Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T16:53:09.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - The concept of debriefing and its application to staff dealing with life-threatening illnesses such as cancer, AIDS and other conditions

from Part III - Adaptations of debriefing models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

Beverley Raphael
Affiliation:
New South Wales Health Department, Sydney
John Wilson
Affiliation:
Cleveland State University
Get access

Summary

EDITORIAL COMMENTS

The ubiquity of the conceptualization of debriefing as an appropriate intervention to deal with ‘stress’ has meant that it is now frequently applied in health care settings to deal with emergency health workers' experience and also that of other workers perceived to work in stressful settings such as with terminally ill patients as well as more widely.

This detailed review examines the types of stressor experienced by health care workers, and their relationship to burnout and other work-related stress is considered. Critical incident stress debriefing as a model in such contexts is critically reviewed, although Turner and Kelly note that there is no empirical research validating its use for health care staff in these settings.

Of particular value, and applicable to many other worker and stress situations is the detailed review of factors that need to be considered as sources of stress. These include factors relating to the situation of the patient and the illness, for example type of illness, stage of lifecycle, suVering and other clinical problems, and patient characteristics. Factors relating to the individual worker include maturity and past experience, personality style, interpersonal relationships, expectations, requirement for emotional support, education and training experiences of staff, pre-existing psychological vulnerability and morbidity, and protective factors. External factors include administrative issues, team membership, and volunteer status. Sociocultural factors include personal and social attitudes to death and dying and cultural requirements for these.

Type
Chapter
Information
Psychological Debriefing
Theory, Practice and Evidence
, pp. 254 - 271
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×