Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T17:33:32.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction and overview: Key issues in the conceptualization of debriefing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

Beverley Raphael
Affiliation:
New South Wales Health Department, Sydney
John Wilson
Affiliation:
Cleveland State University
Get access

Summary

Introduction: Models of debriefing

There is significant conceptual and definitional confusion in the use of the term debriefing. The word ‘debriefing’ is in very common usage, its popular meaning being that of ‘telling about what has happened’. There is also a sense of reviewing or going over an experience or set of actions, to achieve some sort of order or meaning concerning them. Being debriefed implies being enabled or assisted to achieve such a review.

Debriefing as a technical term, implying a specific and active intervention process, has developed with more formal meanings. Foremost there has been the concept of ‘operational debriefing’. This is a structured process following an exercise or event that reviews the actions taken, the contribution of various workers or participants, and the degree of success or otherwise of the operation. The purpose of this review is to learn from the experience, and so further develop skills to deal with similar or related events in the future. Operational debriefing is usually a formal process occurring some time after the action or event and may deal with equipment, activities, fulfilment of functions and roles, and so forth. It is at times also carried out more informally, as part of an operational team's activities, led by a designated person. It has often been recognized that such discussion has clarified the experience for those involved. It has also been suggested that it may have promoted a sense of mastery of the situation and team morale through the review of achievements.

Type
Chapter
Information
Psychological Debriefing
Theory, Practice and Evidence
, pp. 1 - 14
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×