Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:19:57.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Visions Towards Landscape Stewardship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2017

Edited by
Claudia Bieling  and
Tobias Plieninger
Claudia Bieling
Affiliation:
Universität Hohenheim, Stuttgart
Tobias Plieninger
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Science and Practice of Landscape Stewardship , pp. 309 - 382
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Adger, W. N., Benjaminsen, T. A., Brown, K. & Svarstad, H. (2001). Advancing a political ecology of global environmental discourses. Development and Change, 32, 681–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bieling, C., Plieninger, T., Pirker, H. & Vogl, C. R. (2014). Linkages between landscapes and human well-being: An empirical exploration with short interviews. Ecological Economics, 105, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapin, F. S., Carpenter, S. R., Kofinas, G. P., Folke, C., Abel, N., Clark, W. C., Olsson, P., Smith, D. M. S., Walker, B., Young, O. R. & Berkes, F. (2010). Ecosystem stewardship: Sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25, 241–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claus, C. A., Osterhoudt, S., Baker, L., Cortesi, L., Hebdon, C., Zhang, A. & Dove, M. R. (2015). Disaster, degradation, dystopia. In The International Handbook of Political Ecology, Bryant, R. L (ed.). London: Routledge, pp. 291–304.Google Scholar
Cusicanqui, S. R. (2012). Ch'ixinakax utxiwa: A reflection on the practices and discourses of decolonization. South Atlantic Quarterly, 111, 95–109.Google Scholar
Doblin, J. (1987). A short, grandiose theory of design. STA Design Journal, Analysis and Intuition, 1987, 6–16.Google Scholar
Duncan, J. & Duncan, N. (1988). (Re) reading the landscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 6, 117–126.Google Scholar
Elbakidze, M. & Angelstam, P. (2007). Implementing sustainable forest management in Ukraine's Carpathian Mountains: The role of traditional village systems. Forest Ecology and Management, 249, 28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estrada-Carmona, N., Hart, A. K., De Clerck, F. A., Harvey, C. A. & Milder, J. C. (2014). Integrated landscape management for agriculture, rural livelihoods, and ecosystem conservation: An assessment of experience from Latin America and the Caribbean. Landscape and Urban Planning, 129, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flader, S. L. (ed.). (1994). Thinking like a Mountain: Aldo Leopold and the Evolution of an Ecological Attitude toward Deer, Wolves, and Forests. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Ford, L. (2015). Sustainable development goals: All you need to know. The Guardian. (https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2015/jan/19/sustainable-development-goals-united-nations).Google Scholar
Griggs, D., Stafford-Smith, M., Gaffney, O., Rockström, J., Öhman, M. C., Shyamsundar, P., Steffen, W., Glaser, G., Kanie, N. & Noble, I. (2013). Policy: Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature, 495, 305–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedberg, R. C. (2015). The ecology of alternative food landscapes: A framework for assessing the ecology of alternative food networks and its implications for sustainability. Landscape Research, 2015, 1–13.Google Scholar
Kolko, J. (2010). Abductive thinking and sensemaking: The drivers of design synthesis. Design Issues, 26, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, A. (1937). A conservationist in Mexico. American Forests, 43, 118–120, 146.Google Scholar
Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac: And Sketches Here and There. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, S. A. & Clark, W. C. (2010). Toward a Science of Sustainability. Center for International Development Working Papers 196, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Liu, J. & Opdam, P. (2014). Valuing ecosystem services in community-based landscape planning: Introducing a wellbeing-based approach. Landscape Ecology, 29, 1347–1360.Google Scholar
Lyson, T. A. (2012). Civic Agriculture: Reconnecting Farm, Food, and Community. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Maher, M. L. (1990). Process models for design synthesis. AI Magazine, 11, 49–58.Google Scholar
Marris, E. (2013). Rambunctious Garden: Saving Nature in a Post-Wild World. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Miller, T. R., Wiek, A., Sarewitz, D., Robinson, J., Olsson, L., Kriebel, D. & Loorbach, D. (2014). The future of sustainability science: A solutions-oriented research agenda. Sustainability Science, 9, 239–246.Google Scholar
Mitchell, D. (1996). The Lie of the Land: Migrant Workers and the California Landscape. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Musacchio, L. R. (2011). The grand challenge to operationalize landscape sustainability and the design-in-science paradigm. Landscape Ecology, 26, 1–5.Google Scholar
