Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T21:01:55.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Gamete and embryo donation

a legal view from Spain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Martin Richards
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Guido Pennings
Affiliation:
Universiteit Gent, Belgium
John B. Appleby
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Spain has a strong culture of family life. Family relationships are often close and people grow up aspiring to have their own children. So, if a couple find that they are infertile and may need the assistance of a gamete donor to have children, this can be deeply disturbing. Their hopes and expectations of having ‘their own’ children may crumble and their feelings of esteem and personal worth can be jeopardized. Many feel deeply frustrated and find this one of the most challenging situations they have had to face in life. In Spain there is little understanding of what conception by assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs) is and no knowledge of gamete donation, and this can make the experience even more difficult for prospective parents.

It is estimated that at least three million children have been conceived in fertility clinics, according to the statistics collected by the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (De Mouzon et al., 2010). This figure is an underestimate, since the report only collects data from fifty-two countries and about two thirds of the global activity of ARTs. ARTs have brought a revolution with medical, social and legal implications for Spanish society. Since the birth of Spain’s first IVF baby, Anna Victoria, at the Dexeus Clinic in Barcelona in 1984, Spain has experienced many changes in the development of ARTs. Expectations – and controversies – have grown with the development of egg donation and more recently with the possibility of freezing and storing eggs. Since the late 1980s, many countries have enacted laws designed to regulate these practices. However, far from achieving a consensus, legislation has been characterized by diversity, especially in the most controversial areas, such as the involvement of donors in the reproductive process. Maintaining donor anonymity, payment for donation, the risks to the health of the donor (in the case of egg donation), the relevance for children’s welfare of knowing their biological origins, the importance of limiting the total number of donations by a donor and recording donations in a donor registry have all been regulated differently in jurisdictions around the world. Currently, these issues are raising new legal challenges that are leading to significant legislative changes in some countries.

Type
Chapter
Information
Reproductive Donation
Practice, Policy and Bioethics
, pp. 112 - 129
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Assemblée Nationale 2010 www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/rap-info/i2235-t1.asp
Baetens, P.Devroey, P.Camus, M.Van Steirteghem, A. C. 2000 Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: the decision to use either known or anonymous oocyteHuman Reproduction 15 476CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blyth, E. 2006 Donor anonymity and secrecy versus openness concerning the genetic origins of the offspring: international perspectivesJewish Medical Ethics 5 4Google Scholar
Blyth, E.Frith, L. 2009 Donor-conceived people’s access to genetic and biographical history: an analysis of provisions in different jurisdictions permitting disclosure of donor identityInternational Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 23 174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braverman, A. M.Corson, S. L. 2002 A comparison of oocyte donors’ and gestational carriers/surrogates’ attitudes towards third party reproductionJournal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 19 462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewaeys, A.de Bruyn, J. K.Louwe, L. A.Helmerhorst, F. M. 2005 Anonymous or identity-registered sperm donors? A study of Dutch recipients’ choicesHuman Reproduction 20 820CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, R.Golombok, S. 1995 A survey of semen donation: phase 2 – the view of the donorsHuman Reproduction 10 951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, K. 2007 Anonymity and openness and the recruitment of gamete donors. Part I: semen donorsHuman Fertility 10 151CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniels, K. R.Curson, R.Lewis, G. M. 1996 Semen donor recruitment: a study of donors in two clinicsHuman Reproduction 11 746CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniels, K.Lalos, A.Gottlieb, C.Lalos, O. 2005 Semen providers and their three familiesJournal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology 26 15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Mouzon, J.Goossens, V.Battacharya, S.Ferraretti, A. P. 2010 European IVF-monitoring (EIM) Consortium, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE): Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE, 2010Human Reproduction 25 1851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolz del Castellar, P. 2008
Englert, Y. 1994 Artificial insemination with donor semen: particular requestHuman Reproduction 9 1969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fielding, D.Handley, S.Duqueno, L.Weaver, S.Lui, S. 1998 Motivation, attitudes and experience of donation: a follow-up of women donating eggs in assisted conception treatmentJournal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 8 2733.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, T.Jadva, V.Kramer, W.Golombok, S. 2009 Gamete donation: parents’ experiences of searching for their child’s donor sibling and donorHuman Reproduction 24 505CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
García-Ruiz, Y. 2004 Reproducción humana asistida: derecho, conciencia y libertadGranadaComaresGoogle Scholar
García-Ruiz, Y. 2008
Golombok, S. 2009 Day Sclater, S.Ebtehaj, F.Jackson, E.Richards, M.Regulating Autonomy. Sex, Reproduction and FamilyOxfordHart PublishingGoogle Scholar
Golombok, S.Brewaeys, A.Giavazzi, M. T.Guerra, D. 2002 The European study of assisted reproduction families: the transition to adolescenceHuman Reproduction 17 830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grupo de Interés de Psicología Sociedad Española de Fertilidad 2010 Manual de intervención psicológica en Reproducción Asistida (Guidelines)BarcelonaEdikamedGoogle Scholar
Guerra, D.Tirado, M.Fernández, M.Dolz del Cautelar, P. 2007
Kan, A. K. S.Abadía, H. I.Ogunyemi, B. O.Korea, L. 1998 A survey of anonymous oocyte donors: demographicsHuman Reproduction 13 2762CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klock, S. C.Scout, J. E.Davidson, M. 1999 Analysis of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 profiles of prospective anonymous oocyte donors in relation to the outcome of the donor selection processFertility and Sterility 72 1066CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lalos, A.Daniels, K.Gottlieb, C.Lalos, O. 2003 Recruitment and motivation of semen providers in SwedenHuman Reproduction 18 212CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindheim, S. R.Frumovitz, M.Saber, M. V. 1998 Recruitment and screening policies and procedures used to establish a paid donor oocyte registryHuman Reproduction 13 2020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lutjen, P. J.Trounson, A.Leeton, J.Findlay, J. 1984 The establishment and maintenance of pregnancy using in vitro fertilisation and embryo donation in a patient with primary ovarian failureNature 307 174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marina, S.Expósito, R.Marina, F.Nadal, J. 1999 Oocyte donor selection from 554 candidatesHuman Reproduction 14 2770CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, S.Pérez, C.Salinas, A.Giménez, V. 2007 Protocolo de actuación y perfil psicológico de donantes de ovocitos de la unidad de reproducción asistida de Quirón BilbaoRevista Iberoamericana de Fertilidad y Reproducción Humana 24 389Google Scholar
Paul, S.Harbottle, S.Stewart, J. A. 2006 Recruitment of sperm donors: the Newcastle-Upon-Tyne experience 1994–2003Human Reproduction 21 150CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennings, G. 1997 The “double track” policy for donor anonymityHuman Reproduction 12 2839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennings, G. 2007 Belgian law on medically assisted reproduction and the disposition of supernumerary embryos and gametesEuropean Journal of Health Law 3 251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, K. 2006 Bennet, B.Tomossy, G. F.Globalization and HealthDordrechtSpringerLinkGoogle Scholar
Schover, L. R.Reis, J.Collins, R. L.Blankstein, J. 1990 The psychological evaluation of oocyte donorsJournal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology 11 299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, C.Schinfeld, J. S. 1984 The single woman and artificial insemination by donorThe Journal of Reproductive Medicine 29 293Google ScholarPubMed
Thorn, P.Katzorke, T.Daniels, K. 2008 Semen donors in Germany: a study exploring motivations and attitudesHuman Reproduction 23 2415CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vives, A.Marina, D.Alcolea, R.Latre, L. 2006

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×