Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:22:32.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - The legal and ethical regulation of transnational donation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Martin Richards
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Guido Pennings
Affiliation:
Universiteit Gent, Belgium
John B. Appleby
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter provides an overview and analysis of the phenomenon of transnational donation, an aspect of donation practices which has grown both in prevalence and significance over the past decade. After defining what we mean by ‘transnational donation’, we interrogate this phenomenon from different perspectives in three different sections. The first section surveys the empirical evidence and available data on transnational donation and cross-border reproductive care (CBRC), first with regard to the movements of patients and second with regard to the movements of gametes across borders. The second section analyses the potential regulatory approaches that may be developed as a response to transnational reproduction, investigating in turn the pros and cons of coerced conformity, international harmonization and moral pluralism. The final section evaluates the three main ‘dangers’ of CBRC – to safety, to autonomy and to justice – and analyses the ethical force, accuracy and strength of each of these arguments.

What is ‘transnational donation’?

Transnational donation is one aspect of the newly emerging, and rapidly developing, phenomenon of CBRC. CBRC refers to movements across national borders to seek or facilitate infertility treatments. Within this broader phenomenon the term ‘transnational donation’ is reserved specifically for the pursuit of treatments involving the use of donor gametes. Although CBRC covers a wide range of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) – for example, pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) – infertility treatments involving donation make up a large subset of the CBRC market. This is because ARTs involving donor gametes are subject to great diversity between jurisdictions with regard both to the level and nature of regulatory control and to the availability of necessary resources (see Chapter 5, Chapter 6, and Chapter 7). It is the prevalence of such diversity, even among countries in close geographical proximity to one another, that drives transnational donation and makes it a very significant aspect of the broader CBRC phenomenon.

Type
Chapter
Information
Reproductive Donation
Practice, Policy and Bioethics
, pp. 130 - 149
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous, 2009 www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hBNU1WQrNjmPogMWhQc1XYQly65Q
Blyth, E. 2010 Fertility patients’ experiences of cross-border reproductive careFertility and Sterility 94 11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blyth, E.Farrand, A. 2005 Reproductive tourism – a price worth paying for reproductive autonomy?Critical Social Policy 25 91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbone, J.Gottheim, P. 2006 Markets, subsidies, regulation, and trust: building ethical understandings into the market for infertility servicesJournal of Gender, Race and Justice 9 509Google Scholar
Castilla, J. A.Hernandez, E.Caballo, Y.Navarro, J. L. 2009 Assisted reproductive technologies in public and private clinicsReproductive BioMedicine Online 19 872CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J. 2006 Procreative tourism and reproductive freedomReproductive BioMedicine Online 13 145CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Culley, L.Hudson, N.Blyth, E.Norton, W. 2010 Travelling abroad for fertility treatment: an exploratory study of UK residents seeking cross-border careHuman Reproduction 25 i78Google Scholar
de Brito, L.Kaycoff, K. K. 2010 Decision-making factors that influence U.S. patients in selecting overseas egg donor programs and how clinics can appeal to those potential patientsHuman Reproduction 25 i153Google Scholar
de Mouzon, J.Goossens, V.Battacharya, S.Castilla, J. A.Ferraretti, A. P.Korsak, V.Kupka, M.Nygren, K. G.Nyboe Andersen, A. 2010 Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHREHuman Reproduction 25 1851CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de la Fuente, L. A. 2010
Gürtin-Broadbent, Z. 2010 Problems with legislating against “reproductive tourism”BioNews550Google Scholar
Hernandez, J.de la Fuente, L. A 2010
Hervey, T. K. 1998 Buy baby: the European Union and regulation of human reproductionOxford Journal of Legal Studies 8 207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, E. J.DeJean, D. 2010 Cross-border fertility services in North America: a survey of Canadian and American providersFertility and Sterility 94 e16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) 2010 www.hfea.gov.uk/patient-questions-importing.html
Inhorn, M. C.Patrizio, P. 2009 Rethinking reproductive “tourism” as reproductive “exile”Fertility and Sterility 92 904CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inhorn, M. C.Shrivastav, P. 2010 Globalization and reproductive tourism in the United Arab EmiratesAsia-Pacific Journal of Public Health 22 68SCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magureanu, G. 2005 www.handsoffourovaries.com/pdfs/appendixg.pdf
McKelvey, A.David, A. L.Shenfield, F.Jauniaux, E. R. 2009 The impact of cross-border reproductive care or fertility tourism on NHS maternity servicesBritish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 116 1520CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millns, S. 2002 Reproducing inequalities: assisted conception and the challenge of legal pluralismJournal of Social Welfare and Family Law 24 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norden Report 2006 www.norden.org/en/publications/publications/200
Nygren, K.Adamson, D.Zegers-Hochschild, F.de Mouzon, J. 2010 Cross-border fertility care—International Committee Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies global survey: 2006 data and estimatesFertility and Sterility 94 e4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennings, G. 2002 Reproductive tourism as moral pluralism in motionJournal of Medical Ethics 28 337CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennings, G. 2004 Legal harmonization and reproductive tourism in EuropeHuman Reproduction 19 2689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennings, G. 2010 The rough guide to insemination: cross-border travelling for donor semen due to different regulationsFacts, Views and Vision in OBGYN55Google Scholar
Pennings, G.de Wert, G.Shenfield, F.Cohen, J. 2008 ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 15: Cross-border reproductive careHuman Reproduction 23 2182CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennings, G.Autin, C.Decleer, W.Delbaere, A. 2009 Cross-border reproductive care in BelgiumHuman Reproduction 24 3108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
www.iwannagetpregnant.com/
Shenfield, F.De Mouzon, J.Pennings, G.Ferraretti, A-P. 2010 ESHRE Taskforce on Cross Border Reproductive Care, Cross border reproductive care in six European countriesHuman Reproduction 25 1361CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, A. 2009 Experts attack “fertility tourism” industryBionews526Google Scholar
Walsh, A. P. H.Shkrobot, L. V.Omar, A. B.Walsh, D. J. 2010 EU screening applied to anonymous oocyte donors from Ukraine: logistics, results and reproductive outcomes from an Irish IVF programmeHuman Reproduction 25 i154Google Scholar
Zegers-Hochschild, F.Adamson, G. D.de Mouzon, J.Isihara, O. 2009 The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Revised Glossary on ART TerminologyHuman Reproduction 24 2683CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×