Musacchio, L. R. (2013). Cultivating deep care: Integrating landscape ecological research into the cultural dimension of ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology, 28, 1025–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassauer, J. I. (2011). Care and stewardship: From home to planet. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 321–323.Google Scholar
Olwig, K. (2002). Landscape, Nature, and the Body Politic: From Britain's Renaissance to America's New World. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Olwig, K. R. (2007). The practice of landscape ‘conventions’ and the just landscape: The case of the European Landscape Convention. Landscape Research, 32, 579–594.Google Scholar
Ostergren, R. C. & Vale, T. R. (1997). Wisconsin Land and Life. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing social-ecological systems. Science, 325, 419–423.Google Scholar
Peters, C. J., Bills, N. L., Lembo, A. J., Wilkins, J. L. & Fick, G. W. (2009). Mapping potential foodsheds in New York State: A spatial model for evaluating the capacity to localize food production. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 24, 72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potschin, M. & Haines-Young, R. (2006). ‘Rio+10’, sustainability science and landscape ecology. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75, 162–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radcliffe, S. A. (2015). Dilemmas of Difference: Indigenous women and the limits of postcolonial development policy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. D. (2012). From millennium development goals to sustainable development goals. The Lancet, 379, 2206–2211.Google Scholar
Sack, R. D. (1993). The power of place and space. Geographical Review, 83, 326–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayer, J., Sunderland, T., Ghazoul, J., Pfund, J. L., Sheil, D., Meijaard, E., Venter, M., Boedhihartono, A. K., Day, M., Garcia, C., van Oosten, C. & Buck, L. (2013). Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 8349–8356.Google Scholar
Tuan, Y. F. (1974). Topophilia. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Termorshuizen, J. W. & Opdam, P. (2009). Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology, 24, 1037–1052.Google Scholar
Turner, B. L. (1997). The sustainability principle in global agendas: Implications for understanding land-use/cover change. Geographical Journal, 1997, 133–140.Google Scholar
Vale, T. R. (2001). Landscape change, global change, and the wisdom of Roy Bedichek. Physical Geography, 22, 277–290.Google Scholar
Waldheim, C. (ed.). (2012). The Landscape Urbanism Reader. San Francisco, CA: Chronicle Books.Google Scholar
Worrell, R. & Appleby, M. C. (2000). Stewardship of natural resources: Definition, ethical and practical aspects. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12, 263–277.Google Scholar
Wu, J. (2013). Landscape sustainability science: Ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 28, 999–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerer, K. S. (2000). The reworking of conservation geographies: Nonequilibrium landscapes and nature-society hybrids. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90, 356–369.Google Scholar
Zimmerer, K. S. (ed.) (2006). Globalization and New Geographies of Conservation. Chicago, MI: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Zimmerer, K. S. (2011). ‘Conservation Booms’ with agricultural growth? Sustainability and shifting environmental governance in Latin America, 1985–2008 (Mexico, Costa Rica, Brazil, Peru, Bolivia). Latin American Research Review, 46, 82–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerer, K. S. (2012). The indigenous Andean concept of kawsay, the politics of knowledge and development, and the borderlands of environmental sustainability in Latin America. Publications of the Modern Language Association, 127, 600–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerer, K. S. (2015). Environmental governance through ‘Speaking Like an Indigenous State’ and respatializing resources: Ethical livelihood concepts in Bolivia as versatility or verisimilitude? Geoforum, 64, 314–324.Google Scholar
Zimmerer, K. S. (2017). Ordenamiento Territorial (Territorial Ordering) and land use planning in Mérida: Multi-scale strategies for urban-rural integration and their implications for next-generation conservation. In Regional and Urban Planning in Mexico and the Mérida Studio, Davis, D., Castillo, J. & Segovia, R. (eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Design, pp. 142–151.Google Scholar
Zimmerer, K. S., Carney, J. A. & Vanek, S. J. (2015). Sustainable smallholder intensification in global change? Pivotal spatial interactions, gendered livelihoods, and agrobiodiversity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerer, K. S. & Vaca, H. L. R. (2016). Fine-grain spatial patterning and dynamics of land use and agrobiodiversity amid global changes in the Bolivian Andes. Regional Environmental Change, 16, 2199–2214.Google Scholar

