp. 80 - 98Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Bloch, D. (1982). Animal life on the Faeroe Islands. In The Physical Environment of the Faroe Islands, Rutherford, G. K (ed.). The Hague: Dr. W. Junk Publishers, pp. 53–68.Google Scholar
Bonney, R., Shirk, J. L., Phillips, T. B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H. L., Miller-Rushing, A. J. & Parrish, J. K. (2014). Next steps for citizen science. Science, 343, 1436–1437.Google Scholar
Brammer, J. R., Brunet, N. D., Burton, A. C., Cuerrier, A., Danielsen, F., Dewan, K., Herrmann, T. M., Jackson, M., Kennett, R., Larocque, G., Mulrennan, M., Pratihast, A. K., Saint-Arnaud, M., Scott, C. & Humphries, M. M. (2016). The role of digital data entry in participatory environmental monitoring. Conservation Biology, 30, 1277–1287.Google Scholar
CAFF (2013). Status and trends in Arctic biodiversity. In Arctic Biodiversity Assessment, Meltofte, H (ed.). Akureyi, Iceland: Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna, pp. 44–69.Google Scholar
Chandler, M., See, L., Copas, K., Bonde, A. M. Z., López, B. C., Danielsen, F., Legind, J. K., Masinde, S., Miller-Rushing, A. J., Newman, G., Rosemartin, A. & Turak, E. (2016). Contribution of citizen science towards international biodiversity monitoring. Biological Conservation. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.004).Google Scholar
Constantino, P. A. L., Buening, J. K., Silvius, K., Danielsen, F., Poulsen, M. K., Arroyo, P., Cruz, A. T., Ribeiro, K. T., Hvalkof, S., Durigan, C., Tofoli, C., Kinouchi, M. R., Leão, A., Estupinan, G., Tawada, R. & Fonseca, C. B. (2016). Monitoramento participativo da biodiversidade e dos recursos naturais (in Portuguese). Biodiversidade Brasileira, 16, l8–33.Google Scholar
Danielsen, F., Topp-Jørgensen, E., Levermann, N., Løvstrøm, P., Schiøtz, M., Enghoff, M. & Jakobsen, P. (2014). Counting what counts: Using local knowledge to improve Arctic resource management. Polar Geography, 37, 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danielsen, F. (2016). Expanding the Scientific Basis for How the World can Monitor and Manage Natural Resources. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen/NORDECO.Google Scholar
Eira, I. M. G., Jaedicke, C., Magga, O. H., Maynard, N. G., Vikhamar-Schuler, D. & Mathiesen, S. (2013). Traditional Sámi snow terminology and physical snow classification – two ways of knowing. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 85, 117–130.Google Scholar
Feodoroff, P. & Mustonen, T. (2013). Näätämö and Ponoi River Collaborative Management Plan. Kontiolahti: Snowchange Cooperative.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, G., Mallory, M. & Merkel, F. (2005). Can local ecological knowledge contribute to wildlife management? Case studies of migratory birds. Ecology and Society, 10, 20. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art20/).Google Scholar
Greenland Government (1999). Landstingslov nr. 12 af 29. oktober 1999 om fangst og jagt, §2 stk. 3. (http://dk.nanoq.gl).Google Scholar
Johnson, N., Behe, C., Danielsen, F., Krümmel, E.-M., Nickels, S. & Pulsifer, P. L. (2016). Community-Based Monitoring and Indigenous Knowledge in a Changing Arctic: A Review for the Sustaining Arctic Observing Networks. Ottawa: Inuit Circumpolar Council.Google Scholar
Kennett, R., Danielsen, F. & Silvius, K. M. (2015). Conservation management: Citizen science is not enough on its own. Nature, 521, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, J. F. (2014). Towards a more balanced view on the potentials of locally-based monitoring. Biodiversity and Conservation, 23, 237–239.Google Scholar
Magnussen, E. (2013). Hunting of Hare in the Faroe Islands in 2012 (in Faroese). Haruveiðan í Føroyum 2012. Tórshavn: University of the Faroe Islands.Google Scholar
Magnussen, E. (2014). Hunting of Hare in the Faroe Islands in 2013 (in Faroese). Haruveiðan í Føroyum 2013. Tórshavn: University of the Faroe Islands.Google Scholar
Magnussen, E. (2015a). Hunting of Hare in the Faroe Islands in 2014 and Other Information of Faroese Hare (in Faroese). Haruveiðan í Føroyum 2014 og annað tilfar um føroysku haruna. Tórshavn: University of the Faroe Islands.Google Scholar
Magnussen, E. (2015b). Facebook was the key to collecting data for the Faroese hare hunt (in Danish). Facebook var nøglen til indsamling af data for den færøske harejagt. Jagt & Jægere, 6 /7, 6–9.Google Scholar
Magnussen, E. (2016). Hunting of hare in the Faroe Islands in 2015 (in Faroese). Haruveiðan í Føroyum 2015. Tórshavn: University of the Faroe Islands.Google Scholar
Mustonen, T. (2013). Oral histories as a baseline of landscape restoration – Co-management and watershed knowledge in Jukajoki River. Fennia, 191, 76–91.Google Scholar
Mustonen, T. (2014). Power discourses of fish death: Case of Linnunsuo peat production. Ambio, 43, 234–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mustonen, T. (2015). Communal visual histories to detect environmental change in northern areas: Examples of emerging North American and Eurasian practices. Ambio, 44, 766–777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nuttall, M. (2009). Living in a world of movement: Human resilience to environmental instability in Greenland. In Anthropology and Climate Change: From Encounters to Actions, Crate, S. A. & Nuttall, M. (eds.). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, pp. 292–326.Google Scholar
Nordic Council of Ministers (2015). Local Knowledge and Resource Management. On the Use of Indigenous and Local Knowledge to Document and Manage Natural Resources in the Arctic. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
Plieninger, T. & Bieling, C. (2012). Connecting cultural landscapes to resilience. In Resilience and the Cultural Landscape – Understanding and Managing Change in Human-Shaped Environments, Plieninger, T. & Bieling, C. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
Post, E., Forchammer, M. C., Bret-Harte, M. S., Callaghan, T. V, Christensen, T. R., Elberling, B., Fox, A. D., Gilg, O., Hik, D. S., Høye, T. T., Ims, R. A., Jeppesen, E., Klein, D. R., Madson, J., Mc Cuire, A. D., Rysgaard, S., Schindler, D. E., Stirling, I., Tamstorf, M. P., Tyler, N. J. C., van der Wal, R., Welker, J., Wookey, P. A., Schmidt, N. M. & Aastrup, P. (2009). Ecological dynamics across the Arctic associated with recent climate change. Science, 325, 1355–1358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riedlinger, D. & Berkes, F. (2001). Contributions of traditional knowledge to understanding climate change in the Canadian Arctic. Polar Record, 37, 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sejersen, F. (2003). Greenlands Nature Management (in Danish). Grønlands Naturforvaltning. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Tengö, M., Hill, R., Malmer, P., Raymond, C. M., Spierenburg, M., Danielsen, F., Elmqvist, T. & Folke, C. (2016). Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond – lessons learned for sustainability. Current Opinions in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 17–25.Google Scholar
- 6
- Cited by