Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T17:12:13.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Vitrification for IVF

Training Protocol

from Section 1 - Starting a New Laboratory and Training Protocols

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2023

Markus H. M. Montag
Affiliation:
ilabcomm GmbH, St Augustin, Germany
Dean E. Morbeck
Affiliation:
Kindbody Inc, New York City
Get access

Summary

In recent years, reliable aseptic closed vitrification systems have been accepted instead of open devices and have changed the ART-cryopreservation landscape in the combat against any microbiological exposure. Still, misunderstanding on the balances in a vitrification method and inappropriate implementations expose IVF laboratories to inconsistent survival and pregnancy outcomes. The present set-up and training of a microdroplet vitrification model for human blastocysts takes into account some important quality-control factors to minimize technical variation with consistent good laboratory practice. A uniform approach of the physical environment at 37 °C was validated with a ready-to-use DMSO free vitrification kit plus Ssucrose warming kit and a closed storage device with a hole carrier, based on optimal visualization, simplicity of loading/recovery, consistent volumes and ionomeric-resin straws with secured seals. The microdroplet closed vitrification model offers safety, reliability, consistency with successful results towards benchmark survival / transfer rates (>95%) and promising day 5 vitrified blastocyst live birth rates (>30%).

Type
Chapter
Information
Principles of IVF Laboratory Practice
Laboratory Set-Up, Training and Daily Operation
, pp. 65 - 74
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rienzi, L., Gracia, C., Maggiulli, R., et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod 2017; 23:139–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Kuwayama, M., Vatja, G., Ieda, S. and Kato, O. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 11:608–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanderzwalmen, P., Zech, N., Greindl, A.-J., Ectors, F. and Lejeune, B. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification. Gyn Obstet & Fert 2006; 34:760–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Cai, H., Niringiyumukiza, J. D., Li, Y., et al. Open versus closed vitrification system of human oocytes and embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis of embryologic and clinical outcomes. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2018; 16:111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seki, S. and Mazur, P. The dominance of warming rate over cooling rate in the survival of mouse oocytes subjected to a vitrification procedure. Cryobiology 2009; 59:7582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanderzwalmen, P., Lejeune, B., Stecher, A., et al. Survival of day 3 and day 5 embryos following vitrification in aseptic and non-aseptic conditions: a prospective randomized analysis. Fertil Steril 2005; 84 (Suppl):S175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camus, A., Clairaz, P., Ersham, A., et al. Principe de la vitrification: cinétiques comparatives. The comparison of the process of vitrification of five different vitrification devices. Gyn Obstet & Fertil 2006; 34:737–45.Google Scholar
Larman, M. and Gardner, D. Vitrification of mouse embryos with super-cooled air. Fert Steril 2011; 95:1462–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunst, J., Vynck, M. and Van de Vijver, A. Slow developing embryos undergoing compaction or cavitation on day 5 substantially contribute to live birth rate after single day 6 vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod 2020; 35 (Suppl. 1):i201.Google Scholar
Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine. The Alpha consensus meeting on cryopreservation key performance indicators and benchmarks: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online 2012; 25:146–67.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×