Further Reading

www.accesstoland.eu/-Terre-de-liens-Google Scholar

References

Armitage, D. R., Plummer, R., Berkes, F., Arthur, R. I., Charles, A. T., Davidson-Hunt, I. J., Diduck, A. P., Doubleday, N. C., Johnson, D. S., Marschke, M., McConney, P., Pinkerton, E. W. & Wollenberg, E. K. (2009). Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 95–102.Google Scholar
Bastian, O., Grunewald, K., Syrbe, R-U., Walz, U. & Wende, W. (2014). Landscape services: The concept and its practical relevance. Landscape Ecology, 29, 1463–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1692–1702.Google Scholar
Beunen, R. & Opdam, P. (2011). When landscape planning becomes landscape governance, what happens to the science? Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 324–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, Ö. & Crona, B. I. (2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change, 19, 366–374.Google Scholar
Borgström Hansson, C. & Wackernagel, M. (1999). Rediscovering place and accounting space: How to re-embed the human economy. Ecological Economics, 29, 203–213.Google Scholar
Bourgoin, J., Castella, J. C., Pullar, D., Lestrelin, G. & Bouahom, B. (2012). Toward a land zoning negotiation support platform: ‘Tips and tricks’ for participatory land use planning in Laos. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104, 270–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G., de Bie, K. & Weber, D. (2015). Identifying public land stakeholder perspectives for implementing place-based land management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 139, 1–15.Google Scholar
Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., Kinzig, A. P., Daily, G. C., Loreau, M., Grace, J. B., Larigauderie, A., Srivastava, D. S. & Naeem, S. (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486, 59–67.Google Scholar
Carlsson, L. & Sandström, A. (2008). Network governance of the commons. International Journal of the Commons, 2, 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapin, F. S., III & Knapp, C. N. (2015). Sense of place: A process for identifying and potentially contested visions of sustainability. Environmental Science and Policy, 53, 38–46.Google Scholar
Cong, R-G., Smith, H. G., Olsson, O. & Brady, M. (2014). Managing ecosystem services for agriculture: Will landscape-scale management pay? Ecological Economics, 99, 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowell, R. & Lennon, M. (2014). The utilisation of environmental knowledge in land use planning: Drawing lessons for an ecosystem services approach. Environment and Planning C, 32, 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crona, B. & Hubacek, K. (2010). The right connections: How do social networks lubricate the machinery of natural resource management? Ecology and Society, 15, 28. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art18/).Google Scholar
Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse. How Societies Choose to Fail or Survive. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E. & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 1907–1912.Google Scholar
Dinnie, E., Brown, K. M. & Morris, S. (2013). Community, cooperation and conflict: Negotiating the social well-being benefits of urban greenspace experiences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 112, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernstson, H., Barthel, S., Andersson, E. & Bergström, S. T. (2010). Scale-crossing brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services: The case of Stockholm. Ecology and Society, 15, 28. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art28/).Google Scholar
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P. & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folke, C., Jansson, Å., Rockström, J., Olsson, P., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., III, Crépin, A-S., Daily, G., Danell, K., Ebbesson, J., Elmqvist, T., Galaz, V., Moberg, F., Nilsson, M., Österblom, H., Ostrom, E., Persson, Å., Peterson, G., Polasky, S., Steffen, W., Walker, B. & Westley, F. (2011). Reconnecting to the Biosphere. Ambio, 40, 719–738.Google Scholar
Görg, C. (2007). Landscape governance: The ‘politics of scale’ and the ‘natural’ conditions of places. Geoforum, 38, 954–966.Google Scholar
