Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:24:25.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2019

David Zarefsky
David Zarefsky
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Practice of Argumentation
Effective Reasoning in Communication
 , pp. 259 - 260
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Booth, Wayne. Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. The Public and Its Problems. New York: Henry Holt, 1927.Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van. Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2010.Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Grootendorst, Rob. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Grootendorst, Rob, and Henkemans, Francisca Snoeck. Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Grootendorst, Rob, Jackson, Sally, and Jacobs, Scott. Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Goodnight, G. Thomas. “The Personal, Technical, and Public Spheres of Argument: A Speculative Inquiry into the Art of Public Deliberation.” Argumentation and Advocacy, 18 (Spring, 1982), 214–227.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Communication and the Evolution of Society. Boston: Beacon Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Hamblin, C. L. Fallacies. London: Methuen, 1970.Google Scholar
Hample, Dale. Arguing: Exchanging Reasons Face to Face. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2005.Google Scholar
Herrick, James A. Argumentation: Understanding and Shaping Arguments, 3rd ed. State College, PA: Strata Publishers, 2007.Google Scholar
Hultzén, Lee S. “Status in Deliberative Analysis.” In The Rhetorical Idiom, ed. Bryant, Donald C.. 1958; rpt. New York: Russell and Russell, 1966, pp. 97–123.Google Scholar
Johnson, Ralph H. Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel S. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. Essays in the Public Philosophy. Boston: Little, Brown, 1955.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarianism. Auckland: Floating Press, 1879.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaim, and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, trans. James, Wilkinson and Purcell, Weaver. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Charles L. Ethics and Language. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Tindale, Christopher W. Fallacies and Argument Appraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N. A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N. Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Weaver, Richard M. The Ethics of Rhetoric. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1953.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • David Zarefsky, Northwestern University, Illinois
  • Book: The Practice of Argumentation
  • Online publication: 06 September 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139540926.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • David Zarefsky, Northwestern University, Illinois
  • Book: The Practice of Argumentation
  • Online publication: 06 September 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139540926.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • David Zarefsky, Northwestern University, Illinois
  • Book: The Practice of Argumentation
  • Online publication: 06 September 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139540926.013
Available formats
×