Granek, E. F., Polasky, S., Kappel, C. V., Reed, D. J., Stoms, D. M., Koch, E. W., Kennedy, C. J., Cramer, L. A., Hacker, S. D., Barbier, E. B., Aswani, S., Ruckelshaus, M., Perillo, G. M. E., Silliman, B. R., Muthiga, N., Bael, D. & Wolanski, E. (2009). Ecosystem services as a common language for coastal ecosystem-based management. Conservation Biology, 24, 207–216.Google Scholar
Grashof-Bokdam, C., Cormont, A., Polman, N., Westerhof, E., Franke, J. & Opdam, P. (2017). Modeling shifts between mono- and multifunctional farming systems: The importance of social and economic drivers. Landscape Ecology, 32, 595–607.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. S. (2010). Key principles of community-based natural resource management: A synthesis and interpretation of identified effective approaches for managing the commons. Environmental Management, 45, 52–66.Google Scholar
Hagens, J. E. (2010). The performance of landscape concepts in spatial planning: Branding, bonding and bringing about. PhD thesis. Wageningen: Wageningen University.Google Scholar
Hawkins, V. & Selman, P. (2002). Landscape scale planning: Exploring alternative land use scenarios. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60, 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschi, C. (2010). Strenghtening regional cohesion: Collaborative networks and sustainable development in Swiss rural areas. Ecology and Society, 15, 16. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art16/).Google Scholar
Innes, J. E. & Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems – a framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65, 412–423.Google Scholar
Klug, H. (2012). An integrated holistic transdisciplinary land use planning concept after the Leitbild approach. Ecological Indicators, 23, 616–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, M. B. & McDonald, G. (2005). Community-based environmental planning: Operational dilemmas, planning principles and possible remedies. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 48, 709–731.Google Scholar
Linehan, J. R. & Gross, M. (1998). Back to the future, back to basics: The social ecology of landscapes and the future of landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42, 207–223.Google Scholar
Liu, J. & Opdam, P. (2014). Valuing ecosystem services in community-based landscape planning: Introducing a wellbeing-based approach. Special issue: Integrating ecosystem services in land use planning and decision-making practice. Landscape Ecology, 29, 1347–1360.Google Scholar
Loorbach, D. & Rotmans, J. (2010). The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases. Futures, 42, 237–246.Google Scholar
Mell, I. C., Henneberry, J., Hehl-Lange, S. & Keskin, B. (2013). Promoting urban greening: Valuing the development of green infrastructure investments in the urban core of Manchester, UK. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12, 296–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassauer, J. (2011). Care and stewardship: From home to planet. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 321–323.Google Scholar
Nassauer, J. (2012). Landscape as medium and method for synthesis in urban ecological design. Landscape and Urban Planning, 106, 221–29.Google Scholar
Nassauer, J. & Opdam, P. (2008). Design in science: Extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecology, 23, 633–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, P., Pattberg, P. & Schroeder, H. (2012). Multi-actor governance and the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 365–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newig, J., Günther, D. & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2010). Synapses in the network: Learning in governance networks in the context of environmental management. Ecology and Society, 15, 24. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art24/).Google Scholar
Newig, J. & Koontz, T. M. (2014). Multi-level governance, policy implementation and participation: The EU's mandated participatory planning approach to implementing environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 21, 248–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, P., Gunderson, L. H., Carpenter, S. R., Rayn, P., Lebel, L., Folke, C. & Holling, C. S. (2006). Shooting the rapids: Navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11, 18. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol1/iss1/art18/).Google Scholar
Opdam, P., Steingröver, E. & Van Rooij, S. (2006). Ecological networks: A spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75, 322–332.Google Scholar
Opdam, P. (2013). Using ecosystem services in community based planning: Science is not ready to deliver. In Landscape Ecology for Sustainable Environment and Culture, Fu, B & Jones, K. B (eds.). New York, NY: Springer, pp. 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opdam, P., Nassauer, J., Wang, Z., Albert, C., Bentrup, G., Castella, J-C., McAlpine, C., Liu, J., Sheppard, S. & Swaffield, S. (2013). Science for action at the local landscape scale. Landscape Ecology, 28, 1439–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opdam, P. (2014). Incorporating multiple ecological scales into the governance of landscape services. In Scale-Sensitive Governance of the Environment, Padt, F., Opdam, P., Polman, N. & Termeer, C. (eds.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 17–37.Google Scholar
Opdam, P., Westerink, J., Vos, C. & De Vries, B. (2015). The role and evolution of boundary concepts in transdisciplinary landscape planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 16, 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325, 419–422.Google Scholar
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2005). Information, public empowerment and the management of urban watersheds. Environmental Modelling & Software, 20, 457–467.Google Scholar
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19, 354–365.Google Scholar
Pahl-Wostl, C., Holtz, G., Kastens, B. & Knieper, C. (2010). Analyzing complex water governance regimes: The management and transition framework. Environmental Science and Policy, 13, 571–581.Google Scholar
Penker, M. (2009). Landscape governance for or by the local population? A property rights analysis in Austria. Land Use Policy, 26, 947–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persha, L., Agrawal, A. & Chhatre, A. (2012). Social and ecological synergy: Local rulemaking, forest livelihoods, and biodiversity conservation. Science, 331, 1606–1608.Google Scholar
Pouwels, R., Opdam, P. & Jochem, R. (2011). Reconsidering the effectiveness of scientific tools for negotiating local solutions to conflicts between recreation and conservation with stakeholders. Ecology and Society, 16, 17. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss4/art17/).Google Scholar
Raymond, C. M., Fazey, I., Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Robinson, G. M. & Evely, A. C. (2010). Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1766–1777.Google Scholar
Raymond, C. M., Singh, G. G., Benessaiah, K., Bernhardt, J. R., Levine, J., Nelson, H., Turner, N. J., Norton, B., Tam, J. & Chan, K. M. A. (2013). Ecosystem services and beyond: Using multiple metaphors to understand human-environment relationships. Bioscience, 63, 536–546.Google Scholar
Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141, 2417–2431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandström, A. & Rova, C. (2010). Adaptive co-management networks: A comparative analysis of two fishery conservation areas in Sweden. Ecology and Society, 15, 14. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art14/).Google Scholar
Shandas, V. & Messer, W. B. (2008). Fostering green communities through civic engagement: Community based environmental stewardship in the Portland area. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74, 408–418.Google Scholar
Somanathan, E., Prabhakar, R. & Mehta, B. S. (2009). Decentralization for cost-effective conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 4143–4147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Southern, A., Lovett, A., O'Riordan, T. & Watkinson, A. (2011). Sustainable landscape governance: Lessons from a catchment based study in whole landscape design. Landscape and Urban Planning, 101, 179–189.Google Scholar
Steiner, F. (2000). The Living Landscape: An Ecological Approach to Landscape Planning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Steingröver, E. G., Geertsema, W. & van Wingerden, W. K. R. E. (2010). Designing agricultural landscapes for natural pest control: A transdisciplinary approach in the Hoeksche Waard (the Netherlands). Landscape Ecology, 25, 825–838.Google Scholar
Termorshuizen, J. & Opdam, P. (2009). Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology, 24, 1037–1052.Google Scholar
Turnhout, E., Stuiver, M., Klostermann, J., Harms, B. & Leeuwis, C. (2013). New roles of science in society: Different repertoires of knowledge brokering. Science and Public Policy, 40, 354–365.Google Scholar

Further Reading

www.yourdartmoor.org/the-plan/the-visionGoogle Scholar

References

Anders, K. & Fischer, L. (eds.) (2014). Landschaftswerkstatt Wasser. Wissenstransfer für einen zukünftigen Landschaftswasserhaushalt in der Region Uckermark-Barnim. Croustillier: Aufland Verlag.Google Scholar
Anders, K. & Fischer, L. (2012a). Zehn Thesen zur Landschaftskommunikation. In Landschafts-kommunikation. Thesen und Texte, Anders, K. & Fischer, L. (eds.). Croustillier: Aufland Verlag, pp. 11–24.Google Scholar
Anders, K. & Fischer, L. (2012b). Was ist eine Landschaftswerkstatt? Ein Definitionsversuch. In Landschaftskommunikation. Thesen und Texte, Anders, K. & Fischer, L. (eds.). Croustillier: Aufland Verlag, pp. 138–142.Google Scholar
Anders, K. & Fischer, L. (2015a). Thesen über Landwirtschaft im Diskurs. In Auf der Suche nach einer neuen Sesshaftigkeit, Anders, K. & Fischer, L. (eds.). Croustillier: Aufland Verlag, pp. 40–63.Google Scholar
Anders, K. & Fischer, L. (2015b). Viele offene Fragen für Pfeils Erben. In Auf der Suche nach einer neuen Sesshaftigkeit, Anders, K. & Fischer, L. (eds.). Croustillier: Aufland Verlag, pp. 64–77.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (2004). Talking whilst walking: A geographical archaeology of knowledge. Area, 36, 254–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. & Mitchell, B. (2000). Landscape stewardship. New directions in conservation of nature and culture. The George Wright Forum, 17, 70–79.Google Scholar
Burckhard, L. (2006). Warum ist Landschaft schön? Die Spaziergangswissenschaft. Berlin: Martin Schmitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2000). European Landscape Convention. European Treaty Series, 176, 3.Google Scholar
Galerie für Landschaftskunst (2015). Text zur Kartierungsabteilung. (www.gflk.de/index.php?title=Kartierungsabteilung).Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, A. (2000). Andy Goldsworthy. 10th edn. Frankfurt am Main: Zweitausendeins.Google Scholar
Hobbs, R. (1982). Robert Smithson: A Retrospective View. Duisburg: Lembruck Museum.Google Scholar
Howoldt, J., E. & Schneede, U. M. (eds.) (2003). Die Entdeckung der Natur von C. D. Friedrich bis Humboldt. Hamburg/München: Dölling und Galitz.Google Scholar
Kagan, S. (2014). The Practice of Ecological Art. (http://art-science.univ-paris1.fr/plastik/document.php?id=866).Google Scholar
Krause, T. (2004). Zwischenbericht zur Hamburg-Kartierung und Anmerkungen zur Kartografie. In Mapping a City, Möntmann, N, Dziewio, Y & Landschaftskunst, Galerie für (eds.). Hamburg: Hantje Cantz, pp. 172–189.Google Scholar
Krause, T. (2012). Freie Flusszone Süderelbe. Hypothetische Schließung für die Binnenschifffahrt. In Aus Hamburg – Lokale Positionen urbaner Landschaftsgestaltung, Schreiner, S (ed.). Hamburg: Gudberg Verlag, pp. 8–15.Google Scholar
Lemke, H. (2013). Dem Schilf zuhören. Von den bedrohten Klängen der Parthenaue. Croustillier: Aufland Verlag.Google Scholar
Lemke, H. (2014). Cànan – Sreathan – Tuinn. Über Den Hörwert – Luach Eile Fhuaimean – The Surplus Value of Sound. Todmorden: HK Publishing.Google Scholar
Lippard, L. R. (1997). The Lure of the Local. Senses of Place in a Multicentered Society. New York, NY: The New Press.Google Scholar
Lippard, L. R. (2004). Alles auf einen Blick. In Mapping a City, Möntmann, N, Dziewio, Y & Landschaftskunst, Galerie für (eds.). Hamburg: Hantje Cantz.Google Scholar
Makowski, H. & Buderath, B. (1983). Die Natur dem Menschen Untertan. Ökologie im Spiegel der Landschaftsmalerei. München: Kindler Verlag.Google Scholar
Ott, K. & Döring, R. (2004). Theorie und Praxis starker Nachhaltigkeit. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.Google Scholar
Runte, A. (1997). National Parks. The American Experience. 3rd edn. Lincoln, NE/London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Schiffers, A. & Sprenger, T. (2010). Ich bin gerne Bauer und möchte es auch gerne bleiben. Berlin: Agrobooks.Google Scholar
Seel, M. (1997). Die Kunst der Entzweiung. Zum Begriff der ästhetischen Rationalität. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Sieferle, R. P. (1984). Fortschrittsfeinde? Opposition gegen Technik und Industrie von der Romantik bis zur Gegenwart. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Spaid, S. (2002). Ecovention. Current Art to Transform Ecologies. Cincinnati, OH: The Contemporary Arts Center.Google Scholar
Tiberghien, G. A. (1995). Land Art. Paris: Éditions Carré.Google Scholar
Trnek, R. (1977). Der Wandel des Sehens und Empfindens von Landschaft durch die Kunst. In Die Ware Landschaft. Eine kritische Analyse des Landschaftsbegriffs, Achleitner, F (eds). Salzburg: Residenz Verlag, pp. 31–42.Google Scholar
Werkner, P. (1992). Land Art USA. Von den Ursprüngen zu den Großraumprojekten in der Wüste. München: Prestel VerlagGoogle Scholar
Wikipedia (2016). Environmental Art. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_art).Google Scholar
Wollmeiner, S. (2002). Naturkunst. Künstlersymposien in Deutschland. Petersberg: Imhof Verlag.Google Scholar

Further Reading

www.onehutfull.org/Google Scholar

References

Andersson, E., Barthel, S., Borgström, S., Colding, J., Elmqvist, T., Folke, C. & Gren, Å. (2014). Reconnecting cities to the biosphere: Stewardship of green infrastructure and urban ecosystem services. Ambio, 43, 445–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F. (2012). Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management. 3rd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Bieling, C., Plieninger, T., Vogl, C. R. & Pirker, H. (2014). Linkages between landscapes and human well-being: An analysis of short interviews. Ecological Economics, 105, 19–30.Google Scholar
Brown, J. & Mitchell, B. (2000). The stewardship approach and its relevance for protected landscapes. The George Wright Forum, 17, 70–79.Google Scholar
Chapin, F. S., Carpenter, S. R., Kofinas, G. P., Folke, C., Abel, N., Clark, W. C., Olsson, P., Smith, D. M. S., Walker, B., Young, O. R., Berkes, F., Biggs, R., Grove, J. M., Naylor, R. L., Pinkerton, E., Steffen, W. & Swanson, F. J. (2010). Ecosystem stewardship: Sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 241–249.Google Scholar
Cordell, K., Barns, C., Brownlie, D., Carlson, T., Dawson, C., Koch, W., Oye, G. & Ryan, C. (2016). Wilderness stewardship in America today and what we can do to improve it. Journal of Forestry, 114, 292–297.Google Scholar
Corsale, A. & Iorio, M. (2014). Transylvanian Saxon culture as heritage: Insights from Viscri, Romania. Geoforum, 52, 22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crumley, C. (2012). A heterarchy of knowledge: Tools for the study of landscape histories and futures. In Resilience and the Cultural Landscape: Understanding and Managing Change in Human-Shaped Environments, Plieninger, T. & Bieling, C. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 303–313.Google Scholar
Crutzen, P. J. (2002). Geology of mankind. Nature, 415, 23.Google Scholar
García-Martín, M., Bieling, C., Hart, A. & Plieninger, T. (2016). Integrated landscape initiatives in Europe: Multi-sector collaboration in multi-functional landscapes. Land Use Policy, 58, 43–53.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. New York, NY/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laven, D. N., Jewiss, J. L. & Mitchell, N. J. (2013). Toward landscape-scale stewardship and development: A theoretical framework of United States National Heritage Areas. Society & Natural Resources, 26, 762–777.Google Scholar
LRG (Landscape Research Group) (2014). Research Strategy. Oxford: Landscape Research Group.Google Scholar
MA (Millennium Ecoystem Assessment) (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., Casado-Arzuaga, I., Amo, D. G. D., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Oteros-Rozas, E., Palacios-Agundez, I., Willaarts, B., González, J. A., Santos-Martín, F., Onaindia, M., López-Santiago, C. & Montes, C. (2012). Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS ONE, 7, e38970.Google Scholar
Mels, T. (2016). The trouble with representation: Landscape and environmental justice. Landscape Research, 41, 417–424.Google Scholar
Milder, J. C., Hart, A. K., Dobie, P., Minai, J. & Zaleski, C. (2014). Integrated landscape initiatives for African agriculture, development, and conservation: A region-wide assessment. World Development, 54, 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musacchio, L. R. (2013a). Cultivating deep care: Integrating landscape ecological research into the cultural dimension of ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology, 28, 1025–1038.Google Scholar
Musacchio, L. R. (2013b). Key concepts and research priorities for landscape sustainability. Landscape Ecology, 28, 995–998.Google Scholar
Nassauer, J. I. (2011). Care and stewardship: From home to planet. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 321–323.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2008). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. 22nd edn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raymond, C. M., Reed, M., Bieling, C., Robinson, G. M. & Plieninger, T. (2016). Integrating different understandings of landscape stewardship into the design of agri-environmental schemes. Environmental Conservation, 43, 350–358.Google Scholar
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C. & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rozzi, R., Chapin, F. S., III, Callicott, J. B., Pickett, S. T. A., Power, M. E., Armesto, J. J. & May Jr., R. H. (2015). Earth Stewardship: Linking Ecology and Ethics in Theory and Practice. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Sabaté, X., Basora, X., O'Neill, C. & Mitchell, B. (2013). Caring Together for Nature. Manual on Land Stewardship as a Tool to Promote Social Involvement with the Natural Environment in Europe. (http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/project/Projects/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.showFile&rep=file&fil=LANDLIFE_European_manual.pdf).Google Scholar
Sayre, N. F., Kelty, R., Simmons, M., Clayton, S., Kassam, K.-A., Pickett, S. T. & Chapin, F. S., III (2013). Invitation to earth stewardship. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11, 339.Google Scholar
Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J. & Mc Neill, J. R. (2007). The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? Ambio, 36, 614–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W. & de Wit, C. A. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347, 1259855.Google Scholar
WBGU (German Advisory Council on Global Change) (2011). A World in Transition: A Social Contract for Sustainability. Berlin: WBGU (German Advisory Council on Global Change).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×